Citations

Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is common after injury and reliable quantification of its severity is lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether thrombin generation would be significantly altered if whole blood samples from trauma patients were collected without (citrate-only) and with corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI+). In a prospective cohort study, 36 trauma pts presenting to a Level I Trauma Center within 12 hours of injury, had whole blood collected simultaneously in citrate-only (3.2%) and citrated plus CTI (CTI+ [final 25 ug/mL]), and processed to platelet free plasma by double centrifugation (3000g, 15 minutes). Samples were stored at -80C with no thawing until analysis. Thrombin generation profiles were measured using the ST Genesia assay (Diagnostica STAGO SAS) and parameters included endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), lag time (LT), peak height, start of tail, velocity index, and time to peak (ttPeak) were analyzed for trauma pts. Data presented as median [IQR] or n (%), with paired t-test and Spearman's correlation analysis were performed between citrated non-CTI and citrated CTI spiked blood samples, with p-value <0.05 statistically significant. Pts presented with significant injury ISS 13 [5, 21], age 45 [29, 59] years, 80.6% male, BMI 26.9 [25.4, 28.3], 94.4% blunt trauma, 22.3% had surgery by day 1 of admission. Significant differences were found between the citrated-only and CTI +tubes in several thrombin generation parameters: ETP (1339 Nm*min [1172.5,1417], 1124.5 [925.4,1285], p<0.001), peak height (222.3 Nm [186.0, 275.6], 160.6 [132.7,208.3], p<0.001), ttPeak (5.64 min [4.86,6.63], 6.19 [5.36, 7.34], p<0.001), start of tail (19.4 min [17.6,21.3], 21.6 [18.9, 23.6], p=0.014), and velocity index (117.6 Nm/min [77.9, 163.1], 71.9 [54.9,106.0], p<0.001). However, LT (3.14 min [2.74, 3.90], 3.08 [2.84, 3.96], p=0.665) did not show a statistically significant difference. Spearman's correlation analysis showed high correlation between citrate-only and CTI+ citrated plasma samples, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for LT (0.941), peak height (0.760), ttPeak (0.928), ETP (0.770), start of tail (0.869), and velocity index (0.766) respectively. The results suggest that use of CTI+ decrease thrombin generation kinetics from blood samples obtained from trauma patients. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of sample collection and processing for use of thrombin generation assays in clinical setting. However, there is very strong correlation of the thrombin parameters obtained from citrated-only plasma to CTI+ plasma samples, suggesting they capture similar information. CTI-spiked citrated tubes appear to reduce contact activation with respect to thrombin generation profiles compared to standard citrated only tubes. This should be a consideration for platform-based lab processing of thrombin generation assays for assessment of coagulopathy after injury; however, given the cost of CTI, citrated-only tubes can be an option for characterization of thrombin generation profile in clinical samples.

Introduction: The MI-GENES randomized clinical trial (NCT01936675) assessed the effect of disclosing a polygenic risk score (PRS) for coronary heart disease (CHD), in addition to a clinical risk based on Framingham risk score (FRS), on LDL-C levels. The trial enrolled participants from Olmsted County, Minnesota, without cardiovascular disease, at intermediate CHD risk (10-y risk: 5-20%), and not on statins. There was a significant LDL-C reduction in the integrated risk score group (IRS g ; received PRS information in addition to the FRS) compared to the FRS group (FRS g ; received their risk based on FRS), due to more frequent statin initiation. Research Question: Does disclosure of an IRS for CHD lead to a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)? Methods: Participants were followed from randomization beginning in October 2013 until September 2023 to ascertain cardiovascular events, testing for CHD, and risk factor changes, by blinded review of electronic health records. The primary outcome was time from randomization to the first MACE— defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, coronary revascularization, and nonfatal stroke. Analyses were done using Cox and linear mixed-effects models. Results: We followed all 203 participants, who completed the MI-GENES trial, 100 in FRS g and 103 in IRS g (mean age at the end of follow-up 68.2±5.2 years, 48% male). During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 9 MACE occurred in FRS g and 2 in IRS g (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.94; P =0.042, Figure 1A). In FRS g , 47 (47%) underwent at least one test for CHD, compared to 30 (29%) in IRS g (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.81; P =0.004, Figure 1B). IRS g participants had a longer duration of statin therapy during the first four years post-randomization (Figure 1C) and a greater reduction in LDL-C for up to 3 years post-randomization (Figure 1D). No significant differences between the two groups were observed for hemoglobin A1C, blood pressure, weight, and smoking cessation rate during follow-up. Conclusion: The disclosure of 10-year CHD risk that included a PRS to those at intermediate risk was associated with lower incidence of MACE after a decade, likely due to more frequent and prolonged statin use, leading to lower LDL-C levels.

