AbstractBackgroundPrimary cutaneous B‐cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is a group of B‐cell lymphomas of the skin containing primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma (PCFCL) and marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disorder (PCMZL), which are indolent, and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL‐LT), which is aggressive.ObjectivesTo evaluate treatment outcomes between PCBCL subtypes after treatment with rituximab and to compare the efficacy of intralesional against systemic rituximab in indolent subtypes.MethodsA search for patients diagnosed with PCBCL and treated with rituximab (systemic or intralesional) across all Mayo Clinic sites was performed, yielding 39 patients.ResultsEight patients had PCFCL (six treated intralesionally and two systemically), 11 had PCMZL (four intralesional, eight systemic with one dual‐treated) and 20 had PCDLBCL‐LT (all systemic). The average age at diagnosis was 62.1 years (SD = 15.1), with average follow‐up of 1852.6 days (SD = 1473.2). 69.2% of all patients treated with any form of rituximab experienced a complete response (100% PCFCL, 81.8% PCMZL and 50% PCDLBCL‐LT). When comparing all three subtypes, a significant difference was seen in overall treatment response (p = 0.022), and progressive disease rates (p = 0.015), but not in retreatment with rituximab (p = 0.440), time to retreatment (p = 0.757), recurrence (p = 0.907) or survival (p = 0.093). In the indolent subtypes, no difference in overall treatment response (p = 1.000), progressive disease rates (p = 1.000), recurrence (p = 0.650), rituximab retreatment (p = 0.650) or time to retreatment (p = 0.724) was observed.ConclusionsThis study suggests that rituximab, as systemic therapy and intralesional therapy, is effective in the management of PCBCL, and that intralesional therapy should be considered before more aggressive therapy in indolent disease.
The role research gap years play in a successful dermatology match
AbstractBackgroundA new trend includes taking a dedicated year away from medical school to complete a research fellowship. There is minimal data on the benefit of a gap year. We aimed to identify if a gap year makes a dermatology applicant more successful in The Match.MethodsDermatology applicants who applied to Mayo Clinic Arizona for the 2018–2019 application cycle and Mayo Clinic Rochester, Arizona, and Florida for the 2019–2020 application cycle were surveyed.ResultsIn total, 291 dermatology applicants completed the initial survey, and 236 completed the follow‐up survey. Ninety applicants took a gap year, 198 applicants did not. There was no significant difference in match rates. When comparing match rates at top dermatology residency programs, 40.6% of gap‐year applicants matched to these residencies versus 19.0% of no gap‐year applicants (P < 0.01).ConclusionApplicants should weigh the opportunity costs before pursuing research gap years as they may not be universally helpful. Applicants who want to match at a top dermatology program may benefit from a research gap year. This data may have limited generalizability outside of the United States.
Photodynamic Therapy in Refractory Mycosis Fungoides: A Prospective, Open-Label Study
Background:Case reports suggest photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is an effective treatment for refractory mycosis fungoides (MF). No prospective trials have examined the use of ALA-PDT in MF. Objective:We aimed to assess the efficacy of ALA-PDT in refractory MF. Methods:This was a prospective study at Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona in patients ≥ 18 years with plaque-stage treatment-refractory MF. Monthly sessions of ALA with blue light PDT were administered for up to six months. Responses were measured by Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Ad hoc analysis with modified CAILS (mCAILS) was performed, eliminating hyperpigmentation from scoring. Results:Eleven patients (30 total lesions) were treated. Six patients completed the trial per protocol. Objective response rates were 36.4% by PGA (10.9-69.2%), 18.2% by CAILS (2.3-51.8%), and 36.4% by mCAILS (10.9-69.2%). Limitations:Five patients did not complete all six PDT cycles per protocol, possibly accounting for reduced efficacy. Conclusion:ALA-PDT with blue light irradiation was moderately effective and well tolerated in refractory plaque stage MF. Lower response rates compared to similar trials may be partially explained by utilization of strict lesional assessment criteria and other variations in methodology. Disclosures Mangold: MiRagen:Research Funding;Sun Pharma:Research Funding;Elorac:Research Funding;Kirin:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Solagenix:Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Photodynamic therapy is a two-step therapy in which a drug that acts as a photosensitizer is administered to target a diseased tissue, followed by illumination with visible light to activate the drug and destroy the target tissue. PDT has been used to treat internal cancers as well as treatment of cancer and precancer of the skin.
A case of pediatric lymphomatoid papulosis treated with photodynamic therapy and narrowband ultraviolet B
AbstractWe report a case of a 13‐year‐old boy with extensive lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) involving his elbows, forearms, proximal thighs, and right hip, with treatment‐resistant nodules on his right forearm. He was treated with full‐body narrowband ultraviolet B and targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 20% aminolevulinic acid (ALA). After two months, there was complete resolution of the right forearm nodules. Due to its minimal toxicity, PDT offers unique advantages and may be considered for pediatric LyP patients with symptomatic, localized disease resistant to conventional treatments.
Regression of mycosis fungoides with large‐cell transformation following skin biopsy
Objectives: To report a contemporary review from a single-institution series on Paget's disease of the temporal bone (PDTB). Study Design: Retrospective chart review of patients evaluated from 1998 to 2016. Setting: Quaternary referral center. Patients: Patients with radiographically confirmed PDTB. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical, audiological, and radiological features and management strategies of PDTB. Results: A total of 50 temporal bones in 27 patients (15 men) were diagnosed with PDTB. Symptoms at presentation included hearing loss (n = 23, 85%), headache (n = 18, 67%), dizziness (n = 14, 52%), tinnitus (n = 5, 19%), chronic otitis media (n = 2, 7%), hemifacial spasm without facial paralysis (n = 1, 4%), multiple cranial neuropathies (n = 1, 4%), and neoplastic transformation (n = 1, 4%). Of the 23 ears with audiometric data available for review, 65% exhibited sensorineural hearing loss, and 35% mixed hearing loss. Long-term audiometric follow-up was available on two patients, both of whom demonstrated hearing loss at a rate greater than would be expected for normal aging. Two patients underwent successful cochlear implantation, achieving open-set speech recognition. Radiographic features of temporal bone involvement are reviewed and illustrated. Conclusion: This is the largest single-institution clinical series examining patients with PDTB in the English literature. Variable patterns of temporal bone involvement by Paget's disease are observed leading to a diverse set of clinical symptoms, including slowly progressive hearing loss, tinnitus, compressive cranial neuropathies, and benign or malignant tumorigenesis. Involvement typically begins in the petrous apex and progresses laterally. Otic capsule bone demineralization occurs late in the disease process. Cochlear implantation appears to be an effective management strategy for patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss.