Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1908 citation(s) found for "Wu, Henry".

How to build and operationalise a hospital command centre
Crawley, Danielle, Engler, Nicole, Stellmaker, Jessica, Buechler, Tamara, Bany, Mary, Dangerfield, Benjamin, Newman, James S. , Stellmaker, Jessica A.

Management in Healthcare: A Peer-Reviewed Journal | October 1, 2024 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 46

10.69554/eftp6260 Get It

In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, hospitals routinely grapple with daily disruptions and unforeseen events affecting resources and capacity. This paper explores the implementation and impact of the Rochester Hospital Operations Command Center (RHOCC) as a strategic response to challenges faced by the Mayo Clinic Hospital campuses in Rochester. The RHOCC, developed with an expedited timeline in response to capacity issues, exacerbated by COVID-19, serves as a centralised hub for real-time monitoring, coordination and decision-making related to patient flow. The process of establishing the command centre involved role identification, skill set determination, location of important personnel in an organised central space and vendor selection to develop the necessary infrastructure. Dashboards were developed to provide real-time actionable insights into external transfers, surgical and other planned admissions, emergency department status, patient throughput and discharges. These dashboards include colour-coded keys highlighting thresholds related to patient flow metrics and are used to facilitate daily huddles and enhance transparency and data-driven decision-making among hospital stakeholders. The outcomes of implementing the RHOCC include improved efficiency and collaboration, as well as a significantly enhanced ability to proactively respond to factors affecting census. The development of a command centre — driven by leadership endorsement and a commitment to continuous improvement — emerges as a transformative strategy in healthcare innovation. The RHOCC’s approach of building capability, fostering inclusion and articulating a vision of providing superior care while driving impactful improvements, positions it as a leading force in creating operational efficiencies to define healthcare delivery.
Primary failure of OKT3 antibody for rejection prophylaxis in orthotopic heart transplantation
Vigneswaran, W T, Rodeheffer, Richard J. , Katzmann, Jerry A., Tazelaar, Henry D. , McGregor, Christopher G.A. , Tazelaar, Henry D.

Clinical Transplantation | September 30, 2024 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 537-540

