Citations

Abstract Background Despite aggressive upfront treatment in glioblastoma (GBM), recurrence remains inevitable for most patients. Accumulating evidence has identified hypermutation induced by temozolomide (TMZ) as an emerging subtype of recurrent GBM. However, its biological and therapeutic significance has yet to be described. Methods We combined GBM patient and derive GBM stem cells (GSCs) from tumors following TMZ to explore response of hypermutant and non-hypermutant emergent phenotypes and explore the immune relevance of hypermutant and non-hypermutant states in vivo. Results Hypermutation emerges as one of two possible mutational subtypes following TMZ treatment in vivo and demonstrates distinct phenotypic features compared to non-hypermutant recurrent GBM. Hypermutant tumors elicited robust immune rejection in subcutaneous contexts which was accompanied by increased immune cell infiltration. In contrast, immune rejection of hypermutant tumors were stunted in orthotopic settings where we observe limited immune infiltration. Use of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy showed that immunosuppression in orthotopic contexts was independent from the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Finally, we demonstrate that mutational burden can be estimated from DNA contained in extracellular vesicles (EVs). Conclusion Hypermutation post-TMZ are phenotypically distinct from non-hypermutant GBM and requires personalization for appropriate treatment. The brain microenvironment may be immunosuppressive and exploration of the mechanisms behind this may be key to improving immunotherapy response in this subtype of recurrent GBM.

AbstractEpilepsy syndromes have been recognized for >50 years, as distinct electroclinical phenotypes with therapeutic and prognostic implications. Nonetheless, no formally accepted International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of epilepsy syndromes has existed. The ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions was established to reach consensus regarding which entities fulfilled criteria for an epilepsy syndrome and to provide definitions for each syndrome. We defined an epilepsy syndrome as “a characteristic cluster of clinical and electroencephalographic features, often supported by specific etiological findings (structural, genetic, metabolic, immune, and infectious).” The diagnosis of a syndrome in an individual with epilepsy frequently carries prognostic and treatment implications. Syndromes often have age‐dependent presentations and a range of specific comorbidities. This paper describes the guiding principles and process for syndrome identification in both children and adults, and the template of clinical data included for each syndrome. We divided syndromes into typical age at onset, and further characterized them based on seizure and epilepsy types and association with developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy or progressive neurological deterioration. Definitions for each specific syndrome are contained within the corresponding position papers.

AbstractThe goal of this paper is to provide updated diagnostic criteria for the epilepsy syndromes that have a variable age of onset, based on expert consensus of the International League Against Epilepsy Nosology and Definitions Taskforce (2017–2021). We use language consistent with current accepted epilepsy and seizure classifications and incorporate knowledge from advances in genetics, electroencephalography, and imaging. Our aim in delineating the epilepsy syndromes that present at a variable age is to aid diagnosis and to guide investigations for etiology and treatments for these patients.

Abstract The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Task Force on Nosology and Definitions proposes a classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes in the neonate and infant with seizure onset up to 2 years of age. The incidence of epilepsy is high in this age group and epilepsy is frequently associated with significant comorbidities and mortality. The licensing of syndrome specific antiseizure medications following randomized controlled trials and the development of precision, gene‐related therapies are two of the drivers defining the electroclinical phenotypes of syndromes with onset in infancy. The principal aim of this proposal, consistent with the 2017 ILAE Classification of the Epilepsies, is to support epilepsy diagnosis and emphasize the importance of classifying epilepsy in an individual both by syndrome and etiology. For each syndrome, we report epidemiology, clinical course, seizure types, electroencephalography (EEG), neuroimaging, genetics, and differential diagnosis. Syndromes are separated into self‐limited syndromes, where there is likely to be spontaneous remission and developmental and epileptic encephalopathies , diseases where there is developmental impairment related to both the underlying etiology independent of epileptiform activity and the epileptic encephalopathy. The emerging class of etiology‐specific epilepsy syndromes, where there is a specific etiology for the epilepsy that is associated with a clearly defined, relatively uniform, and distinct clinical phenotype in most affected individuals as well as consistent EEG, neuroimaging, and/or genetic correlates, is presented. The number of etiology‐defined syndromes will continue to increase, and these newly described syndromes will in time be incorporated into this classification. The tables summarize mandatory features, cautionary alerts, and exclusionary features for the common syndromes. Guidance is given on the criteria for syndrome diagnosis in resource‐limited regions where laboratory confirmation, including EEG, MRI, and genetic testing, might not be available.

Abstract In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epilepsies described the “genetic generalized epilepsies” (GGEs), which contained the “idiopathic generalized epilepsies” (IGEs). The goal of this paper is to delineate the four syndromes comprising the IGEs, namely childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic–clonic seizures alone. We provide updated diagnostic criteria for these IGE syndromes determined by the expert consensus opinion of the ILAE’s Task Force on Nosology and Definitions (2017–2021) and international external experts outside our Task Force. We incorporate current knowledge from recent advances in genetic, imaging, and electroencephalographic studies, together with current terminology and classification of seizures and epilepsies. Patients that do not fulfill criteria for one of these syndromes, but that have one, or a combination, of the following generalized seizure types: absence, myoclonic, tonic‐clonic and myoclonic‐tonic‐clonic seizures, with 2.5–5.5 Hz generalized spike‐wave should be classified as having GGE. Recognizing these four IGE syndromes as a special grouping among the GGEs is helpful, as they carry prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Abstract The 2017 International League Against Epilepsy classification has defined a three‐tier system with epilepsy syndrome identification at the third level. Although a syndrome cannot be determined in all children with epilepsy, identification of a specific syndrome provides guidance on management and prognosis. In this paper, we describe the childhood onset epilepsy syndromes, most of which have both mandatory seizure type(s) and interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) features. Based on the 2017 Classification of Seizures and Epilepsies, some syndrome names have been updated using terms directly describing the seizure semiology. Epilepsy syndromes beginning in childhood have been divided into three categories: (1) self‐limited focal epilepsies, comprising four syndromes: self‐limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, self‐limited epilepsy with autonomic seizures, childhood occipital visual epilepsy, and photosensitive occipital lobe epilepsy; (2) generalized epilepsies, comprising three syndromes: childhood absence epilepsy, epilepsy with myoclonic absence, and epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia; and (3) developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathies, comprising five syndromes: epilepsy with myoclonic–atonic seizures, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike‐and‐wave activation in sleep, hemiconvulsion–hemiplegia–epilepsy syndrome, and febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome. We define each, highlighting the mandatory seizure(s), EEG features, phenotypic variations, and findings from key investigations.

