Citations

Background: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs) are associated with more aggressive rheumatoid arthritis disease. We aimed to determine the effect of ACPA serostatus on survival free from revision, all-cause reoperation, and recurrence of coronal plane deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing silicone metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively identified silicone MCP arthroplasties performed in patients with RA with known ACPA serostatus from 2000 to 2022. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to report survival free from revision, all-cause reoperation, and recurrence of coronal plane deviation >10° on postoperative radiographs. We analyzed ACPA serostatus as a risk factor for these endpoints using cluster-robust Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for patient sex. Results: We included 133 joints in 39 ACPA seropositive patients (9.0 years mean follow-up) and 63 joints in 21 ACPA seronegative patients (5.7 years mean follow-up). Survival free from revision, all-cause reoperation, and recurrent coronal deformity was higher in seropositive patients than in seronegative patients. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity was significantly associated with lower risk for revision (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.16), all-cause reoperation (HR = 0.20), and recurrent coronal plane deviation >10° (HR = 0.28). Seropositive patients had longer average time to recurrent coronal deviation >10° (3.5 years vs 1.3 years) and less coronal deviation at final radiographic follow-up (15.9° vs 21.5°). Conclusions: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity is associated with improved silicone MCP implant survivorship and lower risk of recurrent coronal plane deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. More work is needed to better understand the biologic basis of these findings.

ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2 = 0.89) than above (R 2 = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.

ABSTRACT Introduction and Methods Cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a well established and potentially life‐threatening complication of contemporary oncologic treatment. Although comprehensive cardio‐oncology guidelines have been developed, their integration into routine hematology and oncology practice remains inconsistent. This consensus statement, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of cardio‐oncology experts, aims to provide practical, case‐based guidance to help oncology providers recognize, assess, and manage CTRCD across a spectrum of malignancies and cardiovascular presentations. Clinical Scenarios and Discussion We present representative clinical scenarios that illustrate real‐world challenges in cardio‐oncology and apply evidence‐based recommendations from current guidelines, including those from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the International Cardio‐Oncology Society (ICOS)—to support informed decision‐making. Key areas of focus include baseline cardiovascular risk stratification prior to initiating potentially cardiotoxic therapies, with an emphasis on biomarker and imaging surveillance strategies tailored to individual risk profiles. Also, this document outlines the application of guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) for cancer patients with heart failure. Conclusion By offering a structured, user‐friendly framework, this document seeks to bridge the implementation gap between oncology and cardiology disciplines. Our goal is to equip oncology providers with accessible tools that facilitate early recognition, consistent surveillance, and timely referral, thereby preserving cancer treatment intensity while minimizing cardiovascular morbidity.

RET fusions appear in 1%-2% of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). The results from the ARROW study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03037385 ) supported US Food and Drug Administration approval of pralsetinib, an oral selective RET inhibitor, for metastatic RET -altered NSCLC and RET fusion–positive thyroid cancers. ARROW was a phase I/II open-label study of pralsetinib 400 mg once daily in RET fusion–positive NSCLCs. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Key secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). At data lock (May 20, 2024), 281 patients initiated pralsetinib (median treatment duration, 15.0 months). ORR (measurable disease patients; n = 259) was 78% (95% CI, 69 to 86) for treatment-naïve patients and 63% (95% CI, 54 to 71) for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Median OS was 44.3 months (95% CI, 30.9 to 53.1), 50.1 months (95% CI, 28.3 to not reached) in treatment-naïve patients, and 39.7 months (95% CI, 27.8 to 53.2) in prior platinum patients. Common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (21%), hypertension (15%), and decreased neutrophils (13%). Three treatment-related deaths occurred (pneumonia, n = 2; interstitial lung disease and rhabdomyolysis, n = 1 each). Safety was consistent with previous ARROW reports; no hypersensitivity was reported in patients receiving prior immunotherapies. Pralsetinib produced robust, durable responses with manageable safety in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLCs, confirming previous findings with longer follow-up.

