Citations

Abstract Background: Standard treatment for stage III melanoma is surgery followed by consideration of adjuvant therapy. This strategy is inadequate for high-risk stage III patients who have a substantial risk of subsequent relapse and distant metastasis. The goals of this trial are to improve oncologic outcomes, assess treatment response and spare patients with poorly responsive, rapidly metastatic disease from a futile operation. This protocol based on the hypothesis that treatment before surgery will immunize patients against his or her own unique tumor. While new drugs are now FDA-approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma, outcomes are still suboptimal in high-risk patients. The neoadjuvant approach is largely untested and preclinical data suggest neoadjuvant therapy is more effective than adjuvant immunotherapy. While targeted therapies can be rapidly effective, immunotherapy responses, when they occur, tend to be much more durable, prompting this study. Our specific strategy is based on the fact that BRAFm melanoma patients benefit both from BRAF/MEK inhibition (vemurafenib/cobimetinib) and PD-1 axis inhibition (atezolizumab) while patients with BRAFwt melanoma benefit from PD-1 axis inhibition (atezolizumab) and intermittent MEKi (cobimetinib) may increase effector function in tumor-infiltrating T cells. A second component of the study is robust evaluation of biomarkers of response, toxicity and outcome. Specific correlatives include assessment of the predictive value of Bim levels in tumor-related T cells, correlation of sPD-L1 with efficacy and toxicity, correlation of PD-L1 expression with efficacy, and determination of key relationships between tumor and immune cells via mIHC spatial analysis, gene expression profiles and microbiome associations with clinical response. Methods: The NeoACTIVATE trial enrolls melanoma patients with resectable clinically detectable nodal metastases (by physical examination or imaging), dual nodal basin disease or nodal recurrence of melanoma. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is based on BRAF mutation status; participants receive either vemurafenib, cobimetinib and atezolizumab (vem/cobi/atezo), or cobimetinib and atezolizumab (cobi/atezo) before surgery. Following surgery, all patients receive atezo immunotherapy. The primary aim of the study is RFS estimates for each cohort. Secondary aims are safety/toxicity, pathologic complete response rate and prospective evaluation of biomarkers of treatment response and toxicity. This study is significant in that it is the first to test 1) combined of targeted and immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable Stage III melanoma and 2) the novel combination of MEK-inhibition with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable Stage III melanoma. As of January 1, 2019, 10% of planned patients have been enrolled and enrollment continues. Citation Format: Tina J. Hieken, Vera J. Suman, Shernan G. Holtan, Thomas J. Flotte, Lisa A. Kottschade, Matthew S. Block. Neoadjuvant combination targeted and immunotherapy for high-risk resectable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE), NCT03554083 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT121.

138 Background: Clinical management of metastatic melanoma (MM) after PD-1 blockade failure remains challenging and lacks a standard of care. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) combinations have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer patients. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of CIT with immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone after PD-1 blockade failure. Methods: We reviewed MM patients seen at Mayo Clinic between Jan, 2012 and Jun, 2018 who failed anti-PD1 therapy and received subsequent CIT, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. A total of 60 patients were analyzed, the CIT cohort [n=33 (55%)] treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=29), nab-paclitaxel (n=2), paclitaxel (n=1), and temozolomide (n=1). In the ICI (n=9) or chemotherapy alone cohort (n=18) [n=27 (45%)], treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=11), temozolomide (n=4), nab-paclitaxel (n=3), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n=4), pembrolizumab (n=4), or nivolumab (n=1). Results: Patients in the CIT cohort had a median OS of 3.5 years (95% CI: 1.7-NR) compared to 1.8 years (95% CI: 0.9-2) in the ICI or chemotherapy alone cohort, p=0.02. The median EFS following CIT was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6-10) compared to 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.1) following either ICI or chemotherapy alone, p=0.0005. A trend towards longer median EFS with use of CIT was seen in patients with BRAF wild-type [median 9 months (95% CI: 6-12)] compared to those harboring a BRAF mutation [median 6.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-9.1), p=0.29]. Side effects were similar among both groups. Conclusions: In MM patients who have failed anti-PD-1 therapy, the CIT combination showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile. This regimen should be considered for MM pts in this setting who have limited treatment options. [Table: see text]

