Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

372 citation(s) found for "O'Driscoll, MC".

Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns
Carlson, Matthew L. , O’Connell, Brendan P., Lohse, Christine M. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Sweeney, Alex D. , Driscoll, Colin L.

Otology & Neurotology | November 28, 2017 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e20-e27

10.1097/mao.0000000000001631 | PMID 29210943 Get It

Objective: To examine surgical and device-related cochlear implant practice patterns across centers in the United States. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of the American Neurotology Society (ANS). Results: A total of 81 surveys were returned from ANS members who report regular involvement in cochlear implant care. Overall there was a broad distribution in age and clinical experience, with most respondents reporting Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation in neurotology and employment at an academic center. The annual volume of cochlear implant surgeries varied considerably across centers. Eighty percent of respondents report to offer all three Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved device brands at their center. In cases where hearing preservation is not a goal, 56% of respondents prefer a perimodiolar electrode design, while 44% prefer a lateral wall electrode. With regard to insertion technique for scala tympani access, 64% prefer inserting through the round window (RW) membrane, 26% prefer an extended round window (ERW) approach, while only 10% prefer a cochleostomy. In cases where hearing preservation is a goal of surgery, 86% of respondents prefer a lateral wall electrode design, while only 14% prefer a perimodiolar electrode design. With regard to insertion technique, 86% prefer RW insertion, while only 9% prefer an ERW approach, and only 5% prefer a cochleostomy. Respondents who prefer RW electrode insertion more commonly use a lateral wall electrode, whereas those who prefer an ERW or cochleostomy approach more commonly use a periomodiolar electrode (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant greater number of surgeons that prefer lateral wall electrodes (p < 0.001) and RW insertion (p < 0.001) for hearing preservation cases compared with non-hearing preservation cases. For implantation of a hypothetical patient with significant residual hearing, within the range of hybrid device candidacy, the great majority of surgeons prefer a conventional length electrode and only 29% prefer to implant a hybrid device. In cases where hearing preservation is a goal, the overwhelming majority of respondents (96%, n = 74) reported using at least one form of steroid application. Ninety-two percent (n = 71) used intraoperative intravenous steroids, 55% (n = 42) prescribed postoperative oral steroids, 44% (n = 34) bathed the middle ear with steroids during surgery, and 30% (n = 23) prescribed preoperative oral steroids. Together, 65% of respondents use a variation of the tight subperiosteal pocket