10.1111/j.1399-0012.1993.tb01134.x Get It

Cytolytic immunosuppression with OKT3 antibody has been shown to be highly effective in reducing the frequency of early allograft rejection in cardiac transplantation. Failure of OKT3 immunosuppression in the absence of anti‐OKT3 antibodies is a rare event, having been reported in only 3 patients who manifested predominantly vascular (humoral) rejection during OKT3 therapy. We report the first case of hemodynamically serious cellular rejection, without a demonstrable vascular rejection component, in a cardiac allograft recipient during OKT3 treatment. This case underscores the need to remain vigilant for signs of rejection in cardiac recipients during OKT3 immunosuppression.
The impact of multimorbidity on Quality of Life in inflammatory myopathies: A cluster analysis from the COVAD dataset
Fornaro, Marco , Venerito, Vincenzo , Pellico, Maria Rosa , Iannone, Florenzo , Joshi, Mrudula , Chen, Yi‐Ming , Tan, Ai Lyn , Saha, Sreoshy , Chatterjee, Tulika , Agarwal, Vishwesh , Kadam, Esha , Hasan, A T M Tanveer , Shumnalieva, Russka , Milchert, Marcin , Tan, Chou Luan , Vaidya, Binit , Kuwana, Masataka , Shaharir, Syahrul Sazliyana , Tehozol, Erick Adrian Zamora , Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique Toro , Goo, Phonpen Akawatcharangura , Katchamart, Wanruchada , Parodis, Ioannis , Nikiphorou, Elena , Chinoy, Hector , Agarwal, Vikas , Gupta, Latika, Group, CoVAD Study, Sen, Parikshit, Javaid, Mahnoor, Andreoli, Laura, Lini, Daniele, Schreiber, Karen, Nune, Arvind, Tan, Ai Lyn, Patel, Aarat, Pauling, John D, Wincup, Chris, Barman, Bhupen, Torre, Ignacio García-De La, Colunga-Pedraza, Iris J, Merayo-Chalico, Javier, Chibuzo, Okwara Celestine, Kibbi, Lina El, Lilleker, James B, Salim, Babur, Gheita, Tamer, Saavedra, Miguel A, Griger, Zoltán, Kardes, Sinan, Vince, Melinda Nagy, Singh, Yogesh Preet, Ranjan, Rajiv, Jain, Avinash, Pandya, Sapan C, Pilania, Rakesh Kumar, Sharma, Aman, M, Manesh Manoj, Gupta, Vikas, Kavadichanda, Chengappa G, Patro, Pradeepta Sekhar, Ajmani, Sajal, Phatak, Sanat, Goswami, Rudra Prosad, Chowdhury, Abhra Chandra, Mathew, Ashish Jacob, Shenoy, Padnamabha, Asranna, Ajay, Bommakanti, Keerthi Talari, Shukla, Anuj, Pande, Arunkumar R, Chandwar, Kunal, Ghodke, Akanksha, Boro, Hiya, Fazal, Zoha Zahid, Vaidya, Binit, Cansu, Döndü Üsküdar, Yıldırım, Reşit, Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Papa, Nicoletta Del, Sambataro, Gianluca, Fabiola, Atzeni, Govoni, Marcello, Parisi, Simone, Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Sebastiani, Gian Domenico, Fusaro, Enrico, Sebastiani, Marco, Quartuccio, Luca, Franceschini, Franco, Sainaghi, Pier Paolo, Orsolini, Giovanni, Angelis, Rossella De, Danieli, Maria Giovanna, Grignaschi, Silvia, Giollo, Alessandro, Alunno, Alessia, Traboco, Lisa S, Wibowo, Suryo Anggoro Kusumo, Loarce-Martos, Jesús, Prieto-González, Sergio, Gonzalez, Raquel Aranega, Yoshida, Akira, Nakashima, Ran, Sato, Shinji, Kimura, Naoki, Kaneko, Yuko, Gono, Takahisa, Tomaras, Stylianos, Proft, Fabian Nikolai, Holzer, Marie-Therese, Gromova, Margarita Aleksandrovna, Aharonov, Or, Griger, Zoltán, Hmamouchi, Ihsane, bouchti, Imane El, Baba, Zineb, Giannini, Margherita, Maurier, François, Campagne, Julien, Meyer, Alain, Langguth, Daman, Limaye, Vidya, Needham, Merrilee, Srivastav, Nilesh, Hudson, Marie, Landon-Cardinal, Océane, Zuleta, Wilmer Gerardo Rojas, Arbeláez, Álvaro, Cajas, Javier, Silva, José António Pereira, Fonseca, João Eurico, Zimba, Olena, Ima-Edomwonyi, Uyi, Dedeke, Ibukunoluwa, Airenakho, Emorinken, Madu, Nwankwo Henry, Yerima, Abubakar, Olaosebikan, Hakeem, Becky, A, Koussougbo, Oruma Devi, Palalane, Elisa, So, Ho, Ugarte-Gil, Manuel Francisco, Chinchay, Lyn, Bernaola, José Proaño, Pimentel, Victorio, Fathi, Hanan Mohammed, Mohammed, Reem Hamdy A, Harifi, Ghita, Fuentes-Silva, Yurilís, Cabriza, Karoll, Losanto, Jonathan, Colaman, Nelly, Cachafeiro-Vilar, Antonio, Bautista, Generoso Guerra, Ho, Enrique Julio Giraldo, González, Raúl, Nunez, Lilith Stange, M, Cristian Vergara, Báez, Jossiell Then, Alonzo, Hugo, Pastelin, Carlos Benito Santiago, Salinas, Rodrigo García, Obiols, Alejandro Quiñónez, Chávez, Nilmo, Ordóñez, Andrea Bran, Argueta, Sandra, Llerena, Gil Alberto Reyes, Sierra-Zorita, Radames, Arrieta, Dina, Hidalgo, Eduardo