Abstract A limited number of drugs are available to treat patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). We attempted to identify alternative agents that may target abnormalities within malignant hematopoietic stem (HSCs) and progenitor cells (HPCs). Previously, MDM2 protein levels were shown to be upregulated in PV/ET CD34+ cells, and exposure to a nutlin, an MDM2 antagonist, induced activation of the TP53 pathway and selective depletion of PV HPCs/HSCs. This anticlonal activity was mediated by upregulation of p53 and potentiated by the addition of interferon-α2a (IFN-α2a). Therefore, we performed an investigator-initiated phase 1 trial of the oral MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin (RG7388; Roche) in patients with high-risk PV/ET for whom at least 1 prior therapy had failed. Patients not attaining at least a partial response by European LeukemiaNet criteria after 6 cycles were then allowed to receive combination therapy with low-dose pegylated IFN-α2a. Thirteen patients with JAK2 V617F+ PV/ET were enrolled, and 12 (PV, n = 11; ET, n = 1) were treated with idasanutlin at 100 and 150 mg daily, respectively, for 5 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle. Idasanutlin was well tolerated; no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, but low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity was common. Overall response rate after 6 cycles was 58% (7 of 12) with idasanutlin monotherapy and 50% (2 of 4) with combination therapy. Median duration of response was 16.8 months (range, 3.5-26.7). Hematologic, symptomatic, pathologic, and molecular responses were observed. These data indicate that idasanutlin is a promising novel agent for PV; it is currently being evaluated in a global phase 2 trial. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02407080.

e21039 Background: Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) and their myeloid precursors play an important role in cancer biology. While activated neutrophils have been shown to kill tumor cells, there is growing evidence that neutrophils may also support tumor progression by impairing T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity. We hypothesized that low TINs would be associated with better responses to immunotherapy (IO). Methods: Pretreatment biopsies from 15 metastatic melanoma (MM) pts treated with anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy from 2012-17 were collected and stained with myeloperoxidase (MPO). Slides were scanned at 40x magnification on the Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo brightfield instrument (Leica Biosystems) at a resolution of 0.25 microns per pixel. To indicate the region of analysis, the digital pen tool was used to trace a minimum 85% of tumor. Ten fixed-sized boxes were placed on the hottest staining region in a second annotation layer on the image. The boxes equaled 1mm2 in total area. If the tumor tracing had an area of 1mm2, or less, boxes were not placed on the image. The selected tissue was analyzed using an Aperio imaging quatification algorithm . The number of 3+ cells were considered positive for neutrophils and used in subsequent calculations. Quality control review was performed on a subset of cases by Anatomic Pathologists. Response to therapy was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: The median number of treatment lines before the biopsy was 1 (range 0-2). The treatment immediately following the biopsy consisted of ipilimumab (n = 10, 66.6%), pembrolizumab (n = 4, 26.6%), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n = 1, 6.6%). The median number of neutrophils in the biopsy hotspot was 92/mm2 (range 6-219) for the entire cohort. For patients achieving PR and CR after 4 cycles of therapy, the median neutrophils were 36/mm2 (IQ 14-78) while the median was 106/mm2 (IQ 60-138) for patients who had progressive disease,( p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the numbers of neutrophils in the biopsy with the absolute neutrophil count in the peripheral blood (R value: 0.012). Conclusions: Decreased TINs are significantly associated with better responses to IO in MM pts. Measurements of TINs may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of whether combining therapies that decrease neutrophils intratumorally should be explored.

