Citations

Key Points HERC4 is the first identified ubiquitin ligase that mediates c-Maf ubiquitination and degradation. HERC4 suppresses MM cell proliferation and delays MM tumor growth.

Abstract Background: Genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by Next-Generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied to guide clinical prognostic and therapeutic decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been limited to gene panels and whole exome based strategies due to challenges with time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, analyte quality, and ethical-legal-social issues (ELSI). Methods: Excisional or core tumor biopsies or bone marrow biopsies were obtained from consenting participants. Nucleic acid was extracted from fresh or frozen samples followed by WGS/WES/RNASeq on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 and bioinformatics analysis. Therapeutic targets were then prioritized by a multi-disciplinary Genomic Tumor Board (GTB) and CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH and/or IHC. Treatment was delivered using on/off-label FDA approved drugs, available clinical trials and single patient INDs. Results: We consented 64 and enrolled 35 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers. Median age was 59 (range 27-91) with 62% male. The majority had ECOG scores of 1 (94%). A median of 79 (range 28-8891) potentially functional somatic point mutations were identified in each case. One to two mutations/case were further identified as therapeutically targetable in 60% of the cases. The median time from tissue acquisition to CLIA validated results was 116 days (range 42-282) with CLIA validation of targets achieved in 21 of 22 patients. Genomic, target directed treatment was ultimately instituted in 13 patients utilizing: on/off label FDA approved drugs (n = 9), clinical trial (n = 3) and single patient IND (n = 1). Preliminary clinical efficacy was noted in 5 patients (2 PR, 3 SD). Integration of WES, long-insert WGS and RNA-Seq identified a case with an ERRFI1 mutant allele present in only 11% of the DNA reads while 82% of the RNA-Seq reads had the mutant transcript. The patient was treated with erlotinib and achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. In another case, a fusion between FGFR2-MGEA5 was observed in WES and RNA-Seq data leading to prioritization as a drug target. Reasons for patients not receiving targeted therapy included: inability to access treatment (n = 1), death prior to intended treatment (n = 3), results returned after death (n = 3), no targets identified (n = 2) and decision to pursue alternate therapy (n = 5). Conclusions: Integrating whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is not only feasible, but also valuable, in the prioritization and selection of potential targeted therapies for patients with advanced tumors. Continued barriers to broad application include the need for shorter time to reporting as well as broad availability of therapies through basket studies. Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, Jan Egan, Mia Champion, Katherine Hunt, Robert McWilliams, Ann McCullough, Jessica Aldrich, Sara Nasser, Winnie Liang, Michael Barrett, David Craig, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Carpten, A. Keith Stewart, Alan Bryce. Implementation of CLIA enabled integrated whole genome (WGS)/exome (WES)/transcriptome (RNAseq) next-gen sequencing to identify therapeutically relevant targets in advanced cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT112

Abstract Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are therapeutically active compounds that bind to the E3 ubiquitin ligase substrate recruiter cereblon (CRBN) and induce many cellular responses, including cytotoxicity. We had found that the expression of CRBN in multiple myeloma (MM) cells provided the basis for their responses to IMiDs. In this report, we have identified argonaute 2 (AGO2) as a new member of CRBN-downstream binding protein and found that: 1) the steady-state levels of CRBN in IMiD-sensitive cells are significantly higher than in IMiD-resistant cells; 2) the steady-state levels of AGO2 in IMiD-sensitive cells are significantly less compared to IMiD-resistant cells, suggesting that CRBN plays a role in regulating AGO2. AGO2 is a component of microRNA (miRNA)-induced silencing complexes and plays an important role in miRNA maturation and function. The matured miRNAs are considered as key regulators of almost all cellular pathways. Treatment of IMiD-sensitive MM cells with lenalidomide, an IMiD, significantly increased CRBN, decreased both AGO2 and miRNAs and inhibited cell growth. In contrast, although treatment of IMiD-resistant MM cells with lenalidomide moderately increased CRBN and decreased both AGO2 and miRNAs, this treatment did not significantly inhibit cell growth. However, silencing of AGO2 with small hairpin RNA significantly decreased both AGO2 and miRNAs and inhibited cell growth regardless of whether the cells are sensitive or resistant to IMiDs. Therefore, AGO2 could be considered as a new drug target for overcoming IMiDs resistance in MM cells. Citation Format: Qinqin Xu, Yuexian Hou, Paul Langlais, Patrick Erickson, James Zhu, Changxin Shi, Moulun Luo, Yuanxiao Zhu, Lawrence Mandarino, Keith Stewart, Xiu-Bao Chang. Expression of CRBN binding protein AGO2 plays important roles for myeloma cell growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3625. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3625

Key PointsIn a randomized phase 3 trial, overall response rates, PFS, and overall survival were similar between MPT-T and mPR-R. Toxicity with both regimens was common, but mPR-R was better tolerated, and patients on the mPR-R regimen reported better quality of life.

Abstract Purpose: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma confined to the central nervous system. Whether there is a PCNSL-specific genomic signature and, if so, how it differs from systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncertain. Experimental Design: We performed a comprehensive genomic study of tumor samples from 19 immunocompetent PCNSL patients. Testing comprised array-comparative genomic hybridization and whole exome sequencing. Results: Biallelic inactivation of TOX and PRKCD was recurrently found in PCNSL but not in systemic DLBCL, suggesting a specific role in PCNSL pathogenesis. In addition, we found a high prevalence of MYD88 mutations (79%) and CDKN2A biallelic loss (60%). Several genes recurrently affected in PCNSL were common with systemic DLBCL, including loss of TNFAIP3, PRDM1, GNA13, TMEM30A, TBL1XR1, B2M, CD58, activating mutations of CD79B, CARD11, and translocations IgH-BCL6. Overall, B-cell receptor/Toll-like receptor/NF-κB pathways were altered in >90% of PNCSL, highlighting its value for targeted therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, integrated analysis showed enrichment of pathways associated with immune response, proliferation, apoptosis, and lymphocyte differentiation. Conclusions: In summary, genome-wide analysis uncovered novel recurrent alterations, including TOX and PRKCD, helping to differentiate PCNSL from systemic DLBCL and related lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res; 21(17); 3986–94. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: Whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing has revolutionized the ability to assess the genomic landscape of cancer and is increasingly being utilized for clinical decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been constrained by specimen quantity, analyte quality and the time from sample acquisition to results report. Methods: Patients with advanced cancers underwent surgical resection, excisional/core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing in addition to RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients for whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in a CLIA-enabled phase. Tumor types in the CLIA-enabled phase with the highest enrollment were pancreatic cancer (n=8) and cholangiocarcinoma (n=8). We sought to quantify the targets identified along with clinical benefit, defining these as the “Actionable Index” (AI) (proportion of patients with ≥ 1 putative drug target) and “Utility Index” (UI) (proportion of patients who derive clinical benefit). Putative therapeutic targets were identified in 7/8 (AI=0.88) cholangiocarcinoma (CC) patients and in 5/8 (AI=0.63) pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. All 3 CC patients who received target directed treatment achieved a partial response (UI=0.38). In contrast, none of the 4 PC patients who received target directed therapy had treatment response (UI=0.0). Interestingly no actionable targets were identified in 1 CC and in 2 PCs. One CC with an identified target was unable to access the drug and subsequently died. A CC patient and a PC patient, each with identified targets, expired prior to the initiation of therapy. Conclusions: While whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing is providing unparalleled detail of tumor genomes, the application to the clinic must be carefully considered. Actionability of targets will eventually need to be defined in close relation to eventual clinical utility and appropriate refinements to disease-gene-drug databases implemented. Preliminary observations in pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma demonstrate disparity in correlation between utility indices and actionable indices. Application of these tools in larger cohorts and types of tumors will need to be conducted to ascertain more precise estimates. Additional measures that are organ-site agnostic but pertain to specific targets (e.g. BRAF) will also need to be developed in order to facilitate more judicious application of sequencing in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Jan B. Egan, Alan H. Bryce, Mia D. Champion, Winnie S. Liang, Rafael Fonseca, Ann E. McCullough, Michael T. Barrett, Katherine Hunt, Rachel M. Condjella, Robert R. McWilliams, Stephen D. Mastrian, Janine LoBello, Daniel Von Hoff, David W. Craig, A. Keith Stewart, John D. Carpten, Mitesh J. Borad. Indices of actionability and clinical utility in a CLIA-enabled study of whole genome/exome/RNA sequencing in 33 cancer patients: Actionable vs. utility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4694. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4694

BACKGROUNDNVP‐AUY922 (AUY; Luminespib) with or without bortezomib showed preclinical activity against multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This phase 1/1B study assessed NVP‐AUY922 alone and with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.METHODSDose escalation was guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model. In phase 1, patients who progressed after 2 to 4 prior therapies received NVP‐AUY922 intravenously once weekly. In phase 1B, patients who progressed after 2 or fewer prior therapies received NVP‐AUY922 plus bortezomib. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NVP‐AUY922.RESULTSTwenty‐four patients received NVP‐AUY922 monotherapy at doses of 8 to 70 mg/m2. One dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed (grade 3 blurred vision at 70 mg/m2); no MTD was reached. The recommended phase 2 dose was 70 mg/m2. The most frequent drug‐related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, and ocular toxicities. Grade 3/4 AEs were uncommon (<10%). Eight patients discontinued treatment because of AEs; 5 had ocular toxicities (≥45 mg/m2). The best response was stable disease in 66.7% of the patients. There were no partial or complete responses. Five patients received NVP‐AUY922 (which was started at 50 mg/m2) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2). Three of these patients experienced DLT. No further dose escalation was performed; the MTD for NVP‐AUY922 plus bortezomib was not established.CONCLUSIONSThis study showed disease stabilization with NVP‐AUY922 in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The MTD for NVP‐AUY922 was not reached, but reversible ocular toxicity has been reported at high dose levels. Bortezomib at the standard recommended dose plus NVP‐AUY922 was not tolerated. Cancer 2015;121:2185–2192. © 2015 American Cancer Society.