Citations

AbstractTwo simplified methods for quantitative lipoprotein analysis have been calibrated and compared with each other using analytic ultracentrifugation as a standard reference procedure. The first method was the Friedewald procedure and the second was an automated agarose gel electrophoresis system. Both procedures offer comparable quantitative lipoprotein analysis with potential for large scale screening purposes at low cost ($4.00–$5.00 per analysis). There were advantages and limitations to both procedures. The Friedwald procedure can be used on frozen sera but requires 3 ml sera. In contrast, the electrophoresis system must be used with fresh serum but requires only 50 μl serum and the electrophoretic slides may be quantitatively analyzed several years retrospectively.

Abstract Background: The genetic heterogeneity of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) makes the choice of genetic markers and sequence variation–detection technologies critical to the performance of screening assays. We have previously described the effectiveness of a CRC assay composed of 22 known variants in KRAS, APC, TP53, and BAT-26 (V1). We introduce a new marker formulation (V2) that includes detection of de novo variation in APC, PIK3CA, and CTNNB1, hypermethylated sequences within SMARCA3 and VIM, and a single-base variation within BRAF. We compared the abilities of the V1 and V2 markers to detect aberrant DNA in colorectal neoplasias. Methods: V1 and V2 marker formulations were used to analyze 144 colorectal tissue samples comprising 50 precancerous adenomas, 94 carcinomas, and 11 nonpathologic tissues. V1 analysis consisted of single-base extension analysis of the 22 V1 variants. V2 analysis consisted of DNA scanning of the APC mutation cluster region, PIK3CA exons 9 and 20, CTNNB1 exon 3, analysis for the BRAF Val600Glu substitution, and methylation-specific PCR analysis of VIM and SMARCA3. Results: The V2 marker formulation had significantly higher sensitivity than the V1 markers for carcinomas (93.6% and 72.3%, respectively; P = 0.0002) and adenomas (92.0% and 62.0%, respectively; P = 0.0006). None of the nonpathologic samples were positive for any marker. Conclusions: We demonstrate improved sensitivity of a new marker formulation (V2) to detect aberrant DNA in CRC and precancerous adenoma tumor tissues.

In this article, we have characterized and compared gene expression profiles from laser capture microdissected neurons in six functionally and anatomically distinct regions from clinically and histopathologically normal aged human brains. These regions, which are also known to be differentially vulnerable to the histopathological and metabolic features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), include the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus (limbic and paralimbic areas vulnerable to early neurofibrillary tangle pathology in AD), posterior cingulate cortex (a paralimbic area vulnerable to early metabolic abnormalities in AD), temporal and prefrontal cortex (unimodal and heteromodal sensory association areas vulnerable to early neuritic plaque pathology in AD), and primary visual cortex (a primary sensory area relatively spared in early AD). These neuronal profiles will provide valuable reference information for future studies of the brain, in normal aging, AD and other neurological and psychiatric disorders.

In seven strains of cultured normal human osteoblast-like cells, a mean of 1615 molecules of tritium-labeled 17β-estradiol per cell nucleus could be bound to specific nuclear sites. The nuclear binding of the labeled steroid was temperature-dependent, steroid-specific, saturable, and cell type-specific. These are characteristics of biologically active estrogen receptors. Pretreatment with 10 nanomolar estradiol in vitro increased the specific nuclear binding of progesterone in four of six cell strains, indicating an induction of functional progesterone receptors. RNA blot analysis demonstrated the presence of messenger RNA for the human estrogen receptor. The data suggest that estrogen acts directly on human bone cells through a classical estrogen receptor-mediated mechanism.