Romero, Saenz, Ricardo, M, Idania Escalante, Morales, Roberto, Calapaqui, Wendy, Quezada, Ivonne, Arredondo, Gabriela, Pauling, John D , Wincup, Chris , Sambataro, Gianluca , Angelis, Rossella De , Loarce‐Martos, Jesus , Lini, Daniele , Fuentes-Silva, Yurilís , Giollo, Alessandro , Grignaschi, Silvia , Schreiber, Karen , Danieli, Maria Giovanna , Gupta, Latika , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Hoff, Leonardo Santos , Kadam, Esha , Ziade, Nelly , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Hasan, A T M Tanveer , Shumnalieva, Russka , Milchert, Marcin , Tan, Chou Luan , Gracia-Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Cavagna, Lorenzo , Vaidya, Binit , Kuwana, Masataka , Sazliyana Shaharir, Syahrul , Knitza, Johannes , Makol, Ashima , Zamora Tehozol, Erick Adrian , Rojas Serrano, Jorge , Halabi, Hussein , Dey, Dzifa , Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique Toro , Distler, Oliver , Katchamart, Wanruchada , Day, Jessica , Parodis, Ioannis , Nikiphorou, Elena , Chinoy, Hector , Agarwal, Vikas , Gupta, Latika , Joshi, Mrudula , Agarwal, Vishwesh , Tan, Ai Lyn , Chatterjee, Tulika , Pauling, John D , Wincup, Chris , Chen, Yi-Ming , Saha, Sreoshy , De Angelis, Rossella , Iannone, Florenzo , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Ziadé, Nelly , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Gracia‐Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Makol, Ashima , Halabi, Hussein , Dey, Dzifa , Caballero‐Uribe, Carlo V. , Distler, Oliver , Day, Jessica , Group, CoVAD Study, Sen, Parikshit, Javaid, Mahnoor, Andreoli, Laura, Nune, Arvind, Tan, Ai Lyn, Patel, Aarat, Barman, Bhupen, Torre, Ignacio García-De La, Colunga-Pedraza, Iris J, Merayo-Chalico, Javier, Chibuzo, Okwara Celestine, Kibbi, Lina El, Lilleker, James B, Salim, Babur, Gheita, Tamer, Saavedra, Miguel A, Griger, Zoltán, Kardes, Sinan, Vince, Melinda Nagy, Singh, Yogesh Preet, Ranjan, Rajiv, Jain, Avinash, Pandya, Sapan C, Pilania, Rakesh Kumar, Sharma, Aman, M, Manesh Manoj, Gupta, Vikas, Kavadichanda, Chengappa G, Patro, Pradeepta Sekhar, Ajmani, Sajal, Phatak, Sanat, Goswami, Rudra Prosad, Chowdhury, Abhra Chandra, Mathew, Ashish Jacob, Shenoy, Padnamabha, Asranna, Ajay, Bommakanti, Keerthi Talari, Shukla, Anuj, Pande, Arunkumar R, Chandwar, Kunal, Ghodke, Akanksha, Boro, Hiya, Fazal, Zoha Zahid, Vaidya, Binit, Cansu, Döndü Üsküdar, Yıldırım, Reşit, Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Papa, Nicoletta Del, Fabiola, Atzeni, Govoni, Marcello, Parisi, Simone, Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Sebastiani, Gian Domenico, Fusaro, Enrico, Sebastiani, Marco, Quartuccio, Luca, Franceschini, Franco, Sainaghi, Pier Paolo, Orsolini, Giovanni, Alunno, Alessia, Traboco, Lisa S, Wibowo, Suryo Anggoro Kusumo, Prieto-González, Sergio, Gonzalez, Raquel Aranega, Yoshida, Akira, Nakashima, Ran, Sato, Shinji, Kimura, Naoki, Kaneko, Yuko, Gono, Takahisa, Tomaras, Stylianos, Proft, Fabian Nikolai, Holzer, Marie-Therese, Gromova, Margarita Aleksandrovna, Aharonov, Or, Griger, Zoltán, Hmamouchi, Ihsane, bouchti, Imane El, Baba, Zineb, Giannini, Margherita, Maurier, F. , Campagne, Julien, Meyer, Alain , Langguth, Daman, Limaye, Vidya, Needham, Merrilee, Srivastav, Nilesh, Hudson, Marie, Landon‐Cardinal, Océane , Zuleta, Wilmer Gerardo Rojas, Arbeláez, Álvaro, Cajas, Javier, Silva, José António Pereira, Fonseca, João Eurico, Zimba, Olena, Ima-Edomwonyi, Uyi, Dedeke, Ibukunoluwa, Airenakho, Emorinken, Madu, Nwankwo Henry, Yerima, Abubakar, Olaosebikan, Hakeem, Becky, A, Koussougbo, Oruma Devi, Palalane, Elisa, So, Ho, Ugarte-Gil, Manuel Francisco, Chinchay, Lyn, Bernaola, José Proaño, Pimentel, Victorio, Fathi, Hanan Mohammed, Mohammed, Reem Hamdy A, Harifi, Ghita, Cabriza, Karoll, Losanto, Jonathan, Colaman, Nelly, Cachafeiro-Vilar, Antonio, Bautista, Generoso Guerra, Ho, Enrique Julio Giraldo, González, Raúl, Nunez, Lilith Stange, M, Cristian Vergara, Báez, Jossiell Then, Alonzo, Hugo, Pastelin, Carlos Benito Santiago, Salinas, Rodrigo García, Obiols, Alejandro Quiñónez, Chávez, Nilmo, Ordóñez, Andrea Bran, Argueta, Sandra, Llerena, Gil Alberto Reyes, Sierra-Zorita, Radames, Arrieta, Dina, Hidalgo, Eduardo Romero, Saenz, Ricardo, M, Idania Escalante, Morales, Roberto, Calapaqui, Wendy, Quezada, Ivonne, Arredondo, Gabriela

