Citations

Background/Aims: The Pediatric Research Equity Act and Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act are intended to promote the conduct of clinical trials that generate pediatric-specific evidence about drug safety and efficacy. This study assesses the quality of evidence generated through Pediatric Research Equity Act–mandated and Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–incentivized clinical trials of hematology/oncology drugs and characterizes subsequent changes in pediatric drug utilization rates. Methods: Trial characteristics (blinding, randomization, and comparator group) were determined for clinical trials that supported pediatric label changes. Using data from OptumLabs ® Data Warehouse, a de-identified administrative claims database, we calculated pediatric utilization rates for each drug. We calculated monthly utilization rates from January 2003 (or from the first month in which data were available) to December 2018. Results: We identified 11 hematology/oncology drugs that underwent pediatric label changes under the Pediatric Research Equity Act Pediatric Research Equity Act and/or Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, and we identified 15 trials supporting these changes. Of these trials, 36% (5/14) were randomized, 31% (4/13) were blinded, and 36% (5/14) used a comparator group. A median of 49 children (interquartile range 29.5) received the drug under investigation across these trials. Pediatric label changes were not associated with subsequent changes in pediatric drug utilization. Although some drugs saw increased pediatric use after gaining new pediatric indications, this pattern was not consistently observed. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that drugs were utilized less frequently after they failed to receive pediatric indications. Conclusions: Clinical trials of hematology/oncology drugs conducted under the Pediatric Research Equity Act Pediatric Research Equity Act and Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act generally have low methodological rigor, and the resulting label changes are not consistently associated with changes in pediatric utilization. Alternative regulatory strategies and study designs may be necessary to maximize the impact of newly generated knowledge on drug utilization.

Diabetes mellitus is considered to be a coronary heart disease (CHD) equivalent, with heart disease and stroke accounting for the majority of diabetes-related deaths. As a result, patients with diabetes require aggressive treatment of CHD risk factors, including dyslipidemia. In addition to targeted reduction of LDL cholesterol, current guidelines recommend addition of a fibrate (gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, or clofibrate) in patients with established CHD and atherogenic dyslipidemia: triglycerides (TG) 200-499 mg/dL and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) ≤40 mg/dL. Fibrates have also been recommended for patients with TG ≥500 mg/dL to reduce risk of acute pancreatitis. Yet, data supporting the use of fibrates in these settings remains variable and inconclusive. We therefore sought to provide an in-depth analysis of patterns of fibrate use among patients with type 2 diabetes between 2001 and 2010. Using Ingenix administrative claims, we identified 71,161 patients age ≥18 years old with an established diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (ICD-9 250.XX) and ≥3 years of continuous enrollment who were newly initiated on a fibrate between 2001 and 2010. Lab results were available for a subset of 18,863 (26.5%) patients, who were included in final analysis. During each 2-year period, between 77.6% - 84.1% of patients had a lipid test performed within the preceding 12 months (p=0.59 for change in testing over time). The prevalence of atherogenic dyslipidemia increased over time, from 20.8% (2001-2002) to 41.2% (2009-2010); 4.84% rise per 2-year period (p=0.002). The prevalence of severe atherogenic dyslipidemia (HDL-C ≤40 mg/dL and TG ≥500 mg/dL), also increased over time, from 9.3% in 2001-2002 to 13.6% in 2009-2010; 1.17% rise per 2-year period (p=0.002). In contrast, percent of patients with TG ≥500 mg/dL decreased over time, from 20.5% in 2001-2002 to 16.7% in 2009-2010; 1.19% decline per 2-year period (p=0.03). Initiation of new fibrate therapy in treatment naïve patients with diabetes remained constant; 2.0% in 2001-2002 and 1.6% in 2009-2010 (p=0.93). Subgroup analysis of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia also showed no significant change in fibrate initiation over time; 11.4% in 2001-2002 and 15.7% in 2009-2010 (p=0.3). Similarly, while there was a trend toward increased initiation of fibrates among patients with TG ≥500 mg/dL, this trend was not statistically significant (27.4% in 2001-2002 and 41.6% in 2009-2010; 3.34% change per 2-year period (p=0.09)). In conclusion, the prevalence of atherogenic dyslipidemia among patients with type 2 diabetes has increased significantly over the past decade. However, fibrate use in all patients with type 2 diabetes, including those specifically with atherogenic dyslipidemia, has remained constant throughout the observation period, despite lack of conclusive evidence supporting its use.

