Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

727 citation(s) found for "Xu, Jeff L".

The Physician-Patient Relationship Impacts Patient Quality of Life in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of an International Survey of 1482 Patients.
Bowen, Deborah A., Venkat, Chaya, Reinalda, Megan S., Sloan, Jeff A. , Call, Timothy G. , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Slager, Susan L. , Zent, Clive S. , Kay, Neil E.

Blood | April 19, 2020 | Volume: 110 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2060-2060

10.1182/blood.v110.11.2060.2060 Get It

Abstract Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can have a profound effect on the quality of life (QOL) of patients living with the illness. To our knowledge, no studies to date have evaluated the influence of the doctor-patient relationship on patient’s emotional distress or QOL. Methods: We conducted an international, web-based survey of patients with CLL using standardized instruments to evaluate QOL. Additional questions on the survey explored how often patients thought about their disease and evaluated their satisfaction with specific aspects of their relationship with the physician caring for them. Patients were also asked to indicate what phrases their physicians had used to describe/characterize CLL. Results: Between June and October 2006, 1482 patients responded to the survey. The diagnosis of CLL was validated in a randomly selected subset of patients. Over half (55.9%; n=822) of patients reported they thought about their CLL diagnosis daily. Although the proportion of patients who thought about CLL daily decreased with time, two or more years after diagnosis over 50% of patients still thought about their disease every day. When asked to indicate their satisfaction with various aspects of the physician caring for their CLL, more than 90% (n=1340) of patients felt their doctor had a good understanding of how their disease was progressing (i.e., the stage, blood counts, lymph nodes) but only 69% (n=1024) felt their physician had a good understanding of how CLL affected their QOL (anxiety, worry, fatigue, etc.). Similarly, while 90% (n=1324) of patients felt comfortable talking to their doctor about treatment and management of CLL, only 77% (n=1134) felt comfortable talking to their doctor about how CLL affected QOL. Reported satisfaction with their physician in these areas strongly related to patients’ measured emotional and overall QOL on standardized instruments (all p<0.001). This effect on QOL remained (p<0.002) after adjustment for age, extent of co-morbid health conditions, measured fatigue, and treatment status in a regression analysis. Finally, patients were asked to indicate whether the physician caring for them had used specific phrases to describe CLL. Thirty-three percent of patients had been told “CLL is the ‘good’ leukemia,” 24% had been told “don’t worry about your CLL,” and 35% had been told “if you could pick what cancer to have, this is what you would choose.” Overall, 52% of patients had received one or more of these characterizations of CLL by their physician. The emotional and overall QOL were worse among patients who reported their physician had used these phrases to describe CLL (all p≤0.001). This effect on QOL remained after regression analysis (p<0.002). Patients whose physician had used one of these phrases to describe CLL were also less likely to feel their physician understood how CLL was effecting their QOL and to feel comfortable discussing the effects of CLL on their QOL with their physician (all p<0.001). Conclusions: Physicians play an important role helping patients adjust to the physical, intellectual, and emotional challenges of CLL. The effectiveness with which physicians accomplish these tasks appears to impact the QOL of patients with CLL. Additional studies exploring how physicians can best support patients with CLL are needed.
Fostamatinib Disodium (FosD), An Oral Inhibitor of Syk, Is Well-Tolerated and Has Significant Clinical Activity in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL/CLL)
Friedberg, Jonathan W. , Sharman, Jeff P. , Schaefer-Cutillo, Julia, Johnston, Patrick B. , Vos, Sven de , LaCasce, Ann S. , Leonard, John P. , Cripe, Larry D., Sinha, Rajni, Gregory, Stephanie A., Sweetenham, John , Lowe, Ann M., Vose, Julie M. , Levy, Ronald , Shipp, Margaret Ann

Blood | April 18, 2020 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3-3

10.1182/blood.v112.11.3.3 Get It

Abstract Certain normal and malignant B-cells rely upon “tonic” B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated survival signals. BCR signaling induces the phosphorylation of the associated Ig alpha and beta proteins and the recruitment and activation of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK); thereafter, SYK initiates downstream events and amplifies the original BCR signal. A subset of DLBCL exhibits coordinate overexpression of BCR pathway components, including SYK, and relies upon tonic BCR signaling. FosD is an orally available inhibitor of SYK under development for rheumatoid arthritis, and has demonstrated significant in vitro activity against BCR-dependent NHLs. We have performed the first clinical trial of the oral SYK inhibitor, FosD, in patients (pts) with a variety of relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. We first enrolled 13 pts in a Phase I component, exploring two dose levels (200 and 250 mg BID) of FosD. Pts (Follicular [FL], 5; CLL/SLL, 2; mantle [MCL], 3; DLBCL, 3) were heavily pretreated. On the first day of FosD dosing at 200 mg and 250 mg, the maximum plasma concentrations were 668 ± 258 ng/mL and 1020 ± 781 ng/mL, and the AUC0–4 estimates were 1800 ± 602 ng*h/mL and 2590 ± 1900 ng*h/mL, respectively. Plasma concentrations increased approximately 2-fold with continued administration, but beyond Day 29 there was no apparent change in FosD concentrations measured over time. Dose limiting toxicity in Phase I was neutropenia; and 200 mg BID was chosen for Phase II evaluation. We then enrolled 68 pts with relapsed/refractory NHL in 3 separate disease cohorts: DLBCL (23); FL (21) and other B-cell NHL (24) including SLL/CLL (11), MCL (9) marginal zone/MALT (3) and lymphoplasmacytic NHL (1). The median age of pts in phase II was 61 (range 41–87); pts received a median of 5 prior therapies, including ASCT (16; 12 with DLBCL) and radioimmunotherapy (8). FosD was overall very well tolerated; there were 4 cases of febrile neutropenia reported. Eight pts required dose modification for neutropenia (2), hypertension (2), liver function test abnormalities (2), fever (1) and mucositis (1). Six pts withdrew before initial response evaluation (AE, 5; noncompliance, 1). Best responses by disease were: DLBCL 21% (4PR; 1CR); SLL/CLL 54% (6PR); FL 10% (2PR); MCL 11% (1PR). Stable disease was observed in an additional 23 patients, including 12 with FL, 4 with DLBCL, 4 with MCL, 2 with CLL/SLL and 1 with MALT. As of 7/15/08, 16 pts were treated for more than 200 days, and 14 pts remain on study. Median PFS is 4.5 months, and only 5 pts have died (4 with DLBCL of disease progression and 1 with CLL of infection following therapy). Several pts with CLL/SLL experienced a transient increase in circulating lymphocytes in the setting of responding nodal disease. Of the 6 responding pts with CLL, Zap-70 status was positive (3), negative (1) and unknown (2); cytogenetics were trisomy 12 (1), del13 (1), normal (1), complex (1) and unknown (2). We conclude that disrupting BCR-induced signaling by inhibiting SYK kinase represents a safe and well-tolerated novel therapeutic approach to NHL. In addition to significant responses in DLBCL and CLL/SLL, prolonged stable disease was observed in pts with FL. FosD should be developed further, as a single agent and in rational combinations, for BCR-dependent B-cell NHLs.
Validation of single item Linear Analogue Scale Assessments (LASAs) for assessing quality of life (QOL) in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas
Decker, Paul A. , Brown, Paul D. , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Buckner, Jan C. , Rummans, Teresa A. , Clark, Matthew M. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Decker, Paul A. , Ballman, Karla V. , Locke, Dona E.C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8583-8583

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8583 Get It

8583 Background: Patient QOL assessment requires balancing the detail provided by multi-item assessments with the reduced burden of single-item assessments. We investigated the psychometric properties of single-item LASA assessments used in 3 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II trials for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. Methods: Measures included QOL LASAs (overall, physical, emotional, spiritual, intellectual), Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Profile of Mood States (POMS), and Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy (FACT; overall, physical, emotional). Association of LASA measures with SDS, POMS, and FACT domains and with ECOG performance score (PS) and MMSE was assessed with Spearman’s correlation. Repeated measures ANOVA models compared the change over time of LASAs and SDS, POMS, and FACT. Cox regression modeled the association of baseline QOL and survival. Results: 205 patients completed the QOL assessments across 3 time points. LASA mean scores ranged from 60–78; SDS, POMS, and FACT ranged from 68–81. No significant changes across time for overall and emotional scores were observed. FACT physical decreased over time (p<0.001) as did LASA physical (p=0.08). LASA scales were strongly associated with corresponding scales on SDS, POMS, and FACT (0.44<rho<0.65; p<0.001). LASA was negatively associated with PS and positively with MMSE. Baseline scores for overall FACT (p=0.005) and LASA physical (p=0.015) were associated with better survival. Conclusions: The single-item LASA assessments have comparable psychometric properties as longer assessments for the same constructs. Correlations with PS and MMSE were as expected (convergent/concurrent validity). The discriminant validity and prognostic ability of LASA items were similar to the multi-item instruments. Collectively, the data suggest that the single item LASA scales are valid for assessing QOL in patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas and are an appropriate alternative when a shorter instrument is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
What is the value added of patient reported outcomes relative to physician rated symptom assessments?
Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Huschka, Mashele , Schaefer, Paul, Jett, James R., Adjei, Alex A. , Sloan, Jeff A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8580-8580

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8580 Get It

8580 Background: This pooled analysis examined the relationship between single-item and multiple-item quality of life (QOL) measures and assessed the agreement between changes in QOL and patient-reported adverse events (AE). Methods: Data from six lung cancer clinical trials involving 358 patients were pooled. All trials incorporated the UNISCALE and one of three multiple-item assessments: the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-Lung, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, or the Symptom Distress Scale. A clinically significant decline (CSD) in QOL was defined as a 10-point drop from baseline. A CSD in AE was defined as a change from ≤ grade 2 at baseline to ≥ grade 3 post-baseline. Spearman rank correlations and Bland-Altman approach were used to assess agreement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the time to the first occurrence of a severe (grade 3+) AE and first CSD in QOL. Results: Correlations between the UNISCALE and multi-item assessments were modest (rho=0.49–0.66). At least one 10-point decline in the UNISCALE and multi-item assessments were reported by 58% and 40% respectively. At least one severe AE was reported in 44% of patients post-baseline. The percent agreement between experiencing a severe AE and a CSD in QOL was 49% and 59% for UNISCALE and the multi-item tools. For individual AE, the percent agreement between a CSD in AE and a CSD in QOL ranged from 37% to 50% for UNISCALE and 44% to 69% for the multi-item tools. The median time to the first CSD in QOL for UNISCALE and multi-item tools was 67 and 142 days respectively. The median time to the first occurrence of a severe AE was 304 days. Conclusions: QOL and AE provide quantifiably different information. A 10-point decline in QOL occurs earlier than CTC AE reporting. Patient reported outcomes may be more sensitive in identifying clinically relevant problems than physician rated symptom assessments. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Providing end-of-life care to patients seeking hope for cure: Improving Mayo Clinic palliative care utilization
Moynihan, Timothy J. , Ruegg, Suzanne R., Tan, A., Sloan, Jeff A. , Swetz, Keith M. , Atherton, Philip J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 18552-18552

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.18552 Get It

18552 Background: We reviewed Palliative Care Consultation Service (PCCS) referrals to attempt to promote earlier referrals, and to improve overall patient care. Methods: Eligibility for PCCS referral is life expectancy of one year or less. Data was collected prospectively on the first 461 referrals (452 individual patients) over the initial 30-month period (January 1, 2003 to July 1, 2005). Additional factors were retrospectively abstracted from documentation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was then performed. Results: 452 patients were seen (mean age 71.9 years), and 387 (86%) have died. Median length of inpatient stay was 8 days, with PCCS consultation requested 3 days prior to discharge. 107 patients (24%) died prior to hospital discharge. 345 patients survived to discharge, 236 (68%) died within 3 months, and 262 (76%) died within 6 months. Median survival from consultation to death was 12 days and after hospital discharge was 6 days. Secondary analysis determined that patients with malignancy had longer median survival from discharge to death than those with other diagnoses (11 days versus 3 days, p = 0.025). Median survival was longer with referrals from general surgery and surgical specialties (37 days and 8 days, respectively), compared to hematology-oncology and critical care (2 days and 0 days, respectively). Conclusions: The primary goal of the PCCS is to provide symptom control and maximize quality of life at the end of life. These data suggest palliative care services are unnecessarily delayed until too late. Education is necessary to facilitate earlier PCCS intervention. Survival analysis suggests providers are more likely to consider PCCS involvement in patients with malignancy compared with other diseases. Critical care and hematology-oncology, showed the lowest median survivals. Education efforts must be focused on these areas. Programs are underway to identify eligible patients earlier in their disease process, and educate providers about key end-of-life services provided to patients and families. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
A placebo-controlled trial of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, in patients with the cancer anorexia/weight loss syndrome. North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trial N00C1
Jatoi, Aminah , Dakhil, Shaker R. , Kugler, J. W., Rowland, K. M., Keit, Joan, Verdirame, Joseph D., Novotny, Paul J. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Nguyen, Phuong L., Loprinzi, Charles L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8534-8534