Rheumatology | September 26, 2024 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 2133-2142

10.1093/rheumatology/keae520 | PMID 39324556 Get It

Abstract Objective The presence of comorbidities can substantially affect patients’ quality of life, but data regarding their impact on idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are limited. Methods We examined the prevalence of comorbidities in IIM patients, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (oAIRDs) and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the self-reported COVAD-2 survey. We defined basic multimorbidity (BM) as the presence of ≥2 non-rheumatic chronic conditions and complex multimorbidity (CM) as the presence of ≥3 non-rheumatic chronic conditions affecting ≥3 organ systems. Hierarchical clustering on principal components was performed for grouping. Results Among the COVAD respondents, 1558 IIMs, 4591 oAIRDs and 3652 HCs were analysed. IIMs exhibited a high burden of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR]: 1.62 vs oAIRDs and 2.95 vs HCs, P < 0.01), BM (OR: 1.66 vs oAIRDs and 3.52 vs HCs, P < 0.01), CM (OR: 1.69 vs AIRDs and 6.23 vs HCs, P < 0.01) and mental health disorders (MHDs) (OR: 1.33 vs oAIRDs and 2.63 vs HCs, P < 0.01). Among the IIM patients, those with comorbidities or MHDs had lower PROMIS Global Physical (PGP), PROMIS Global Mental (PGM), and PROMIS Physical Function (SF10) scores, and higher fatigue (F4a) scores (all P < 0.001). PGP, PGM, SF10a and F4a were influenced by age, active disease, BM and MHDs. Four distinct clusters were identified among the IIMs according to comorbidities and PROMIS scores. Conclusion Patients with IIMs have a higher burden of comorbidities that influence physical and mental health, identifiable as clinical clusters for optimized and holistic management approaches.
Characteristics of Patients with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Presenting with Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the United States and the Potential Role of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy
Krittanawong, Chayakrit , Qadeer, Yusuf Kamran , Sharma, Samin, Jneid, Hani, Ang, Song Peng , Wang, Zhen , Alam, Mahboob , Sharma, Samin, Jneid, Hani

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine | September 25, 2024 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.31083/j.rcm2509318 | PMID 39355574 Get It

