Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

272 citation(s) found for "Kamal, MM".

Significance of prolonged PR interval in infections
Mishra, Ajay Kumar , Sahu, Kamal Kant , Lal, Amos , Mishra, Ajay K , Lal, Amos

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | July 24, 2019 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 150-151

10.1093/qjmed/hcz192 | PMID 31359046 Get It

A rare cause of sepsis: Lactococcus garvieae
Sahu, Kamal Kant , Sherif, Akil Adrian , Syed, Masood Pasha , Rajendran, Aruna, Mishra, Ajay Kumar , Davaro, Raul, Sherif, Akil , Mishra, Ajay K , Rajendran, A

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine | March 28, 2019 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 447-448

10.1093/qjmed/hcz078 | PMID 30924867 Get It

Hydrogels: Multifunctional “Hydrogel Skins” on Diverse Polymers with Arbitrary Shapes (Adv. Mater. 7/2019)
Yu, Yan , Yuk, Hyunwoo , Parada, German Alberto , Wu, You , Liu, Xinyue , Nabzdyk, Christoph S. , Youcef‐Toumi, Kamal , Zang, Jianfeng , Zhao, Xuanhe

Advanced Materials | February 12, 2019 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/adma.201970044 Get It

Team Approach: Management of Scapholunate Instability
Kamal, Robin N. , Moore, Wendy C. , Kakar, Sanjeev , Moore, Wendy , Kakar, Sanjeev , Kamal, Robin N

JBJS Reviews | February 5, 2019 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e2-e2

10.2106/jbjs.rvw.18.00021 | PMID 30724763 Get It

* The wrist maintains stability through complex articulations of the carpal bones, dependent upon intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments. * Injury to the scapholunate interosseous ligament may lead to dissociative carpal instability, abnormal carpal kinetics, and sometimes arthritis. * The kinematics, kinetics, and self-stabilizing role of the tendons and their influence on the scapholunate interosseous ligament continue to be studied. * Critical to successful treatment of scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries is timely and complementary therapy. * There is currently no gold standard for a treatment algorithm for this condition.
Burnout among palliative care clinicians in the United States: Results of a national survey.
Bull, Janet , Wolf, Steven , Samsa, Gregory P., Ast, Katherine , Abernethy, Amy Pickar, Kamal, Arif H. , Swetz, Keith M. , Shanafelt, Tait D.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 3, 2019 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e20530-e20530

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e20530 Get It

Multifunctional “Hydrogel Skins” on Diverse Polymers with Arbitrary Shapes
Yu, Yan , Yuk, Hyunwoo , Parada, German Alberto , Wu, You , Liu, Xinyue , Nabzdyk, Christoph S. , Youcef‐Toumi, Kamal , Nabzdyk, Christoph , Zang, Jianfeng , Zhao, Xuanhe

Advanced Materials | December 20, 2018 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/adma.201807101 | PMID 30570776 Get It

Abstract Slippery and hydrophilic surfaces find critical applications in areas as diverse as biomedical devices, microfluidics, antifouling, and underwater robots. Existing methods to achieve such surfaces rely mostly on grafting hydrophilic polymer brushes or coating hydrogel layers, but these methods suffer from several limitations. Grafted polymer brushes are prone to damage and do not provide sufficient mechanical compliance due to their nanometer‐scale thickness. Hydrogel coatings are applicable only for relatively simple geometries, precluding their use for the surfaces with complex geometries and features. Here, a new method is proposed to interpenetrate hydrophilic polymers into the surface of diverse polymers with arbitrary shapes to form naturally integrated “hydrogel skins.” The hydrogel skins exhibit tissue‐like softness (Young's modulus ≈ 30 kPa), have uniform and tunable thickness in the range of 5–25 µm, and can withstand prolonged shearing forces with no measurable damage. The hydrogel skins also provide superior low‐friction, antifouling, and ionically conductive surfaces to the polymer substrates without compromising their original mechanical properties and geometry. Applications of the hydrogel skins on inner and outer surfaces of various practical polymer devices including medical tubing, Foley catheters, cardiac pacemaker leads, and soft robots on massive scales are further demonstrated.
Safety and efficacy of combined ruxolitinib and decitabine in accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms
Rampal, Raajit K. , Price, Leah , Berenzon, Dmitriy, Abboud, Camille N. , Kremyanskaya, Marina , Weinberg, Rona Singer , Salama, Mohamed E. , Menghrajani, Kamal , Najfeld, Vesna , Sandy, Lonette, Heaney, Mark , Levine, Ross L. , Dueck, Amylou C. , Goldberg, Judith D. , Dueck, A. C. , Price, Leah , Goldberg, Judith D , Najfeld, Vesna , Mascarenhas, John , Kosiorek, Heidi , Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Mesa, Ruben A. , Hoffman, Ronald

Blood Advances | December 18, 2018 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 3572-3580

10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019661 | PMID 30563881 Get It

