Citations

803 Background: The routine use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has led to better genomic characterization, more personalized treatments and higher enrollment in clinical trials for many solid cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and genomic prolife of patients (pts) with gastrointestinal cancers (GIC) with the use of a CGP assay and their potential therapeutic benefit at a large comprehensive cancer center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 consecutive pts with GIC that had CGP at the JTCC between 01/2014-09/2016. Demographics, CGP results, and clinical characteristics were studied. Clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGAs) were identified using the FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA), and were defined as alterations linked to approved therapies and those under evaluation in genotype-driven clinical trials. Results: 83 pts with GIC were analyzed. 46.9% males and 53.0% females. The median age at diagnosis was 58.5 years. 73 (88%) patients were stage III/IV at diagnosis. Tumors consisted of colorectal (36%), gastric (24%), pancreatic (12%) and cholangiocarcinoma (6%). All the pts were found to have at least one genomic alteration (GA). CRGAs were identified in 63 (76%) of cases, with an average of 2 per pt. The most frequently identified GAs were TP53 43 (29.9%), APC 24 (16.7%), KRAS 31 (21.5%), ARID1A 12 (8.3%), PIK3CA 11 (7.6%), and SMAD4 11 (7.6%). Of the 63 pts with CRGAs, 23 (36%) received one of the therapies suggested by the NGS assay, and 9 (14%) were enrolled in a clinical trial. Conclusions: The use of CGP assay identified a high frequency of CRGAs in GIC pts. The assay provided information for genomic-directed therapy in 36% of the patients. The routine use of CGP in GIC may lead to pts receive more personalized treatments. The potential benefit of selected targeted therapies in individual cases suggests that larger studies of treatment guided by routine CGP in gastrointestinal malignancies are warranted.

The natural history of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs) of the descending thoracic aorta remains unclear. Between January 1996 and June 2000, PAU was diagnosed in 36 patients (16 men, 20 women; mean age 74.9 ± 1.5 years) at Washington University. Imaging studies and hospital records were reviewed. Late follow-up was by search of the Social Security Death Index and telephone interview. None of 16 asymptomatic patients underwent operation. At follow-up (median 457 days), 6 patients had died of unrelated and 2 of unknown causes. Among 20 symptomatic patients, 10 had associated intramural hematoma (5) or dissection (5), of whom 3 underwent operation. At median follow-up (448 days), the 7 unoperated patients remained alive without an aortic operation. Among the remaining 10 symptomatic patients, 3 had an aortic operation and 2 died of unknown causes during follow-up (median 586 days). These data suggest that, in selected cases, PAU may be managed expectantly with careful observation.

SummaryBackgroundIn patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN‐1), pancreaticoduodenal (PD) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are associated with early mortality, yet the best treatment strategy remains uncertain.AimTo assess patient important outcomes (mortality and metastasis) of PD‐NETs and predictors of outcomes in patients with MEN‐1.MethodsRetrospective cohort of patients with MEN‐1 who attended the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from 1997 to 2014.ResultsWe identified 287 patients with MEN‐1; 199 (69%) patients had 217 PD‐NETs. Among those with a PD‐NETs, 129 (65%) had surgery of which 90 (70%) had their primary surgery performed at Mayo Clinic. The median postoperative follow‐up was 8 years during which 13 (14%) patients died. The mean (±standard deviation) age of death was 51 (±9) years. Tumour size, metastasis at surgery or tumour type were not predictive of mortality, but for every year older at surgery, the odds of metastasis increased by 6%. Surgery was not performed in 70 (35%) patients. Among those who were observed/medically managed without known metastatic disease, mean tumour growth was 0·02 cm/year (range, −0·13–0·4 cm/year). Four patients (7%) died at a median age of 77 (range, 51–89) years.ConclusionPD‐NETs are common in patients with MEN‐1 and are associated with early mortality even after surgical intervention. Active surveillance is a viable option in nonaggressive PD‐NETs, although definitive factors identifying such patients are lacking. Therefore, counselling regarding risks and benefits of current treatment options remains integral to the care of patients with MEN‐1.

Background— We sought to determine the concordance between the accumulating evidence about the impact of tight versus less tight glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus since the publication of UKPDS (UK Prospective Diabetes Study) in 1998 until 2015 with the views about that evidence published in journal articles and practice guidelines. Methods and Results— We searched in top general medicine and specialty journals for articles referring to glycemic control appearing between 2006 and 2015 and identified the latest practice guidelines. To summarize the evidence, we included all published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of contemporary randomized trials of glycemic control measuring patient-important microvascular and macrovascular outcomes, and completed a meta-analysis of their follow-up extensions. We identified 16 guidelines and 328 statements. The body of evidence produced estimates warranting moderate confidence. This evidence reported no significant impact of tight glycemic control on the risk of dialysis/transplantation/renal death, blindness, or neuropathy. In the past decade, however, most published statements (77%–100%) and guidelines (95%) unequivocally endorsed benefit. There is also no significant effect on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or stroke; however, there is a consistent 15% relative-risk reduction of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Between 2006 and 2008, most statements (47%–83%) endorsed the benefit; after 2008 (ACCORD), only a minority (21%–36%) did. Conclusions— Discordance exists between the research evidence and academic and clinical policy statements about the value of tight glycemic control to reduce micro- and macrovascular complications. This discordance may distort priorities in the research and practice agendas designed to improve the lives of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.