Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

195 citation(s) found for "Qi, Andy".

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Bone Quality Using Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Scores in Spine Surgery—A Critical Assessment and Narrative Review
Gausper, Adeesya , Gibbs, Wende N. , Elder, Benjamin D. , Scheer, Justin K. , Perry, Tiffany G. , Etigunta, Suhas K. , Liu, Andy M. , Tuchman, Alexander , Walker, Corey T.

Journal of Clinical Medicine | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 6477

10.3390/jcm14186477 | PMID 41010680 Get It

Bone health is a key determinant of success in spine surgery, making preoperative assessment of bone quality essential to optimal surgical risk stratification. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score offers a novel approach to assess bone health in spine surgery candidates. The ability of MRI to assess bone quality without exposure to ionizing radiation makes it a potentially advantageous alternative to other traditional measures of bone density. VBQ has additionally shown potential to predict adverse outcomes, such as fragility fractures, instrumentation failure, subsidence and proximal junctional kyphosis. Variations of VBQ, such as endplate bone quality, S1 VBQ, and cervical VBQ, provide targeted insights at specific anatomical regions and potentially enhance the predictive accuracy of VBQ. However, clinical application of VBQ is limited by variability in MRI systems, patient-specific factors, and lack of standardized threshold values. This review aims to critically evaluate VBQ scores as an opportunistic, MRI-based assessment of bone health and its potential role in predicting surgical outcomes. While VBQ may provide some valuable insights into bone health, its role in preoperative risk assessment likely remains supplementary and requires further research to establish clinical validity and optimal cutoffs.
Evaluation of [18F]F-CNBI and [18F]F-CNPI PET Probes in GSK-3β Transgenic Mice
Kethamreddy, Manasa, Gundam, Surendra Reddy, Rivera, Alexander, Bansal, Aditya , Lim, Do Young , Giri, Sharmila, Larson, Nicholas B. , Lowe, Val J. , Pandey, Mukesh K. , Rivera, Andy González, Pandey, Mukesh K , Larson, Nicholas B , Wootla, Bharath , Baker, Darren J.

ACS Chemical Neuroscience | August 15, 2025 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 3340-3353

10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00442 | PMID 40815164 Get It

Isolated Sensorineural Hearing Loss as the Sole Manifestation of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis
Arango, Alejandro , Abril, Andy , Martinez, Alejandro Arango , Mumtaz, Sehreen , Abril, Andy , Mumtaz, Sehreen

American Journal of Case Reports | August 13, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.12659/ajcr.948700 | PMID 40938809 Get It

Trends and Risk Factors for the Hospitalization of Older Adults Presenting to Emergency Departments After a Bed-Related Fall: A National Database Analysis
Tom, Andy , Navarro, Sergio M. , Spears, Grant M. , Schluttenhofer, Adam , Junker, Michelle S., Zietlow, John , Davis, R B, Palmer, Allyson K. , Bellolio, Fernanda , Park, Myung S., Junker, Michelle, Davis, Roderick, Bellolio, M Fernanda , Palmer, Allyson K , Navarro, Sergio Michael , Schluttenhofer, Adam , LeBrasseur, Nathan K.

Journal of Clinical Medicine | July 15, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 5008

