Citations

Caveolae are specialized membrane microdomains expressing the scaffolding protein caveolin-1. We recently demonstrated the presence of caveolae in human airway smooth muscle (ASM) and the contribution of caveolin-1 to intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) regulation. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that caveolin-1 regulates ASM contractility. We examined the role of caveolins in force regulation of porcine ASM under control conditions as well as TNF-α-induced airway inflammation. In porcine ASM strips, exposure to 10 mM methyl-β-cyclodextrin (CD) or 5 μM of the caveolin-1 specific scaffolding domain inhibitor peptide (CSD) resulted in time-dependent decrease in force responses to 1 μM ACh. Overnight exposure to the cytokine TNF-α (50 ng/ml) accelerated and increased caveolin-1 expression and enhanced force responses to ACh. Suppression of caveolin-1 with small interfering RNA mimicked the effects of CD or CSD. Regarding mechanisms by which caveolae contribute to contractile changes, inhibition of MAP kinase with 10 μM PD98059 did not alter control or TNF-α-induced increases in force responses to ACh. However, inhibiting RhoA with 100 μM fasudil or 10 μM Y27632 resulted in significant decreases in force responses, with lesser effects in TNF-α exposed samples. Furthermore, Ca2+sensitivity for force generation was substantially reduced by fasudil or Y27632, an effect even more enhanced in the absence of caveolin-1 signaling. Overall, these results indicate that caveolin-1 is a critical player in enhanced ASM contractility with airway inflammation.

Abstract Rationale: Given recent success in delivering interferon-beta (IFNβ) using replication incompetent adenovirus in patients with malignant pleural effusions, we hypothesized that vectors that could replicate (inducing oncolysis) and express IFNβ at high level would be more effective. Both vaccinia virus (VV) and vesicular stomatitis (VSV) expressing mouse IFNβ have been constructed in a manner to improve their safety and efficacy as oncolytic vectors. In this study, we evaluated these two oncolytic vectors in different murine thoracic cancer models for clinical translation. Experimental procedures: We compared the efficacy of VVIFNβ and VSVIFNβ to kill 3 mouse lung cancer and 4 mouse mesothelioma lines in vitro over a 5 day-period assessing cell viability by MTT assay. The amount of IFNβ produced by these two vectors were measured with ELISA. The viral replication in infected mice was assessed by measuring viral titers in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice bearing an IFN-non-responsive AB12 tumor, following intratumoral injection of either vector at 108 pfu/mouse. To assess their anti-tumor activity, the two vectors were also given at 108 pfu/mouse intratumorally in mice bearing two lung cancer tumors on their flanks. Results: The replication of VSVIFNβ and its killing ability was limited in some of the tumor lines. This appeared to be due to an intact IFN response pathway. In contrast, VVIFNβ was able to kill all of the tumor lines. In culture, VSV replicates faster than VV, which resulted in faster cell killing (in susceptible cell lines), but with less IFNβ production. The amount of IFNβ production by VVIFNβ was comparable with AdIFNβ over a 5 day period. VVIFNβ-infected immunodeficient mice showed minimal or no toxicity when given virus intravenously, while all 5 mice infected with VSVIFNβ developed neurotoxicity within a week. In the TC-1 lung cancer model, VVIFNβ caused tumor regression, while VSVIFNβ and AdIFNβ were completely ineffective. In a second model using LKRM2, all 3 viral vectors were equivalent. The anti-tumor effect of VVIFNβ was shown to be mainly CD8 dependant, as depletion of CD8 with antibody dampened the tumor growth inhibition from 48% to 20%. Conclusions: Overall, VVIFNβ appears to be a better oncolytic vector than VSVIFNβ for a number of reasons: 1) it is safer, 2) it is able to replicate in vitro and in vivo in almost every cell line tested, 3) it induces longer and larger IFNβ production, and 4) it can potentially be given intravenously. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1513.

