Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Studies demonstrate an association between aortic hemodynamics and cognitive function. The impact of pregnancy history on this association is unknown. METHODS Postmenopausal women (age 59 ± 5 years; years since last pregnancy 35 ± 3) with either a history of preeclampsia (PE; n = 34) or a history of a normotensive pregnancy (NP; n = 30) underwent cognitive testing: Letter-Number Sequencing, Digit Span, Trail Making Test, and letter and category fluency. Applanation tonometry was used to derive aortic systolic and diastolic blood pressure and augmentation index. RESULTS Distribution of cognitive scores and aortic hemodynamic measures was similar between the PE and NP groups. Principal component (PC) analysis was used to reduce the 3 aortic hemodynamic measures and the 5 cognitive variables to single summary indices, each representing a weighted average of their respective constituent variables. Using a multivariable linear model based on these PCs that adjusted for pregnancy history and body mass index, the composite index of aortic hemodynamics was associated with the summary cognitive index, whether taking into account a potential interaction with pregnancy history (P = 0.035) or not (P = 0.026) (interaction P = 0.178). Multivariable modeling of individual cognitive tests revealed a differential association for letter fluency by pregnancy history (test for interaction P = 0.023); this score correlated with the aortic hemodynamic index in the PE (partial R2 = 0.20), but not the NP (partial R2 = 0.00) group. CONCLUSIONS Elevated aortic hemodynamics may negatively impact cognitive function in postmenopausal women with specific executive functions, such as letter fluency, being impacted more by a pregnancy history of PE.

Abstract Background: Active cancer is an independent predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE; hazard ratio=2.2–4.2). However, whether the risk of VTE recurrence among active cancer patients can be further stratified by tumor site or presence of metastases is uncertain. Objectives: To estimate and compare the cumulative incidence of VTE recurrence by tumor site and presence of metastases among active cancer patients with incident VTE. Study Design and Population: Retrospective cohort study of Olmsted County, MN residents with active cancer who lived >1 day after a first-lifetime deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism over the 35-year period, 1966–2000 (n=418). 25 patients with oral (6), bone (1), skin (4), soft tissue (3), eye (1) and other/unknown (10) were excluded, leaving 393 remaining patients. Measurements: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, tumor site, presence and location of tumor metastases, and date of first recurrent VTE. Tumor site and metastases were tested as potential predictors of time-to-recurrent VTE using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 114 of 393 patients with active cancer developed recurrent VTE over 764 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE at seven, 30, 90, and 180 days, 1, 5, and 10 years was 1.9%, 10.3%, 18.3%, 22.3%, 28.7%, 44.5%, and 53.5%, respectively. After adjusting for age and gender, tumor site was an independent predictor of first VTE recurrence (p<0.01). The hazard of VTE recurrence was over 2-fold higher for lung cancer patients compared to the lowest recurrence group (kidney, bladder and other genitourinary cancer; HR=2.04, 95% CI: 0.88, 4.70, p=0.096), and the hazard for brain and pancreatic cancer was nearly 2-fold higher (HR=1.9 for each, p=0.22, 0.24, respectively). The hazard of recurrence among hematological; breast and ovarian; gastric, colon, and liver; and prostate cancer patients did not differ significantly from the lowest recurrence group. Univariately, the presence of metastases at cancer diagnosis was not associated with recurrent VTE (HR=1.16; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.69, p=0.45). Conclusions: Tumor site is an independent predictor of VTE recurrence after adjusting for age and gender. In particular, lung, brain and pancreatic cancer patients have the highest risk for recurrence and these patients should be considered for secondary prophylaxis. Disease severity, as reflected by metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis, is not a predictor of recurrence.

