Citations

11030 Background: Drug regulators operate on their own timelines to assess the safety and efficacy of new drugs and/or extensions to existing indications, such that there are delays between regulators. During such a gap, patients in the “early” domain have access to the approved drug, while those in the “late” domain do not, outside of compassionate use. Our study aimed to quantify the “opportunity lost” for new therapies approved by FDA and EMA, assuming patients in the late domain receive standard-of-care (SOC) therapy – which is presumably inferior to the new drug – during the gap. Methods: Anticancer drugs approved by both FDA and EMA were identified through the HemOnc knowledgebase. Inclusion criteria included: 1) drugs approved in both domains based on the same randomized clinical trial (RCTs) for the same indication; 2) a primary time-to-event endpoint; and 3) a quantitated median time-to-event for the primary endpoint. For each included trial, the approval gap between FDA and EMA in days and the ratio of approval gap to median control arm time-to-event duration was calculated. A ratio ≥2 implies that, on average, no late domain patients starting treatment in the first half of the gap would be expected to have access to the new drug prior to an event. Results: Of 60 eligible RCTs, 59 had calculable median event durations. 25 (42%) had a primary overall survival endpoint; the most common surrogate endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; 29/59; 49%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) approval gap was 186 (124-271) days, with FDA being the first approver in 56/59 (95%) cases. The median (IQR) ratio of approval gap to median control arm event duration was 0.63 (0.35-1.11). Drugs with ratio ≥2 (Table) were targeted or immunotherapies; 7/8 (88%) were approved with PFS endpoint; 5/8 (62.5%) were approved for second line or later. Conclusions: Our study shows that FDA approves most drugs prior to EMA and a nontrivial number of patients may experience progression or death events while awaiting access to anticancer therapies already approved in another domain. The analysis does not take into consideration scenarios in which the new therapy is inferior to SOC or delays in patient access (due to slow uptake; regulatory barriers [in Europe/UK]; or patient affordability [in US]). Further regulatory collaboration (e.g., Project Orbis) between FDA and EMA could help to reduce and potentially ameliorate this differential in access to new cancer drugs in the future. [Table: see text]

11023 Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in cancer typically compare experimental to control arm regimens. The choice of an appropriate control (ctrl) arm can have a major impact on the expected success of an RCT. The frequency with which cancer RCTs use control arms based on established dosing and scheduling protocols has not been described. Methods: The HemOnc knowledgebase (KB) was used to identify systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) regimen variants, defined as regimens with identical components that differ in dosing, scheduling, and/or route. Non-cancer, nonrandomized, and non-SACT studies were excluded. Study publication year was used to define standard variants as those evaluated in the experimental arm of a positive phase 3 RCT >1 year prior to publication as a control arm, regardless of cancer type or context of treatment. Study-variant dyads were evaluated to determine whether the variant was standard. Success rates of RCTs with standard vs non-standard control arms were evaluated with Fisher’s exact test. Results: 5221 studies were associated with ≥1 named variant in the HemOnc KB, as of 2024-02-06. After exclusions, there were 3511 study-variant dyads (2386 studies; 1714 variants). The 9 most common regimens are shown in the Table. The median (IQR) number of variants per regimen was 2 (1-3); carboplatin & paclitaxel (CP) had the most variants (n=33). Across all control arm study-variant dyads, 2228/3492 (64%) utilized non-standard variants. For example, 60/97 studies (62%) of docetaxel as control used the 75 mg/m2 q3wk variant after it was established in 2000, whereas n=27 others used 19 non-standard variants. Trials that used a standard control arm had a numerically higher success rate, 45% vs 42% (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92-1.32). Conclusions: Non-standard regimen variants are frequently used in cancer RCTs. Reasons for this could include toxicity, patient convenience, or emerging data from smaller studies that establish comparable efficacy or improved toxicity to standard variants. However, the a priori efficacy of non-standard control arms is less rigorously established, and trials with standard control arms might be more successful. Future directions include quantifying the granular differences between standard and non-standard variants and investigating whether certain types of non-standard variation (e.g. fewer cycles, lower doses) associate with trial success rates. [Table: see text]

Nosocomial infections and thrombosis are frequent complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Preventative measures and close monitoring for early recognition of these complications are imperative in patients supported with ECMO. We report the case of a 41 year old female on veno-venous ECMO awaiting surgical thrombectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension that developed profound bacteremia leading to gross purulence and thrombosis of the membrane oxygenator. Recannulation in addition to targeted antibiotics, frequent cultures, imaging, and surgery were diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that led to ultimate resolution.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused tremendous disruption to the U.S. healthcare system and nearly crippled some hospitals during large patient surges. Limited ICU beds across the country further exacerbated these challenges. Telemedicine, specifically tele-critical care (TCC), can expand a hospital’s clinical capabilities through remote expertise and increase capacity by offloading some monitoring to remote teams. Unfortunately, the rapid deployment of telemedicine, especially TCC, is constrained by multiple barriers. In the summer of 2020, to support the National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network (NETCCN) deployment, more than 50 national leaders in applying telemedicine technologies to critical care assembled to provide their opinions about barriers to NETCCN implementation and strategies to overcome them. Through consensus, these experts developed white papers that formed the basis of this article. Herein, the authors share their experience and propose multiple solutions to barriers presented by laws, local policies and cultures, and individual perspectives according to a minimum, better, best paradigm for TCC delivery in the setting of a national disaster. Cross-state licensure and local privileging of virtual experts were identified as the most significant barriers to rapid deployment of services, whereas refining the model of TCC to achieve the best outcomes and defining the best financial model is the most significant for long-term success. Ultimately, we conclude that a rapidly deployable national telemedicine response system is achievable.