10.3390/jcm14145008 | PMID 40725700 Get It

Background/objectives: Falls are a leading cause of traumatic injury and hospitalization for adults over the age of 65. While common, bed-related falls are relatively understudied when compared to ambulatory falls. The aim of this study is to characterize the risk factors for the hospitalization of older adults presenting to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) after a fall from bed. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using publicly available data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from 2014 to 2023, including all adults over the age of 65 presenting to the NEISS’s participating EDs with bed-related fall injuries. We identified fall injuries using a keyword search of the NEISS narratives and determined how the fall occurred by manually reviewing a randomized 3% sample of the narratives. We summarized demographics and injury patterns with descriptive statistics. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for hospitalization and used Poisson regression to assess temporal trends in fall incidence and hospital admissions. Results: An estimated average of 320,751 bed-related fall injuries presented to EDs annually from 2014 to 2023. ED visits increased by 2.85% per year, while hospital admissions rose by 5.67% per year (p < 0.001). The most common injury patterns were superficial injuries (contusions, abrasions, lacerations, avulsions, and punctures) (28.6%), fractures (21.7%), and internal injuries (including concussions) (21.6%). Most of the falls occurred while transitioning into or out of bed (34.4%) or falling out of bed (56.8%). Hospitalization was required in 34.1% of cases and was associated with male sex, medication use at time of injury, and fracture injuries. Conclusions: Bed-related falls and associated hospitalizations are increasing among older adults. ED providers should understand risk factors for hospitalization in these common injuries such as male sex, medication use at time of injury, and high-risk injury patterns. Additionally, prevention efforts should focus on helping older adults remain safely in bed and then assisting with transitions into or out of bed.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Cryoballoon vs Laser Balloon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Magdon, Dorota, Mounir, Abdulghani, Erickson, Lynn, Adefisoye, James, Kanani, Jim, Kieu, Andy, Ali, Ali , Ghosoun, Nour, Zilinski, Jodi , Mortada, M. Eyman , Bhatia, Atul , Ali, Mahmoud , Erickson, Lynn , Malik, Abdullah , Jahangir, Arshad , Niazi, Imran Khan

Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews | July 15, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 106-112

10.17294/2330-0698.2126 | PMID 40697633 Get It

Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia in older adults, is often treated with cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or laser balloon ablation (LBA) when refractory to medication. We used real-world patient data to investigate differences in arrhythmia-free survival, procedure and fluoroscopy times, and complications between these techniques. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study of 178 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF referred for first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), 103 underwent CBA, and 75 underwent LBA. Recurrence was defined as any atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds’ duration after a three-month blanking period. Complications at 30 days were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate arrhythmia-free survival at one year for both groups. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%) and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with exception to left atrial volume index (CBA 32.2 ± 10.9 ml/m2; LBA 36.0 ± 11.0 ml/m2, p = 0.047). History of stroke was higher in CBA (13.6% vs 2.7%; p = 0.012), as was coronary artery disease (35.0% vs 14.7%, p = 0.002). Median fluoroscopy and procedure times (min) were significantly shorter in LBA (24.2 vs 31.6, p = 0.004; 141.0 vs 210.0, p < 0.0001, respectively). One-year arrhythmia-free survival rates were similar (CBA 79.1% vs LBA 78.7%, p = 0.934), as were total complication rates (21.4% vs 16.0%, p = 0.289), including rates of transient ischemic attack/stroke and vascular complications. Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI, CBA and LBA were equally efficacious at one year and demonstrated acceptably low complication rates. LBA was associated with reduced procedure time and fluoroscopy exposure.
Surgical Treatment and Complications of Lateral Extra‐articular Procedures in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee: Part II of an International Consensus Statement
Sonnery‐Cottet, Bertrand , Carrozzo, Alessandro , Saithna, Adnan , Vieira, Thaïs Dutra , Musahl, Volker , Helito, Camilo Partezani , Panel, The International Experts, Bedi, Asheesh, Bryant, Dianne, Cavaignac, Etienne, Chahla, Jorge, Claes, Steven, Cordasco, Frank, Daggett, Matt, Devitt, Brian, Feller, Julian, Fink, Christian, Frank, Rachel, Geeslin, Andrew, Grassi, Alberto, Green, Daniel, Guenther, Daniel, Heard, Mark, Herbst, Elmar, Hopper, Graeme, Inderhaug, Eivind, Irrgang, James, Kaeding, Christopher, Kittl, Christopher, Kocher, Mininder, Koga, Hideyuki, Krych, Aaron J., LaPrade, Robert, Levy, Bruce, Litchfield, Robert Bruce, Lording, Tim, Lowe, Walter, MacDonald, Peter, Marx, Robert, Moatshe, Gilbert, Neri, Thomas, Ouanezar, Herve, Padua, Vitor Barion de Castro, Parker, David, Pioger, Charles, Servien, Elvire, Sherman, Seth, Smith, Patrick, Spalding, Tim, Tapasvi, Sachin, Verdonk, Peter, Williams, Andy, Xerogeanes, John, Young, Simon W., Monaco, Edoardo , Getgood, Alan , Panel, The International Experts, Bedi, Asheesh, Bryant, Dianne, Cavaignac, Etienne, Chahla, Jorge, Claes, Steven, Cordasco, Frank, Daggett, Matt, Devitt, Brian, Feller, Julian, Fink, Christian, Frank, Rachel, Geeslin, Andrew, Grassi, Alberto, Green, Daniel, Guenther, Daniel, Heard, Mark, Herbst, Elmar, Hopper, Graeme, Inderhaug, Eivind, Irrgang, James, Kaeding, Christopher, Kittl, Christopher, Kocher, Mininder, Koga, Hideyuki, Krych, Aaron J., LaPrade, Robert, Levy, Bruce, Litchfield, Robert Bruce, Lording, Tim, Lowe, Walter, MacDonald, Peter, Marx, Robert, Moatshe, Gilbert, Neri, Thomas, Ouanezar, Herve, Padua, Vitor Barion de Castro, Parker, David, Pioger, Charles , Servien, Elvire, Sherman, Seth, Smith, Patrick, Spalding, Tim, Tapasvi, Sachin, Verdonk, Peter, Williams, Andy, Xerogeanes, John, Young, Simon W.