Abstract Epidemiologic studies suggest that breast cancer risk factor associations vary by tumor marker expression; however, individual studies have had limited power to address this question. We pooled data from up to 35,568 invasive breast cancer cases from 34 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) to evaluate associations between established risk factors (age at menarche, nulliparity, age at first full time birth [AFFTB], body mass index [BMI] and family history) and breast cancer subtypes, defined by immunohistochemical expression of ER, PR, HER2, and basal markers (CK5/6 or CK5, EGFR). We used polychotomous logistic regression to evaluate relationships between risk factors and tumor subtypes in case-only analyses and to estimate case-control odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between risk factors and specific tumor subtypes in 11 population-based studies including up to 12,841 cases and 17,032 controls. In case-only analyses, we found that reproductive risk factors were more common in hormone receptor positive tumors: early age at menarche was most strongly related to PR status (34.6% vs. 32.4% of women with age at menarche ≤12 years among PR+ and PR- cases, respectively, P= 0.001); whereas nulliparity, and late AFFTB in parous women were most strongly related to ER status (15.3% vs. 13.6% nulliparous women, 17.1% vs. 15.2% women with late AFFTB [≥30 years], among ER+ and ER- cases, respectively, P=2.6×10−6 for nulliparity and P=2.0×10−7 for late AFFTB). Nulliparity and late AFFTB were less common among triple negative (TN) tumors overall and among TN tumors expressing basal markers. Elevated BMI in women aged 50 years or younger was more common in ER-&PR- than ER+&PR+ tumors (17.0% vs 13.6% women with BMI ≥30, respectively, P=1.3×10−7), whereas above age 50 years, elevated BMI was more common in ER+&PR+ than ER+&PR- tumors (20.9% vs 16.7% women with BMI ≥30, respectively, P=2.8×10−8 comparing BMI ≥30 to BMI <25). In case-control analyses, early age at menarche was associated with increased risk of PR+ tumors; nulliparity and late AFFTB were most strongly associated with increased risk of (ER+ or PR+)&HER2- tumors, and did not increase the risk of TN tumors. Having a family history of breast cancer increased the risk of all tumor subtypes, although the association was strongest for TN tumors expressing basal markers. Our data provide convincing evidence for etiological heterogeneity with respect to breast cancer risk factors stratified by ER and PR status. Stratification by additional markers provides additional insights about etiologic differences in breast cancer risk. Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 870.

Abstract In a randomized trial of therapy for FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse, 224 patients received chemotherapy alone or followed by 80 mg of the FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib twice daily. Endpoints included complete remission or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CR/CRp), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and analysis of in vivo FLT3 inhibition. There were 29 patients with CR/CRp in the lestaurtinib arm and 23 in the control arm (26% vs 21%; P = .35), and no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. There was evidence of toxicity in the lestaurtinib-treated patients, particularly those with plasma levels in excess of 20μM. In the lestaurtinib arm, FLT3 inhibition was highly correlated with remission rate, but target inhibition on day 15 was achieved in only 58% of patients receiving lestaurtinib. Given that such a small proportion of patients on this trial achieved sustained FLT3 inhibition in vivo, any conclusions regarding the efficacy of combining FLT3 inhibition with chemotherapy are limited. Overall, lestaurtinib treatment after chemotherapy did not increase response rates or prolong survival of patients with FLT3 mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00079482.

AbstractPurposeNumerous surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of peroneal nerve palsy after knee dislocation with less than optimal outcomes. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the literature including modern surgical treatment options for peroneal nerve palsy after knee dislocation.MethodReview of the current body of literature relevant to the topic was undertaken and summarized accordingly. Mechanism of injury, pathology and prognosis as well as current and novel treatment options are presented.ResultsNeurolysis and nerve grafting results are dependant on nerve graft length, with documented recovery rates of only 44% for nerve grafts longer than 6 cm. Posterior tibial tendon transfer procedures have had reasonable success in allowing patients to return to ambulation without assistive devices; however, dorsiflexion strength on the affected side has been reported at only 30% that of the normal contralateral side, and return to activities more strenuous than walking has not been reported. Future concepts including partial nerve transfer of a motor branch of the tibial nerve to the peroneal nerve have been described, but no outcome data is currently available.ConclusionPeroneal nerve palsy after knee dislocation leads to significant functional impairment. Prior treatment strategies utilized for restoration of dorsiflexion and peroneal nerve function have yielded overall poor results. Newer surgical techniques are being developed and clinical trials are under way to evaluate their effectiveness.