Abstract Aims Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with mechanical dyssynchrony, heterogeneous perfusion, and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling. However, not all patients with LBBB develop cardiomyopathy, and dyssynchrony can occur without conduction defects. The role of microvascular dysfunction remains uncertain. We aimed to assess how mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity relate to LV remodelling and function in patients with and without LBBB. Methods and results We analysed 233 patients with LBBB and 932 matched controls who underwent PET myocardial perfusion imaging, assessing mechanical dyssynchrony (phase entropy), LV volumes, and ejection fraction (EF); coronary vascular resistance (CVR), myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) as markers of microvascular function; and septal-to-lateral MBF ratio (SLR) as a measure of regional perfusion heterogeneity. Compared with controls, LBBB patients had greater dyssynchrony (56% vs. 40%), larger LV volumes, and lower EF (54% vs. 67%) (all P &lt; 0.001), as well as higher stress CVR (37 vs. 34 mmHg/mL·min−1·g−1), and lower MBF (2.4 vs. 2.6 mL/min/g), MFR (2.4 vs. 2.6), and SLR (0.95 vs. 1.00) (all P &lt; 0.05). Among patients with dyssynchrony, SLR &lt;1.0 identified greater remodelling. In multivariable regression, phase entropy and SLR independently predicted LV volumes and EF, with adverse effects of SLR reduction amplified in LBBB (interaction P &lt; 0.01). In Cox analysis, phase entropy (HR:1.02, P = 0.01), MFR (HR:0.62, P &lt; 0.001), and LVEF (HR:0.97, P &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with death or heart failure hospitalization, whereas LBBB was not. Conclusion Mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity independently predict adverse LV remodelling, irrespective of LBBB. Integrated imaging improves cardiomyopathy stratification.

Background: Sinonasal malignancies (SNM) are rare cancers associated with poor prognosis and impaired quality of life (QOL). The 22-question Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) has been used to assess QOL in patients with SNM. Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the SNOT-22 in patients with SNM. Methods: About 264 patients with SNM were drawn from a prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional study. SNOT-22 scores were collected at pre-treatment baseline and follow-up through 5 years post-treatment. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the SNOT-22. Distribution-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with SNOT-22 improvement exceeding the determined MCID. Results: Cronbach’s alpha was >.85. The estimated MCIDs were: 1.44 (Cohen’s effect size), 1.32 (standard error of the mean), 10.45 (1/2 of baseline standard deviation), and 3.67 (minimum detectable change). The mean MCID across methods was 4.22. Multivariable regression demonstrated higher odds of clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in patients with early-stage disease (odds ratio (OR) 3.510, P = .035), no neck irradiation (OR 11.050, P = .014), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 16.667, P = .047). Conclusions: The SNOT-22 MCID was estimated as 4.22 in a large multi-center cohort of patients with SNM, suggesting that relatively small QOL changes are clinically relevant. When applying the MCID to the current cohort, advanced stage, treatment of neck disease, and not requiring neoadjuvant therapy were predictive of worse QOL.

PURPOSE Cancer recurrence is a critical outcome for patients and physicians. Retrospective cancer recurrence data can evaluate recurrence-directed treatment and generate novel interventions targeting recurrent cancers. However, large cancer databases do not provide recurrence-related information, stymying study at scale, and consequently require significant manual record review. Automated evaluation of records may allow for the rapid generation of easily analyzed data sets, accelerating the evaluation of recurrence altogether. METHODS Patients treated with radiation therapy at one tertiary referral center from 2010 to 2018 with a verified cancer status (cancer recurrence v no cancer recurrence) were identified. Patients with recurrent disease were initially identified through manual record review, and the associated pathology report was collected. Google Automated Machine Learning with Natural Language Processing (AutoNLP) and Google Gemini 1.5 Pro were used to generate a model for binary classification, with comparison to the gold-standard manually developed data set. RESULTS A total of 7,054 patients were identified. 3,431 (48.6%) were female, with a median age of 64 years. Head and neck (1,482, 21%), breast (1,480, 21%), upper GI (1,307, 18.5%), and lung/thorax (1,107, 15.7%) were the most common disease sites. Recurrence was verified for 1,546 patients (21.9%) using pathology reports, of which 1,249 positive cases were paired with 651 negative pathology reports for model development. Google Gemini 1.5 Pro consistently outperformed AutoNLP across all measurements of accuracy, generating a greater absolute difference in precision, recall, negative predictive value, and specificity, and a higher likelihood of correct classification at the individual level, rendering Gemini superior in recurrence status extraction. CONCLUSION AutoNLP and Google Gemini 1.5 Pro are promising tools for identifying recurrence from pathology reports, with the latter demonstrating superior overall performance, making it particularly suitable for clinical translation.