Background: In July 2015, the FDA approved the use of sacubitril/ valsartan in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. It was shown in a large clinical trial to reduce the risk of both hospitalization and death compared with enalapril, and has since received a class I recommendation for use in the 2016 ACC/ AHA HF guidelines. However, the use of sacubitril/ valsartan in a clinical practice has not been described. We aimed to assess the uptake and cost of sacubitril/ valsartan in its first year following FDA approval. Methods: Using a large U.S. insurance database, we identified privately insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) patients who filled a first prescription for sacubitril/ valsartan between July 1, 2015 and July 31, 2016. We restricted to persons with medical and pharmacy enrollment for 6 months prior to first fill. For reference, we identified all individuals with a diagnosis of HF on a billing claim (ICD9 428.X or ICD-10 I50.X) in the same time period. Results: There were 314,410 individuals with a diagnosis of HF in the study period. In total, 972 filled a new prescription for sacubitril/ valsartan, and the number of new users steadily increased over time (Figure). The mean age of sacubitril/ valsartan users was 68.1±12.3 years, 32.5% were women, 61.1% were white, and 77% were enrolled in MA plans. Most prescribing clinicians were cardiologists (82.5%). A majority of prescription costs were covered by the health plan (mean $324.05, median $335.38, interquartile range [IQR] $266.56-$370.10). Out-of-pocket (OOP) costs per 30-day prescription filled were variable (mean $101.53, median $45.00, IQR $7.40-$97.49), and were similar in beneficiaries enrolled in MA and commercial plans. By comparison, median OOP costs were $2-4 for lisinopril, losartan, carvedilol, and spironolactone per 30-day prescription. Discussion: These finding suggest that the uptake of sacubitril/ valsartan has been slow in the first year after FDA approval. While the majority of prescription costs are covered by the health plan, OOP costs are still much higher than other guideline-recommended HF medications. Further studies are needed to determine if uptake of sacubril/ valsartan continues to rise and if the higher prescription cost is associated with lower downstream costs of hospitalization and mortality benefit.

Introduction: Recent studies showed post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased stroke risk - even approaching that of unprovoked AF. This raises the question of whether patients with POAF should receive anticoagulation. We aim to compare different anticoagulation strategies in patients with POAF after cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. Methods: Using a large national administrative database (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), we identified 33,981 patients with POAF between 1/1/2013-9/30/2019. Patients were divided to four groups based on the initial treatment within 30 days of POAF: (1) no anticoagulation (N=28,807) (2) apixaban (N=2178) (3) rivaroxaban (N=1320) (4) warfarin (N=1676). Follow up started at the 30 th day after POAF to exclude patients who died shortly after surgery and minimize immortal time bias. The follow up continued until patients changed treatment strategies, insurance, or died. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between each anticoagulant to no treatment to balance on 86 baseline characteristics. Results: The mean age was 71.1±11.2 yr; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was 4.1±1.8; 29.1% received cardiac surgeries; 15.2% received anticoagulation within 30 days of POAF. The event rate per 100 person years was 1.58 for stroke in no-anticoagulation group, and 1.29 for anticoagulation group; 2.86 for major bleeding in no-anticoagulation group and 4.50 for anticoagulation group. After matching, apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke, but a higher risk of major bleeding; warfarin was not associated with a lower risk of stroke, but a higher risk of major bleeding (Figure). The effect was consistent across subgroups, e.g., age and surgery type. Conclusions: In patients with POAF, the stroke rate was lower than what was typically observed in clinical AF. Treatment with apixaban and rivaroxaban immediately after POAF was associated with a reduced risk of stroke but an increased risk of major bleeding.

Introduction: Watchman has been increasingly used in AF patients who have difficulties taking anticoagulation, but the RCTs only compared Watchman to warfarin. There was also a signal of increased ischemic stroke with Watchman in comparison to warfarin in RCTs, which made some clinicians question the fundamental premise that Watchman can reduce stroke. We aimed to compare Watchman to no anticoagulation in a large national cohort of patients in the US. Methods: We identified AF patients treated with Watchman (N=7,309) or no anticoagulation (N=1,234,543) between 2015-2017 from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, which is the first to link private insurance, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare Fee-for-Service records at patient level longitudinally. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on demographics and medical history. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hereafter referred to as stroke) and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and intracranial bleeding. Results: In the unmatched cohort, the mean age was 76.6±6.4 yr in the Watchman group and 76.6 ±8.5 yr in the no anticoagulation group, but Watchman patients were more likely to have a history of bleeding (44.9% vs 13.7%) and intracranial bleeding (9.5% vs 2.6%). After matching, the two groups were similar on 18 baseline characteristics. Watchman was associated with a lower risk of stroke and mortality, but a higher risk of major bleeding and a similar risk of intracranial bleeding. The associations were largely consistent across subgroups, including those with relative contraindications to anticoagulation (Figure). Conclusions: In AF patients who had difficulties taking anticoagulation, Watchman offers an alternative approach to reduce stroke and mortality. The results provide important evidence to inform clinical decision making in the absence of RCTs, since 40% of AF patients in routine practice are not on anticoagulation.

