Citations

AbstractCancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium’s conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

AbstractBackgroundSomali immigrants and refugees constitute one of the largest African ethnic groups immigrating to the United States over the past three decades with the majority resettling in the state of Minnesota. Previous studies have documented significant cancer screening disparities between the Somali population and the general population. However, little is known about cancer incidence among Somali groups living in the United States.MethodsWe determined the incidence of 18 types or sites of malignancy using ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes and compared them between Somali and non‐Somali populations in Olmsted County, Minnesota utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records‐linkage infrastructure for the years 2000–2020. Poisson regression models were used to model the rates for each malignancy.ResultsThere was a higher incidence and relative risk of liver malignancies among the Somali population versus non‐Somali population, but lower relative risk and incidence of the following malignancies: breast, cervical, and melanoma. After direct age‐sex adjustment to the United States 2000 Census population, liver was the most common cancer in Somali men, while breast cancer was the most common malignancy in women.ConclusionMalignancies related to infectious agents such as viral hepatitis have a higher incidence in the Somali immigrant population of Olmsted County. There is a lower incidence of malignancies related to lifestyle factors in this Somali population. Findings of this study may help inform cancer prevention and screening strategies among Somali communities in the United States.

Abstract Background: Adherence to recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among US adults is below the public health target of 80%. The multi-target stool DNA assay (mt-sDNA) is a self-administered CRC screening test that may remove barriers to adherence. To improve understanding of long-term outcomes and the real-world impact of mt-sDNA screening, Mayo Clinic and Exact Sciences Laboratories are collaborating on a prospective cohort study of CRC incidence and mortality outcomes in individuals screened with mt-sDNA. We conducted an embedded experiment to identify the optimal incentive protocol for maximizing participation while managing study costs. Methods: A subset of the opt-in cohort was randomized to receive postage stamps as a pre-consent incentive, or as a post-consent incentive after completion of the consent and questionnaire. Descriptive statistics from year one of recruitment, as well as the incentive experiment, are reported. Results: During year 1 of the Voyage trial, a total of 600,258 individuals with mt-sDNA orders received at Exact Sciences Laboratories were randomly selected and invited to participate. Of those, 26,429 (4.4%) opted in, 14,365 of whom (54.3%) consented. The opt-in and consent samples were similar to the target population with respect to sex but differed by geographic residence and age (p<0.001). For the embedded incentive experiment, 2,333 were randomized to the pre-incentive arm while 2,342 were randomized to the post-incentive arm. Overall consent rate in the incentive trial was 56.4% (60.9% for the pre-consent incentive arm (1421/2333) vs. 52.0% for the post-consent incentive arm (1217/2432), p<0.001). A cost reduction was observed for the pre-consent incentive group. Higher response rates were seen among older vs. younger individuals, reflecting a common pattern in healthcare-related survey research participation. Age adjusted incidence rates for CRC have been shown to vary regionally; thus, adjustment for differential response by region will be important to ensure representativeness. Conclusions: CRC incidence and mortality vary with age; thus, adjusting for differential participation by age will be important in analyses of Voyage data. Pre-consent incentive option was associated with a higher participation rate and lower costs, and will be used for the remainder of the study recruitment. Trial Registration: NCT04124406; October 11th, 2019

e22514 Background: Several colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, are recommended for average-risk adults aged 45-75 years. CRC screening is underutilized in the US with access to facility-based options, such as colonoscopy, representing a barrier to screening. Stool-based tests are guideline-endorsed and offer patients a convenient and more accessible CRC screening option that can be completed at home. Provider recommendation is consistently identified as the primary factor driving patient adherence. Understanding how aspects of patient-provider communication influence CRC screening can inform interventions to improve adherence. We developed a survey, informed by behavioral theory, to identify communication factors associated with completion of mt-sDNA screening. Methods: Adults aged 45-75 years, with a US postal address, who received a valid order for mt-sDNA and whose kit was shipped between 5/21-9/21 were eligible for sampling. The survey was administered by RTI International between 3/22-6/22. Participants could complete electronic or paper surveys. We fit a multivariable logistic regression to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with mt-sDNA test completion. Results: 2,973 respondents completed the survey (response rate = 21.7%). The majority (77.3%) completed the mt-sDNA test and said they would be ‘very likely’ (76.8%) to complete Cologuard in the future. The proportion of respondents who had conversations with their healthcare provider about Cologuard, and the specific content of those conversations, was significantly different between completers and non-completers and between respondents who said they were ‘very likely’ to complete Cologuard in the future compared to respondents who were not. Results from a binary logistic regression suggested that discussions with a healthcare provider related to step-by-step instructions for completing Cologuard (OR = 1.62) and needing to have a colonoscopy follow-up (OR = 1.93), as well as feeling included ‘a great deal’ in the decision-process with respondents’ healthcare provider (compared to ‘somewhat’ or ‘not at all’) increase the odds of kit completion. Additionally, healthcare provider discussions relating to test cost (OR = 1.47) and performance (OR = 1.72), as well as feeling included ‘a great deal’ in the decision-process was positively associated with respondents indicating they were ‘very likely’ to use Cologuard in the future. Provider discussions about the cost of a follow-up colonoscopy was negatively associated with a ‘very likely’ future user (OR = 0.52). Conclusions: Healthcare providers play a key role in patient adherence to CRC screening and must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

