Citations

Objectives The aim of the study was to identify trends in postoperative management of persons undergoing surgery for Zenker diverticula (ZD) by evaluating length of stay (LOS), diet on discharge, and imaging with or without surgical complication. Methods Prospectively enrolled adult patients with cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction with diverticula undergoing surgery from August 1, 2017 to February 1, 2023 were included. Data were extracted from a multi‐institutional REDCap database, summarizing means, medians, percentages, and frequencies. Fisher's exact or chi squared analyses were utilized, as appropriate, to compare subsets of data. Descriptive analysis assessed differences in clinical course and the relationship to postoperative management. Results There were 298 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 71.8 (11.2) years and 60% male. Endoscopic surgery was performed in 79.5% (237/298) of patients versus 20.5% (61/298) open surgery. Sixty patients (20.1%) received postoperative imaging, with four leaks identified. Complications were identified in 9.4% of cases ( n = 29 complications in 28 patients), more commonly in open surgery. Most (81.2%) patients were discharged within 23 h. About half of patients (49%) were discharged from the hospital on a pureed/liquid diet; 36% had been advanced to a soft diet. In patients without complications, LOS was significantly longer following open cases ( p = 0.002); postoperative diet was not different between open and endoscopic ( p = 0.26). Conclusions Overall, most patients are discharged within 23 h without imaging. However, LOS was affected by surgical approach. Postoperative complications are different in endoscopic versus open surgery. Complications with either approach were associated with prolonged LOS, need for imaging, and diet restriction. Level of Evidence Level III Laryngoscope , 134:2678–2683, 2024

AbstractBackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are challenging to differentiate. Mobile health devices that measure motor and sleep domains between clinic visits may improve differential diagnosis.MethodParticipants with probable AD and probable DLB wore ActiGraph triaxial wGT3X‐BT actigraphy devices on their nondominant wrists for 2 weeks and multichannel Sleep ProfilerX8TM EEG devices on their foreheads for 2 consecutive nights.3 Actigraphy data were processed and scored using GGIR and activity counts in R. The Sleep Profiler characterizes abnormal slow‐wave sleep and non‐REM hypertonia (NRH).ResultAt baseline, participants with DLB (n = 9) had higher UPDRS scores and a higher likelihood of psychosis than participants with AD (n = 8; see Table 1). Using univariate Wilcoxon Rank‐Sum tests, we found that at baseline participants with DLB had lower daily activity counts, higher % time in NRH, and lower % time in REM sleep than participants with AD (unadjusted p‐values < 0.05; See Figure 1).In a recent 6‐month followup, activity levels were lower on average than baseline activity levels for both DLB (n = 5) and AD (n = 5). at 6‐months, the differences in % sleep in NRH increased between DLB participants (n = 5) and AD participants (n = 3) as average % NRH increase 6% in DLB and decreased 1% in AD (see Table 2). These 6‐month differences are not statistically significant, but data collection are ongoing.An exploration of methods for processing and scoring actigraphy data revealed that processing can result in wide range of findings. As a result, we have focused on actigraphy outcomes which are more suitable to older participants with dementia.ConclusionParticipants with DLB demonstrated lower baseline physical activity and higher rates of baseline sleep disturbances than participants with AD; sleep differences between DLB and AD appeared to increase over 6 months.Actigraphy and sleep‐monitoring devices are well tolerated in participants with dementia and they can reliably collect valid, useful activity and sleep data in between clinic visits.

Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are challenging to differentiate. Mobile health devices that measure motor and sleep domains between clinic visits may improve differential diagnosis. Method Participants with probable AD and probable DLB wore ActiGraph triaxial wGT3X‐BT actigraphy devices on their nondominant wrists for 2 weeks and multichannel Sleep ProfilerX8TM EEG devices on their foreheads for 2 consecutive nights.3 Actigraphy data were processed and scored using GGIR and activity counts in R. The Sleep Profiler characterizes abnormal slow‐wave sleep and non‐REM hypertonia (NRH). Result At baseline, participants with DLB (n = 9) had higher UPDRS scores and a higher likelihood of psychosis than participants with AD (n = 8; see Table 1). Using univariate Wilcoxon Rank‐Sum tests, we found that at baseline participants with DLB had lower daily activity counts, higher % time in NRH, and lower % time in REM sleep than participants with AD (unadjusted p‐values < 0.05; See Figure 1). In a recent 6‐month followup, activity levels were lower on average than baseline activity levels for both DLB (n = 5) and AD (n = 5). at 6‐months, the differences in % sleep in NRH increased between DLB participants (n = 5) and AD participants (n = 3) as average % NRH increase 6% in DLB and decreased 1% in AD (see Table 2). These 6‐month differences are not statistically significant, but data collection are ongoing. An exploration of methods for processing and scoring actigraphy data revealed that processing can result in wide range of findings. As a result, we have focused on actigraphy outcomes which are more suitable to older participants with dementia. Conclusion Participants with DLB demonstrated lower baseline physical activity and higher rates of baseline sleep disturbances than participants with AD; sleep differences between DLB and AD appeared to increase over 6 months. Actigraphy and sleep‐monitoring devices are well tolerated in participants with dementia and they can reliably collect valid, useful activity and sleep data in between clinic visits.

The release of danger signals from tissues in response to trauma during cardiac surgery creates conditions to reprogram the immune system to subsequent challenges posed by pathogens in the postoperative period. To demonstrate this, we tested immunoreactivity before surgery as the baseline (tbaseline), followed by subsequent challenges during the acute phase (t24h), convalescence (t7d), and long-term recovery (t3m). For 108 patients undergoing elective heart surgery, whole blood was stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Influenza A virus subtype N2 (H3N2), or the Flublok™ vaccine to represent common pathogenic challenges. Leukocytosis, platelet count, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were used to measure non-specific inflammation. Cytokines were measured after 18 h of stimulation to reflect activation of the various cell types (activated neutrophils–IL-8; activated T cells-IL-2, IFNγ, activated monocyte (MO)-TNFα, IL-6, and deactivated or atypically activated MO and/or T cells–M-CSF, IL-10). IL-2 and IL-10 were increased at t7d, while TNFα was suppressed at t24h when LPS was utilized. Interestingly, M-CSF and IL-6 production was elevated at seven days in response to all stimuli compared to baseline. While some non-specific markers of inflammation (white cell count, IL-6, and IL-8) returned to presurgical levels at t3m, CRP and platelet counts remained elevated. We showed that surgical stimulus reprograms leukocyte response to LPS with only partial restoration of non-specific markers of inflammation.

Abstract Purpose: The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. Patients and Methods: I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy “graduates” if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%–99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. Conclusions: The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority &gt;90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.