Citations

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test DRIVE (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based multi‐device (smartphone, tablet, personal computer) platform optimized for remote self‐administered cognitive assessment that includes a computer‐adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span; SLS), a measure of processing speed/executive functioning (Symbols Test) and a score combining both the memory and processing speed/executive functioning measures (MTD Composite). We aimed to determine the reliability of MTD measures across follow‐up sessions.MethodIndividuals participating in this ancillary study who completed at least two and up to four complete MTD sessions were included, resulting in 1,293 participants (mean age = 70.6, SD = 11.6; mean education = 15.6, SD = 2.3; 48.6% male; 96.9% White; 99.1% non‐Hispanic; 97.1% cognitively unimpaired) from parent studies (see Table 1). MTD raw scores were winsorized at 1% and 99% to minimize the impact of outliers. Test‐retest reliability was assessed using single‐rating, absolute‐agreement, and two‐way mixed ICCs and results are described using descriptives from Koo et al. (2016). ICCs for in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological measures are also reported alongside MTD for a subset of participants newly enrolled into the MCSA (to ensure participants were test naïve to both MTD and in‐person tests).ResultReliability was good for the MTD Composite raw [total ICC = 0.78; see Table 2 for session‐to‐session ICCs and 95% CIs], and moderate‐to‐good for the primary outcome variables for each subtest [total ICC = 0.74 for both SLS and Symbols]. Weighting by accuracy negatively impacted reliability of Symbols and the Composite; without this weighting, MTD Composite and Symbols variables showed higher reliability (MTD Composite z total ICC = 0.80; Symbols response time total ICC = 0.84; see Table 2). Alternative methods of defining response time on Symbols showed nearly identical reliability values. SLS sum of trials (primary variable) had subtly higher reliability than separate measures of learning (1‐5 correct, max span) or delay. Reliability of remote MTD and in‐person‐administered measures and select comparisons are provided in Table 3.ConclusionMTD showed moderate to good reliability, similar to in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological tests. Future work will examine the effect of demographics, device type, and session interference on reliability.

AbstractBackgroundThe NIA Health Disparities Research (NIA‐HD) Framework organizes factors in four domains (i.e., environmental, sociocultural, behavioral, and biological), which work together over the lifetime to influence health and health disparities.MethodIn previous work, we employed a 2‐stage approach using factor and principal component (PC) analyses to identify patterns of factors in the domains of the NIA‐HD Framework. We found three PCs that identified related groupings from more than one NIA‐HD domain. PC1: retirement status, residence type, multivitamin use, heart disease, Charlson comorbidity index, walking/balance difficulties, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)‐II questions – mainly from the somatic dimension; PC2: physical activity/exercise, social and group activities, education, occupation, cardiometabolic risk factors, and self‐rated health; PC3: national and state area deprivation index ranking and BDI‐II questions – mainly in the cognitive dimension. Age and sex‐adjusted linear regression models were used to assess the cross‐sectional association of each PC with AD‐plasma biomarkers measured using the Quanterix Simoa platform in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants. AD‐plasma biomarkers included Aβ 42/40, phosphorylated‐tau 181 (p‐tau181), plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). All analyses were considered statistically significant at a p <0.05.ResultThere were 1300 cognitively unimpaired participants, 50 years old or older, with available plasma biomarkers (mean age (SD) 68.6 (9.5) years; 49.1% were female) at the current study baseline. PC1 and PC3 were associated with higher NfL and p‐tau 181 values (p<0.05). PC1 and PC2 were associated with higher GFAP values (p<0.05). No PCs were associated with the Aβ 42/40 ratio. Findings were mostly similar after additionally adjusting for global cognitive performance and chronic kidney disease.ConclusionWe found that patterns in a wide range of environmental, sociocultural, behavioral, and biological factors were associated with AD plasma biomarkers. Longitudinal studies are warranted to validate findings and support multi‐faceted approaches to address health disparities and achieve disease delay and prevention.