PURPOSE Gastroesophageal carcinoma (GEC) is increasingly managed using biomarker-guided therapies. Although both tissue DNA (tDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing are used clinically, the concordance of genomic alterations between primary tumors, metastatic sites, and liquid biopsy remains incompletely understood. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 345 patients with GEC who underwent ctDNA testing at Mayo Clinic. tDNA next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 ( ERBB2 ) and mismatch repair (MMR) were collected. Concordance was evaluated between ctDNA and tDNA, ctDNA and IHC, and across all three modalities, using 60-day and 30-day intervals. RESULTS Among 345 patients with ctDNA testing, 186 had tDNA testing, and 310 underwent IHC. ctDNA testing showed a shorter turnaround time than tDNA (median 6 v 13 days). The most frequent alteration in ctDNA, primary tDNA, and metastatic tDNA was TP53. Concordance between ctDNA and primary tDNA was ≥78.8% for key genes; between ctDNA and metastatic tDNA, it was ≥84.8%. IHC-ctDNA concordance was higher in metastatic tumors, with 91.1% for HER2/ ERBB2 and 97.7% for mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) compared with 81.1% and 95.8%, respectively, in primary tumors. Triplet concordance for MSI/MMR was 97.6% in primary tumors and 100% in metastatic tumors, while ERBB2 /HER2 showed 84.4% and 93.9% concordance, respectively. ctDNA temporal heterogeneity analysis revealed 14 patients with fluctuating ERBB2 status and 3 with fluctuating MSI-H status. CONCLUSION ctDNA testing demonstrates high concordance with tDNA and IHC and offers faster turnaround. Given its minimally invasive nature and strong concordance with tissue-based testing, ctDNA is a reliable tool for genomic profiling and longitudinal monitoring in GEC.

Objective This study evaluates the impact of international observerships organized by Help Ukraine Group (HUG) on professional development, knowledge transfer, and clinical practice improvement in radiation oncology in Ukraine. Methods A total of 50 observerships were facilitated for Ukrainian medical professionals at 14 institutions across the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia from 2022 to 2024, including 31 radiation oncologists and medical physicists. A survey assessed their impact on oncology care, focusing on knowledge gained, lessons learned, and challenges in implementing new techniques. The primary outcome was the success score, defined as a composite score of implementing new procedures, initiating improvement projects, and knowledge dissemination efforts. Descriptive and comparative analyses examined satisfaction and success outcomes. Results A total of 43 respondents participated in the survey (response rate 86.0%). Twenty-eight of the responders were radiation oncology professionals (67.8% radiation oncologists, 32.1% medical physicists). The median observership duration for radiation oncology professionals was four weeks, with 96.4% also attending a professional conference. Overall satisfaction was high (mean 9.5 out of 10, median 10.0, IQR 9.0-10.0) while the success score was substantial (mean 6.1 out of 10, median 7.0, IQR 5.0-8.0). Time since certification influenced success, with ≥10 years’ experience associated with higher success scores (7.4 vs. 4.7, p=0.01). Importantly, 100% of respondents learned new procedures, 89.3% reported shifts in their clinical perspective, and 60.7% successfully implemented new techniques. Subsequent knowledge dissemination in Ukraine was substantial: 82.1% provided informal training, 60.7% delivered institutional or national presentations, 39.3% incorporated materials into lectures, and 10.7% engaged in all activities. Continued mentorship with host institutions was reported by 82.1%. Conclusions Amid the war, international observerships advanced clinical practice, education, and procedures in Ukraine, demonstrating the resilience of its medical community and providing a model that other LMICs/UMICs can follow.

Abstract Optimal management of anticoagulation for patients with aortic mechanical heart valves (MHVs) receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures is clinically challenging. Risk of bleeding from an unanticipated polypectomy or biopsy further complicates this issue. Current guidelines on use of bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for these procedures are based on low-quality evidence. We conducted a subanalysis of a retrospective, multicenter observational study of adult patients with aortic MHVs receiving VKAs who underwent elective gastrointestinal endoscopies (colonoscopy or upper endoscopy). We included patients who underwent the procedure between July 1, 2020, and July 1, 2023, at five centers in Canada and the United States Patients with procedures performed on separate days within a 30-day period were excluded. Efficacy and safety outcomes included thromboembolic events, major bleeding (MB), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in the 30 days post procedure. A total of 192 endoscopic procedures were analyzed. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age was 66 years (58.2–72.8) and 22% were female. Warfarin was interrupted for 185 procedures (96%). Among these, 119 (64%) received LMWH bridging: 33 (17%) pre-procedure only, 10 (5%) post-procedure only, and 76 (40%) both pre- and post-procedure. Post-procedure LMWH was initiated a median (IQR) of 1 day (1–1) and discontinued 5 days post-procedure (3–8). MB occurred in two patients (1%), CRNMB in two patients (1%), and one death (0.5%) was identified; no thromboembolic events occurred. Prior to propensity score matching (PSM), post-procedure LMWH with or without pre procedure LMWH was associated with the composite outcome of MB and CRNMB (P = 0.034), although not with MB or CRNMB individually. After stepwise regression and PSM analyses, no significant differences in bleeding outcomes were observed between patients who received LMWH bridging and those who did not. Our findings indicate that although adverse thrombotic events were rare and use of post-procedure LMWH bridging was significantly associated with a small absolute increased risk of bleeding, it was not significant after PSM. Larger prospective studies are needed to better inform antithrombotic management guidelines for patients with aortic MHVs undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.