Introduction Current diabetes quality measures are agnostic to patient clinical complexity and type of treatment required to achieve it. Our objective was to introduce a patient-centered indicator of appropriate diabetes therapy indicator (ADTI), designed for patients with type 2 diabetes, which is based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) but is also contextualized by patient complexity and treatment intensity. Research design and methods A draft indicator was iteratively refined by a multidisciplinary Delphi panel using existing quality measures, guidelines, and published literature. ADTI performance was then assessed using OptumLabs Data Warehouse data for 2015. Included adults (n=206 279) with type 2 diabetes were categorized as clinically complex based on comorbidities, then categorized as treated appropriately, overtreated, or undertreated based on a matrix of clinical complexity, HbA1c level, and medications used. Associations between ADTI and emergency department/hospital visits for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were assessed by calculating event rates for each treatment intensity subset. Results Overall, 7.4% of patients with type 2 diabetes were overtreated and 21.1% were undertreated. Patients with high complexity were more likely to be overtreated (OR 5.60, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.83) and less likely to be undertreated (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.68) than patients with low complexity. Overtreated patients had higher rates of hypoglycemia than appropriately treated patients (22.0 vs 6.2 per 1000 people/year), whereas undertreated patients had higher rates of hyperglycemia (8.4 vs 1.9 per 1000 people/year). Conclusions The ADTI may facilitate timely, patient-centered treatment intensification/deintensification with the goal of achieving safer evidence-based care.

To compare the outcomes of non-operative versus operative treatment for distal radius fractures in patients aged from 18 to 64 years, we performed a retrospective analysis using the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes of distal radius fracture. Of the 34,184 distal radius fractures analysed, 11,731 (34%) underwent operative management. Short-term complications within 90 days of fracture identified an overall complication rate of 16.6 per 1000 fractures and the 1-year upper extremity-specific complication rate was 287 per 1000 fractures. Overall, post-injury stiffness was the most common 1-year upper extremity-specific complication and was associated with operative management (202.8 vs. 123.4 per 1000 fractures, operative vs. non-operative, p < 0.01). Secondary procedures were significantly more common following non-operative management (8.7% vs. 43%, operative vs. non-operative, p < 0.01) with carpal tunnel release representing the most common secondary procedure. Operative management of distal radius fractures resulted in significantly fewer secondary procedures at the expense of increased overall 1-year complication rates, specifically stiffness. Level of evidence: III

Background: This study aims to determine the trends in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged 18 years and older. Methods: An administrative claims database of more than 100 million patients was used to identify patients aged 18 years and older with a DRF between 2005 and 2014. A total of 137 130 DRFs were identified in 135 128 patients. Results: The proportion and rate of fractures were more predominant in those aged 55 years and older compared with a decreasing incidence in patients younger than 55 years. Age-adjusted rates of surgical treatment have significantly increased in both women and men by 15.9% (absolute change, 4.8%) and 5.0% (absolute change, 1.7%) change over time, respectively. Conversely, age-adjusted rates of nonsurgical treatment have significantly decreased overtime in both women and men by 6.9% and 2.6%, respectively. Conclusions: These data provide better understanding of the epidemiology of DRF, which is important to develop preventive strategies targeting high-risk populations and to develop effective treatment strategies.

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend consideration of the use of echocardiography 6 to 12 months after completion of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in at-risk populations. Assessment of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) has also been suggested by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America for the identification of Stage A (at risk) heart failure patients. The real-world frequency of the use of these tests in patients after receipt of anthracycline therapy, however, has not been studied previously. Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we identified 31 447 breast cancer and lymphoma patients (age ≥18 years) who were treated with an anthracycline in the United States between January 1, 2008 and January 31, 2018. Continuous medical and pharmacy coverage was required for at least 6 months before the initial anthracycline dose and 12 months after the final dose. Only 36.1% of patients had any type of cardiac surveillance (echocardiography, BNP, or cardiac imaging) in the year following completion of anthracycline therapy (29.7% echocardiography). Surveillance rate increased from 37.5% in 2008 to 42.7% in 2018 (25.6% in 2008 to 40.5% echocardiography in 2018). Lymphoma patients had a lower likelihood of any surveillance compared with patients with breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74–0.85]; P <0.001). Patients with preexisting diagnoses of coronary artery disease and arrhythmia had the highest likelihood of cardiac surveillance (odds ratio, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.39–1.69] and odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.3–1.53]; P <0.001 for both), although no single comorbidity was associated with a >50% rate of surveillance. Conclusions: The majority of survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma who have received anthracycline-based chemotherapy do not undergo cardiac surveillance after treatment, including those with a history of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as heart failure.