AbstractBackgroundAnti‐amyloid monoclonal antibody therapies for AD have documented plaque removal on amyloid PET scans. We evaluate the findings for amyloid PET, tau PET, FDG PET and volumetric MRI over the course the open label extension (OLE) for the DIAN‐TU gantenerumab treatment, compared to the last imaging obtained prior to the OLE (to evaluate for potential rebound effects) and in comparison to longitudinal imaging in the DIAN Observational study.MethodThis double‐blind, phase 2/3 trial (2012‐2019), followed by open‐label extension (OLE), investigated varying gantenerumab doses up to 1500 mg SQ q2 weeks [NCT NCT01760005]. We report long‐term amyloid‐plaque removal by PET and findings for metabolic FDG PET and tau PET, and additionally changes of atrophy on volumetric MRI. Imaging measures were secondary outcome analyses. Comparison is made between the treatment cohort and controls (DB placebo participants who didn’t enter OLE, plus external controls from the DIAN OBS). Estimated years to onset was included as a covariate. The gap period of ∼1 year is specifically analyzed to estimate any “rebound” effect on amyloid or tau accumulation or neurodegeneration. Volumetric MRI measures include hippocampal volumes, lateral ventricular volumes, and white matter hyperintensities.ResultIn participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and treated with gantenerumab (n = 53), amyloid‐plaque removal measured by PIB‐PET in Centiloids was dose‐dependent. Few participants had reached completely negative levels (below 24). No statistical significance was found for FDG PET, tau PET, or volumetric MRI, including hippocampal volumes. Impact of the gap period of ∼1 year (gap in treatment) on the rate of amyloid accumulation compared to the rate of accumulation predicted in observational studies of this cohort is under evaluation, as are the other imaging measures.ConclusionWhile no overall effect was observed in the total group for non‐amyloid measures, results suggest dose dependent clearance of amyloid plaque in asymptomatic DIAD mutation carriers following long‐term, high‐dose gantenerumab. The potential “rebound effect” of elevated amyloid accumulation for participants for whom there was a significant gap in therapy between the trial and the OLE is under evaluation and will be presented, as will the variables for FDG PET, tau PET, and volumetric MRI.

AbstractThe National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA‐AA) convened three separate work groups in 2011 and a single work group in 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Several fundamental principles emerged from these efforts. These include, AD should be defined biologically, not by clinical syndromes. The disease is a continuum that is first evident with the appearance of brain pathologic changes in asymptomatic individuals and progresses through stages of increasing pathologic burden eventually leading to appearance/progression of clinical symptoms.The Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer's Disease is the product of a work group sponsored by the Alzheimer’s Association. The revised Criteria update the 2018 Research Framework in response to major recent developments. First, since 2018, for the first time, treatments that target core disease pathology have received regulatory approval. Second, accepted biomarkers in 2018 were either CSF assays or imaging. Since then, plasma‐based biomarkers were developed, and some (but not all) demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance.The objective of the work group was to propose objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to be specific clinical practise guidelines, but rather criteria for diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science.Defining neurodegenerative diseases by their underlying biology rather than by non‐specific syndromic presentations has gained momentum in recent years. In addition, investigators increasingly recognize that across the spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders, the disease progresses along a continuum that begins with the appearance of the defining neuropathology while patients are asymptomatic. This symposium will examine the unifying theme of biologically based diagnosis and staging across neurodegenerative diseases.

AbstractBackgroundSubjective cognitive concerns are common in functionally intact adults, potentially indicating future cognitive decline. Remote smartphone cognitive testing holds promise for objectively tracking cognition in individuals reporting complaints. In our initial exploration of the link between subjective cognitive complaints and digital clinical outcomes, we examined participants' self‐reported cognitive complaints' association with smartphone tests on memory and executive functioning.MethodsParticipants, without self‐reported MCI or dementia, were recruited from the UCSF Brain Healthy Registry (BHR) to complete cognitive tasks on their personal smartphone with the ALLFTD Mobile App. Participants also completed the 12‐item Everyday Cognition Screening Tool (ECog‐12), assessing subjective cognitive impairment, online as part of BHR. Average ECog‐12 scores, including Memory and Executive Functioning subdomains, were calculated. Correlations between scores from online ECog‐12 scores and app‐based smartphone tasks were examined. Regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, and sex, were performed to evaluate the relationship between ECog‐12 and smartphone tasks (Stroop & Flanker) measuring executive function and memory.ResultsOut of 2,283 invited BHR participants, 456 (mean age: 64.6 years (SD=11.8) and education: 16.3 years (SD=2.4)) completed smartphone tasks (81.1% completion rate). Age was negatively associated with executive functioning and memory tasks (β’s=‐0.51 to ‐0.54, p’s<0.05), while higher education correlated with better performance (β’s=0.10‐0.14, p’s<0.05). Sex was not significantly associated with performance on any task (β’s=‐0.04 to 0.09, p’s>0.05). Subjective cognitive concerns were linked to tasks of executive functioning (Stroop: β=‐0.18, p=0.002) and memory (β=‐0.14, p=0.02). Endorsement of executive functioning items on ECog‐12 associated with Stroop performance (β=‐0.16, p=0.005), and memory‐specific complaints were related to memory performance (β=‐0.1, p=0.09). The relationship with flanker scores was not significant (β=‐0.08, p=0.17). Similar patterns emerged with the online ECog‐12; online and app‐based scores are strongly correlated (β=0.75, p<0.05).ConclusionsIn this cognitively intact sample, subjective cognitive concerns were linked to poorer performance on ALLFTD Mobile App tasks assessing executive functioning and memory. These findings suggest that unsupervised remote smartphone testing merits further consideration to monitor cognition in individuals with subjective cognitive concerns. Subsequent studies in deeply phenotyped cohorts with follow‐up assessments are essential for understanding the clinical relevance of these results.