Introduction: Living in an area with high Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is linked to worse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. However, the association of ADI with type 2 diabetes (T2D), a major CVD risk factor, is incompletely described. This knowledge may guide primary CVD prevention. Method: Rochester Epidemiology Project is a medical record linkage system of persons in southeast Minnesota and southwest Wisconsin. We identified 253,890 persons (aged 4–98 yrs on July 1, 2015) in 9 counties with >90% population coverage. ADI scores, from 2015 home addresses, were grouped into quartiles of low (Q1) to high (Q4) deprivation. We excluded persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or history of T2D and identified new T2D cases (2015-2020) using ICD codes, HbA1c and medications. We examined the association between ADI quartile and risk of incident T2D using Cox regression with persons right censored at death, T2D, T1D or last visit. Models were adjusted for age and gender, and reported adjusted hazard ratios (aHR [95% confidence interval]). Results: Age, gender, and race statistically differed across ADI quartiles (Table). Age × ADI interaction was significant ( P <.001). T2D incidence ranged from 6.3 (Q1) to 9.0 (Q4) per 1000 person-years ( P <.001). Women vs. men/non-binary persons (combined due to limited non-binary persons) had 30% lower risk of incident T2D (aHR 0.70 [0.67–0.72]). Risk of incident T2D was higher in persons from higher ADI areas. At median age of 48.6 yrs, the risk was 30% higher in Q2 (aHR 1.3 [1.22–1.38]), 38% higher in Q3 (aHR 1.38 [1.30–1.47]) and 53% higher in Q4 (aHR 1.53 [1.43–1.62]) vs. Q1. Higher ADI was associated with higher incident T2D in younger persons, with risk attenuation with increasing age (Figure). Conclusion: In this population cohort, persons, particularly of younger age, living in more deprived areas had a higher risk of incident T2D. ADI may help identify areas for targeted T2D screening, with implications for CVD screening and prevention.

Abstract Introduction Vulnerable populations experience a higher burden of cardiovascular disease.(1) However, the incidence of cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes, within these populations, is incompletely characterized. Recently, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC) developed the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to categorize counties that may be vulnerable to worse health outcomes. The SVI is composed of 4 themes: socioeconomic status (Theme 1), household composition & disability (Theme 2), minority status & language (Theme 3), and housing type & transportation (Theme 4).(2) We sought to evaluate the association of the 4 SVI themes with county incidence of diagnosed diabetes. Method We used CDC data (2004-2019; reported for 94% of US counties), on county incidence of diagnosed diabetes. The SVI themes were scored from 0 to 1 (low to high vulnerability) based on national percentile ranking. We used weighted least squares regression with restricted cubic splines to model the relationship between SVI themes and incidence of diagnosed diabetes (median data 2004−2019), adjusting for median age, sex ratio, state, percent uninsured, food environment index, healthcare providers, and rurality.(3) The partial effects of SVI themes and diabetes incidence were reported as F-statistics (P-values) and diabetes incidence rate ratios (IRR [95% confidence interval]), which were plotted for all values compared with the 50th percentile (SVI 0.5). For each theme, we also present the IRR for a 0.5-point increase when moving over the lower (SVI score 0.5 vs. 0.0) and the upper (1.0 vs. 0.5) half of the SVI score distribution. Results The 4 SVI theme rank scores were significantly associated with diabetes incidence (all, P&lt;.001). However, Theme 1 and 2 scores showed stronger associations with IRR than Theme 3 and 4 (Figure). For Theme 1, SVI score 0.5 vs. 0.0 was associated with a 15% higher incidence (IRR 1.15 [1.13–1.18]) and score 1.0 vs. 0.5 was associated with a 13% higher incidence (IRR 1.13 [1.11–1.16]). For Theme 2, SVI score 0.5 vs. 0.0 was associated with a 16% higher incidence (IRR 1.16 [1.14–1.18]), but there was no difference between rates for SVI score 1.0 vs. 0.5 (IRR 1.01 [0.99–1.03]). For Theme 3, there was no difference between SVI score 0.5 vs. 0.0 (IRR 0.98 [0.96–1.00]), but rates were 8% lower for SVI score 1.0 vs. 0.5 (IRR 0.92 [0.90–0.94]). For Theme 4, SVI score 0.5 vs. 0.0 was associated with a 3% lower incidence (IRR 0.97 [0.96–0.99]) and score 1.0 vs. 0.5 was associated with a 2% higher incidence (IRR 1.02 [1.01–1.04]). Conclusion In US counties, the strength and directionality of the association between SVI themes and diabetes incidence differed by theme and level of SVI scores. These themes, particularly socioeconomic status and household composition & disability may be leveraged to identify high-risk counties for primary prevention of diabetes, with implications for reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Abstract Context Multiple common genetic variants have been associated with type 2 diabetes, but the mechanism by which they predispose to diabetes is incompletely understood. One such example is variation in MTNR1B, which implicates melatonin and its receptor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Objective To characterize the effect of diabetes-associated genetic variation at rs10830963 in the MTNR1B locus on islet function in people without type 2 diabetes. Design The association of genetic variation at rs10830963 with glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and indices of insulin secretion and action were tested in a cohort of 294 individuals who had previously undergone an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin sensitivity, β-cell responsivity to glucose, and Disposition Indices were measured using the oral minimal model. Setting The Clinical Research and Translation Unit at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Participants Two cohorts were utilized for this analysis: 1 cohort was recruited on the basis of prior participation in a population-based study in Olmsted County. The other cohort was recruited on the basis of TCF7L2 genotype at rs7903146 from the Mayo Biobank. Intervention Two-hour, 7-sample OGTT. Main Outcome Measures Fasting, nadir, and integrated glucagon concentrations. Results One or 2 copies of the G-allele at rs10830963 were associated with increased postchallenge glucose and glucagon concentrations compared to subjects with the CC genotype. Conclusion The effects of rs10830963 on glucose homeostasis and predisposition to type 2 diabetes are likely to be partially mediated through changes in α-cell function.