Abstract Background: Most trials of standard heparin and warfarin therapy used the 3- to 6-month cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence as the primary efficacy outcome. Consequently, the effect of heparin anticoagulation intensity on short-term VTE recurrence after controlling for other predictors of recurrence (e.g., active cancer, neurological disease with extremity paresis) is uncertain. Objectives: To test standard heparin anticoagulation intensity, using activated partial prothrombin time (APTT) data, as an independent predictor of 14-day VTE recurrence. Measurements: Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we identified all Olmsted County, MN residents with an incident deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism over the 14-year period, 1984–1997 (n=1165). We followed each case (conditional on surviving one day) forward in time through their complete medical records in the community for first VTE recurrence. We collected date of incident VTE onset, start and stop dates of heparin and warfarin, and date, time and result of all APTT and platelet count values. Using these and other measures of standard heparin therapy as time-dependent variables, we tested the intensity of heparin anticoagulation as an independent predictor of 14-day VTE recurrence while controlling for other baseline characteristics using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Of the 1165 patients, 1026 (88%) and 989 (85%) received heparin and warfarin, respectively, and 254 (22%) developed recurrent VTE over 5461 person-years of follow-up; 23 recurred within 14 days. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of 14-day recurrence included female gender (HR=3.06, 95%CI: 1.05, 8.91; p=0.04) and neurologic disease with extremity paresis (HR=6.01, 95%CI: 1.93, 18.66; p<0.01); the hazard of recurrence was marginally increased for active cancer (HR=2.21, p=0.13). Warfarin therapy (HR=0.44, p=0.11) and a therapeutic APTT within the first 24 hours of therapy (HR=0.41, p=0.08) were marginally protective, but age, body mass index, time interval between VTE onset and start of heparin, and other measures of heparin anticoagulation intensity (e.g., proportion of time in therapeutic APTT range, etc) were not predictors of recurrence. Three patients developed new and persistent thrombocytopenia beginning 2, 4 and 5 days after starting heparin, respectively and prior to VTE recurrence. Conclusions: VTE recurrence is uncommon within 14 days after starting heparin therapy. Female gender and neurologic disease with extremity paresis are independent predictors of 14-day recurrence, and active cancer may be an additional predictor. Warfarin therapy and a therapeutic APTT within the first 24 hours may predict a reduced recurrence risk. However, other measures of heparin anticoagulation intensity were non-predictive. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia may partially account for early VTE recurrence.

Abstract Background: Most trials of standard heparin and warfarin therapy used the 3- to 6-month cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence as the primary efficacy outcome. However, the independent effect of warfarin anticoagulation intensity on VTE recurrence after controlling for other predictors of recurrence (e.g., active cancer, neurological disease with extremity paresis) is uncertain. Objectives: To test warfarin anticoagulation intensity, using international normalized ratio (INR) data, as an independent predictor of 6-month VTE recurrence. Measurements: Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we identified all Olmsted County, MN residents with an incident deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism over the 14-year period, 1984–1997 (n=1165). We followed each case (conditional on surviving 14 days without VTE recurrence) forward in time through their complete medical records in the community for first VTE recurrence. We collected date of incident VTE onset, start and stop dates of heparin and warfarin, and date, time and result of all INR values. Using these and other measures of standard warfarin therapy as time-dependent variables, we tested the intensity of warfarin anticoagulation (expressed as the cumulative percent of time with an INR at or above 2.0 [or at or above 1.5] while on warfarin) as an independent predictor of 6-month VTE recurrence while controlling for other baseline characteristics using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Of the 1165 patients, 1026 (88%) and 989 (85%) received heparin and warfarin, respectively, and 254 (22%) developed recurrent VTE over 5461 person-years of follow-up; 52 recurred within 15–180 days. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictor of 6-month recurrence was active cancer (HR=3.98, 95% CI: 2.12, 7.45; p<0.01); age, gender, body mass index and neurologic disease with extremity paresis were not predictors of VTE recurrence. In models that included presence or absence of warfarin therapy along with proportion of time with an INR ≥2, this latter intensity variable was protective (HR=0.16 for 100% versus 0% of time, p=0.02) against recurrence, while mere presence of warfarin therapy (HR =0.72, p= 0.56) was not. Similar results were obtained when intensity was represented as proportion of time with an INR ≥1.5 (HR=0.17, p=0.02). Interestingly, a therapeutic APTT within the first 24 hours of heparin therapy also was protective against 6-month recurrence (HR=0.45, p=0.02). Conclusions: Active cancer is an independent predictor of 6-month VTE recurrence. Warfarin therapy with a higher proportion of time with an INR ≥1.5 or ≥2 offers similar protection against recurrence. A rapid heparin-response (as reflected by a therapeutic APTT within 24 hours of heparin therapy) also is a predictor of reduced 6-month recurrence, possibly reflecting lower factor VIII activity at the acute incident VTE event. Gender is not a predictor of long-term recurrence.