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a disease entity that often occurs in young, healthy women and can cause life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac arrest. However, the characteristics and outcomes of SCAD with cardiac arrest are not well characterized. Methods: This study investigated the baseline characteristics of SCAD patients with cardiac arrest using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2016 and 2020. In addition, we also sought to determine the potential impact that implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy had on morbidity and mortality in SCAD patients presenting with cardiac arrest. Results: Our findings showed that the SCAD with cardiac arrest population had significantly higher comorbidities, including cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disorders, liver diseases, solid tumors, coagulopathy, fluid disorders, chronic kidney disease (CKD), anemia secondary to deficiency, psychosis, neurological disorders, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF)), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), compared to the SCAD without cardiac arrest population. Likewise, for SCAD patients who did not have an ICD in place, we found increasing age, fluid and electrolyte disorders, uncomplicated diabetes, neurological disorders, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary circulatory disorders, cardiac arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure to be associated with greater mortality. Conclusions: SCAD patients with certain comorbidities (e.g., pulmonary diseases, liver diseases, cancers, coagulopathy, and CKD) who presented with AMI or congestive heart failure should be monitored closely for ventricular arrhythmias as they have a higher chance of progressing to cardiac arrest. ICD therapy can be considered for these patients, but data on the success of this treatment option are limited, and more research needs to be performed to determine whether the benefits of this outweigh the risks.
Home- vs Office-Based Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy for Patients With Psoriasis
Armstrong, April W. , Lim, Henry W., Johnson, Sandra Marchese , Claiborne, W. C. Cole, Kalb, Robert E. , Jakus, Jeannette , Mangold, Aaron R. , Bagel, Jerry , Fretzin, Scott , Sheehan, Michael P. , Krell, James, Reeder, Margo J. , Kartono, Francisca, Bridges, Alisha, Nehal, Umbereen S., Schaecher, Kenneth L., Howard, Leah, Eakin, Guy S. , Báez, Suzette , Bishop, Brooke E., Fitzsimmons, Robert C., Papadopoulos, Maryte , Song, William B. , Linn, Kristin A. , Duffin, Kristina Callis , Mangold, A R , Gelfand, Joel M. , Lim, Henry W. , Feldman, Steven R. , Flowers, Richard Hal , Bhutani, Tina , Durkin, John R. , Kaffenberger, Jessica A. , Takeshita, Junko , Fielding, Eric Jameson , Bishop, B., Fitzsimmons, Robert C. , Hubbard, Rebecca A. , Shin, Daniel B.

JAMA Dermatology | September 25, 2024 | Volume: 160 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1320

10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3897 | PMID 39319513 Get It

Importance Office-based phototherapy is cost-effective for psoriasis but difficult to access. Home-based phototherapy is patient preferred but has limited clinical data, particularly in patients with darker skin. Objective To compare the effectiveness of home- vs office-based narrowband UV-B phototherapy for psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants The Light Treatment Effectiveness study was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial embedded in routine care at 42 academic and private clinical dermatology practices in the US. Enrollment occurred from March 1, 2019, to December 4, 2023, with follow-up through June 2024. Participants were 12 years and older with plaque or guttate psoriasis who were candidates for home- and office-based phototherapy. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive a home narrowband UV-B machine with guided mode dosimetry or routine care with office-based narrowband UV-B for 12 weeks, followed by an additional 12-week observation period. Main Outcomes and Measures The coprimary effectiveness outcomes were Physician Global Assessment (PGA) dichotomized as clear/almost clear skin (score of ≤1) at the end of the intervention period and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 5 or lower (no to small effect on quality of life) at week 12. Results Of 783 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 376 [48.0%] male), 393 received home-based phototherapy and 390 received office-based phototherapy, with 350 (44.7%) having skin phototype (SPT) I/II, 350 (44.7%) having SPT III/IV, and 83 (10.6%) having SPT V/VI. A total of 93 patients (11.9%) were receiving systemic treatment. At baseline, mean (SD) PGA was 2.7 (0.8) and DLQI was 12.2 (7.2). At week 12, 129 patients (32.8%) receiving home-based phototherapy and 100 patients (25.6%) receiving office-based phototherapy achieved clear/almost clear skin, and 206 (52.4%) and 131 (33.6%) achieved DLQI of 5 or lower, respectively. Home-based phototherapy was noninferior to office-based phototherapy for PGA and DLQI in the overall population and across all SPTs. Home-based phototherapy, compared to office-based phototherapy, was associated with better treatment adherence (202 patients [51.4%] vs 62 patients [15.9%]; P < .001), lower burden of indirect costs to patients, and more episodes of persistent erythema (466 of 7957 treatments [5.9%] vs 46 of 3934 treatments [1.2%]; P < .001). Both treatments were well tolerated with no discontinuations due to adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, home-based phototherapy was as effective as office-based phototherapy for plaque or guttate psoriasis in everyday clinical practice and had less burden to patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03726489
Outcomes related to penile prosthesis reservoir removal: a 7-year multi-institutional experience
Piraino, Javier , Madison, Ian, Supak, Dylan N., Trost, Landon , Cornell, Robert J., Köhler, Tobias , Henry, Gerard D., Loeb, Aram, Wang, Run , Hernandez, J. Clavell, Piraino, Javier

