Meehan, Brian

Abstract Background Despite aggressive upfront treatment in glioblastoma (GBM), recurrence remains inevitable for most patients. Accumulating evidence has identified hypermutation induced by temozolomide (TMZ) as an emerging subtype of recurrent GBM. However, its biological and therapeutic significance has yet to be described. Methods We combined GBM patient and derive GBM stem cells (GSCs) from tumors following TMZ to explore response of hypermutant and non-hypermutant emergent phenotypes and explore the immune relevance of hypermutant and non-hypermutant states in vivo. Results Hypermutation emerges as one of two possible mutational subtypes following TMZ treatment in vivo and demonstrates distinct phenotypic features compared to non-hypermutant recurrent GBM. Hypermutant tumors elicited robust immune rejection in subcutaneous contexts which was accompanied by increased immune cell infiltration. In contrast, immune rejection of hypermutant tumors were stunted in orthotopic settings where we observe limited immune infiltration. Use of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy showed that immunosuppression in orthotopic contexts was independent from the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Finally, we demonstrate that mutational burden can be estimated from DNA contained in extracellular vesicles (EVs). Conclusion Hypermutation post-TMZ are phenotypically distinct from non-hypermutant GBM and requires personalization for appropriate treatment. The brain microenvironment may be immunosuppressive and exploration of the mechanisms behind this may be key to improving immunotherapy response in this subtype of recurrent GBM.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is invariably fatal due to failure of current chemoradiation (Stupp) regimes. Biomarkers such as MGMT have proven to predict response to Temozolomide (TMZ). An equivalent biomarker for radiation (RT) has not yet been identified. Transglutaminase-2 (TGM2) has been implicated in driving radiation resistance; but the mechanism is poorly understood. We have investigated how exposure to neoadjuvant TMZ in glioma stem cells (GSCs) with different levels of TGM2 would affect the response to RT. MATERIALS/METHODS: Primary GSCs lines with different TGM2 levels (high: 1123, 83; low: 528, OPK49) were used to explore the role of TGM2 in RT response and modulation of expression by TMZ in vitro and in-vivo. RESULTS: We showed that TGM2 drives radioresistance in GSCs through restriction of p53 mediated repression of RAD51 expression. We demonstrate that exposure of GSCs to TMZ drives rapid downregulation of TGM2 in vitro and this phenomenon is recapitulated in vivo. Interestingly, we confirm that RT is able to drive reciprocal changes in TGM2 and promotes reactivation of TGM2 in TGM2-high tumours but not TGM2-low tumours. Given these observations, we hypothesized that exposure to neoadjuvant TMZ in TGM2-low tumours would increase the efficacy of subsequent RT in these tumours. Comparison of the effect of standard treatment consisting of 3 weeks of concurrent TMZ and RT (Stupp) to a novel regime (neo-Stupp) consisting of 1 week of neoadjuvant TMZ followed by two weeks of TMZ and hypofractionated RT revealed a superior survival benefit of this novel regime in TGM2-low tumours but not in TGM2-high tumours. Utilization of the TGM2 inhibitor GK921 in combination with neo-Stupp prevented rapid relapse previously observed in TGM2-high tumours. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that TGM2 is a biomarker of RT response and can be used to tailor chemoradiation protocols to the unique biology of each individual GBM patient.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly type of malignant brain cancer in adults. While current standard of care which combines resection, radiation therapy (RT) and Temozolomide (TMZ) effectively eliminates primary disease, recurrence is inevitable, occurs rapidly following treatment and is ultimately lethal due to limited therapeutic opportunities of recurrent GBM. Hypermutation has been reported to occur in a subset of both low and high-grade gliomas and emerges after exposure to TMZ. Mutational inactivation and loss of mismatch repair (MMR) gene expression lead to the accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms throughout the genome. To date, the gain of hypermutation and subsequent therapeutic responses are still largely unknown. We hypothesized that hypermutant (HM) and non-hypermutant (NH) tumors represent two recurrent GBM subtypes, which has distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities. In addition, given the lack of concordance between microsatellite instability (MSI) and occurrence of hypermutation in GBM, we sought to derive a limited gene panel which can be used as surrogate biomarker for hypermutation following TMZ to replace whole exome sequencing (WES). Using public datasets, we demonstrated that recurrent GBM can be clustered into two subtypes: HM and NH. We used matched primary and recurrent GBM datasets to derive a gene panel signature, which is uniquely mutated at recurrence in HM GBM and confirmed the specificity of this panel in an independent dataset. Furthermore, we utilized patient derived xenograft (PDX) models to generate pre-clinical models and demonstrated that HM recurrent GBM are more immune responsive while NH recurrent GBM maintained sensitivity to a range of alternate chemotherapies such as cisplatin and RT. Finally, we demonstrated that this signature is represented in exosomes and can be enriched by use of tumor specific antibody capture methods to improve the sensitivity of hypermutation detection in liquid biopsy.