Abstract Background: While several uncommon disorders (e.g., myeloproliferative diseases, connective tissue disease, etc.) have been suggested as potential risk factors for VTE, the independence and magnitude of any risk is uncertain. Objective: To test uncommon characteristics as potential independent risk factors for VTE, and estimate the magnitude of risk for each. Methods: Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we identified all incident cases of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism over the 6-year period, 1992–1997. For each objectively confirmed case (n=562), we identified up to two Olmsted County residents without VTE who most closely matched a case on age, gender, and medical record number (n=755). Because medical record numbers are assigned sequentially, such matching assures a similar duration of medical follow-up. For all cases and controls, we reviewed the complete medical records in the community for over 125 baseline characteristics which were tested for an association with VTE using conditional logistic regression. Results: The mean ± SD (range) ages for cases and controls were 65.71 ± 18.85 (0–102) and 64.90 ± 18.66 (0–102) years, respectively, and 55.5% were female. Novel univariate risk factors for incident VTE included former tobacco smoker, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, chronic lung disease, all-cause pulmonary hypertension, chronic renal disease, myeloproliferative disorders, any infection, femoral artery catheterization (angiography or percutaneous intervention), ICU admission and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. Among infections, septicemia, pneumonia, and ENT, cardiovascular, GI, urinary tract and skin/soft tissue infections were univariately associated with VTE; reproductive tract infection was not. Diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, lipid-lowering drugs (including statins), inflammatory bowel disease, asthma, connective tissue disease, and influenza were not univariately associated with VTE, and beta-blocker therapy was not protective. A multivariate analysis will test these characteristics as potential independent VTE risk factors. Conclusions: Several novel characteristics are univariately associated with VTE. Such novel characteristics may provide new insights into VTE mechanisms if, upon further analysis, these characteristics are independent VTE risk factors.

Abstract Confinement to a nursing home (NH) is an independent risk factor for VTE and accounts for 13% of all VTE occurring in the community, but the question of which NH residents are at risk is largely unanswered. Objective: To determine VTE risk factors among NH residents. Methods: Using the Minnesota State Case Mix Review Program Public Research Files, we performed a case-control study of all Olmsted County, MN NH patients with an ICD-9 code-identified diagnosis of VTE from 1988–1994. From the same source, we identified one age-, sex-matched control and used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for an association of VTE with 46 characteristics assessed in the Minnesota Case Mix data. Results: Univariate associations between characteristics and odds of VTE are described below. Significantly increased odds were observed for residents assessed following hospitalization (a nearly 4-fold increase, p=0.002, Table) and residents considered incapable of self-preservation (i.e., unable to cope with potentially harmful situations) (> 2.0 fold increase, p=0.03). Non-significant 2–3 fold increased odds were observed for limitations in certain specific Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (including walking and dressing) and for limitations in more than 3 ADLs. Similar increased odds were observed for residents using a wheelchair, taking more than 3 oral medications, enrolled in professional activity programs, and needing behavior management. Conclusions: Need for assistance (especially problems with immobility), lack of self preservation, and recent hospitalization may identify a subset of NH residents that are at especially high VTE risk and who may warrant consideration of prophylaxis. Univariate VTE Risk Factors for Nursing Home Residents Characteristic Odds Ratio 95% CI P-value Oral medications > 3 3.00 0.97-9.30 0.06 Activities of Daily Living High/Medium (4-8) vs. low (0-3) 2.20 0.76-6.33 0.14 Help dressing 2.75 0.88-8.64 0.08 Help walking 3.00 0.61-14.86 0.18 Wheelchair use 2.50 0.97-6.44 0.58 Needs behavior management 3.00 0.62-14.86 0.18 Help toileting 2.00 0.68-5.85 0.20 Lack of self-preservation 2.33 1.07-5.10 0.03 Transfer from hospital 3.86 1.68-8.86 0.0015 Anti-depressant drugs 0.50 0.19-1.33 0.16 Professional activity program 2.25 0.69-7.3 0.18

