Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

377 citation(s) found for "Yu, Joyce".

Cochaperone immunophilin FKBP52 is critical to uterine receptivity for embryo implantation
Tranguch, Susanne , Cheung‐Flynn, Joyce , Daikoku, Takiko , Prapapanich, Viravan, Cox, Marc B. , Xie, Huirong , Smith, David F. , Wang, Haibin , Das, Sanjoy K. , Dey, Sudhansu K.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | September 21, 2005 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 40 | Pages: 14326-14331

10.1073/pnas.0505775102 | PMID 16176985 Get It

Embryo implantation in the uterus is a critical step in mammalian reproduction, requiring preparation of the uterus receptive to blastocyst implantation. Uterine receptivity, also known as the window of implantation, lasts for a limited period, and it is during this period blastocysts normally implant. Ovarian steroid hormones estrogen and progesterone (P 4 ) are the primary regulators of this process. The immunophilin FKBP52 serves as a cochaperone for steroid hormone nuclear receptors to govern appropriate hormone action in target tissues. Here we show a critical role for FKBP52 in mouse implantation. This immunophilin has unique spatiotemporal expression in the uterus during implantation, and females missing the Fkbp52 gene have complete implantation failure due to lack of attainment of uterine receptivity. The overlapping uterine expression of FKBP52 with nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) in wild-type mice together with reduced P 4 binding to PR, attenuated PR transcriptional activity and down-regulation of several P 4 -regulated genes in uteri of Fkbp52 -/- mice, establishes this cochaperone as a critical regulator of uterine P 4 function. Interestingly, ovulation, another P 4 -mediated event, remains normal. Collectively, the present investigation provides evidence for an in vivo role for this cochaperone in regulating tissue-specific hormone action and its critical role in uterine receptivity for implantation.
CD44 Attenuates Metastatic Invasion during Breast Cancer Progression
Camenisch, Todd D. , Stevens, Mark V., Sands, Barbara J., McDonald, John A., Schroeder, Joyce A. , López, José I.

Cancer Research | September 15, 2005 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 6755-6763

10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0863 | PMID 16061657 Get It

Abstract Metastatic invasion is the primary cause of breast cancer mortality, and adhesion receptors, such as CD44, are believed to be critical in this process. Historically, primary breast tumor epithelium has been investigated in isolation from other tissue components, leading to the common interpretation that CD44 and its primary ligand, hyaluronan, promote invasion. Here, we provide in vivo evidence showing CD44 antagonism to breast cancer metastasis. In a mouse model of spontaneously metastasizing breast cancer (MMTV-PyV mT), we found that loss of CD44 promotes metastasis to the lung. Localization studies, in combination with a novel hyaluronan synthase-GFP transgenic mouse, show a restricted pattern of expression for CD44 and hyaluronan. Whereas CD44 is expressed in tumor epithelium, hyaluronan synthase expression is restricted to stromal-associated cells. This distinct CD44 and hyaluronan pattern of distribution suggests a role for epithelial-stromal interaction in CD44 function. To define the relevance of this spatial regulation, we developed an in vitro invasion assay to emulate invasion into the extracellular matrix. Invasion of CD44-positive tumor cells was inhibited in hyaluronan-containing matrices, whereas blocking CD44-hyaluronan association increased invasion. Collectively, these data show that during breast cancer progression, hyaluronan-CD44 dynamics occurring through epithelial-stromal interactions are protective against metastasis.
Clinical Inertia Contributes to Poor Diabetes Control in a Primary Care Setting
Ziemer, David C., Miller, Christopher, Rhee, Mary K. , Doyle, Joyce , Watkins, Clyde, Gallina, Daniel L., El‐Kebbi, Imad M., Barnes, Catherine S., Dunbar, Virginia G., Branch, William T. , Phillips, Lawrence S. , Cook, Curtiss B.

The Diabetes Educator | August 12, 2005 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 564-571

10.1177/0145721705279050 | PMID 16100332 Get It

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether “clinical inertia”—inadequate intensification of therapy by the provider—could contribute to high A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes managed in a primary care site. Methods In a prospective observational study, management was compared in the Medical Clinic, a primary care site supervised by general internal medicine faculty, and the Diabetes Clinic, a specialty site supervised by endocrinologists. These municipal hospital clinics serve a common population that is largely African American, poor, and uninsured. Results Four hundred thirty-eight African American patients in the Medical Clinic and 2157 in the Diabetes Clinic were similar in average age, diabetes duration, body mass index, and gender, but A1C averaged 8.6% in the Medical Clinic versus 7.7% in the Diabetes Clinic (P < .0001). Use of pharmacotherapy was less intensive in the Medical Clinic (less use of insulin), and when patients had elevated glucose levels during clinic visits, therapy was less than half as likely to be advanced in the Medical Clinic compared to the Diabetes Clinic (P < .0001). Intensification rates were lower in the Medical Clinic regardless of type of therapy (P < .0001), and intensification of therapy was independently associated with improvement in A1C (P < .001). Conclusions Medical Clinic patients had worse glycemic control, were less likely to be treated with insulin, and were less likely to have their therapy intensified if glucose levels were elevated. To improve diabetes management and glycemic control nationwide, physicians in training and generalists must learn to overcome clinical inertia, to intensify therapy when appropriate, and to use insulin when clinically indicated.
Multicenter Evaluation of a Candida albicans Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Probe for Characterization of Yeast Isolates from Blood Cultures
Joyce, Maria , Reller, L. Barth, Roberts, Glenn D., Hall, Gerri S. , Alexander, Barbara D. , Procop, Gary W. , Wilson, Donald A. , Hall, Laurence S.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | June 15, 2005 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2909-2912

10.1128/jcm.43.6.2909-2912.2005 | PMID 15956416 Get It

ABSTRACT We evaluated aliquots from 244 clinical blood culture bottles that demonstrated yeasts on Gram stain using a Candida albicans peptide nucleic acid (PNA) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probe. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the C. albicans PNA FISH test in this study were 99%, 100%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively.
Physiological Role for the Cochaperone FKBP52 in Androgen Receptor Signaling
Cheung‐Flynn, Joyce , Prapapanich, Viravan, Cox, Marc B. , Suárez‐Quian, Carlos A. , Riggs, Daniel L. , Smith, David F.