technique for internal device fixation, 19% prefer a bony well and trough with tie-downs, 10% prefer a bony well and trough without tie-downs, and 5% prefer a screw fixation system. Of the 50 who prefer utilizing a subperiosteal pocket, 31 (62%) incorporate a bony trough and 19 (38%) perform a subperiosteal pocket alone without a bony trough. Conclusion: The results of this survey reflect the evolution in surgical and device-related preferences for cochlear implantation in the United States. An increasing number of surgeons prefer the RW approach for electrode insertion. When hearing preservation is not a goal, there is a near even preference for lateral wall and perimodiolar electrode designs; however, the great majority of surgeons prefer a lateral wall design when attempting to preserve residual acoustic hearing. Even in cases where substantial residual hearing exists, many surgeons prefer conventional length electrodes to hybrid designs. These changes reflect the prioritization of atraumatic surgery and parallel the development of thinner and more atraumatic electrodes.
Impact of Excessive Weight Gain on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: Results From the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study
Purnell, Jonathan Q. , Braffett, Barbara H. , Zinman, Bernard, Gubitosi‐Klug, Rose , Sivitz, William, Bantle, John P., Ziegler, Georgia, Cleary, Patricia A., Brunzell, John D. , Nathan, D.M., Zinman, B., Crofford, O., Genuth, S., Brown-Friday, J., Crandall, J., Engel, S., Martinez, H., Phillips, M., Reid, M., Shamoon, H., Sheindlin, J., Gubitosi-Klug, R., Mayer, L., Pendegast, S., Zegarra, H., Miller, D., Singerman, L., Smith-Brewer, S., Novak, M., Quin, J., Genuth, Saul, Palmert, M., Brown, E., McConnell, J., Pugsley, P., Crawford, P., Dahms, W., Gregory, N.S., Lackaye, M.E., Kiss, S., Chan, R., Orlin, A., Rubin, M., Brillon, D., Reppucci, V., Lee, T., Heinemann, M., Chang, S., Levy, B., Jovanovic, L., Richardson, M., Bosco, B., Dwoskin, A., Hanna, R., Barron, S., Campbell, R., Bhan, A., Krüger, D., Jones, J.K., Edwards, P.A., Bhan, A., Carey, J.D., Angus, E., Thomas, A., Galprin, A., McLellan, M., Whitehouse, F., Bergenstal, R., Johnson, M., Gunyou, K., Thomas, L., Laechelt, J., Hollander, P., Spencer, M., Kendall, D., Cuddihy, R., Callahan, P., List, S., Gott, J., Rude, N., Olson, B., Franz, M., Castle, G., Birk, R., Nelson, J., Freking, D., Gill, L., Mestrezat, W., Etzwiler, D., Morgan, K., Aiello, L.P., Golden, E., Arrigg, P., Asuquo, V., Beaser, R., Bestourous, L., Cavallerano, J., Cavicchi, R., Ganda, O., Hamdy, O., Kirby, R., Murtha, T., Schlossman, D., Shah, S., Sharuk, G., Silver, P., Silver, P., Stockman, M., Sun, J., Weimann, E., Wolpert, H., Aiello, L. M., Jacobson, A., Rand, L., Rosenzwieg, J., Nathan, D.M., Larkin, M.E., Christofi, M., Folino, K., Godine, J., Lou, P., Stevens, C., Anderson, E., Bode, H., Brink, S., Cornish, C., Cros, D., Delahanty, L., deManbey, A., Haggan, C., Lynch, J., McKitrick, C., Norman, D., Moore, D., Ong, M., Taylor, C., Zimbler, D., Crowell, S., Fritz, S., Hansen, K., Gauthier‐Kelly, C., Service, F. J., Ziegler, G., Barkmeier, A., Schmidt, L., French, B., Woodwick, R., Rizza, R., Schwenk, W. F., Haymond, M., Pach, J., Mortenson, J., Zimmerman, B., Lucas, A., Colligan, R., Luttrell, L., Lopes-Virella, M., Caulder, S., Pittman, C., Patel, N., Lee, K., Nutaitis, M., Fernandes, J., Hermayer, K., Kwon, S., Blevins, A., Parker, J., Colwell, J., Lee, D., Soule, J., Lindsey, P., Bracey, M., Farr, A., Elsing, S., Thompson, T., Selby, J., Lyons, T., Yacoub-Wasef, S., Szpiech, M., Wood, D., Mayfield, R., Molitch, M., Adelman, D., Colson, S., Jampol, L., Lyon, A., Gill, M., Strugula, Z., Kaminski, L., MIRZA, R., Simjanoski, E., Ryan, D., Johnson, C., Wallia, A., Ajroud-Driss, S., Astelford, P., Leloudes, N., Degillio, A., Schaefer, B., Mudaliar, S., Lorenzi, G., Goldbaum, M., Jones, K., Prince, M., Swenson, M., Grant, I., Reed, R., Lyon, R., Kolterman, O., Giotta, M, Clark, T., Friedenberg, G., Sivitz, W.I., Vittetoe, B., Kramer, J., Bayless, M., Zeitler, R., Schrott, H., Olson, N., Snetselaar, L., Hoffman, R., MacIndoe, J., Weingeist, T., Fountain, C., Miller, R., Johnsonbaugh, S., Patronas, M., Carney, M., Mendley, S., Salemi, P., Liss, R., Hebdon, M., Counts, D., Donner, T., Gordon, J., Hemady, R., Kowarski, A., Ostrowski, D., Steidl, S., Jones, B., Herman, W.H., Martin, C.L., Pop-Busui, R., Greene, D. A., Stevens, M.J., Burkhart, N., Sandford, T, Floyd, J., Bantle, J., Flaherty, N., Terry, J., Koozekanani, D., Montezuma, S., Wimmergren, N., Rogness, B., Mech, M., Strand, T., Olson, J., McKenzie, L., Kwong, C., Goetz, F., Warhol, R., Hainsworth, D., Goldstein, D., Hitt, S., Giangiacomo, J., Schade, D.S., Canady, J.L., Burge, M. R., Das, A., Avery, R.B., Ketai, L.H., Chapin, J.E., Schluter, M.L, Rich, J., Johannes, C., Hornbeck, D., Schutta, M., Bourne, P.A., Brucker, A., Braunstein, S., Schwartz, S., Maschak-Carey, B. J., Baker, L., Orchard, T., Cimino, L., Songer, T., Doft, B., Olson, S., Becker, D., Rubinstein, D., Bergren, R.L., Fruit, J., Hyre, R., Palmer, C., Silvers, N., Lobes, L., Rath, P. Paczan, Conrad, P. W., Yalamanchi, S., Wesche, J., Bratkowksi, M., Arslanian, S., Rinkoff, J., Warnicki, J., Curtin, D., Steinberg, D., Vagstad, G., Harris, R., Steranchak, L., Arch, J., Kelly, K., Ostrosaka, P., Guiliani, M., Good, M., Williams, T., Olsen, K., Campbell, A., Shipe, C., Conwit, R., Finegold, D., Zaucha, M., Drash, A., Morrison, A., Malone, J.I., Bernal, M.L., Pavan, P. R., Grove, N., Tanaka, E.A., McMillan, D., Vaccaro‐Kish, J., Babbione, L., Solc, H., DeClue, T.J., Dagogo-Jack, S., Wigley, C., Ricks, H., Kitabchi, A., Chaum, E., Murphy, M.B., Moser, S., Meyer, D., Iannacone, A., Yoser, S., Bryer‐Ash, M., Schüßler, S., Lambeth, H., Raskin, P., Strowig, S., Basco, M., Cercone, S., Zinman, B., Barnie, A., Devenyi, R., Mandelcorn, M., Brent, M., Rogers, S., Gordon, A., Bakshi, N., Perkins, B., Tuason, L., Perdikaris, F., Ehrlich, R., Daneman, D., Perlman, K., Ferguson, S., Palmer, J., Fahlstrom, R., Boer, I.H.de, Kinyoun, J., Ottingham, L. Van, Catton, S., Ginsberg, J., McDonald, C., Harth, J., Driscoll, M., Sheidow, T., Mahon, J., Canny, C., Nicolle, D., Colby, P., Dupre, J., Hramiak, I., Rodger, NW, Jenner, M., Smith, T., Brown, W., May, M., Hagan, J. Lipps, Agarwal, A., Adkins, T., Lorenz, R., Feman, S., Survant, L., White, N. H., Levandoski, L., Grand, G., Thomas, M., Joseph, D., Blinder, K., Shah, G., Burgess, D., Boniuk, I., Santiago, J., Tamborlane, W., Gatcomb, P., Stoessel, K., Ramos, P., Fong, K., Ossorio, P., Ahern, J., Meadema-Mayer, L., Beck, C., Farrell, K., Quin, J., Gaston, P., Trail, R., Lachin, J., Backlund, J., Bebu, I., Braffett, B., Diminick, L., Gao, X., Hsu, W., Klumpp, K., Trapani, Victoria R., Trapani, V., Cleary, P., McGee, P., Sun, W. , Villavicencio, S., Anderson, K., Dews, L., Younes, Naji , Rutledge, B., Chan, K., Rosenberg, D. , Petty, B., Determan, A., Kenny, D., Williams, C., Cowie, C., Siebert, C., Steffes, M., Arends, V., Bucksa, J., Nowicki, M., Chavers, B., O’Leary, D., Polák, J. (Jaroslav), Harrington, A., Funk, L., Crow, R., Gloeb, B., Thomas, S., O’Donnell, C., Soliman, EZ, Zhang, Z.M., Li, Y., Campbell, C., Keasler, L., Hensley, S., Hu, J., Barr, M., Taylor, T., Prineas, R., Feldman, E.L., Albers, J.W., Low, P., Sommer, C., Nickander, K., Speigelberg, T., Pfiefer, M., Schumer, M., Moran, M., Farquhar, J., Ryan, C., Sandstrom, D., Geckle, M., Cupelli, E., Thoma, F., Burzuk, B., Woodfill, T., Danis, R., Blodi, B., Lawrence, D., Wabers, H., Gangaputra, S., Neill, S., Burger, M., Dingledine, J., Gama, V., Sussman, R., Davis, M., Hubbard, L., Budoff, M., Darabian, S., Rezaeian, P., Wong, N., Fox, M., Oudiz, R., Kim, L., Detrano, R., Cruickshanks, K., Bainbridg, K., Lima, J., Bluemke, D., Turkbey, E., Geest, R. J. van der, Liu, C., Malayeri, A., Jain, A., Miao, C., Chahal, H., Jarboe, R., Nathan, D.M., Monnier, V., Sell, D., Strauch, C., Hazen, S., Pratt, A., Tang, W., Brunzell, J., Purnell, J., Purnell, J., Natarajan, R., Miao, F., Zhang, L., Chen, Z., Paterson, A., Boright, A., Bull, S., Sun, L., Scherer, S., Lyons, T.J., Jenkins, A., Klein, R., Virella, G., Jaffa, A., Carter, R., Stoner, J., Garvey, W.T., Lackland, D., Brabham, M., McGee, D., Zheng, D., Mayfield, R. K., Maynard, J., Wessells, H., Sarma, A., Dunn, R., Holt, S., Hotaling, J., Kim, C., Clemens, Q., McVary, Kevin T. , Cuddihy, Robert , Paterson, Andrew D. , Gubitosi-Klug, Rose A , Paterson, Andrew , Zinman, Bernard , Sivitz, William I. , Ziegler, G., Nathan, D.M., Engel, Samuel S. , Reid, M., Genuth, Saul, McConnell, J., Campbell, R., Carey, J.D., Dd, Etzwiler, Cavallerano, Jerry D. , Larkin, M.E., DeManbey, Andrea, Ajroud-Driss, S., Mudaliar, S., Herman, W.H., Pop-Busui, R., Mech, Michael, Schade, D.S., Schwartz, S., Becker, Dj., Arch, J., Shipe, C., Drash, A L, Pavan, P R , DeClue, Terry J., Raskin, P., Rogers, S., Boer, I.H. de, Dupre, J, Tamborlane, W., Gatcomb, P., Bebu, I., Cleary, P., McGee, P., Steffes, M., Arends, V., Bm, Chavers, Polak, J., Feldman, E. L., Nickander, K. K., Pfiefer, M., Dittz, Dalton , Virella, Gabriel, Mayfield, R. K., Brown, Jonathan D. , Cuddihy, Robert M