Abstract Background: Multiple guideline-recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options have been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality among average-risk patients. Yet, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. Provider recommendation has consistently shown to improve screening completion. Our study aimed to delineate the pathways through which provider communication influences CRC screening completion. We tested how provider communication about the "Why” and “How” of mt-sDNA screening contributes to mt-sDNA screening intention through influencing patients’ screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control. Methods: Data came from a behavioral theory-informed survey that we developed to identify psychosocial factors associated with mt-sDNA screening. The survey was administered between 3/22-6/22 by RTI International, with a sample of US adults ages 45-75 who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening with a shipping date between 5/21-9/21. Participants completed an electronic or paper survey. We measured patients’ reports of providers’ “Why” communication with items on mt-sDNA screening performance, advantages/disadvantages, and cost. Providers’ “How” communication was measured with items on instructions and need for follow-up testing. We tested the proposed relationships using structural equation modeling and tested indirect effects using bootstrapping. Results: A total of 2973 participants completed the survey (response rate: 21.7%). “Why” communication was positively associated with perceived effectiveness of mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.349, p &lt; .001) and negatively associated with CRC worry (b = -0.078, p = .002). “How” communication was positively associated with perceived ease of use (b = 0.392, p &lt; .001) and perceived comfort of mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.138, p &lt; .001). Perceived effectiveness and perceived ease of use were positively associated with intention to complete mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.404, p &lt; .001; b = 0.339, p &lt; .001). “Why” communication contributed to screening intention through influencing perceived effectiveness (b-indirect effect = 0.141, 95% CI: 0.115, 0.177). “How” communication contributed to screening intention through influencing perceived ease of use (b-indirect effect = 0.133, 95% CI: 0.104, 0.172). Conclusions: Improving patients’ beliefs about the effectiveness and ease of use of screening may be one pathway through which provider communication contributes to CRC screening completion. Efforts are needed to develop and implement provider-patient communication strategies and toolkits that are efficacious at fostering patient understanding of the rationale for CRC screening and the effectiveness of available screening options as well as addressing barriers and enhancing patients’ self-efficacy in completing their preferred screening option. Citation Format: Xuan Zhu, Paul Limburg, Linda Squiers, Leah Helmueller, Gabriel Madson, Brian Southwell, Carlye Gates, Shama Alam, Jennifer Laffin, Lila Finney Rutten. Provider communication contributes to colorectal cancer screening intention through improving screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 770.

Abstract Introduction Vaccinations against preventable respiratory infections such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza are important in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Little is known about the role of age, race, ethnicity, sex, and sociodemographic factors including rurality, or socioeconomic status (SES) associated with vaccine uptake in this population. Methods We conducted a population‐based study using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a medical records linkage system, to assess socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates among adult recipients of solid organ transplantation (aged 19–64 years) living in four counties in southeastern Minnesota. Vaccination data were obtained from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection from June 1, 2010 to June 30, 2020. Vaccination rate was assessed with Poisson and logistic regression models. Results A total of 468 SOT recipients were identified with an overall vaccination rate of 57%–63% for influenza and 56% for pneumococcal vaccines. As expected, vaccination for pneumococcal vaccine positively correlated with influenza vaccination. Rural patients had decreased vaccination in both compared to urban patients, even after adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and SES. Although the population was mostly White and non‐Hispanic, neither vaccination differed by race or ethnicity, but influenza vaccination did by SES. Among organ transplant groups, liver and lung recipients were least vaccinated for influenza, and heart recipients were least up‐to‐date on pneumococcal vaccines. Conclusions Rates of vaccination were below national goals. Rurality was associated with undervaccination. Further investigation is needed to understand and address barriers to vaccination among transplant recipients. image

61 Background: Although several guideline-recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities have been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, adherence remains below U.S. public health goals. Patient navigation services have been shown to improve CRC screening completion. Patient navigation services, including outbound phone, text, and e-mail reminders, and inbound phone support (>200 languages) are included with all mt-sDNA test (Cologuard) orders. A website and financial assistance (upon request and qualification) are also available for patients. We developed a survey, informed by behavioral theory, to identify psychosocial and communication factors associated with completion of mt-sDNA screening including questions to evaluate awareness and use of navigation services. Methods: Adults aged 45-75 years, with a US postal address, who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening between 5/21-9/21 were eligible for sampling. RTI administered the survey between 3/22-6/22. Participants had the option to complete electronic- or paper-based surveys. We conducted crosstabulation with Chi Square to assess whether awareness and use of navigation services was significantly associated with (a) test completion within 6 months of the order date and (b) likelihood of future mt-sDNA use. Results: 2,973 participants completed the survey (RR= 21.7%; 65.15% by web and 34.85% by paper). Responders and non-responders did not differ significantly by age or sex. For each navigation service, awareness was significantly higher among those who completed the mt-sDNA test compared to those did not. Across all services, awareness was significantly higher among respondents reporting they were ‘very likely’ to complete mt-sDNA if recommended by a healthcare provider in the future than all other responses combined. A significantly higher proportion of completers (vs. non-completers) reported receiving the email reminder, using the Cologuard website, and using the English language inbound phone support. A significantly higher proportion of those “very likely” to complete mt-sDNA screening in the future reported receiving the email reminder, using the Cologuard website, and using the English language inbound phone support. Conclusions: Awareness and use of patient navigation services was associated with higher completion of the mt-sDNA test and with greater likelihood of future mt-sDNA test use. Patient navigation services comprised of evidence-based strategies, such as reminders, support patient adherence to CRC screening.

60 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Several CRC screening modalities are guideline recommended for average-risk adults aged 45-75 years. CRC screening is underutilized in the US and access to facility-based options, such as colonoscopy, represents a potential barrier. Home-based stool tests are guideline-endorsed and offer a convenient, accessible, scalable option for CRC screening. Thus, understanding the factors that influence completion of stool-based CRC screening is important to guide interventions to improve adherence. We developed a survey, informed by behavioral theory, to identify psychosocial, behavioral and communication factors associated with completion of mt-sDNA screening. Methods: The survey instrument was finalized through expert review, quality testing, and cognitive testing. Adults aged 45-75 years, with a US postal address, who received a valid order for mt-sDNA and whose kit was shipped between 5/21-9/21 were eligible for sampling. RTI administered the survey between 3/22-6/22. Participants had the option to complete electronic or paper surveys. We fit a multivariable logistic regression to identify factors significantly associated with mt-sDNA test completion. Results: Of 17,370 individuals invited to participate, 2,973 completed the survey (AAPOR RR3 = 21.7%); 77.3% of the sample completed the mt-sDNA test. Responders and non-responders did not differ significantly by sex or age. Controlling for demographic characteristics and insurance status, the odds of mt-sDNA test completion were significantly higher among participants who reported greater perceived test effectiveness (OR = 1.20), greater ease (OR = 4.06), and greater comfort in test use (OR = 1.18). Odds of test completion were significantly higher among participants who reported their healthcare provider discussed the mt-sDNA test with them (OR = 2.01) and involved them a great deal in decision making about CRC screening (OR = 1.29). Participants who expressed greater worry about developing CRC were less likely to return their mt-sDNA kit (OR = 0.81). Conclusions: To improve population adherence to CRC screening recommendations, efforts are needed to ensure patients understand the attributes and effectiveness of available test options and feel adequately prepared to complete their preferred screening test. Additionally, healthcare providers must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

Abstract We previously described the hypotheses, outcomes, design, and analysis for E2C2, a pragmatic stepped-wedge trial to assess an intervention to improve symptom control in patients with cancer. Subsequent consideration of the design and cohort led to the addition of a second primary hypothesis. This article describes and presents the rationale for this second hypothesis. This addendum also details a revised analytic approach, necessitated by inconsistencies in the original analytic plan. The design, outcomes, and other aspects of the protocol remain unchanged.