Molecular Endocrinology | April 15, 2005 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1654-1666

10.1210/me.2005-0071 | PMID 15831525 Get It

AbstractMolecular chaperones mediate multiple aspects of steroid receptor function, but the physiological importance of most receptor-associated cochaperones has not been determined. To help fill this gap, we targeted for disruption the mouse gene for the 52-kDa FK506 binding protein, FKBP52, a 90-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90)-binding immunophilin found in steroid receptor complexes. A mouse line lacking FKBP52 (52KO) was generated and characterized. Male 52KO mice have several defects in reproductive tissues consistent with androgen insensitivity; among these defects are ambiguous external genitalia and dysgenic prostate. FKBP52 and androgen receptor (AR) are coexpressed in prostate epithelial cells of wild-type mice. However, FKBP52 and AR are similarly coexpressed in testis even though testis morphology and spermatogenesis in 52KO males are usually normal. Molecular studies confirm that FKBP52 is a component of AR complexes, and cellular studies in yeast and human cell models demonstrate that FKBP52 can enhance AR-meditated transactivation. AR enhancement requires FKBP52 peptidylprolyl isomerase activity as well as Hsp90-binding ability, and enhancement probably relates to an affect of FKBP52 on AR-folding pathways. In the presence of FKBP52, but not other cochaperones, the function of a minimally active AR point mutant can be dramatically restored. We conclude that FKBP52 is an AR folding factor that has critically important physiological roles in some male reproductive tissues.
Structure of the large FK506-binding protein FKBP51, an Hsp90-binding protein and a component of steroid receptor complexes
Sinars, Cindy R., Cheung‐Flynn, Joyce , Rimerman, Ronald A., Scammell, Jonathan G. , Smith, David F. , Clardy, Jon

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | February 4, 2003 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 868-873

10.1073/pnas.0231020100 | PMID 12538866 Get It

The ability to bind immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporin and FK506 defines the immunophilin family of proteins, and the FK506-binding proteins form the FKBP subfamily of immunophilins. Some FKBPs, notably FKBP12 (the 12-kDa FK506-binding protein), have defined roles in regulating ion channels or cell signaling, and well established structures. Other FKBPs, especially the larger ones, participate in important biological processes, but their exact roles and the structural bases for these roles are poorly defined. FKBP51 (the 51-kDa FKBP) associates with heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and appears in functionally mature steroid receptor complexes. In New World monkeys, FKBP51 has been implicated in cortisol resistance. We report here the x-ray structures of human FKBP51, to 2.7 Å, and squirrel monkey FKBP51, to 2.8 Å, by using multiwavelength anomalous dispersion phasing. FKBP51 is composed of three domains: two consecutive FKBP domains and a three-unit repeat of the TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) domain. This structure of a multi-FKBP domain protein clarifies the arrangement of these domains and their possible interactions with other proteins. The two FKBP domains differ by an insertion in the second that affects the formation of the progesterone receptor complex.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Yttrium-90–Labeled Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy Versus Rituximab Immunotherapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Low-Grade, Follicular, or Transformed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Gordon, Leo I. , Cabanillas, Fernando , Czuczman, Myron S., Emmanouilides, Christos, Pohlman, Brad , Bartlett, Nancy L. , Wiseman, Gregory A., Padre, Norman M., Grillo-López, Antonio J, Multani, Pratik S. , White, Christine A., Witzig, Thomas E. , Joyce, Robin , Gordon, Leo I , Bartlett, Nancy L

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 27, 2002 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2453-2463

10.1200/jco.2002.11.076 | PMID 12011122 Get It

PURPOSE: Radioimmunotherapy combines biologic and radiolytic mechanisms to target and destroy tumor cells, thus offering a needed therapeutic alternative for refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients. This phase III randomized study compares the novel radioimmunotherapy yttrium-90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan with a control immunotherapy, rituximab, in 143 patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed CD20+transformed NHL.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either a single intravenous (IV) dose of90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg (n = 73) or rituximab 375 mg/m2IV weekly for four doses (n = 70). The radioimmunotherapy group was pretreated with two rituximab doses (250 mg/m2) to improve biodistribution and one dose of indium-111 ibritumomab tiuxetan for imaging and dosimetry. The primary end point, overall response rate (ORR), was assessed by an independent, blinded, lymphoma expert panel.RESULTS: ORR was 80% for the90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan group versus 56% for the rituximab group (P = .002). Complete response (CR) rates were 30% and 16% in the90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan and rituximab groups, respectively (P = .04). An additional 4% achieved an unconfirmed CR in each group. Kaplan-Meier estimated median duration of response was 14.2 months in the90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan group versus 12.1 months in the control group (P = .6), and time to progression was 11.2 versus 10.1 months (P = .173) in all patients. Durable responses of ≥ 6 months were 64% versus 47% (P = .030). Reversible myelosuppression was the primary toxicity noted with90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan.CONCLUSION: Radioimmunotherapy with90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan is well tolerated and produces statistically and clinically significant higher ORR and CR compared with rituximab alone.