The Journal of Sexual Medicine | September 14, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1076-1080

10.1093/jsxmed/qdae112 | PMID 39271240 Get It

Abstract Background The 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the most widely used device for erectile dysfunction refractory to medications, containing a reservoir inserted into the retropubic space (RPS) or an alternative/ectopic space (AES). Indications for removal of the reservoir include malfunction, malposition, or infection. In revision cases without infection, reservoir removal is sometimes optional. Aim We reviewed outcomes and complications related to reservoir removal from a large multi-institutional series. Methods We retrospectively reviewed databases at 6 institutions over 7 years. Patients with artificial urethral sphincter, urethral sling, or mini-jupette were excluded. Outcomes Outcomes and complications related to IPP reservoir removal were analyzed. Data were collected, but only reservoir-related complications at surgery were included. Data were compared between the RPS and AES cohorts to evaluate differences with a χ2 test, with significance at P < .05. Results Of 215 cases, there were 172 RPS and 43 AES reservoirs. The mean patient age was 65.3 years. An overall 131 procedures were due to malfunction and 49 to malposition of an IPP component; 35 were secondary to infection. Among those retained (n = 44), reasons included reuse, avoiding surrounding structure damage, and difficult dissection. Among those removed (n = 171), 15 required a counterincision. To determine the statistical difference between those removed from the RPS and an AES, the χ2 test result was P = .00059, indicating a significant difference in the need for a counterincision between the groups. Complications included bladder perforation (n = 1) in the RPS group and an avulsion of the epigastric vessels requiring abdominal exploration (n = 1) in the AES group. To determine the statistical difference between RPS and AES complications, the χ2 test result was P = .365, indicating no significant difference between the groups. Strengths and Limitations Strengths include being a multi-institutional study with high-volume skilled implanters. Limitations include being a retrospective review, with implanters exclusively performing penoscrotal incisions and not utilizing an infrapubic approach. Last, there was a lack of long-term follow-up with these patients. Conclusions Removal of an IPP reservoir remains safe, with few intraoperative complications. Surgeons should be aware of the inferior epigastric vessels during removal in an AES or be willing to perform a counterincision to avoid injury to surrounding structures. Surgeons should also obtain preoperative imaging to identify the specific location of the reservoir and adjacent anatomy. This is the first multi-institutional study reviewing outcomes related to reservoir removal during IPP revision or removal surgery.
Clinical Significance of Tumor Location for Ureteroscopic Tumor Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Katayama, Satoshi , Pradère, Benjamin , Grossmann, Nico C. , Potretzke, Aaron M. , Boorjian, S., Daneshmand, Siamak , Djaladat, Hooman , Sfakianos, John P. , D’Andrea, David , Hayakawa, Nozomi , Heindenreich, Axel, Margulis, Vitaly , Karakiewicz, Pierre I, Nasu, Yasutomo , Shariat, Shahrokh F., Grossman, Nico C , Daneshmand, Siamak , D'Andrea, David , Ghoreifi, Alireza , Pradere, Benjamin , Ghoreifi, Alireza , Mari, Andrea , Khene, Z. , Fujita, Kazutoshi , Heindenreich, Axel, Raman, Jay D. , Roumiguié, M. , Abdollah, Firas , Breda, Alberto , Fontana, Matteo , Rouprêt, Morgan , Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Araki, Motoo , Shariat, Shahrokh F.

Journal of Endourology | September 12, 2024 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1156-1163

10.1089/end.2024.0335 | PMID 39264866 Get It

Background: Although previous literature shows tumor location as a prognostic factor in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), there remains uninvestigated regarding the impact of tumor location on grade concordance and discrepancies between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and final radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) pathology. Methods: In this international study, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,498 patients with UTUC who underwent diagnostic URS with concomitant biopsy followed by RNU between 2005 and 2020. Tumor location was divided into four sections: the calyceal-pelvic system, proximal ureter, middle ureter, and distal ureter. Patients with multifocal tumors were excluded from the study. We performed multiple comparison tests and logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, 1,154 patients were included; 54.4% of those with low-grade URS biopsies were upgraded on RNU. In the multiple comparison tests, middle ureter tumors exhibited the highest probability of upgrading, meanwhile pelvicalyceal tumors exhibited the lowest probability of upgrading (73.7% vs 48.5%, p = 0.007). Downgrading was comparable across all tumor locations. On multivariate analyses, middle ureteral location was significantly associated with a low probability of grade concordance (odds ratio [OR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–1.00; p = 0.049) and an increased risk of upgrading (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.20–6.52; p = 0.017). The discordance did not vary regardless of caliceal location, including the lower calyx. Conclusions: Middle ureteral tumors diagnosed to be low grade had a high probability to be undergraded. Our data can inform providers and their patients regarding the likelihood of undergrading according to tumor location, facilitating patient counseling and shared decision making regarding the choice of kidney sparing vs RNU.
Randomised controlled trials on radiation dose fractionation in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on side effects and cosmesis
Lee, Shing Fung , Kennedy, Samantha , Caini, Saverio, Wong, Henry C.Y., Poortmans, Philip , Meattini, Icro , Recht, Abram , Hijal, Tarek , Torres, Mylin A. , Cao, Jeffrey , Corbin, Kimberly S. , Choi, J. Isabelle , Koh, Wee Yao , Kwan, Jennifer , Karam, Irene , Chow, Edward , Wong, Henry C. Y. , Meattini, Icro , Hijal, Tarek , Kennedy, Samantha K. F. , Caini, Saverio , Yip, Pui Lam , Kaidar-Person, Orit , Chan, Adrian Wai , Marta, Gustavo Nader

BMJ | September 11, 2024 | Volume: 386 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: e079089

10.1136/bmj-2023-079089 | PMID 39260879 Get It

Abstract Objective To provide a comprehensive assessment of various fractionation schemes in radiation therapy for breast cancer, with a focus on side effects, cosmesis, quality of life, risks of recurrence, and survival outcomes. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 23 October 2023). Study selection Included studies were randomised controlled trials focusing on conventional fractionation (CF; daily fractions of 1.8-2 Gy, reaching a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy over 5-6 weeks), moderate hypofractionation (MHF; fraction sizes of 2.65-3.3 Gy for 13-16 fractions over 3-5 weeks), and/or ultra-hypofractionation (UHF; schedule of only 5 fractions). Data extraction Two independent investigators screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach, respectively. Data synthesis Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was analysed using Cochran’s Q test and I 2 statistic. Network meta-analysis was used to integrate all available evidence. Main outcome measures The pre-specified primary outcome was grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis and late radiation therapy related side effects; secondary outcomes included cosmesis, quality of life, recurrence, and survival metrics. Results From 1754 studies, 59 articles representing 35 trials (20 237 patients) were assessed; 21.6% of outcomes showed low risk of bias, whereas 78.4% had some concerns or high risk, particularly in outcome measurement (47.4%). The RR for grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis for MHF compared with CF was 0.54 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.61; P<0.001) and 0.68 (0.49 to 0.93; P=0.02) following breast conserving therapy and mastectomy, respectively. Hyperpigmentation and grade ≥2 breast shrinkage were less frequent after MHF than after CF, with RRs of 0.77 (0.62 to 0.95; P=0.02) and 0.92 (0.85 to 0.99; P=0.03), respectively, in the combined breast conserving therapy and mastectomy population. However, in the breast conserving therapy only trials, these differences in hyperpigmentation (RR 0.79, 0.60 to 1.03; P=0.08) and breast shrinkage (0.94, 0.83 to 1.07; P=0.35) were not statistically significant. The RR for grade ≥2 acute radiation dermatitis for UHF compared with MHF was 0.85 (0.47 to 1.55; P=0.60) for breast conserving therapy and mastectomy patients combined. MHF was associated with improved cosmesis and quality of life compared with CF, whereas data on UHF were less conclusive. Survival and recurrence outcomes were similar between UHF, MHF, and CF. Conclusions MHF shows improved safety profile, cosmesis, and quality of life compared with CF while maintaining equivalent oncological outcomes. Fewer randomised controlled trials have compared UHF with other fractionation schedules, but its safety and oncological effectiveness seem to be similar with short term follow-up. Given the advantages of reduced treatment time, enhanced convenience for patients, and potential cost effectiveness, MHF and UHF should be considered as preferred options over CF in appropriate clinical settings, with further research needed to solidify these findings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42023460249.
Point of care ultrasound for triage of critically ill patients in the emergency department
Kinni, Harish , Garcia, Samuel, Clark, Chris

Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine | September 11, 2024 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1097/jtccm-d-24-00013 Get It

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been a constantly evolving and growing tool utilized by emergency medicine and intensive care practitioners. Ultrasound use for the assessment and management of critically ill patients has been available for several decades with the focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) exam being one of the first widely adopted POCUS protocols. This along with other established protocols has made an impact on the care delivered to critically ill patients. This narrative review will cover some of the history of POCUS in the emergency department, brief considerations for machines and infrastructure, and current uses including in trauma, shock/hypotension, cardiac arrest, dyspnea, abdomen, vascular, and procedural guidance. Furthermore, it will provide a review of the evidence supporting its efficacy in managing critically ill patients and future directions.
Quality-of-life outcomes from NRG Oncology NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413: whole-breast irradiation vs accelerated partial-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery
Ganz, Patricia A. , Cecchini, Reena S. , White, Julia , Vicini, Frank A. , Arthur, Douglas W., Rabinovitch, Rachel , Kuske, Robert R. , Julian, Thomas B. , Parda, David S., Scheier, Michael F. , Winter, Kathryn, Paik, Soonmyung , Kuerer, Henry M. , Vallow, Laura A., Pierce, Lori J. , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Germain, Isabelle, Gustafson, Gregory S, Grossheim, Linda , Petersen, Ivy A. , Curran, Walter J. , White, Julia R , Hudes, Richard S , Wolmark, Norman , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , McCormick, Beryl L. , Bear, Harry D. , Wolmark, Norman

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | September 10, 2024 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 103-111

10.1093/jnci/djae219 | PMID 39254630 Get It

Abstract Background NRG Oncology NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 compared whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). APBI was not equivalent to WBI in local tumor control. Secondary outcome was quality of life (QOL). Methods The QOL sub-study used validated self-report questionnaires, including the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) vitality scale. Assessments occurred before random assignment, at treatment completion (chemotherapy or radiotherapy), 4 weeks later, at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Primary aims: cosmesis change equivalency (baseline to 3 years; a priori margin of equivalence 0.4 standard deviations) and fatigue change superiority (baseline to end of treatment [EOT]) for APBI vs WBI, by patient groups treated with or without chemotherapy when appropriate. Results From March 21, 2005 to May 25, 2009, 975 patients enrolled in this sub-study; 950 had follow-up data. APBI had 3-year cosmesis equivalent to WBI (95% CI = -0.0001 to -0.16; equivalence margin -0.22 to -0.22) in all patients. The APBI group without chemotherapy had less EOT fatigue (P = .011; mean score APBI 63 vs WBI 59); the APBI group receiving chemotherapy had worse EOT fatigue (P = .011; APBI 43 vs WBI 49). The APBI group reported less pain (BCTOS) at EOT (WBI 2.29 vs APBI 1.97) but worse pain at 3 years (WBI 1.62 vs APBI 1.71). APBI patients reported greater convenience of care than with WBI and reported less symptom severity at EOT and 4 weeks later. Conclusion Cosmetic outcomes were similar for the APBI and WBI groups, with small statistically significant differences in other outcomes that varied over time. Differences in fatigue and other symptoms appeared to resolve by ≥6 months. APBI may be preferred by some patients, for whom extended treatment is burdensome. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00103181.