Citations

Introduction: FL is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western world. FL may cause disease-related symptoms, and patients with high-risk disease usually require systemic therapy. BR is commonly used as first-line therapy for high-risk FL, and the addition of bortezomib to a BR backbone has been studied (Evens A et al. Clin Can Res 2020). Little is known about how these therapeutic options impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL). To fill this gap, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were administered to patients enrolled on E2408 to quantify symptom burden and effects of BR versus BVR induction on HRQL. Methods: Patients (n=258) randomized to receive 6 cycles of BR or BVR induction completed PROs assessing neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) at the beginning of each treatment cycle. Additional PROs measuring fatigue (FACT-F), lymphoma-specific concerns (FACT-Lym) and HRQL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; FACT-G) were completed at baseline, mid-treatment (MT; cycle 3/4) and end of induction (EOI; cycle 6). Paired t-test was used to assess PRO score changes from baseline to MT and EOI within BR or BVR group. Two-sample t-test was used to compare change scores between groups at MT and EOI, respectively. Univariate analyses with a linear model identified patient baseline characteristics and clinical factors (age, sex, stage, performance status, # extra nodal sites, FLIPI, GELF, bone marrow involvement, elevated LDH, palpable splenomegaly, B-symptoms, CRIS) associated with PRO change scores from baseline to EOI, adjusting for treatment group. A multivariate model was built with backward variable selection approach for each of the PROs. Results: As shown in Figure 1, compared with baseline, patients randomized to BVR reported significantly worse FACT/GOG-Ntx scores at cycle 4, which continued to end of induction (FACT/GOG-Ntx change scores -2.91 to -3.73; p < 0.001). Neurotoxicity remained stable for patients treated with BR (Ntx change scores -0.02 to -0.55). FACT-Fatigue scores indicated worse fatigue at MT compared to baseline for patients receiving BVR (-2.7, p<0.05), yet they remained stable for BR. FACT-Lym scores were significantly higher at MT (BR: 2.69, p<0.001; BVR: 2.71, p=0.007) and end of induction (BR: 3.32, p<0.001; BVR: 3.55, p<0.001) compared to baseline, signifying a reduction in lymphoma-related symptoms in both arms. FACT-G scores were comparable between treatment arms at each time-point and did not change significantly from baseline to end of induction. Univariate analyses among all patients identified older age and the absence of palpable splenomegaly at baseline as associated with worse FACT-Lym, FACT-Fatigue, and FACT-G change scores, signifying less improvement in lymphoma-related symptoms, fatigue and HRQL from baseline to end of induction (p<0.01). The presence of B-symptoms at baseline was associated with a greater reduction in lymphoma-related symptoms and fatigue from baseline to end of induction (p<0.01). Higher ECOG performance status was only associated with higher FACT-Fatigue change score, suggesting more improvement in fatigue for those with worse performance status at baseline. A multivariate model generated similar results. Conclusions: Despite worse treatment-related symptoms throughout induction, the addition of bortezomib was associated with comparable overall HRQL to those treated with BR. Both treatments were associated with a reduction in lymphoma-related symptoms from baseline to end of induction, likely contributing to stable HRQL throughout treatment despite treatment-related symptoms. Findings also suggest that a subgroup of patients, particularly those who are older, may experience fewer improvements in lymphoma-related symptoms. This underscores the potential need for closer monitoring and clinical management of these patients. Collectively, results are likely to be encouraging for patients experiencing lymphoma-related symptoms, for whom the symptom burden associated with treatment may be worth the trade-off given the potential for improved disease-related symptom control. Disclosures Evens: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Research To Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mylteni: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Advani:Celgene, Forty Seven, Inc., Genentech/Roche, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kura, Merck, Millenium, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Cell Medica, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, KitePharma, Kyowa, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda: Consultancy. Ansell:Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Winter:Norvartis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB; Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy; CVS/Caremark: Consultancy; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Epizyme: Other: DSMB; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board. Cella:FACIT.org: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pled Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kiniksa: Consultancy; IDDI: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORP.: Consultancy; Oncoquest: Consultancy; Mei Pharma: Consultancy; Ipsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy, Research Funding; BlueNote: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; PROMIS Health Org: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other. Kahl:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche Laboratories Inc: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wagner:Celgene Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Connect Multiple Myeloma Registry: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background : The presence of TP53 aberrations (defined as del(17p) or TP53 gene mutation) is a strong negative predictor of survival in patients (pts) with CLL. First-line chemoimmunotherapy is suboptimal in pts with CLL bearing TP53 aberrations, with 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of only 18% and 38%, respectively, with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (Hallek, Lancet 2010). Ibrutinib is the only once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor with significant PFS and OS benefit demonstrated in multiple randomized phase 3 studies (eg, RESONATE-2, ECOG1912) in the first-line treatment of CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Previous reports of single-agent ibrutinib or ibrutinib-based combination treatments have further demonstrated favorable PFS benefit in pts with TP53 aberrations in both the first-line and relapsed/refractory settings. Despite these study-specific subgroup analyses, there are limited data on long-term outcomes in pts with TP53 aberrations treated with first-line BTK inhibitors. We performed a pooled analysis of data across 4 studies to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib-based therapy in pts with CLL bearing TP53 aberrations. Methods : Data for first-line ibrutinib treatment in pts with TP53 aberrations were pooled across 4 clinical trials in CLL/SLL: PCYC-1122e (NCT01500733; single-agent ibrutinib; n=34), PCYC-1130 (NCT02264574; ibrutinib + obinutuzumab; n=18), ECOG1912 (NCT02048813; ibrutinib + rituximab; n=26), and RESONATE-2 (NCT01722487; single-agent ibrutinib; n=11). ECOG1912 and RESONATE-2 excluded pts with del(17p) but did not exclude pts with TP53 mutations. Long-term PFS (assessed by investigator), OS, and safety are reported. Results : Eighty-nine pts with TP53 aberrations receiving first-line ibrutinib treatment were included in this pooled analysis. Median age was 65 years (range 33-87), and 69% of pts were male. At baseline, 53% had Rai stage III/IV, 38% had bulky disease (lymph nodes ≥5 cm), and 69% (of 87 evaluable) had unmutated IGHV. All patients had either del(17p) or TP53 mutation; 53% (of 89 evaluable) had del(17p) and 91% (of 58 evaluable) had TP53 mutation. Among 16 pts with del(17p) who had TP53 sequencing results available, 11 (69%) had both del(17p) and TP53 mutation. Forty-five pts received ibrutinib as a single agent and 44 received ibrutinib in combination with an anti-CD20 agent. With a median follow-up of 50 months (range 0.1 to 95.9 months), median PFS was not reached (95% CI: 67 months to not estimable; Figure 1A). At 48 months, the PFS rate was 79% and the OS rate was 88% (Figure 1B). Median duration of ibrutinib treatment was 46 months (range 0.1 to 95.5 months). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (20%), study closure (12%), adverse event (10%), withdrawal by pt (7%), death (3%), and other (physician decision due to scheduled pt surgery; 1%). Grade ≥3 adverse events of clinical interest with up to 8 years of treatment with ibrutinib were infection (22%; most commonly pneumonia in 7%), hypertension (13%), atrial fibrillation (12%), and major hemorrhage (7%). With the current follow-up, 46% of pts with TP53 aberrations remained on ibrutinib treatment. Conclusions : With a median follow-up of 4 years, first-line ibrutinib-based treatment resulted in sustained efficacy with high PFS and OS rates in CLL pts with TP53 aberrations, a population with historically poor outcomes. Although pts with TP53 aberrations remain at risk for progression, first-line treatment with ibrutinib has partially overcome the poor prognosis in this high-risk population with 4-year PFS and OS rates of 79% and 88%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in this analysis. These results from a large, pooled, multi-study dataset demonstrated the long-term benefit of first-line ibrutinib-based treatment in pts with TP53 aberrations. Disclosures Allan: Janssen, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Celgene, Genentech, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, and Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Genentech, AbbVie, Ascentage, and Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie: Honoraria. Shanafelt:Genentech, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property. Wiestner:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company; Acerta, Merck, Nurix, Verastem, and Genmab: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property. Moreno:Janssen, AbbVie, Sunesis, and AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie and Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. O'Brien:Eisai: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Vida Ventures: Consultancy; KITE: Research Funding; Vaniam Group LL: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Liu:AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment. Dean:AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment. Lai:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses.

ObjectivesUrine leukotriene E4 (uLTE4) is a biomarker of leukotriene synthesis and is elevated in patients with aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). It can also be useful to help delineate aspirin‐tolerant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) patients from AERD patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if uLTE4 biomarker levels are associated with objective and subjective markers of disease severity in patients with CRSwNP.MethodsA retrospective analysis of CRSwNP patients who underwent uLTE4 testing was completed to determine the association of uLTE4 levels to markers of disease severity. uLTE4 levels, as well as presenting subjective (Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 [SNOT22] scores, asthma control test [ACT] scores) and objective data (Lund‐Mackay CT score, spirometry and lab values) were collected.ResultsAmong the 157 CRSwNP patients who met inclusion criteria, uLTE4 levels were associated with history of asthma (P< .001), aspirin sensitivity (P< .001), worse Lund‐Mackay CT scores (P= .002) and other objective markers of disease severity including serum IgE (P= .05), presenting blood eosinophil level (P< .001), and the highest recorded eosinophil level (P< .001). In subgroup analysis, associations of uLTE4 to disease markers had stronger correlations in the aspirin sensitive CRSwNP group (Rrange 0.31–0.52) than the aspirin tolerant CRSwNP group (Rrange −0.30–0.24). uLTE4 levels were not associated with subjective symptom scores (SNOT22 and ACT scores).ConclusionElevated uLTE4 biomarker levels are associated with worsened objective markers of disease severity in CRSwNP patients but not patient‐reported symptom measures.Level of Evidence3Laryngoscope, 131:961–966, 2021

ObjectiveTo ascertain the prevalence of and associations with distress and professional burnout among academic otolaryngology attending physicians.Study DesignCross‐sectional survey.SettingTwelve US academic otolaryngology programs.MethodsA questionnaire was administered that encompassed sociodemographic and professional features, the Expanded Physician Well‐being Index for distress, the 2‐item Maslach Burnout Inventory for professional burnout, the Patient Health Questionnaire–2 screen for major depressive disorder, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 screen for generalized anxiety disorder.ResultsThe survey response rate was 56% and included 186 attending physicians. The average respondent age was 47 years; 72% were men; 93% were married or partnered; and 86% had children. Distress was present in 40%, professional burnout in 26%, positive depression screening in 8%, and positive anxiety screening in 11%. In a univariable setting, age, hours worked in a typical week, nights on call in a typical week, and years of practice were significantly associated with distress, although in a multivariable setting, only hours worked in a typical week remained significantly associated with a positive Expanded Physician Well‐being Index screen (odds ratio for each 10‐hour increase, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.73‐3.93; P <. 001). In a univariable setting, hours worked in a typical week was significantly associated with a positive Maslach Burnout Inventory screen.ConclusionDistress or professional burnout occurs in more than a quarter of academic otolaryngology attending physicians, whereas the prevalence of depression or anxiety is approximately 10%. The number of hours worked per week had the strongest association with distress and burnout. These findings may be used to develop and implement programs to promote physician well‐being and mitigate professional burnout.

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of distress and burnout in otolaryngology trainees, including associations with relevant sociodemographic and professional factors, and to compare these results with those of attending otolaryngologists.Study DesignA cross‐sectional survey of trainees and attending physicians.SettingTwelve academic otolaryngology programs.MethodsDistress and burnout were measured with the Expanded Physician Well‐being Index and the 2‐item Maslach Burnout Inventory. The Patient Health Questionnaire–2 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 were used to screen for depressive disorders and anxiety disorders, respectively. Associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics were assessed.ResultsOf the 613 surveys administered to trainees and attending physicians, 340 were completed (56%). Among 154 trainees, distress was present in 49%, professional burnout in 35%, positive depressive disorder screening in 5%, and positive anxiety disorder screening in 16%. In univariable analysis, female gender, hours worked in a typical week (HW), and nights on call in a typical week (NOC) were significantly associated with distress. In multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio, 3.91; P =. 001) and HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.89; P =. 003) remained significantly associated with distress. Female gender, HW, and NOC were significantly associated with burnout univariably, although only HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.92; P =. 003) remained significantly associated with burnout in a multivariable setting. Attending physicians had less distress than trainees (P =. 02) and felt less callous and less emotionally hardened than trainees (P <. 001).ConclusionOtolaryngology trainees experience significant work‐place distress (49%) and burnout (35%). Gender, HW, and NOC had the strongest associations with distress and burnout.

Purpose To explore what influences clinicians in selecting continuing medical education (CME) activities in the United States. Method In August 2018, the authors conducted an Internet-based national survey, sampling 100 respondents from each of 5 groups: family medicine physicians, internal medicine and hospitalist physicians, medicine specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. In total, 1,895 clinicians were invited and 500 (26%) responded. Questions addressed the selection and anticipated use of CME delivery modalities and perceived characteristics of specific CME providers. Response formats used best–worst scaling or 5-point ordinal response options. Results The factors identified as most important in selecting CME activities were topic (best–worst scaling net positivity 0.54), quality of content (0.51), availability of CME credit (0.43), and clinical practice focus (0.41), while referral frequency (−0.57) ranked lowest. The activities that the respondents anticipated using most in the future were live (mean 3.8 [1 = not likely, 5 = very likely]), online (mean 3.5), point-of-care (mean 3.5), and print-based (mean 3.5) activities. For online CME, the features of greatest appeal were that learning could be done when clinicians had time (mean 4.4), at their own pace (mean 4.2), and at lower cost (mean 4.2). For live CME, the features of greatest appeal were that the subject was best taught using this modality (mean 4.0), or the activity was located in a destination spot (mean 4.0) or a regional location (mean 3.9). When rating specific CME providers, most academic institutions received relatively high ratings for research focus and clinical practice focus, whereas commercial providers had slightly higher ratings for ease of access. Responses were generally similar across clinician types and age groups. Conclusions Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants are interested in using a variety of CME delivery modalities. Appealing features of online and live CME were different.

Abstract Immune dysfunction is a hallmark of CLL/MBL; ~25% individuals with newly diagnosed CLL have hypogammaglobulinemia at diagnosis. In this study of newly diagnosed CLL/MBL, we sought to a) investigate the association between serum immunoglobulins and specific mutations identified by next generation sequencing, and b) determine if serum immunoglobulin levels predict TFT, independent of the CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) and tumor mutational load (TML). We used the Mayo Clinic CLL Resource to identify newly diagnosed CLL/MBL individuals consented within 2 years of diagnosis. Baseline clinical characteristics and the CLL-IPI score was ascertained on all individuals. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood CD5+/CD19+ clonal B-cells; and the entire coding regions of 60 somatically recurring mutated CLL driver genes were enriched using a customized Agilent SureSelect gene panel and sequenced in Illumina Hiseq4000. Serum immunoglobulins were quantitated by radial immunodiffusion using Immunoplates. The relationship between serum immunoglobulins was assessed: a) with individual gene mutations (mutated vs. not); and b) using the TML score (using a value of 0, 1, and 2 or greater [2+] mutated genes). The impact of serum immunoglobulin levels on TFT was analyzed for all individuals. Of 356 individuals identified, 80 (22%) had MBL, median age was 63 years (28-87), 261 (73%) were male, and the CLL-IPI distribution was: low risk (n=149, 42%), intermediate risk (n=112, 32%), and high/very high risk (n=94, 26%). We observed 43%, 39%, and 18% individuals with 0, 1, or 2+ mutated genes, respectively. The most commonly mutated genes were NOTCH1 (13%), SF3B1 (13%), TP53 (8%), ATM (8%), BIRC3 (7%), and NFKBIE (7%). Using standard cutoffs, 135 (38%) individuals had low serum IgG, 73 (21%) had low serum IgA, and 154 (44%) had low serum IgM at diagnosis. There were no differences in individual gene mutation frequencies between individuals with low and normal serum IgG. In contrast, individuals with low serum IgA were more likely to have mutations in NOTCH1 (25% vs 10%) and ATM (14% vs 7%) compared to those with normal IgA, and individuals with low serum IgM were more likely to have mutations in NOTCH1 (19% vs 9%) and BIRC3 (11% vs 4%) compared to those with normal IgM (all p-values &lt;0.05). There were no significant differences in individuals with low serum IgG based on TML scores of 0, 1, and 2+ (31%, 35%, 40%, respectively, p=0.28). However, individuals with low serum IgA