In previous studies, we found that after cervical spinal cord hemisection at C2 (SH), neuromuscular transmission improved in the rat diaphragm muscle (DIAm). We also found that exogenous brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) treatment enhanced neuromuscular transmission, whereas inhibiting activation of its receptor (TrkB) worsened neuromuscular transmission. We hypothesized that expression of BDNF and/or its receptor TrkB at phrenic motoneurons would increase following SH. In the present study, adult male rats underwent SH or sham surgery. Phrenic motoneurons were labeled by injection of cholera toxin B into the DIAm and retrogradely‐labeled phrenic motoneurons were sampled by laser capture microdissection (LCM). BDNF and TrkB receptor (truncated – T1 and full length – FL) mRNA were measured in LCM‐microdissected motoneurons using quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR and expressed as a ratio to ribosomal S16 RNA. We found that BDNF mRNA expression in phrenic motoneurons increased by 3 days after SH (~2‐fold). Similarly, both TrkB.T1 and TrkB.FL mRNA increased by 3 days after SH (~17‐ and ~11‐fold, respectively). It is possible that the relative expression of neurotrophins and their receptors (truncated or full‐length) may determine the time‐course of restoration of phrenic activity following SH. Supported by NIH grants AR51173 and HL37680 and the Mayo Foundation.

Abstract Background: Anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimen. Combination netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) + dexamethasone (DEX) is guideline-recommended for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in HEC and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. CMS’ OP-35 measure deems 30-day post-chemotherapy acute care as avoidable if involving nausea and emesis (NV) or any of 8 other toxicities. Results will be publicly reported and impact Medicare reimbursement. CMS (2017) found that 10% of >58,000 patients with avoidable acute care after chemotherapy involved NV. Because NEPA is new, insufficient real world data exist to assess its CINV resource use. CINV-related acute-care after NEPA prophylaxis in AC has been reported in a prospective clinical trial. Our aim was to compare these rates to those seen after prophylaxis with other antiemetics for AC outside of a clinical trial. Methods: Pre-specified endpoints in a prospective trial of oral or IV NEPA + DEX in AC included acute-care use (emergency [ED] visits or inpatient admissions [IP]) involving CINV, defined as emesis or rescue drug use ≤5 days after AC, and concomitant ED/IP in the same period. We also evaluated CINV-related acute care after non-NEPA prophylaxis for AC in breast cancer from 10/2012-8/2018 in IBM Explorys electronic health records. We age-matched patients 3:1 to the NEPA trial. We further adjusted the event rate to address under-reporting of a) CINV rates (vs. 49.2% for aprepitant in AC in a clinical trial [Warr 2005]) and b) acute-care use, projected at 17-50% at sites external to the dataset. To compare the resulting adjusted event rate to the NEPA study, we conducted 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, using random probabilities from 5.2-8.7% for Explorys patients, and from 0-2% for NEPA patients to address potential reporting variability, despite the trial including daily patient diaries. Analysis of data was limited to the first two cycles, the median duration in the NEPA trial. Results: In the NEPA trial, 402 patients received ≥1 cycle; 391 completed two cycles. Nine patients had IP admissions; none involved CINV. Five patients had 6 total ED visits; one met criteria for involving CINV; the resulting rate of acute care rate involving CINV was 0.25 per 100 patients. For other antiemetics, 2598 patients received AC (excluding NEPA prophylaxis). Among 1206 age-matched to the NEPA trial, 15 patients had acute-care events in the first 2 cycles, (1.24 per 100 patients), an odds ratio of 1:5.1 (CI 0.7-38.5) in favor of NEPA. After adjusting via the simulation, the odds ratio was 1:8.3 (CI: 2.43-24.21) in favor of NEPA. Conclusions: Comparing CINV-related acute care seen in a large prospective trial relative to real-world evidence in patients with breast cancer treated with AC, <1% of patients receiving NEPA prophylaxis required acute care for CINV; the CINV-related acute-care risks seen with other antiemetic prophylaxis were 5 times (unadjusted) to 8 times (adjusted) the levels for NEPA. A similar comparison using only real world data should be conducted as data permit. Citation Format: Lee Schwartzberg, Kathryn J Ruddy, Rudolph M Navari, Thomas W LeBlanc, Rebecca Clark-Snow, Rita Wickham, Gary Binder, William L. Bailey, Ravi Potluri, Luke M Schmerold, Eros Papademetriou, Eric J Roeland. Avoidable acute care involving chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC) with NEPA prophylaxis relative to other antiemetics: An external control arm analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-07.