Diabetes Care | November 15, 2017 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1756-1762

10.2337/dc16-2523 | PMID 29138273 Get It

OBJECTIVE Intensive treatment (INT) of type 1 diabetes reduces the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared with conventional treatment (CONV), but it also results in more weight gain. Our objective was to examine whether excessive weight gain from INT of type 1 diabetes is independently associated with subsequent CVD events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Quartiles (Q) of weight gain in 1,213 participants aged 18 years and older at enrollment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) were determined within randomized treatment groups (INT vs. CONV) using change in BMI from baseline to the closeout DCCT visits. Effects of this weight gain on CVD risk factors and outcomes during an additional 20 years of observational follow-up were then determined. RESULTS The Q4 INT group experienced greater proportional weight gain (median change in BMI, 6.08 kg/m2), increases in CVD risk factors, and need for medications for hypertension and lipids compared with the Q1–3 INT and comparable CONV groups. Over a mean of 26 years of follow-up, the numbers of major and total CVD events were not statistically different in Q4 compared with Q1–3 of either the INT or CONV group. By year 14, however, the incident CVD event curve became significantly higher in the Q4 INT group than in the Q1–3 INT groups (P = 0.024) and was similar to that for the CONV group. CONCLUSIONS For the first 13 years after DCCT, INT for type 1 diabetes reduced macrovascular events compared with CONV, even when excessive weight gain occurred. After this, total CVD events significantly increased in the Q4 INT group, becoming equivalent to those in the CONV group. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether this trend continues and results in more major CVD events.
Reply to Letter to the Editor: Paget's Disease of the Temporal Bone: A Single-Institution Contemporary Review of 27 Patients
Deep, Nicholas L. , Besch‐Stokes, Jake , Lane, John I. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Carlson, Matthew L. , Besch-Stokes, J G

Otology & Neurotology | September 7, 2017 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1547-1548

10.1097/mao.0000000000001562 | PMID 28891874 Get It

Culturing Periosteum in Vitro: The Influence of Different Sizes of Explants
Miura, Yasushi , O’Driscoll, Shawn W.

Cell Transplantation | July 26, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 453-457

10.1177/096368979800700504 | PMID 9786065 Get It

Periosteal transplantation is being used clinically to repair articular defects. Isolated cells and very small periosteal explants can be grown in tissue culture, but it will be necessary to test larger sizes for tissue engineering to be applied to clinical transplantation of periosteum. This study was conducted to assess the chondrogenic potential of different sizes of periosteal explants in agarose culture. Ninety-six rabbit tibial periosteal explants in three different sizes (small 1.5 × 2, medium 3 × 2, and large 4 × 6 mm, 32 pieces per size) were cultured in agarose suspension for 6 wk and given TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) for the first 2 wk. Tissue growth, as indicated by normalized final wet weights of the explants after 6 wk in culture, was inversely proportional to explant size. Cartilage formation was observed in all explante. Histomorphometry revealed that cartilage formation was significantly better for the smaller explants (80% cartilage), but similar in the medium and larger explants (60% cartilage). Similar proportions of type II collagen were present in the different-sized explants. This study demonstrates that various sizes of periosteal explants can be grown in culture. Abundant cartilage was produced even by the large explants. © 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction for Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow
Shields, Maegan N. , O’Driscoll, Shawn W. , Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin, O'Driscoll, Shawn W., Camp, Christopher L. , Sánchez‐Sotelo, Joaquín , Fitzsimmons, James S , Shields, Maegan N.

Arthroscopy Techniques | July 24, 2017 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.eats.2017.03.029 | PMID 29354404 Get It

Abstract Reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow is the primary treatment for recurrent symptomatic posterolateral rotatory instability. Although a number of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques have been described, the docking technique has received general acceptance. In this technique, the graft is passed through a tunnel on the ulnar side and the 2 free limbs are docked into the humerus at the isometric point on the lateral condyle. Advantages of this method of reconstruction include reduced bone removal, decreased soft tissue damage, and precise control of graft tensioning. When precise surgical steps are followed, this technique can be performed in a reliable, efficient, and reproducible manner for patients with posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.
Age-Related Changes in Normal Isometric Shoulder Strength
Johnson, Marjorie E., An, Kai‐Nan , Hughes, Richard E. , O’Driscoll, Shawn W.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine | July 19, 2017 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 651-657

10.1177/03635465990270051801 | PMID 10496585 Get It

Normative data are useful for assessing isometric shoulder strength in patients with bilateral shoulder abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to develop a normative database for shoulder strength in the clinically relevant positions and movements. Twenty combinations of exertions and postures—including flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation—were tested for both the dominant and nondominant sides. Strength was measured isometrically using a modified Cybex II dynamometer. The cross-sectional study design included 120 subjects (60 women and 60 men) ranging in age from 20 to 78 years from southern Minnesota. Tables of normative strength data were constructed. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effect of age, sex, and weight on strength. Age was negatively associated with all strength measures, and weight was positively associated with them. Men were stronger than women when controlling for age and weight. Statistically significant differences between dominant and nondominant shoulders were found for only some of the strength measures taken. These normal data will be useful to the clinician, as they permit a standard against which to compare shoulder strength.
Viability of Periosteal Tissue Obtained Postmortem
Meisami, Borna, O’Driscoll, Shawn W. , Miura, Yasushi , Fitzsimmons, James S.

Cell Transplantation | June 22, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 611-616

10.1177/096368979900800607 | PMID 10701490 Get It

Periosteal autografts have the potential to regenerate articular cartilage defects, but this potential is limited by the patient's age. Allograft transplantation from a young donor to an older recipient might bypass this limitation. The effect of the time delay, between death and harvesting of a periosteal graft, on the chondrogenic potential of periosteum is important not only for transplantation but also for studies dealing with tissues retrieved postmortem (i.e., including the periosteal explant model). The purpose of this study was to investigate the chondrogenic potential of periosteum obtained postmortem and a possible beneficial effect of hypothermia. Thirty NZ white rabbits (2 months old) were sacrificed and stored at room temperature or 4°C for 0, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, or 24 h. Periosteal explants were then obtained and a standard cartilage yield assay performed by culturing them for 6 weeks using the periosteal organ culture model as previous published. TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) was added for the first 14 days of culture. Histochemical analysis and quantitative collagen typing were performed. In the explants from the animals kept for 4 h at room temperature growth and chondrogenesis were dramatically reduced. Little or no chondrogenesis was seen in expiants from rabbits maintained at room temperature after 4–8 h (or more) postmortem. Cooling the rabbits to 4°C partially prevented this loss of viability and continued to do so for 24 h. Even storage at 4°C did not eliminate the decrease in chondrogenic potential, though it did permit partial preservation of chondrogenic potential. If periosteum is to be used for allograft transplantation, or if it is used for experimental study, its viability must be assured. This is best accomplished by harvesting it immediately postmortem. Preservation techniques, cryopreservation, or hypothermia might be useful in preserving periosteal chondrogenic potential.
Diagnosing Large Vestibular Aqueduct: Radiological Review of High-Resolution CT Versus High-Resolution Volumetric MRI
Deep, Nicholas L. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Weindling, Steven M. , Barrs, David M., Driscoll, Colin L. W., Lohse, Christine M. , Lane, John I. , Hoxworth, Joseph M.

Otology & Neurotology | June 9, 2017 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 948-955

10.1097/mao.0000000000001482 | PMID 28604576 Get It

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic yield of high-resolution volumetric T2-weighted MRI (HRT2-MRI) with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct (LVA). Study Design: Three board-certified neuroradiologists performed an independent, blinded radiological review for diagnosing LVA with 2:1 age-matched controls on patients with both HRCT and HRT2-MRI imaging. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: All patients between 2002 and 2016 with hearing loss who underwent both HRCT and HRT2-MRI and were diagnosed with LVA on either modality. Main Outcome Measures: Concordance rate for LVA between HRCT and HRT2-MRI. Results: Concordance rate for HRCT and HRT2-MRI for diagnosing LVA was 88% (124/141) when assessing both the midpoint and external aperture diameters. Fifteen ears had LVA on computed tomography (CT), but not on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); in comparison, two ears had LVA on MRI, but not on CT (p = 0.002). Excellent inter-rater reliability among the three radiologists was demonstrated. Conclusion: Historically, HRCT has been the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing LVA. Although a higher concordance rate of HRT2-MRI was found compared with previous studies utilizing earlier MRI technology, HRCT still detected a larger number of patients with clinically significant hearing loss compared with MRI. Given the high concordance rate and efficacy of both modalities in diagnosing LVA, the ultimate decision of which modality to choose may depend on other patient-specific and clinical factors.
Klippel–Trenaunay Syndrome: Current Management
Glovkzki, P, Driscoll, David J.

Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease | May 30, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 291-298

10.1177/026835550702200611 | PMID 18274338 Get It

Klippel–Trenaunay syndrome (KTS) is a rare, sporadic, complex malformation characterized by the clinical triad of (1) capillary malformations (port wine stain); (2) soft tissue and bone hypertrophy or, occasionally, hypotrophy of usually one lower limb; and (3) atypical, mostly lateral varicosity. KTS is a mixed vascular malformation, with predominant capillary, venous and lymphatic components, without significant arteriovenous shunting. Management is largely conservative and the extent of diagnostic evaluation is determined by the planned treatment. Compression is the hallmark of conservative management; laser can be used to treat port wine stains. Imaging before vascular interventions must confirm venous anatomy and deep venous drainage. Techniques for ablation of superficial veins and malformations are individualized and may include sclerotherapy with alcohol or foam, endovenous thermal ablation or, as used most frequently in our practice, surgical stripping and phlebectomy. Intraoperative use of tourniquet will decrease bleeding, selective use of an inferior vena cava filter will prevent pulmonary embolism. A multidisciplinary approach to management of KTS is warranted.
Long-term risk of recurrence and regrowth after gross-total and subtotal resection of sporadic vestibular schwannoma
Jacob, Jeffrey T. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Tanaka, Shota , Tanaka, Minoru , Saito, Nobuhito , Lohse, Christine M. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Link, Michael J. , Nakatomi, Hirofumi

Journal of Neurosurgery | May 19, 2017 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1052-1058

10.3171/2016.11.jns16498 | PMID 28524795 Get It

OBJECTIVEThe management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. One commonly cited advantage of microsurgery over other treatment modalities is that tumor removal provides the greatest chance of long-term cure. However, there are very few publications with long-term follow-up to support this assertion. The purpose of the current study is to report the very long-term risk of recurrence among a large historical cohort of patients who underwent microsurgical resection.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone primary microsurgical resection of unilateral VS via a retrosigmoid approach performed by a single neurosurgeon-neurotologist team between January 1980 and December 1999. Complete tumor removal was designated gross-total resection (GTR), and anything less than complete removal was designated subtotal resection (STR). The primary end point was radiological recurrence-free survival. Time-to-event analyses were performed to identify factors associated with recurrence.RESULTSFour hundred fourteen patients met the study inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Overall, 67 patients experienced recurrence at a median of 6.9 years following resection (IQR 3.9–12.1, range 1.2–22.5 years). Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years following resection were 93% (95% CI 91–96, 248 patients still at risk), 78% (72–85, 88), 68% (60–77, 47), and 51% (41–64, 22), respectively. The strongest predictor of recurrence was extent of resection, with patients who underwent STR having a nearly 11-fold greater risk of recurrence than the patients treated with GTR (HR 10.55, p < 0.001). Among the 18 patients treated with STR, 15 experienced recurrence at a median of 2.7 years following resection (IQR 1.9–8.9, range 1.2–18.7). Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years following GTR were 96% (95% CI 93–98, 241 patients still at risk), 82% (77–89, 86), 73% (65–81, 46), and 56% (45–70, 22), respectively. Estimated recurrence-free survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years following STR were 47% (95% CI 28–78, 7 patients still at risk), 17% (5–55, 2), and 8% (1–52, 1), respectively.CONCLUSIONSLong-term surveillance is required following microsurgical resection of VS even after GTR. Subtotal resection alone should not be considered a definitive long-term cure. These data emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up when reporting tumor control outcomes for VS.