AbstractBackgroundThis study compared the effects of ondansetron and placebo in patients with diabetes mellitus and symptoms of dyspepsia (diabetic gastroenteropathy [DGE]).MethodsWe performed a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study of ondansetron tablets (8 mg) three times daily for 4 weeks in DGE patients. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index daily diaries. Gastric emptying (GE) of solids (scintigraphy) and duodenal lipid infusions (300 kcal over 2 h) were each assessed twice, with placebo and ondansetron. Drug effects on GE, symptoms during the GE study and during lipid infusion, and daily symptoms were analyzed.Key ResultsOf 41 patients, 37 completed both GE studies and one completed 1; 31 completed both lipid infusions and four only placebo; and all 35 randomized patients completed 4 weeks of treatment. Compared to placebo, ondansetron reduced the severity of fullness (p = 0.02) and belching (p = 0.049) during lipid infusion but did not affect GE T1/2. Both ondansetron and placebo improved daily symptoms versus the baseline period (p < 0.05), but the differences were not significant. In the analysis of covariance of daily symptoms during the treatment period, the interaction term between treatment and the acute effect of ondansetron on symptoms during lipid challenge was significant (p = .024).Conclusions & InferencesOndansetron significantly reduced fullness during enteral lipid infusion in patients with DGE. Overall, ondansetron did not improve daily symptoms versus placebo. But patients in whom ondansetron improved symptoms during enteral lipid challenge were perhaps more likely to experience symptom relief during daily treatment.

The T allele at rs7903146 in TCF7L2 increases the rate of conversion from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. This has been associated with impaired β-cell function and with defective suppression of α-cell secretion by glucose. However, the temporal relationship of these abnormalities is uncertain. To study the longitudinal changes in islet function, we recruited 128 subjects, with 67 homozygous for the diabetes-associated allele (TT) at rs7903146 and 61 homozygous for the protective allele. Subjects were studied on two occasions, 3 years apart, using an oral 75-g glucose challenge. The oral minimal model was used to quantitate β-cell function; the glucagon secretion rate was estimated from deconvolution of glucagon concentrations. Glucose tolerance worsened in subjects with the TT genotype. This was accompanied by impaired postchallenge glucagon suppression but appropriate β-cell responsivity to rising glucose concentrations. These data suggest that α-cell abnormalities associated with the TT genotype (rs7903146) occur early and may precede β-cell dysfunction in people as they develop glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. Article Highlights

Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing in Hispanic or Latino adults. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) score to identify current risk of T2D was developed with limited Hispanic or Latino representation. Therefore, we sought to validate the ADA score in a cohort of Hispanic or Latino adults. Methods: At enrollment in the Sangre Por Salud Biobank, 3,625 Hispanic or Latino adults from Phoenix, Arizona completed a baseline questionnaire. Current risk of undiagnosed T2D was based on non-laboratory risk factors and ADA score ≥5 (Table). Participants also completed T2D screening (ie, fasting glucose, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test, and/or hemoglobin A1c). Undiagnosed T2D was based on 'no self-reported T2D but meeting T2D diagnostic’ criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed associations of ADA risk factors and undiagnosed T2D, and model performance was based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: At enrollment, 7.3% of participants had undiagnosed T2D (n=265/3,625). In multivariable analysis, most risk factors described for the ADA score were significantly associated with T2D, except for sex, which showed no association. ADA score ≥5 had sensitivity 50%, specificity 79%, PPV 18%, and NPV 95%. However, ADA score ≥4 had sensitivity 72%, specificity 61%, PPV 14%, and NPV 96%. ADA score ≥4 vs ≥5 identified 22% (n=59) additional cases of undiagnosed T2D. Furthermore, using the revised definition for elevated blood pressure (>120/80 mmHg) vs ≥140/90 mmHg (current ADA score) further improved the ADA score ≥4 (sensitivity 81%; specificity 52%). Other scores had lower performance using both hypertension definitions. Conclusion: In Hispanic or Latino adults, a lower ADA score than currently recommended identified additional cases of undiagnosed T2D. The ADA score requires validation and recalibration, including for the updated hypertension guidelines.