4521 Background: Expression of PDL1 by RCC has been associated with aggressive histology and poor survival. Tissue obtained from the patients enrolled in the IL-2 Select Trial, a prospective, single arm, multicenter CWG study, was analyzed by IHC to determine if PDL1or PDL3 expression predicted for response to initial or subsequent therapy. Methods: Paraffin embedded tumor tissue was stained for PDL1 and PDL3 expression, and results were correlated with RECIST defined response to IL2 treatment. Tumor tissue was considered positive for PDL1 if >5% of the tumor membranes stained for the marker. A cutoff of 10% was used for PDL3. Duration of subsequent VEGFR/mTOR inhibitor therapy was also correlated with tissue PDL1/3 expression. Results: 120 eligible pts were enrolled; 115 had clear cell histology. The overall response rate (ORR) to IL2 was 25% (30/120) with a median OS of 40.6 months. 113 tumors were stained. 18 (16%) were PDL1+. ORR was 19% and 50% in the patients PDL1- and PDL1+ tumors, respectively (p=0.012). 85 (75%) tumors were PDL3+. ORR was 10.7% and 29.4% in the PDL3- and PDL3+ tumors, respectively (p=0.075). In the 17 patients who were positive for both PDL1 and PDL3, ORR was 52.9%. In the 27 pts who were negative for both PDL1 and PDL3, ORR was 11.1%. 69 patients received at least 1 dose of a VEGFR TKI as next therapy following IL2 treatment. 66 tumors were stained. Pts who were PDL1+/PDL3+ had a shorter duration on VEGFR TKI therapy compared to pts who were PDL1-/PDL3- (see Table). Conclusions: This small, retrospective analysis suggests that PDL1 and PDL3 tissue expression may predict for better response to IL2. PDL1 expression has been suggested as a possible predictor of response to anti-PD1 therapy. The current data suggests that its expression may predict for benefit to other immune therapies. PDL3 (+/- PDL1) expression appears to correlate to less benefit from subsequent VEGFR TKI therapy. Funded by NCI SPORE Grant # 5 P50 CA101942-08. [Table: see text]

In 2016, more than 11 million people reported misuse of opioids in the previous year. In an effort to combat opioid use disorder (OUD), the use of agonist/antagonist is becoming increasingly common, with more than 2.2 million patients reporting use of a buprenorphine containing medication such as Suboxone®. Buprenorphine is a unique opioid which acts as a partial μ agonist and ĸ antagonist. These properties make it an effective tool in treating OUD and abuse. However, despite its advantages in treating OUD and abuse, buprenorphine can make it difficult to control acute perioperative pain. We present a case in which the Mayo Clinic Arizona protocol for patients undergoing minimally invasive ambulatory surgery while taking Suboxone® is successfully executed, resulting in adequate postoperative pain control and timely discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit.