Citations

Abstract The Voyage Study is a large-scale, prospective cohort study of long-term health outcomes among participants with a valid multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test order. Recently, the Voyage Study achieved its enrollment target of 150,000 participants. The intent of this descriptive analysis is to provide baseline geographic and socio-demographic characteristics of Voyage Study participants to set the stage for future comparisons to the broader mt-sDNA user population. Participants were randomly selected from all persons in the U.S. or Puerto Rico who had a valid order for mt-sDNA screening during the enrollment period (10/18/2019 - 10/17/2023). Enrolled participants completed a baseline questionnaire that collected socio-demographic and health information. Participant characteristics and baseline survey answers were compared between regions using chi-square tests where appropriate. Regional geographic data was aggregated for the broader mt-sDNA user population during the enrollment period, though no formal comparisons were made between the broader population and the Voyage population at this time. Analyses were limited to 139,369 participants with available baseline questionnaire data. Voyage participants were more likely to reside in the Midwest, Northeast, or Southeast (29.9%, 22.5%, 22.6% respectively) and less likely to reside in the Southwest and West (11.6%, 13.4%). During the enrollment period, differential participation was also observed in the mt-sDNA user population, with the Midwest, Northeast, and Southeast having the greatest proportion (25.4%, 22.2%, 26.7%) and the Southwest and West having the lowest proportion of mt-sDNA users (13.8%, 11.9%). In the Voyage cohort, Midwest participants reported the lowest education attainment as characterized by years of school completed (14.1% high school or below, 59.2% college or greater), while participants in the West reported the highest education attainment (7.9% high school or below, 67.3% college or greater). The West also had the highest percentage of participants reporting an income of $100,000 or greater (51.6%), with the Southeast being the lowest (42.2%), as compared to the other regions. We report here early results of geographic and socio-demographic characteristics from a new research resource that will enable future analyses of health outcomes and behaviors in a population of mt-sDNA users. We observed that the greatest percentage of Voyage participants resided in the Midwest, Northeast, or Southeast, and that there was differential socio-demographic participant characteristics based on region. Future analyses will compare long-term healthcare outcomes and differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality between the broader mt-sDNA user population and the Voyage cohort. Citation Format: Allison M. Berry, Jessica A. Grimm, Christine R. Kirt, Emily J. Kirsch, Rachel E. Dixon, Winnie Z. Fan, Kandace A. Bohn, Jennifer St. Sauver, Kathleen J. Yost, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Janet E. Olson. U.S. Geographic and socio-demographic characteristics of Voyage Study participants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3453.

67 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among men and women combined in the United States (US). Although the national screening rate has increased over the years, it remains below the target of 80% recommended by the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable for improved CRC outcomes. In most recent years, and particularly during COVID-19, screening-eligible individuals preferred at-home, non-invasive screening options over invasive tests such as colonoscopy due to convenience and accessibility. The objective of this study was to understand the CRC screening trends over the last two decades, and the impact of various screening modalities on the overall CRC screening rate. Methods: Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2005 onwards, we examined CRC screening (colonoscopy, mt-sDNA, FIT/FOBT, and sigmoidoscopy) rates among adults aged 50-75 years. A pseudo-time-series cross-sectional (pseudo TSCS) analysis was conducted including random effects Generalized Least Square (GLS) regression model to estimate the relative impact of each modality on the overall increase in CRC rates from 2018 to 2021. Results: Among 50-75 years old individuals, the estimated CRC screening use increased by 32% from 2005 to 2021 (47.7% to 69.9%). Between 2018 to 2021, the rates increased from 64% to 70%, driven largely by increased use of mt-sDNA, a 62.1% increase from 2018 to 2021 (2.5% to 6.6%). During this time period, colonoscopy utilization increased by 4.4% (61.2% to 64.0%), while FOBT/FIT utilization increased by 3.6% (5.3% to 5.5%). A pseudo-TSCS analysis showed that mt-sDNA contributed substantially to the overall CRC screening rate increase during years 2018-2021 (77.3%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: While CRC screening rates are increasing, they remain below the national goal of 80%. Mt-sDNA as a home-based, non-invasive screening, recommended at a 3-year interval, has been leveraged to improve overall CRC screening rates, particularly to address the screening backlog created during the COVID-19 pandemic. A collaborative approach between healthcare providers and screening-eligible individuals is needed to empower patients with choice for their CRC screening modality to achieve the national goal.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Despite the availability of multiple screening options, CRC screening is underutilized. We conducted a survey of patients (n = 2973) who were prescribed the multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening test (commercialized as Cologuard ® and manufactured by Exact Sciences Corporation) to understand attitudes and experiences that influence test completion and likelihood of future test completion. Using exploratory factor analyses, we developed three scales: Perceived Effectiveness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Perceived Comfort.

Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03501992

AbstractCancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium’s conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

AbstractBackgroundSomali immigrants and refugees constitute one of the largest African ethnic groups immigrating to the United States over the past three decades with the majority resettling in the state of Minnesota. Previous studies have documented significant cancer screening disparities between the Somali population and the general population. However, little is known about cancer incidence among Somali groups living in the United States.MethodsWe determined the incidence of 18 types or sites of malignancy using ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes and compared them between Somali and non‐Somali populations in Olmsted County, Minnesota utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records‐linkage infrastructure for the years 2000–2020. Poisson regression models were used to model the rates for each malignancy.ResultsThere was a higher incidence and relative risk of liver malignancies among the Somali population versus non‐Somali population, but lower relative risk and incidence of the following malignancies: breast, cervical, and melanoma. After direct age‐sex adjustment to the United States 2000 Census population, liver was the most common cancer in Somali men, while breast cancer was the most common malignancy in women.ConclusionMalignancies related to infectious agents such as viral hepatitis have a higher incidence in the Somali immigrant population of Olmsted County. There is a lower incidence of malignancies related to lifestyle factors in this Somali population. Findings of this study may help inform cancer prevention and screening strategies among Somali communities in the United States.

Abstract Background: Adherence to recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among US adults is below the public health target of 80%. The multi-target stool DNA assay (mt-sDNA) is a self-administered CRC screening test that may remove barriers to adherence. To improve understanding of long-term outcomes and the real-world impact of mt-sDNA screening, Mayo Clinic and Exact Sciences Laboratories are collaborating on a prospective cohort study of CRC incidence and mortality outcomes in individuals screened with mt-sDNA. We conducted an embedded experiment to identify the optimal incentive protocol for maximizing participation while managing study costs. Methods: A subset of the opt-in cohort was randomized to receive postage stamps as a pre-consent incentive, or as a post-consent incentive after completion of the consent and questionnaire. Descriptive statistics from year one of recruitment, as well as the incentive experiment, are reported. Results: During year 1 of the Voyage trial, a total of 600,258 individuals with mt-sDNA orders received at Exact Sciences Laboratories were randomly selected and invited to participate. Of those, 26,429 (4.4%) opted in, 14,365 of whom (54.3%) consented. The opt-in and consent samples were similar to the target population with respect to sex but differed by geographic residence and age (p<0.001). For the embedded incentive experiment, 2,333 were randomized to the pre-incentive arm while 2,342 were randomized to the post-incentive arm. Overall consent rate in the incentive trial was 56.4% (60.9% for the pre-consent incentive arm (1421/2333) vs. 52.0% for the post-consent incentive arm (1217/2432), p<0.001). A cost reduction was observed for the pre-consent incentive group. Higher response rates were seen among older vs. younger individuals, reflecting a common pattern in healthcare-related survey research participation. Age adjusted incidence rates for CRC have been shown to vary regionally; thus, adjustment for differential response by region will be important to ensure representativeness. Conclusions: CRC incidence and mortality vary with age; thus, adjusting for differential participation by age will be important in analyses of Voyage data. Pre-consent incentive option was associated with a higher participation rate and lower costs, and will be used for the remainder of the study recruitment. Trial Registration: NCT04124406; October 11th, 2019

e22514 Background: Several colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, are recommended for average-risk adults aged 45-75 years. CRC screening is underutilized in the US with access to facility-based options, such as colonoscopy, representing a barrier to screening. Stool-based tests are guideline-endorsed and offer patients a convenient and more accessible CRC screening option that can be completed at home. Provider recommendation is consistently identified as the primary factor driving patient adherence. Understanding how aspects of patient-provider communication influence CRC screening can inform interventions to improve adherence. We developed a survey, informed by behavioral theory, to identify communication factors associated with completion of mt-sDNA screening. Methods: Adults aged 45-75 years, with a US postal address, who received a valid order for mt-sDNA and whose kit was shipped between 5/21-9/21 were eligible for sampling. The survey was administered by RTI International between 3/22-6/22. Participants could complete electronic or paper surveys. We fit a multivariable logistic regression to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with mt-sDNA test completion. Results: 2,973 respondents completed the survey (response rate = 21.7%). The majority (77.3%) completed the mt-sDNA test and said they would be ‘very likely’ (76.8%) to complete Cologuard in the future. The proportion of respondents who had conversations with their healthcare provider about Cologuard, and the specific content of those conversations, was significantly different between completers and non-completers and between respondents who said they were ‘very likely’ to complete Cologuard in the future compared to respondents who were not. Results from a binary logistic regression suggested that discussions with a healthcare provider related to step-by-step instructions for completing Cologuard (OR = 1.62) and needing to have a colonoscopy follow-up (OR = 1.93), as well as feeling included ‘a great deal’ in the decision-process with respondents’ healthcare provider (compared to ‘somewhat’ or ‘not at all’) increase the odds of kit completion. Additionally, healthcare provider discussions relating to test cost (OR = 1.47) and performance (OR = 1.72), as well as feeling included ‘a great deal’ in the decision-process was positively associated with respondents indicating they were ‘very likely’ to use Cologuard in the future. Provider discussions about the cost of a follow-up colonoscopy was negatively associated with a ‘very likely’ future user (OR = 0.52). Conclusions: Healthcare providers play a key role in patient adherence to CRC screening and must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

Abstract Background: Multiple guideline-recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options have been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality among average-risk patients. Yet, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. Provider recommendation has consistently shown to improve screening completion. Our study aimed to delineate the pathways through which provider communication influences CRC screening completion. We tested how provider communication about the "Why” and “How” of mt-sDNA screening contributes to mt-sDNA screening intention through influencing patients’ screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control. Methods: Data came from a behavioral theory-informed survey that we developed to identify psychosocial factors associated with mt-sDNA screening. The survey was administered between 3/22-6/22 by RTI International, with a sample of US adults ages 45-75 who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening with a shipping date between 5/21-9/21. Participants completed an electronic or paper survey. We measured patients’ reports of providers’ “Why” communication with items on mt-sDNA screening performance, advantages/disadvantages, and cost. Providers’ “How” communication was measured with items on instructions and need for follow-up testing. We tested the proposed relationships using structural equation modeling and tested indirect effects using bootstrapping. Results: A total of 2973 participants completed the survey (response rate: 21.7%). “Why” communication was positively associated with perceived effectiveness of mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.349, p &lt; .001) and negatively associated with CRC worry (b = -0.078, p = .002). “How” communication was positively associated with perceived ease of use (b = 0.392, p &lt; .001) and perceived comfort of mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.138, p &lt; .001). Perceived effectiveness and perceived ease of use were positively associated with intention to complete mt-sDNA screening (b = 0.404, p &lt; .001; b = 0.339, p &lt; .001). “Why” communication contributed to screening intention through influencing perceived effectiveness (b-indirect effect = 0.141, 95% CI: 0.115, 0.177). “How” communication contributed to screening intention through influencing perceived ease of use (b-indirect effect = 0.133, 95% CI: 0.104, 0.172). Conclusions: Improving patients’ beliefs about the effectiveness and ease of use of screening may be one pathway through which provider communication contributes to CRC screening completion. Efforts are needed to develop and implement provider-patient communication strategies and toolkits that are efficacious at fostering patient understanding of the rationale for CRC screening and the effectiveness of available screening options as well as addressing barriers and enhancing patients’ self-efficacy in completing their preferred screening option. Citation Format: Xuan Zhu, Paul Limburg, Linda Squiers, Leah Helmueller, Gabriel Madson, Brian Southwell, Carlye Gates, Shama Alam, Jennifer Laffin, Lila Finney Rutten. Provider communication contributes to colorectal cancer screening intention through improving screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 770.