9535 Background: A broad understanding of baseline immunity is needed in order to predict responses to PD-1 blockade. We previously reported in a preclinical model that elevated Th1 signature cytokines are present after successful therapy with PD-1 blockade. In this study we evaluated serum cytokines as biomarkers of response in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: 27 pts diagnosed with metastatic melanoma (MM) received anti-PD-1 therapy and had peripheral blood collected prior to anti-PD-1 therapy start and 12 weeks after; 55 proinflammatory-related serum cytokines were analyzed at both times using the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay. At week 12, we identified 15 pts who had radiographic complete or partial response (TR) and 12 had progressive disease (PD) using RECIST criteria. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) were used to assess association between pre-treatment serum cytokine levels. For each cytokine, differences in pretreatment serum levels and the ratio of the 12 week to pre-treatment serum levels between TR and PD groups were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Pretreatment serum IL-12p40 and MIP3a (CCL20) were moderately correlated (rho=0.3944). Pretreatment IL-12p40 and was found to be significantly higher (p=0.0025) in the TR group (median=48.5; 25th to 75th percentile [IQR]:25.3-63.8) relative to the PD group (median=17.3; IQR: 8.6-30.3). Pretreatment MIP3a was also found to be significantly higher (p=0.0359) in the TR group (median=1.72; IQR: 1.41-2.65) relative to the PD group (median=1.33; IQR: 1.09-1.98). The 12th week pretreatment IL-12p40 ratio (median=1.98; IQR: 1.4-11.3) in the TR group was greater than that (median=0.64; IQR: 0.23-1.61) in the PD group (p=0.0029); we identified that baseline serum levels >15pg/ml of IL12p40 prior to immunotherapy were associated with significantly prolonged event free survival (p=0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of IL-12p40 and MIP-3a levels before immunotherapy may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-PD1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of combination therapies that increase IL-12P40 and MIP3 prior or during immunotherapy should be undertaken.

Abstract Background: MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small, noncoding RNAs with important regulatory roles in tissue development, differentiation, proliferation, and when deregulated tumor formation. The goal of this study was to characterize the miRNA profile of normal breast tissue from carriers of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, with and without a prior history of cancer, for biomarker discovery for future prevention studies in high risk patient populations. Methods: MicroRNA profiling was conducted using a panel of breast candidate miRNAs and normal ‘non-cancerous’ tissue biopsy from 15 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 15 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 15 BRCA screened mutation negative subjects from high risk families. Results: While small differences were observed for any individual miRNA between groups, the most striking observation was the presence of a clear BRCA1 miRNA signature that was distinct from that in BRCA2 subjects or in the high-risk, non-mutation carriers. The BRCA1 pattern was present in normal appearing tissue biopsy independent of previous history of cancer, treatment for cancer, age, menopausal status or oophorectomy. BRCA2 carriers and high risk, mutation negative subjects showed an overall shared miRNA expression pattern. MicroRNA species that distinguished the groups included differences in the expressed levels of let-7a, let-7b, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-15b and members of the miR-181 family. Ongoing efforts include pathway modeling to gain insight on novel targets for prevention along with RT-PCR confirmation of differentiating microRNA species as well the potential downstream targets for example of miR-181b target genes including HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA11 and PBX3. Conclusion: The presence of a distinctive miRNA profile in normal appearing tissue of BRCA1 mutation carriers suggest a major role of BRCA1 mutation status on the normal tissue not previously reported. If corroborated, miRNA profiling studies of normal breast tissue may prove useful in both risk assessment as well as providing insight on deregulated pathways for pharmacologic intervention for risk reduction in the BRCA carrier population. Citation Format: Sandhya Pruthi, Julie Buckmeier, Christina Preese, Vera J. Suman, Rachel M. Hurley, Patricia Thompson. microRNA expression profiling in normal breast epithelium of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers as prevention targets. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr C47.

Abstract Purpose: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers develop breast cancers with a tumor phenotype unique from spontaneous tumors. We surveyed documented BRCA mutation carriers to determine willingness to be contacted about participation in future breast cancer prevention research studies directed to their unique phenotype that may or may not require breast biopsies. Methods: At each of the 3 participating institutions, women at least 20 years of age with a documented germline deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and no prior history of breast cancer were contacted to participate in a survey to ascertain their willingness to be contacted to participate in future prevention trials. Survey results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Among 56 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who responded, 55.4% of women reported high or very high interest in participating in randomized control study of chemoprevention agent vs. placebo. Within this population, post-menopausal women demonstrated a higher interested in study participation (64.5%) versus pre-menopausal women (38.9%). When examining willingness to undergo breast biopsy for a chemoprevention study, women expressed near equal willingness (42.9%) and unwillingness (44.6%) for biopsy. Conclusions: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers demonstrated significant interest in breast cancer prevention study participation involving trial agent versus placebo, and an equal expression of willingness and unwillingness to undergo breast biopsy, establishing the feasibility for future research elucidating targeted chemoprevention agents. Citation Format: Rachel M. Hurley, Vera J. Suman, Mary Daly, Funmi Olopade, Paul J. Limburg, Sandhya Pruthi. Assessment of interest for breast cancer prevention trial participation among BRCA mutation carriers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr C01.