Citations

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Danese et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16753 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16761

Energy Expenditure (EE) (kcal/day), a key element to guide obesity treatment, is measured from CO2 production, VCO2 (mL/min), and/or O2 consumption, VO2 (mL/min). Current technologies are limited due to the requirement of wearable facial accessories. A novel system, the Smart Pad, which measures EE via VCO2 from a room’s ambient CO2 concentration transients was evaluated. Resting EE (REE) and exercise VCO2 measurements were recorded using Smart Pad and a reference instrument to study measurement duration’s influence on accuracy. The Smart Pad displayed 90% accuracy (±1 SD) for 14–19 min of REE measurement and for 4.8–7.0 min of exercise, using known room’s air exchange rate. Additionally, the Smart Pad was validated measuring subjects with a wide range of body mass indexes (BMI = 18.8 to 31.4 kg/m2), successfully validating the system accuracy across REE’s measures of ~1200 to ~3000 kcal/day. Furthermore, high correlation between subjects’ VCO2 and λ for CO2 accumulation was observed (p < 0.00001, R = 0.785) in a 14.0 m3 sized room. This finding led to development of a new model for REE measurement from ambient CO2 without λ calibration using a reference instrument. The model correlated in nearly 100% agreement with reference instrument measures (y = 1.06x, R = 0.937) using an independent dataset (N = 56).

SummaryBackgroundEpithelial barrier dysfunction contributes to a dysregulated intestinal immune response in ulcerative colitis (UC). GB004 is an orally administered, small molecule, gut‐targeted stabiliser of hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α, a transcription factor with protective roles at the epithelial layer of the inflamed gut.AimsTo evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of GB004 in patients with active UC.MethodsThis double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study randomised patients 2:1 to receive an oral solution of GB004 120 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Eligible patients had a Robarts Histopathology Index score ≥4 with neutrophils in the epithelium, total Mayo Clinic score 3‐12, Mayo Clinic endoscopic subscore ≥1, and blood in the stool, despite treatment with 5‐aminosalicylates, corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.ResultsThirty‐four patients were randomised. GB004 120 mg for 28 days was generally well‐tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 27.3% (3/11) and 39.1% (9/23) of patients in the placebo and GB004 groups respectively. Nausea and dysgeusia were most commonly reported in the GB004 group (0% for placebo and 21.7% [5/23] and 13.0% [3/23] respectively for GB004). There were no treatment‐related serious adverse events or deaths. GB004 exhibited minimal accumulation, with higher colonic concentrations relative to plasma. Exploratory pharmacodynamic and efficacy analyses demonstrated GB004 target engagement and numerically higher proportions of patients achieving improvement in multiple measures of disease activity, respectively, at day 28 for GB004 compared to placebo.ConclusionResults from this phase 1b trial support evaluation of the full therapeutic potential of GB004 for the treatment of UC. A phase 2 study (NCT04556383) is ongoing. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03860896.

Objective: We aimed to discern clinico-demographic predictors of large (≥8) tracheostomy tube size placement, and, secondarily, to assess the effect of large tracheostomy tube size and other parameters on odds of decannulation before hospital discharge. Summary of Background Data: Factors determining choice of tracheostomy tube size are not well-characterized in the current literature, despite evidence linking large tracheostomy tube size with posttracheotomy tracheal stenosis. The effect of tracheostomy tube size on timing of decannulation is also unknown, an important consideration given reported associations between endotracheal tube size and probability of failed extubation. Methods: We collected information pertaining to patients who underwent tracheotomy at 1 of 10 U.S. health care institutions between 2010 and 2019. Tracheostomy tube size was dichotomized (≥8 and <8). Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to identify predictors of (1) large tracheostomy tube size, and (2) decannulation before hospital discharge. Results: The study included 5307 patients, including 2797 (52.7%) in the large tracheostomy cohort. Patient height (odds ratio [OR] = 1.060 per inch; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.041–1.070) and obesity (1.37; 95% CI 1.1891.579) were associated with greater odds of large tracheostomy tube; otolaryngology performing the tracheotomy was associated with significantly lower odds of large tracheostomy tube (OR = 0.155; 95% CI 0.131–0.184). Large tracheostomy tube size (OR = 1.036; 95% CI 0.885–1.213) did not affect odds of decannulation. Conclusions: Obesity was linked with increased likelihood of large tracheostomy tube size, independent of patient height. Probability of decannulation before hospital discharge is influenced by multiple patient-centric factors, but not by size of tracheostomy tube.

AbstractBackgroundLogopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) have distinct patterns of hypometabolism and atrophy. However, these clinical syndromes overlap: visuospatial impairment has been documented in LPA and aphasia in PCA. Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure – Copy (Rey‐O Copy) performance is correlated with parietal‐occipital atrophy in LPA. We explore visuospatial impairment on the Rey‐O Copy in LPA and PCA with the Mayo Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS; which uses Meyers & Meyers criteria) and the Boston Qualitative Scoring System (BQSS). We also examine the proportion of visuospatial impairment in LPA, an under‐appreciated phenomenon, compared to PCA wherein it is fundamental.MethodPatients with LPA (n=25) or PCA (n=23) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group. Patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing (including Rey‐O Copy) at baseline visit. Cut‐offs of T‐score=40 (BQSS) or scaled score=7 (MOANS) were used based on normative data. Proportions of patients with low performance were examined across LPA and PCA groups. Individual logistic regressions and AUROC analyses were then conducted to quantify differences in visuospatial impairment in LPA and PCA with both scoring systems. Identical analyses were conducted using raw scores corrected for age and sex, to avoid confounds of adjustments in normative data.ResultLPA and PCA groups were comparable on age, sex, and disease duration (LPA Median = 2.7 years, IQR=1.9‐3.5; PCA Median = 3.6 years, IQR=1.5‐4.9); p=.823). Surprisingly, 52‐72% of LPA participants demonstrated impaired performance across scoring systems, relative to 96% of the PCA group identified by both scoring systems. Odds ratios (OR) for the Rey‐O Copy MOANS (OR = 1.59; p=.008) and BQSS Copy Presence and Accuracy index (CPA; OR = 1.13, p=.002) were significant, persisting for age‐ and sex‐ controlled raw scores, suggesting the odds of a PCA diagnosis increased with decrement on Rey‐O Copy. AUROC values ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 across these indices.ConclusionA substantial number of LPA participants showed visuospatial impairment, despite initial primary language complaints. Differentiation of diagnostic groups by the Rey‐O is likely underscored by relatively uniform, profound, visuospatial impairment in PCA with more variability in LPA. However, the degree of visuospatial impairment overlaps remarkably across diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES: The last decade has seen improved outcomes for children requiring extracorporeal life support as well as for children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Thus, given the historically poor survival of hematopoietic cell transplantation patients using extracorporeal life support, the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators’ hematopoietic cell transplantation and cancer immunotherapy subgroup aimed to characterize the utility of extracorporeal life support in facilitating recovery from critical cardiorespiratory illnesses in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation patients. DATA SOURCES: All available published data were identified using a set of PubMed search terms for pediatric extracorporeal life support and hematopoietic cell transplantation. STUDY SELECTION: All articles that provided original reports of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation patients who underwent extracorporeal life support were included. Sixty-four manuscripts met search criteria. Twenty-four were included as primary reports of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation patients who underwent extracorporeal life support (11 were single case reports, four single institution case series, two multi-institution case series, and seven registry reports from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, Pediatric Heath Information System, and Virtual Pediatric Systems). DATA EXTRACTION: All 24 articles were reviewed by first and last authors and a spread sheet was constructed including sample size, potential biases, and conclusions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Discussions regarding incorporation of available evidence into our clinical practice were held at biannual meetings, as well as through email and virtual meetings. An expert consensus was determined through these discussions and confirmed through a modified Delphi process. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal life support in hematopoietic cell transplantation patients is being used with increasing frequency and potentially improving survival. The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators hematopoietic cell transplantation-cancer immunotherapy subgroup has developed a framework to guide physicians in decision-making surrounding extracorporeal life support candidacy in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation patients. In addition to standard extracorporeal life support considerations, candidacy in the hematopoietic cell transplantation population should consider the following six factors in order of consensus agreement: 1) patient comorbidities; 2) underlying disease necessitating hematopoietic cell transplantation; 3) hematopoietic cell transplantation toxicities, 4) family and patient desires for goals of care; 5) hematopoietic cell transplantation preparatory regimen; and 6) graft characteristics. Although risk assessment may be individualized, data are currently insufficient to clearly delineate ideal candidacy. Therefore, we urge the onco-critical care community to collaborate and capture data to provide better evidence to guide physicians’ decision-making in the future.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults, responsible for approximately 225,000 deaths per year. Despite pre-clinical successes, therapeutic interventions have failed to extend patient survival by more than a few months. Anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition monotherapy has had efficacy against some tumor types but not GBM. The aim of this study was to determine whether supplementing anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade with an engineered extended half-life IL-2 could improve outcomes in a preclinical model of disease. Our enhanced checkpoint blockade (ECB) strategy reliably cures approximately50% of C57BL/6 mice bearing orthotopic GL261 gliomas and extended median survival even in the mice that eventually succumbed. This therapy generates robust immunologic responses, features of which include secondary lymphoid organ enlargement and increased activation status of both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Further, many of the characteristics of brain-tumor mediated peripheral immunosuppression, including MHC class II downregulation on APCs, are prevented by ECB combination therapy. This immunity is durable, with long-term ECB survivors able to resist GL261 rechallenge. Notably, ECB’s efficacy is independent of host MHC class I restricted antigen presentation, being equally efficacious in MHC class I and CD8 T cell deficient mice. Conversely, ECB combination therapy is reliant on CD4 T cells and their depletion abrogates the therapy’s survival benefit. Our data shows ECB combination immunotherapy to be efficacious against the GL261 glioma model through an MHC class I independent mechanism, enhancing its off-the-shelf translational appeal relative to strategies requiring extensive knowledge of tumor-specific antigens.