AbstractBackgroundImaging and plasma markers are used as key indicators of disease for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but their usefulness in predicting regional tau pathology is relatively understudied. Our objective was to construct predictive models for regional tau pathology measured on postmortem brain tissue using multiple ante‐mortem AD biomarkers. We focused on hippocampal and parietal regions that were immunostained with AT8 and 2E9 that reflect early and advanced aspects of tangle maturity, respectively.MethodsUsing autopsy data from 63 participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) where the last clinical visit is within three years of death, we analyzed three ante‐mortem plasma markers ‐ phosphorylated tau protein at the threonine 181 residue, glial fibrillary acidic protein, total β‐amyloid Aβ42 relative to Aβ40 ratio (Quanterix Simoa HD‐X Analyzer), and three regional MRI markers computed using SPM12 ‐ parietal thickness, parietal volume relative to total intracranial volume ratio, and hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume. Based on eight separate cross‐sectional linear regression models weighted by the inverse of time from last visit to death, we estimated the multiple and partial R2 predicting post‐mortem pathology measures, including AT8 and 2E9 in both the hippocampal and parietal regions. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular and metabolic conditions score.ResultsThe MRI models (R2 of 0.26‐0.53) had greater predictive power compared to the plasma models (R2 of 0.17‐0.26). The best multiple R2 was 0.53 for prediction of hippocampal AT8 using antemortem hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume followed by R2 of 0.43 for prediction of hippocampal 2E9 using hippocampal volume adjusted for total intracranial volume. Though the model prediction of parietal AT8 and 2E9 measurements was low (R2 of 0.21‐0.26), parietal thickness exhibited better predictive performance than parietal volume relative to total intracranial volume ratio.ConclusionsThe data we presented here may be utilized to validate biomarkers using regional pathology. Our results support that regional MRI is sensitive to tau pathology. Newer MRI methods should be tested to examine the specificity of newer quantitative measurements to tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundThere is increasing need for noninvasive biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) neuropathologic change for early detection and intervention through risk‐factor modification and disease‐modifying therapies. One such biomarker is the prediction of chronological age from routine clinical tests such as an electrocardiogram (EKG) to discriminate between observed biological age from chronological age for healthy aging. Deviation of true age from predicted age has been associated with heart failure, hypertension, and coronary heart disease. However, the association between EKG‐based age and underlying neuropathology has not been studied.MethodWe used a cohort of 336 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population‐based prospective study of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, with antemortem EKG and post‐mortem brain autopsy (Table 1 & 2). Age was predicted from EKG using a validated convolutional neural network algorithm. We used ordinal logistic regression to identify associations between lower neuropathologic scores of AD (Thal phase, neuritic plaque score, Braak stage, and overall AD neuropathologic change) and the Age‐Gap, defined as EKG‐predicted age minus chronological age. Results were controlled for true age, sex, and APOE e4 carrier status. Neuropathologic scales were grouped into none, low, intermediate, and high categories. Observations were weighted by the inverse of years between last EKG and time of death to account for the time difference between acquisition of EKG and autopsy.ResultWe found that an increasing Age‐Gap (i.e. older predicted age) was inversely associated with lower overall AD neuropathologic change (OR 0.93 [0.89, 0.97], p = 0.002). Investigation of the components of AD neuropathologic change showed that an increasing Age‐Gap was also inversely associated with lower amyloid metrics such as Thal phase (OR 0.85 [0.80, 0.89], p < 0.001) and neuritic plaque scores (OR 0.91 [0.87, 0.96], p < 0.001), but not tau metrics like Braak staging (OR 1.05 [1.00, 1.10], p = 0.05).ConclusionIn this work, we show that older predicted age on EKG, a noninvasive biomarker associated with vascular and biological aging, is associated with higher amyloid burden and neuropathologic change of AD.

Abstract Background Diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces index (DTI‐ALPS), which measures diffusivity increases in the perivascular spaces along the medullary veins, is being increasingly utilized as a surrogate marker of glymphatic clearance (Taoka et. al. Jpn J Radio 2017). Lower DTI‐ALPS index means higher measured diffusivity from the perivascular space, and so it is expected to decrease with age. However, correlation with aging and dementia markers have not been systematically evaluated. The goal of this work was to automatically estimate DTI‐ALPS in a large sample and evaluate the variance explained by various demographic and imaging markers. Methods We identified 2739 participants aged 30+ years (mean 69.6, 48% female, 88% CU) in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with diffusion MRI. We estimated DTI‐ALPS through automated placement of regions as published previously (Liu et al. AAIC 2023) and shown in Figure 1. We examined the associations of DTI‐ALPS with demographics (age, sex), vascular risk (cardiovascular and metabolic condition score), clinical data (diagnosis, global cognition) and imaging markers (white matter hyperintensity (WMH), global amyloid load from PIB‐PET, and the temporal meta‐ROI Tau‐PET SUVR) using partial Pearson correlations and ANCOVA with adjustments for age and sex. Results DTI‐ALPS was negatively correlated with age, higher in females, declined with vascular risk, and lower in MCI/dementia groups (Figure 2). Higher WMH and higher amyloid were associated with lower DTI‐ALPS whereas Tau‐PET SUVR was not associated with DTI‐ALPS. Conclusions DTI‐ALPS can be automatically computed in large samples. Vascular risk and WMH had stronger associations with the computed DTI‐ALPS compared to AD biomarkers (amyloid and tau) suggesting that the surrogate was more likely linked to vascular injury.

AbstractBackgroundMany proposed clinical decision support systems (CDSS) require multiple disparate data elements as input, which makes implementation difficult, and furthermore have a black‐box nature leading to low interpretability. Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG‐PET) is an established modality for the diagnosis of dementia, and a CDSS that uses only an FDG‐PET image to produce a reliable and understandable result would ease both of these challenges to clinical application.MethodA deep variational autoencoder (VAE) was used to extract a latent representation of each image through prior training from FDG‐PET brain images (n=2000). This unsupervised VAE has a novel graph convolutional architecture that makes it applicable to masked template space images. A logistic regression model was used to classify each image. A parametric study of the latent space revealed the imaging features that were used in the logistic regression model to differentiate each class. A separate dataset of participants labeled with their clinical diagnosis (n=1239) was used to assess the logistic regression model’s diagnostic accuracy of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n=679) and between common dementia subtypes: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n=310), Lewy body dementia (DLB) (n=151), and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n=99). The logistic regression classifier was evaluated using receiver‐operator characteristic (ROC‐AUC) curves.ResultROC‐AUC curves for CU and each dementia subtype are illustrated in Figure 1a. A k nearest neighbors model was used to develop a graphical representation of the latent space where nodes are images and edges are drawn between nearest neighbors, illustrated in Figure 1b. The graph of the latent space demonstrates a comparison between dementia subtypes and CU images.ConclusionIn this study, we developed a proof‐of‐concept VAE that can achieve differential diagnosis with 84.8% balanced accuracy. The model architecture provides visual interpretability, and shows that the hippocampi, parietal lobes, and cerebellum, were useful for distinguishing AD, the frontal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampi were useful for distinguishing DLB, and prefrontal pole, subcortical structures, and occipital lobe were useful for distinguishing bvFTD. These regions of metabolism align with clinical pathology and metabolic patterns.

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.