Abstract Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, have a propensity to evolve into accelerated and blast-phase disease (MPN-AP/BP), carrying a dismal prognosis. Conventional antileukemia therapy has limited efficacy in this setting. Thus, MPN-AP/BP is an urgent unmet clinical need. Modest responses to hypomethylating agents and single-agent ruxolitinib have been reported. More recently, combination of ruxolitinib and decitabine has demonstrated synergistic in vitro activity in human and murine systems. These observations led us to conduct a phase 1 study to explore the safety of combined decitabine and dose-escalated ruxolitinib in patients with MPN-AP/BP. A total of 21 patients were accrued to this multicenter study. Ruxolitinib was administered at doses of 10, 15, 25, or 50 mg twice daily in combination with decitabine (20 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) in 28-day cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common reasons for study discontinuation were toxicity/adverse events (37%) and disease progression (21%). Fourteen patients died during study treatment period or follow-up. The median overall survival for patients on study was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-not reached). Among evaluable patients, the overall response rate by protocol-defined criteria (complete remission with incomplete count recovery + partial remission) was 9/17 (53%) and by intention-to-treat analysis was 9/21 (42.9%). The combination of decitabine and ruxolitinib was generally well tolerated by patients with MPN-AP/BP and demonstrates potentially promising clinical activity. A phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of this combination regimen is ongoing within the Myeloproliferative Disorder Research Consortium.
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) Society Recommendations: 2018
Gustafsson, Ulf , Scott, Michael J. , Hübner, Martin , Demartines, Nicolas , Rockall, Timothy , Young‐Fadok, Tonia M., Soop, Mattias , Boer, Hans D. de , Chang, George J. , Keßler, Hermann, Whang, Edward E. , Fawcett, William , Carli, F. , Lobo, Dileep N. , Rollins, Katie E. , Balfour, Angie , Ljungqvist, Olle , Demartines, N , Lobo, D N , Hübner, Martin , Nygren, Jonas , Francis, Nader Kamal , Hill, Andrew Graham , Urman, Richard D , Fichera, A., Grass, Fabian , Baldini, G., Riedel, Bernhard

World Journal of Surgery | November 13, 2018 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 659-695

10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y | PMID 30426190 Get It

Abstract Background This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS ® protocol. Methods A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta‐analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results All recommendations on ERAS ® protocol items are based on best available evidence; good‐quality trials; meta‐analyses of good‐quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly. Conclusions The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS ® Society in this comprehensive consensus review.
Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity‐modulated proton therapy
Kamal‐Sayed, Hisham, Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Herman, Michael , Beltran, Chris , Beltran, Chris J , Ma, J., Abdel‐Rehim, A.

Medical Physics | October 17, 2018 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 5643-5652

10.1002/mp.13239 | PMID 30332515 Get It

PurposeProvide an adaptive multicriteria optimization (MCO) method for intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) utilizing GPU technology. Previously described limitations of MCO such as Pareto approximation and limitation on the number of objectives were addressed.MethodsThe treatment planning process for IMPT must account for multiple objectives, which requires extensive treatment planning resources. Often a large number of objectives (>10) are required. Hence the need for an MCO algorithm that can handle large number of objectives. The novelty of the MCO method presented here lies on the introduction of the adaptive weighting scheme that can generate a well‐distributed and dense representation of the Pareto surface for a large number of objectives in an efficient manner. In our approach the generated Pareto surface is constructed for a set of DVH objectives. The MCO algorithm is based on the augmented weighted Chebychev metric (AWCM) method with an adaptive weighting scheme. This scheme uses the differential evolution (DE) method to generate a set of well‐distributed Pareto points. The quality of the Pareto points’ distribution in the objective space was assessed quantitatively using the Pareto sampling metric. The MCO algorithm was developed to perform multiple parallel searches to achieve a rapid mapping of the Pareto surface, produce clinically deliverable plans, and was implemented on a GPU cluster. The MCO algorithm was tested on two clinical cases with 10 and 18 objectives. For each case one of the MCO‐generated plans was selected for comparison with the clinically generated plan. The MCO plan was randomly selected out of the set of MCO plans that had target coverage similar to the clinically generated plan and the same or better sparing of the organs at risk (OAR). Additionally, a validation study of the AWCM method vs the weighted sum method was performed.ResultsThe adaptive MCO algorithm generated Pareto points on the Pareto hypersurface in a fast (2–3 hr) and efficient manner for 2 cases with 10 and 18 objectives. The MCO algorithm generated a dense and well‐distributed set of Pareto points on the objective space, and was able to achieve minimization of the Pareto sampling metric. The selected MCO plan showed an improvement of the DVH objectives in comparison to the clinically optimized plan in both cases. For case one, the MCO plan showed a 48% reduction of the 50% dose to OARs and a 16% reduction of the 1% dose to OARs. For case 2, the MCO plan showed a 72% reduction of the 50% dose to OARs and a 42% reduction of the 1% dose to OARs. The comparison of AWCM to WS showed that the AWCM method has a dosimetric advantage over WS for both patient cases.ConclusionWe introduced an adaptive MCO algorithm for IMPT accelerated using GPUs. The algorithm is based on an adaptive method for generating Pareto plans in the objective space. We have shown that the algorithm can provide rapid and efficient mapping of the multicriteria Pareto surface with clinically deliverable plans.
Predictive models for splenic response to JAK-inhibitor therapy in patients with myelofibrosis
Menghrajani, Kamal , Boonstra, Philip S. , Mercer, Jessica, Perkins, Cecelia , Gowin, Krisstina , Weber, Alissa A., Wang, Lixia , Talpaz, Moshe , Gowin, Krisstina L, Mesa, Ruben, Talpaz, Moshe , Mesa, Ruben A. , Gotlib, Jason , Singer, Jack W.

Leukemia & Lymphoma | September 20, 2018 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1036-1042

10.1080/10428194.2018.1509315 | PMID 30234400 Get It