Arthroscopy | June 20, 2025 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 3313-3321

10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.013 | PMID 40544924 Get It

Purpose To establish international expert consensus on surgical techniques, complications, and rehabilitation protocols for lateral extra‐articular procedures (LEAPs) performed adjunctively with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Fifty‐five knee surgeons from 17 countries on 5 continents completed a 3‐round modified Delphi process. In the final round, 16 statements on LEAP techniques and complications were scored on a 5‐point Likert scale; ≥75% “agree/strongly agree” constituted consensus. When appropriate, strength of recommendation was graded. Statements lacking support were revised until consensus or abandonment. Results Six statements achieved unanimous consensus (100%), 2 had strong consensus (90%‐99.9%), and 3 reached consensus (75%‐89.9%); 4 were removed. Key technical recommendations were as follows: (1) in iliotibial band procedures, the graft strip should pass beneath the lateral collateral ligament; (2) an anatomic technique is mandatory for anterolateral ligament reconstruction; and (3) no single LEAP is clinically superior to another. Unanimous agreement indicated that modern LEAPs do not increase lateral compartment osteoarthritis risk, carry a low complication rate, and do not necessitate changes to rehabilitation or return‐to‐play timelines. Conclusions Consensus defined core surgical principles and confirmed the safety of adding LEAPs to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. When an iliotibial band graft is used, it should be routed deep to the lateral collateral ligament and fixed between 0° and 60° of knee flexion under low tension. For anterolateral ligament reconstruction, femoral fixation should be in full extension at a posterior‐proximal point relative to the lateral epicondyle. Although no single LEAP proved superiority, adherence to these principles permits safe, effective surgery without altering standard rehabilitation or return‐to‐sport protocols and without increasing osteoarthritis risk. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.
Indications for Lateral Extra‐articular Procedures in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee: Part I of an International Consensus Statement
Sonnery‐Cottet, Bertrand , Carrozzo, Alessandro , Saithna, Adnan , Vieira, Thaïs Dutra , Musahl, Volker , Helito, Camilo Partezani , Panel, The International Experts, Bedi, Asheesh, Bryant, Dianne, Cavaignac, Etienne, Chahla, Jorge, Claes, Steven, Cordasco, Frank, Daggett, Matt, Devitt, Brian, Feller, Julian, Fink, Christian, Frank, Rachel, Geeslin, Andrew, Grassi, Alberto, Green, Daniel, Guenther, Daniel, Heard, Mark, Herbst, Elmar, Hopper, Graeme, Inderhaug, Eivind, Irrgang, James, Kaeding, Christopher, Kittl, Christopher, Kocher, Mininder, Koga, Hideyuki, Krych, Aaron J., LaPrade, Robert, Levy, Bruce, Litchfield, Robert Bruce, Lording, Tim, Lowe, Walter, MacDonald, Peter, Marx, Robert, Moatshe, Gilbert, Neri, Thomas, Ouanezar, Herve, Padua, Vitor Barion de Castro, Parker, David, Pioger, Charles, Servien, Elvire, Sherman, Seth, Smith, Patrick, Spalding, Tim, Tapasvi, Sachin, Verdonk, Peter, Williams, Andy, Xerogeanes, John, Young, Simon W., Sherman, Seth L. , Monaco, Edoardo , Getgood, Alan , Panel, The International Experts, Bedi, Asheesh, Bryant, Dianne, Cavaignac, Etienne, Chahla, Jorge, Claes, Steven, Cordasco, Frank, Daggett, Matt, Devitt, Brian, Feller, Julian, Fink, Christian, Frank, Rachel, Geeslin, Andrew, Grassi, Alberto, Green, Daniel, Guenther, Daniel, Heard, Mark, Herbst, Elmar, Hopper, Graeme, Inderhaug, Eivind, Irrgang, James, Kaeding, Christopher, Kittl, Christopher, Kocher, Mininder, Koga, Hideyuki, Krych, Aaron J., LaPrade, Robert, Levy, Bruce, Litchfield, Robert Bruce, Lording, Tim, Lowe, Walter, MacDonald, Peter, Marx, Robert, Moatshe, Gilbert, Neri, Thomas, Ouanezar, Herve, Padua, Vitor Barion de Castro, Parker, David, Pioger, Charles , Servien, Elvire, Sherman, Seth, Smith, Patrick, Spalding, Tim, Tapasvi, Sachin, Verdonk, Peter, Williams, Andy, Xerogeanes, John, Young, Simon W.

Arthroscopy | June 20, 2025 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 3303-3312

10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.012 | PMID 40544926 Get It

Purpose To define expert consensus on whether and how lateral extra‐articular procedures (LEAPs) should accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to optimize outcomes in ACL‐deficient knees. Methods Fifty‐five knee surgeons from 17 countries on 5 continents completed a 3‐round modified Delphi process. Twenty‐one statements on patient selection for combined ACL reconstruction (ACLR) + LEAPs were graded on 5‐point Likert scales; ≥75% “agree/strongly agree” signified consensus. Strength of recommendation was ranked, and statements failing the threshold were revised or discarded after discussion. Results One statement achieved unanimous agreement (100%): it is strongly recommended to add a LEAP for active patients ≤25 years receiving hamstring‐autograft ACLR to reduce graft failure. Strong consensus (≥90%) supported LEAPs in primary ACLR when grade 3 pivot shift (97.9%), knee hyperextension (97.9%), skeletally immature status (79.5%), revision ACLR (91.5%), return to pivoting sports (93.2%), active patients ≤25 years using nonhamstring grafts (90.7%), grade 3 Lachman test (90%), and when multiple relative risk factors coexist (statement 36, 97.1%). Consensus (75%‐89.9%) favored LEAPs for chronic symptomatic ACL deficiency (86.1%), posterior tibial slope >12° (85.7%), and a history of contralateral ACL injury (88.9%). Eight statements did not reach consensus regarding small‐diameter autografts, female athletes, imaging signs of anterolateral injury (e.g., Segond fracture, lateral femoral‐notch sign), and concomitant meniscal procedures. One statement on LEAPs with primary ACL repair was withdrawn because the project focused on reconstruction. Conclusions International experts strongly recommend adding a LEAP in young active patients undergoing hamstring‐autograft ACLR and in cases of high‐grade rotational or anterior laxity, knee hyperextension, revision surgery, or returning to pivoting sports. Unresolved issues include small graft size, female athletes, imaging findings of rotational instability, and concurrent meniscal procedures, highlighting priorities for future research. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.
Predicting therapeutic clinical trial enrollment for adult patients with low- and high-grade glioma using supervised machine learning
Mehari, Mulki , Warrier, Gayathri , Dada, Abraham , Kabir, Aymen , Haskell-Mendoza, Aden , Tripathy, Arushi , Jha, Rohan , Nieblas‐Bedolla, Edwin , Jackson, Joshua , Gonzalez, Ariel T , Reason, Ellery , Flusché, Ann Marie , Reihl, Sheantel , Dalton, Tara , Negussie, Mikias , Gonzales, Cesar Nava, Ambati, Vardhaan , Desjardins, Annick , Krishna, Saritha, Chang, Susan M. , Porter, Alyx B. , Fecci, Peter E. , Hollon, Todd , Chukwueke, Ugonma , Badal, Kimberly , Molinaro, Annette M. , Hervey‐Jumper, Shawn L. , Haskell-Mendoza, Aden P , Reason, Ellery H , Ambati, Vardhaan , Krishna, Saritha , Porter, Alyx , Hollon, Todd , Chukwueke, Ugonma N , Badal, Kimberly , Molinaro, Annette M. , Hervey-Jumper, Shawn L , Reihl, Sheantel J , Fecci, Peter E , Desjardins, Annick , Daniel, Andy G. S.

Science Advances | June 11, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 23 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/sciadv.adt5708 | PMID 40465719 Get It

Therapeutic clinical trial enrollment does not match glioma incidence across demographics. Traditional statistical methods have identified independent predictors of trial enrollment; however, our understanding of the interactions between these factors remains limited. To test the interactive effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and oncologic variables on trial enrollment, we designed boosted neural networks (BNNs) for all glioma patients ( n = 1042), women ( n = 445, 42.7%), and minorities ( n = 151, 14.5%) and externally validated these models [whole cohort, n = 230; women, n = 89 (38.7%); minority, n = 66 (28.7%)]. For the whole-cohort BNN, the most influential variables on enrollment were oncologic variables, including KPS [total effect (TE), 0.327], chemotherapy (TE, 0.326), tumor location (TE, 0.322), and seizures (TE, 0.239). The women-only BNN exhibited a similar trend. Conversely, for the minority-only BNN, socioeconomic variables [insurance status (TE, 0.213), occupation classification (TE, 0.204), and employment status (TE, 0.150)] were most influential. These results may help prioritize patient-specific initiatives to increase accrual.
Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of cardiac imaging with [ 68 Ga]Ga-NOTA-CTP in normal and infarcted CD1 mice
Gundam, Surendra Reddy, Kethamreddy, Manasa, Rivera, Alexander, Bansal, Aditya , Krol, Viktoria, Sahagun, Daniella, Johnson, Derek R. , Lowe, Val J. , Gundam, Surendra R. , Rivera, Andy González, Sahagun, Daniella A , Kusmirek, Joanna E. , Johnson, Derek R , Zahid, Maliha , Pandey, Mukesh K , Pandey, Mukesh K. , Gundam, Surendra R.

RSC Pharmaceutics | May 29, 2025 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 691-702

10.1039/d5pm00047e | PMID 41836772 Get It

The radiotracer [ 68 Ga]Ga-NOTA-CTP was evaluated in healthy and diseased CD1 mice with myocardial infarction following ligation of the left anterior descending artery.
A National Multi-Center Analysis of the Epidemiology of Pediatric Facial Injuries From Fireworks
Gharavi, Aidin , Lueder, Chase, Tom, Andy , Navarro, Sergio M. , Navarro, Sergio Michael , Gharavi, Aidin

Journal of Burn Care & Research | April 23, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 903-908

10.1093/jbcr/iraf065 | PMID 40304692 Get It

Abstract Firework injuries remain a significant public health concern, with an estimated 9700 injuries reported in 2023. This study examines trends in pediatric facial injuries from fireworks over the past decade using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Pediatric cases from 2014 to 2023 were identified using the fireworks consumer code (1313) and filtered for facial injuries (body part code 76). Data was analyzed using chi-square tests to assess significance and logistic regression to evaluate trends. An estimated 4625 pediatric facial injuries from fireworks presented to emergency departments nationwide from 2014 to 2023. Among cases (n = 177), 68.4% were male and 31.6% were female. Thermal burns (60.5%), lacerations (15.3%), and contusions/abrasions (11.9%) were the most common injuries. Males were more likely to be injured than females (P-value: &lt; .001). Overall, 17.5% of injuries required hospitalization or transfer. Older children were significantly more likely to sustain injuries requiring hospitalization (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.13, 95% CI, 1.04-1.23, P = .005). Younger children had higher odds of sparkler-related injuries, although the risk rapidly decreased with age (OR: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.68-0.86, P &lt; .001). Our results show fireworks continue to cause significant pediatric facial injuries, with thermal burns being the most common diagnosis, and nearly one in 5 facial injuries from fireworks requiring hospitalization. Efforts to reduce facial injuries from fireworks should focus on minimizing the risk of injury in younger children while ensuring safety protocols are in place to address more significant injuries in older children.