Abstract A discussion and debate on the American Medical Informatics Association’s (AMIA) Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Working Group listserv in 2021 raised important issues related to a forthcoming conference in Texas. Texas had recently enacted a restrictive abortion law and restricted voting rights. Several AMIA members advocated for a boycott of the state and the scheduled conference. The discussion led the AMIA Board of Directors to request that the organization’s Ethics Committee provide general guidance for principle-based venue selection. This document recommends overarching principles for the venue selection for future AMIA events and conferences. Discussions by the AMIA Board, the Ethics Committee, and the ELSI Working Group informed these recommendations, and this document on guiding principles was approved by the AMIA Board of Directors in April 2022.

153 Background: The prognostic significance of DDR alterations in mCRPC remains unclear, with conflicting data from prior reports. Whether DDR alterations are predictive of outcomes with therapeutic agents other than PARP inhibitors in mCRPC is also poorly understood. With increasing use of molecular profiling in mCRPC, understanding the full prognostic and predictive utility of plasma DDR alterations is paramount. Methods: A next-generation sequencing Predicine liquid biopsy assay was used to profile cfDNA and germline DNA in 407 mCRPC patients (pts) from two independent international cohorts (n=162 Australia, n=245 US). DDR genes profiled were BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, MLH1 and MSH2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess associations between DDR alterations and clinical outcomes including PSA response rate (PSA RR), progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 74 (IQR 67-79), with median follow up 74 months and median OS 23 months. 65/407 (16%) harboured pathogenic DDR alterations, including 21 patients with ³1 alteration. Frequency of genomic aberrations are shown in the table. BRCA2 alterations were further classified as heterozygous loss (66%), homozygous loss (14%), monoallelic mutation (11%) and biallelic mutation/loss of heterozygosity (9%). Aberrations in any DDR gene, ATM, MLH1 + MSH2 or BRCA2 were associated with shorter OS on univariable analysis, but only any DDR or BRCA2 aberration remained significant upon adjusting for clinical prognosticators and ctDNA fraction (Table). Pre-treatment BRCA2 aberration was associated with significantly shorter OS and lower PSA RR compared to BRCA2 wt for pts receiving an AR pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (18 vs 32 months, p=0.006; 36 vs 60%, p=0.04 respectively) but not for taxane chemotherapy (17 vs 20 months, p=0.3; 45 vs 66, p=0.1 respectively). Conclusions: Detection of an aberration in any DDR gene or BRCA2 was an independent poor prognostic factor across 2 large independent cohorts of mCRPC patients. Intriguingly, patients with a BRCA2 alteration appeared to have worse outcomes with ARPI but not chemotherapy, suggesting predictive utility of DDR profiling. Our data collectively speak to the potential role of DDR alterations, in particular BRCA2, as prognostic and/ or predictive biomarkers in mCRPC.[Table: see text]

150 Background: With the evolving use of targeted therapies exploiting genomic vulnerabilities in mCRPC, screening patients for sensitizing alterations is of increasing relevance. However, the influence of age on the detection of relevant genomic alterations is incompletely understood. In this study, we compared the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiles of younger (age <70) versus older (age ≥70) men with mCRPC and assessed the relative prognostic impact of common genomic alterations. Methods: A next-generation sequencing-based Predicine cfDNA assay was used to profile 276 mCRPC patients from two independent international cohorts. The frequency of genomic alterations across age categories was compared using the chi-squared test, while circulating tumour DNA fraction (ctDNA%) was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Cox proportional hazards analysis with interaction testing was used to assess the association between age, genomic alteration and overall survival. Results: The median age of the combined cohort was 72 years (IQR 66-78), with 170 (62%) patients ≥70 years old. Despite differences in baseline characteristics (poorer performance status in older patients, higher Gleason score and de novo metastatic disease in younger patients), there was no significant difference in ctDNA% (median 22% vs 30%, p=0.6). We observed similar frequencies of genomic alterations across the 10 most commonly aberrant genes, including AR (<70 vs ≥70: 46% vs 49%, p=0.6), TP53 (40% vs 36%, p=0.6), BRCA2 (29% vs 21%, p=0.13) and PTEN (39% vs 35%, p=0.5). This similarity persisted when analysing mutations and copy number alterations in isolation. While driver alterations in both age categories were strongly associated with unfavourable outcomes (Table), an exploratory analysis revealed that copy number gain in PIK3CA may have a worse prognostic impact in younger men ( p for interaction = 0.03), with a lesser effect observed in AR gain ( p = 0.1) and MYC gain ( p = 0.1). Conclusions: The genomic profiles of pertinent alterations between younger and older men are comparable. Certain genomic alterations may carry a worse prognosis in younger men. Patients should be considered for precision medicine assessment and directed therapies, regardless of age. [Table: see text]