and low serum IgM were more likely to have a higher TML (8%, 20%, 36% for IgA, p&lt;0.0001; and 35%, 45%, 54% for IgM, p&lt;0.0001, for TML scores of 0, 1, and 2+, respectively). After a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 157 individuals required CLL therapy. After adjusting for CLL-IPI and TML, low serum IgG, low serum IgA, and low serum IgM (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.8, 2.3, and 2.4, respectively, all p-values &lt;0.05) were independently associated with a shorter TFT. Our study shows that individuals with CLL/MBL who harbor mutations in NOTCH1, ATM and BIRC3 are more likely to have low serum IgA and IgM at diagnosis. Serum IgA and IgM (but not serum IgG) levels decrease with an increase in the TML score. Finally, low serum immunoglobulins can predict TFT, independent of the CLL-IPI and TML, which has important implications for risk stratification in newly diagnosed CLL/MBL. Citation Format: Sameer A. Parikh, Cristine Allmer, Geffen Kleinstern, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Shulan Tian, Cecilia B. De Campos, Laura A. Bruins, Daniel R. o"brien, Brian F. Kabat, Kari G. Rabe, Aaron D. Norman, Huihuang Yan, Xing Li, Timothy G. Call, Wei Ding, Jose F. Leis, Saad J. Kenderian, Celine M. Vachon, James R. Cerhan, Neil E. Kay, Susan L. Slager, Esteban Braggio. Serum immunoglobulins are an independent prognostic marker of time to first therapy in newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6466.

Abstract Background: Obesity is a well established risk factor not only for increased prostate cancer incidence, but for poorer survival from prostate cancer. However, there is limited knowledge on the role of the circulating lipidome in prostate cancer. In order to target lipid metabolism optimally, it is critical to understand the spectrum of changes in circulating lipid profiles and the association with clinical outcome across the natural history of prostate cancer. Aim: To assess the relationship between the plasma lipidome and clinical outcome in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantitate over 500 lipid species in plasma samples from 3 cohorts (1) 389 men with localized prostate cancer, (2) 44 men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), and (3) 137 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Associations between circulating lipids with metastatic relapse, androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) failure or overall survival for each relevant disease stage were examined by latent class analysis and cox regression. Results: Circulating lipid profiles displaying elevated levels of ceramides were associated with metastatic relapse in localized prostate cancer (HR 5.8, 95% CI 3.0-11, P 1 × 10−6), early ADT failure in mHSPC (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.3, P 0.03), and shorter overall survival in CRPC (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.7, P 2 × 10−6). ADT failure in mHSPC and shorter overall survival in CRPC were also associated with elevated levels of other sphingolipids (sphingomyelins, hexosylceramides). The prognostic significance of the high risk lipid profiles in localized prostate cancer was independent of clinicopathological characteristics (lipid profile HR 4.7, 95%CI 2.4-9.3, P 7 × 10−6) when modeled with Gleason score (P&lt;0.0001) and pathological stage (P&lt;0.0001). Furthermore, the circulating lipid profiles were independent of metabolic factors (localized prostate cancer lipid profile HR 8.2, 95% CI 2.6-25, P 0.0003 when modeled with diabetes, statin, hypertension, body mass index [BMI]; CRPC lipid profile HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-3.8, P x10−6 when modeled with BMI). Conclusion: Elevated circulating ceramides are associated with poorer clinical outcomes across the natural history of prostate cancer (from localized to metastatic hormone-sensitive to metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer). This demonstrates that aberrant lipid metabolism in the patients occurs early in prostate cancer and could be therapeutically targeted in prospective clinical trials to improve prostate cancer outcomes. Citation Format: Lisa Glen Horvath, Hui-Ming Lin, Blossom Mak, Kate Mahon, Nicole Yeung, Maria Docanto, Peter Sutherland, andrew Shepherd, Winston Tan, Arun Azad, Manish Kohli, Peter Meikle, Lisa Butler. Lipidomic analysis of circulating lipids across the natural history of prostate cancer identifies aberrant ceramide metabolism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4761.