Abstract Background Despite advances in medical therapy, many children and adults with ileal Crohn’s disease (CD) progress to fibrostenosis requiring surgery. We aimed to identify MRI and circulating biomarkers associated with the need for surgical management. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included pediatric and adult CD cases undergoing ileal resection and CD controls receiving medical therapy. Noncontrast research MRI examinations measured bowel wall 3-dimensional magnetization transfer ratio normalized to skeletal muscle (normalized 3D MTR), modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 relaxation, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging metrics, and the simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (sMaRIA). Circulating biomarkers were measured on the same day as the research MRI and included CD64, extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibodies (Ab). Associations between MRI and circulating biomarkers and need for ileal resection were tested using univariate and multivariable LASSO regression. Results Our study sample included 50 patients with CD undergoing ileal resection and 83 patients with CD receiving medical therapy; mean participant age was 23.9 ± 13.1 years. Disease duration and treatment exposures did not vary between the groups. Univariate biomarker associations with ileal resection included log GM-CSF Ab (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; P = .0009), normalized 3D MTR (OR, 1.05; P = .002), log MOLLI T1 (OR, 0.01; P = .02), log IVIM perfusion fraction (f; OR, 0.38; P = .04), and IVIM apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; OR, 0.3; P = .001). The multivariable model for surgery based upon corrected Akaike information criterion included age (OR, 1.03; P = .29), BMI (OR, 0.91; P = .09), log GM-CSF Ab (OR, 3.37; P = .01), normalized 3D MTR (OR, 1.07; P = .007), sMaRIA (OR, 1.14; P = .61), luminal narrowing (OR, 10.19; P = .003), log C-reactive protein (normalized; OR, 2.75; P = .10), and hematocrit (OR, 0.90; P = .13). Conclusion After accounting for clinical and MRI measures of severity, normalized 3D MTR and GM-CSF Ab are associated with the need for surgery in ileal CD.

Abstract Background: Stroke remains a major health concern globally, with oral anticoagulants widely prescribed for stroke prevention. The efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in anticoagulated patients with distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) are not well understood. Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 1282 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who underwent MT in 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe from September 2017 to July 2023. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, treatment specifics, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes at 90 days post-MT, measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rates, mortality, and hemorrhagic complications. Results: Of the patients, 223 (34%) were on anticoagulation therapy. Anticoagulated patients were older (median age 78 vs 74 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (77% vs 26%; p < 0.001). Their baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were also higher (median 12 vs 9; p = 0.002). Before propensity score matching (PSM), anticoagulated patients had similar rates of favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0–1: 30% vs 37%, p = 0.1; mRS 0–2: 47% vs 50%, p = 0.41) but higher mortality (26% vs 17%, p = 0.008). After PSM, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: Anticoagulated patients undergoing MT for AIS due to DMVO did not show significant differences in 90-day mRS outcomes, reperfusion, or hemorrhage compared to non-anticoagulated patients after adjustment for covariates.

Behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry (BNNP) is a field that seeks to understand brain–behavior relationships, including fundamental brain organization principles and the many ways that brain structures and connectivity can be disrupted, leading to abnormalities of behavior, cognition, emotion, perception, and social cognition. In North America, BNNP has existed as an integrated subspecialty through the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties since 2006. Nonetheless, the number of behavioral neurologists across academic medical centers and community settings is not keeping pace with increasing clinical and research demand. In this commentary, we provide a brief history of BNNP followed by an outline of the current challenges and opportunities for BNNP from the behavioral neurologist’s perspective across clinical, research, and educational spheres. We provide a practical guide for promoting BNNP and addressing the shortage of behavioral neurologists to facilitate the continued growth and development of the subspecialty. We also urge a greater commitment to recruit trainees from diverse backgrounds so as to dismantle persistent obstacles that hinder inclusivity in BNNP—efforts that will further enhance the growth and impact of the subspecialty. With rapidly expanding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches across a range of conditions at the intersection of neurology and psychiatry, BNNP is well positioned to attract new trainees and expand its reach across clinical, research, and educational activities.

Introduction: A significant portion of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have low-gradient AS (LGAS) defined as aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm 2 and a trans-aortic mean systolic gradient and peak velocity < 40 mmHg and < 4 m/s, respectively. LGAS has been shown previously to have worse mortality compared to high-gradient AS (HGAS). Etiologies for LGAS include diastolic dysfunction, heart failure, other significant valvular disease, and atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is associated with worse outcomes compared to sinus rhythm (SR) in HGAS. AF is common in LGAS, but whether AF is associated with worse outcomes versus SR in LGAS has not been elucidated. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that AF is associated with higher mortality compared to SR in patients with LGAS. Methods: We retrospectively identified and reviewed charts of patients who were diagnosed with LGAS on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) from 2010-2020 at Mayo Clinic. Patient were classified according to rhythm at the time of TTE and history of AF was ascertained among those in SR. Patents were divided into 3 groups; SR without history of AF (group 1), SR with history of AF (group 2), and AF during TTE (group 3). Primary endpoints of overall mortality and cardiac mortality were ascertained. Results: A total of 3400 patients were included: n=2036 in group 1, n=519 in group 2, and n=845 in group 3. After adjusting for age, sex, and the Charlson index, group 2 and group 3 patient had significantly higher overall mortality (HR 1.22 and HR 1.52, respectively, p<0.0001 for both) and cardiac mortality (HR 1.37 and HR 2.05, respectively, p<0.0001 for both), Figure . Conclusions: In LGAS, AF is a significant prognostic indicator of overall mortality and cardiac mortality. LAGS associated with AF may need different management strategies given the higher mortality associated with the presence of AF.