Citations

Purpose: Many cancer clinical trials lack appropriate representation of specific patient populations, limiting their generalizability. Therefore, we determined the representation of ethnic minorities and women in cancer clinical trials. Methods: Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported as completed in ClinicalTrials.gov from 2003 to 2016 were analyzed. We calculated enrollment fractions (EFs) for each group, defined as the number of enrollees divided by the 2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database cancer prevalence. Results: Of 1,012 clinical trials, 310 (31%) reported ethnicity with a total of 55,689 enrollees. Participation varied significantly across ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic whites were more likely to be enrolled in clinical trials (EF, 1.2%) than African Americans (EF, 0.7%; P < .001) and Hispanics (EF, 0.4%; P < .001). A decrease in African American (6% v 9.2%) and Hispanic (2.6% v 3.1%) enrollment was observed when compared with historical data from 1996 to 2002. Younger patients (age younger than 65 years) were more likely to be enrolled in clinical trials than the elderly (64% v 36%; P < .001). Low recruitment of female patients was observed in clinical trials for melanoma (35%), lung cancer (39%), and pancreatic cancer (40%). Conclusion: We observed a decrease in recruitment of minorities over the past 14 years compared with historical data. African Americans, Hispanics, and women were less likely to be enrolled in cancer clinical trials. Future trials should take extra measures to recruit participants that adequately represent the US cancer population.

Abstract Background: Early phase trials (EPCT) provide significant value by evaluating the possible benefits of new agents. The eligibility criteria in EPCT are usually rigorous and may exclude many patients (pts) commonly seen in clinical practice. Our objective was to identify the most common comorbidities excluded in EPCT for NSCLC. Methods: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried on August 1st of 2016. 299 interventional drug trials were extracted from 2010 to 2016. We studied the trial characteristics including: experimental therapy, location, funding and eligibility criteria. Exclusion of CNS metastasis was treated as a binary variable (strict exclusion vs. allowed). Logistic regressions were used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 299 trials, 164 (55%) were phase II, 81 (27%) phase I and 54 (18%) phase Ib/II. 164 (55%) were conducted in the United States (US), 45 (15%) in Asia, 39 (13%) in Europe and 51 (17%) were international. 171 (57%) trials were funded by the industry, 54 (18%) by government agencies and 74 (25%) were investigator initiated. Survival was an end-point in 97 (32%) trials. 70 (23%) trials required a repeat lung biopsy. 54 (18%) trials excluded pts &gt;75 years of age. 99 (33%) trials required creatinine levels &lt;1.5 mg/dl, 132 (44%) liver enzymes &lt;2.5 and total bilirubin &lt;1.5 of the upper limit of normal. 88 (29%) trials required Hgb&gt;9 g/dl and 141 (47%) excluded pts with platelets &lt;100,000/dl. In terms of comorbidities, 84 (28%) trials excluded pts with atrial fibrillation, 94 (31%) with any anticoagulation therapy and 120 (40%) HIV positive pts. CNS involvement was a significant exclusion factor, 123 (41%) trials excluded pts with CNS metastasis. On univariate analysis, the odds of CNS metastasis exclusion were significantly higher in immunotherapy trials (OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.2-2.4, p&lt;0.01) and lower in European trials (OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.6-0.9, p&lt;0.005). In multivariate analysis, US based trials had higher odds of exclusion of CNS metastasis (OR: 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-7.5, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Many of the EPCTs excluded pts with advanced age, cytopenias and other common comorbidities, eliminating the possibility of many of our aging pts from participation. Regarding CNS disease, our analysis suggests the type of agent and location may influence the trial design about CNS metastasis inclusion. Investigators should review whether sufficient justification exists for every exclusion criterion before their incorporation in future trial protocols. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Yucai Wang, Aaron Mansfield. Comorbidities limiting recruitment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in early phase trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 766. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-766

791 Background: With the surge of drug development in the past decade, early phase clinical trials (EPCT) have gained value evaluating the potential benefits of new therapies. The inclusion/exclusion criteria in EPCT are usually rigorous and may exclude many patients (pts) commonly seen in clinical practice. Our objective was to identify the most common comorbidities excluded in EPCT for CRC. Methods: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried on December 1stof 2015. We reviewed the characteristics and eligibility criteria of 369 phase I/II interventional drug trials including: experimental arm therapy, location, and exclusion/inclusion criteria. Logistic regressions were completed and exclusion was studied as a binary variable. Results: Of the 369 trials, 68% were phase II and 32% phase I. 46% were conducted in the United States, 30% in Europe, 15% in Asia and 9% in other locations. 74 (20%) trials excluded pts > 70 years of age. 142 (39%) trials required creatinine levels < 1.5 mg/dl, liver enzymes (AST/ALT) < 2.5 and bilirubin < 1.5 of the upper limit of normal. Cytopenia was a significant exclusion factor: 147 (47%) trials required Hgb > 9 g/dl and 218 (59%) excluded pts with platelets < 100,000/dl. In terms of comorbidities, 98 (27%) trials excluded pts with heart failure (NYHA class 3/4), 74 (20%) with atrial fibrillation, 112 (31%) with any anticoagulation therapy and 155 (42%) with positive HIV. Trials located in the US were more likely to exclude pts with Hgb < 9g/dl (OR: 1.5, 95%CI: 1.1-2.3, p < 0.05), immunotherapy trials were more likely to exclude pts on any anticoagulation (OR:1.8, 95%CI: 1.2-2.8, p < 0.007) and targeted therapy trials were more likely to exclude pts with history of DVT/PE or cardiovascular diseases (OR: 3.4, 95%CI: 1.9-5.8, p < 0.0001; OR: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.3-3.8, p < 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: 20% of EPCTs on CRC excluded pts with advanced age, organ dysfunction and common comorbidities. Many of the EPCT reviewed were not inclusive of our aging oncology population who are more likely to have multiple comorbidities. Investigators should review whether sufficient justification exists for every exclusion criterion before their incorporation in future trial protocols.