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8534 Get It

8534 Purpose: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a putative mediator of the cancer anorexia/weight loss syndrome. This study was designed to determine if etanercept (a dimeric fusion protein consisting of the extracellular ligand-binding portion of the human 75 kilodalton TNF receptor linked to the Fc portion of human IgG1) could palliate this syndrome. Methods: 63 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to etanercept 25 mg SQ twice/week versus a comparably-administered placebo, both of which were to be given for at least 12 weeks. All patients had an incurable malignancy, acknowledged loss of weight and/or appetite as a concern, and reported weight loss of > 5 pounds over 2 months and/or a daily intake of < 20 calories/kg body weight. The above sample size provided 81% power to detect a 24% difference in the percentage of patients who gained >/= 10% of baseline weight. Results: At baseline, groups were comparable on age, gender, tumor type, and degree of weight loss. Over time, weight gain was minimal in both groups; no patient gained >/= 10% baseline weight. Appetite questionnaires (the NCCTG Anorexia/Cachexia Questionnaire and FACT-AN) revealed negligible improvements in both groups. Median survival was comparable: 175 days versus 148 in etanercept-treated and placebo-exposed patients, respectively (p=0.82). Finally, preliminary data on adverse events showed that etanercept-treated patients had higher rates of neurotoxicity (29% versus 0%) but lower rates of anemia (0% versus 19%) and thrombocytopenia (0% versus 14%). Infection rates were negligible in both groups. Clinical correlative data on TNF genotyping will be available at the time of the meeting. Conclusion: This TNF inhibitor does not appear to palliate the cancer anorexia/weight loss syndrome. The study was supported by CA37404, the American Institute for Cancer Research, and Amgen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Comparison of baseline quality of life between minority and non-minority patients participating in oncology clinical trials
Tan, Angelina D., Novotny, P. J., Kaur, Judith S. , Buckner, Jan C. , Schaefer, Paul, Stella, Philip J., Sloan, Jeff A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8527-8527

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8527 Get It

8527 Background: Minority patients (MP) suffer deficits in access to care and socioeconomic status. This study uses a patient-level pooled analysis to explore whether these deficits translate into quality of life (QOL) differences between MP and non-MP on clinical trials. Method: Baseline QOL scores were combined from 47 clinical trials (6,513 patients) conducted either at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center or in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. QOL scales used were the Uniscale, Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA), Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G). Fisher’s Exact tests and linear regression adjusted for age, site, and performance score. Survival data was compared using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Results: Eight percent (531) of patients self-reported as MP (0.45% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 0.7% Asian, 5% Black/African American, 1.5% Hispanic, 0.1% Native Hawaiian and 0.3% Other). MP had no meaningful deficits in overall QOL or the SDS and were slightly worse on FACT-G total score, physical, social/family, functional, and SDS nausea severity. MP among lung cancer patients reported greater nausea (58 vs 69) and sleep problems (34 vs 54), with neurological cancers reported worse emotional well-being (53 vs 74), and with GI tumors had lower social/family well-being (60 vs 67). Regression models confirmed these results. Median survival time was shorter for MP (198 vs 310 days, p=0.001) but was not significant after adjusting for disease severity. Conclusions: MP on these clinical trials did not report large QOL deficits at baseline relative to non-MP. MP did indicate small deficits in physical, social, and emotional subscales. MP experienced large tumor-specific deficits for a few QOL domains that might bear further attention. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
What role do cancer patients want to play in treatment decision making: A pooled-analysis
Sloan, Jeff A. , Huschka, Mashele , Atherton, P., Degner, Lesley F., Rummans, Teresa A. , Clark, Matthew M. , Hack, Thomas F. , Smith, Tenbroeck G

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8521-8521

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8521 Get It

8521 Background: The extent of patient involvement in the decision making process for cancer treatment can impact satisfaction with care. A pooled-analysis of clinical studies from the US and Canada incorporating the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) was conducted to produce normalized data regarding patient preferences and examine differences in role preference related to country, tumor type, gender and other demographics. Methods: Patient data culled from six trials indicated the treatment decision making role preferred and the role actually experienced clinically. Fisher’s Exact Tests were performed to compare role distribution concordance and association with clinical and demographic variables. Results: Data available for 3,491 patients indicated that 25% preferred an active role, 46% a collaborative role, and 29% a passive role in their medical treatment decision making. In terms of actual experience, 30% of patients reported taking on an active role, 34% collaborative, and 36% passive. Overall, 61% of patients reported playing the role they prefer. Differences between genders in the preferred role were slight, but males achieved their preferred role more often than females (66% vs. 60%, p=0.011). More women actually took a passive role than men (40% vs. 24%, p<0.0001) as did more patients in the US than Canada (84% vs. 54%, p<0.001). Canadian patients preferred more passive than active roles (33% vs 22.4%) and US patients preferred more active to passive roles (31.9% vs 14.2%) (p<0.001). Older patients preferred a more passive role and took on that role. Differences in role preference across tumor types were negligible. Conclusions: Roughly one half of the cancer patients studied indicated that they preferred to have a collaborative relationship with physicians, the remaining patients split equally between an active and passive role. The US cohort seemed to want to be more assertive than their Canadian counterparts and women ended up playing a more passive role than they preferred. Given these gender and cross-county differences these findings highlight the need for individualized patient communication styles to be incorporated into treatment plans No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Transdermal testosterone in female cancer survivors with decreased libido
Barton, Debra L. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Wender, Donald B., Dalton, Robert J., Balcueva, Ernie, Bernath, Albert M., DeKrey, Wanda L., Larson, Tim , Bearden, James D. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Atherton, Philip J. , Larson, T.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8507-8507

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8507 Get It

8507 Background: Problems with sexual functioning are an issue negatively affecting the quality of life of female cancer survivors. Testosterone has been implicated as an important hormone in sexual functioning such as libido. Studies of transdermal testosterone have shown benefit in enhancing libido in women who have been diagnosed with hypoactive sexual desire disorder after bilateral oophorectomy. This phase III placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated whether transdermal testosterone would increase libido in female cancer survivors. Methods: Women with a history of cancer, currently without evidence of disease, were eligible if they reported a decrease in sexual desire and had a sexual partner. Women must have been postmenopausal. Eligible women were randomized to receive 2% testosterone in Vanicream (10 mg daily) versus placebo Vanicream for four weeks, then crossed over to the opposite treatment. The primary endpoint, libido, was measured via the desire subscales of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ), which were completed at baseline and at the end of 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the average intra-patient change from baseline to four weeks in the CSFQ subscales between the two arms. A total of 64 patients per group were needed to provide 80% power to detect a difference of 8 units between the treatment means. Two-sided alternative hypothesis testing and a 5% Type I error rate were used. Results: One hundred fifty women were enrolled onto this study. Complete data were available for 132 women. For those on active testosterone cream, serum bioavailable testosterone levels increased significantly over placebo, with a mean change from baseline of 12 and 10 ng/dl for the first and second period, respectively (p<.0001). The average intra-patient change from baseline to week 4 in libido was 5.5 on testosterone and 4.4 on placebo (p=0.58). No carryover effect was detected. The difference in average intra-patient changes from baseline for the entire crossover design between the two arms was only 1.1 points (95% confidence interval of -1.2 to 3.4, p=0.35). Conclusion: Testosterone is not a panacea for libido troubles in women with a history of cancer. Further studies are needed to determine whether there is a role for transdermal testosterone in this population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Phase III double-blind study of depot octreotide versus placebo in the prevention of acute diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy: Results of North Central Cancer Treatment Group protocol N00CA
Martenson, James A., Sloan, Jeff A. , Deming, Richard L., Wender, Donald B., Stien, Kathy J., Tai, Tianxiang, Proulx, G., Zhu, Angela W. , Miller, Robert C. , Atherton, Philip J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2020 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 8506-8506

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.8506 Get It

8506 Background: A randomized study (Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 54:195–202, 2002) demonstrated a beneficial effect for octreotide in the treatment of diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of depot octreotide in the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Methods: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy, with a planned minimum dose of 45 Gy at 1.70–2.1 Gy per day, were eligible for this study. The study was designed for a Wilcoxon test, with 112 evaluable patients, to have 85% power to detect a further one grade decrease in diarrhea over and above that experienced by patients treated with placebo. Between June 13, 2002 and October 28, 2005, 120 evaluable patients were randomly allocated, in double blind fashion, to receive octreotide (62 patients) or placebo (58 patients), prior to the fourth radiation therapy fraction. Octreotide dosing: Octreotide, 100 micrograms subcutaneously on day 1 followed by depot octreotide, 20 milligrams intramuscularly on days 2 and 29. Results: Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 diarrhea was observed in 17%, 32%, 26% and 26% of patients treated with octreotide and 18%, 34%, 22%, and 26% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.86). Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 tenesmus was observed in 55%, 30%, 11% and 4% of patients treated with octreotide and 76%, 16%, 4%, and 4% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.04). No other statistically significant differences in toxicity were observed. Conclusions: Octreotide, as administered in this study, did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. [Table: see text]