Citations

Abstract There are a number of human genes which span very large chromosomal regions. Forty genes span greater than 1 megabase and 200 are 500 Kb or larger. We and others have demonstrated that many of the largest genes are derived from within regions of profound genomic instability known as common fragile sites (CFSs). We have been studying oropharyngeal cancers which are derived from the base of tongue, tonsil and larynx. While the traditional etiologic factors underlying the development of this aggressive cancer is a history of smoking and drinking there are an increasing number of younger patients developing this cancer without these risk factors. The most likely cause of these cancers is the presence of human papillomavirus which we detect in over 90% of oropharyngeal cancers derived from the Mayo Clinic. In an attempt to better understand the molecular alterations that underlie oropharyngeal cancers arising from different risk factors we utilized the power of Next Generation sequencing on the Illumina GA IIx to compare the transcriptomes of 12 oropharyngeal cancers to patient matched normal tissue. We first observe a division of patients into two groups of oropharyngeal cancers: those caused by mutations and other alterations induced by a history of smoking and drinking and those associated with HPV infection caused by viral-induced genomic instability. We then examined the expression of the 200 largest human genes in the oropharyngeal tumors and find that each tumor has inactivated the expression of at least 20 different very large genes. There is a distinct pattern of inactivation of these genes in different oropharyngeal cancers depending upon the underlying etiology. Some of the genes most frequently inactivated include Dlg2 (the human homolog of the large discs tumor suppressor gene from drosophila and a mutation target in a number of other cancers); ERBB4 (Her4 and a member of the EGFR family), BAI3 (a brain specific angiogenesis inhibitor that is also mutated in multiple cancers), and ANK2 (mutated in long QT patients). Each of these genes may be functioning as tumor suppressors as has already been demonstrated for the two large CFS genes, FHIT and WWOX. The inactivation of so many of these genes in each oropharyngeal tumor may have a profound effect upon the phenotype of the resulting tumor. When we examine the expression of the large genes most frequently inactivated in each of the two groups of oropharyngeal cancers in panels of breast or lung cancer samples we find that we do not detect significant loss of expression of these genes. We believe that genomic instability promotes alterations in the unstable CFS regions but that there is selective inactivation of different large CFS genes in different cancers. The signature of which specific genes are inactivated may have phenotypic and clinical significance which we are just beginning to investigate. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3885. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3885

Abstract There is considerable clinical interest in the role that human papillomavirus (HPV) plays in the development of oropharyngeal cancers. A variety of assays are currently available to stratify patients based on HPV status prior to treatment. The most frequently utilized are PCR and In Situ hybridization (ISH) to detect the presence of HPV DNA sequences. The increasing clinical interest in determining HPV patient status relates to compelling evidence that a subset of patients with HPV positive tumors have better clinical outcomes. Evidence also suggests that patients with HPV positive tumors should be further divided into groupings based on levels of viral activity and that this may represent additional clinical information necessary to develop appropriate treatment plans. The most frequently applied assay to identify HPV activity in a patient sample is to detect the over-expression of the surrogate protein marker p16 by Immunohistochemisty (IHC), which has been shown to increase expression in response to HPV active infections in oropharyngeal cancer. An alternative technique to quantitatively detect the presence and level of transcriptional activity of HPV in tissue samples is to measure the expression of oncogenes E6 and E7. We have analyzed the fresh frozen tissue samples corresponding to matched tumor, normal and metastatic patient tissues using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) approach to determine the expression of HPV oncogenes and p16 gene expression. We observed that there are three groups of oropharyngeal tumors when grouped by HPV16 E6 and E7 gene expression. The first are the most rare and are tumors that contain no HPV sequences or expression of the E6 and E7 ocogenes. The second are tumors that contain HPV DNA sequences but very low expression of E6 or E7 and the third are tumors that contain HPV DNA sequence and robust expression of E6 and E7. Additionally, we found variable correlation between HPV16 E6 and E7 expression and p16 gene expression, suggesting that factors other than HPV oncogene expression may influence the expression of p16. Our results would indicate that the best assays for quantifying the activity of an HPV infection in oropharyngeal cancers would be those optimized to accurately measure either E6 and E7 transcripts or their protein products directly out of paraffin-embedded tissues. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3859. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3859

Abstract Background: We recently reported a 49% RECIST response rate in conjunction with a phase 2 clinical trial of the multi-targeted kinase inhibitor pazopanib in differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC; Lancet Oncology 2010, 11:962-72), prompting a search for synergistic pazopanib-containing doublets in thyroid cancer cell lines. Methods and Results: Among all explored pazopanib-containing combinations, paclitaxel and pazopanib produced the greatest combined cytotoxic effects (continuous exposure pazopanib, 24 h paclitaxel; Combination Index, CI, at IC90=0.3). Interestingly, analogous synergy resulted when combining pazopanib with other antimicrotubule agents including other taxanes (docetaxel), Vinca alkyloids (vincristine) and epothilones (ixabepilone) – suggesting a class effect. Further, we found this combination to be synergistic in multiple cancer cell lines including DTC, medullary and anaplastic thyroid cancer lines, and in the A549 lung cancer line. In pursuit of underlying mechanism(s), we noted that the combination produced a greater fraction of cells in G2/M phase of the cell cycle and increased apoptosis in comparison to paclitaxel alone, prompting us to examine whether pazopanib might potentiate the effects of paclitaxel on mitosis. Analysis of cell fate resulting from pazopanib and paclitaxel alone and in combination using time-lapsed video microscopy demonstrated that as low as 2.5 μM pazopanib augmented paclitaxel-induce mitotic catastrophe by 2.4 fold, while inducing no appreciable cell death alone. As pazopanib is somewhat promiscuous in inhibition of kinases, we hypothesized that observed combined effects with antimicrotubule agents might be attributed to its inhibition of cell cycle by targeting CDKs or mitosis by targeting aurora kinases. Inhibition of CDKs 1 and 2 required pazopanib concentrations 1000-times those required to inhibit its primary kinase targets, VEGF-Rs; whereas aurora kinases A and B were inhibited at much lower concentrations (IC50s, 500-1000 nM). Hence, we pursued shRNA aurora A knockdown experiments: potentiation of pazopanib effects were observed in knockdown clones, suggesting that pazopanib single-agent effects are at least in part mediated via aurora A inhibition. Moreover, augmentation of paclitaxel effects were achieved in knockdown clones that rivaled those observed for the pazopanib/paclitaxel combination. Additionally, pazopanib/paclitaxel synergy was reduced in aurora A knockdown clones (CI at IC80: vector<0.5, knockdown clones >1.0), indicating that aurora A inhibition by pazopanib is contributory to paclitaxel/pazopanib synergy. Conclusions: Pazopanib combines with antimicrotubule agents to produce cytotoxic synergy associated with augmentation of mitotic catastrophe that appears at least in part mediated by its ability to inhibit aurora kinases. Supported in part by CA125750. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3597. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3597

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.

Objectives: Despite substantial evidence supporting the efficacy of stimulant medication for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), adherence to stimulant treatment is often suboptimal. Applying social/cognitive theories to understanding and assessing parent attitudes toward initiating medication may provide insight into factors influencing parent decisions to follow ADHD treatment recommendations. This report describes results from formative research that used focus groups to obtain parent input to guide development of a provider-delivered intervention to improve adherence to stimulants. Methods: Participants were caregivers of children with ADHD who were given a stimulant treatment recommendation. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed by inductive, grounded theory methods as well as a deductive analytic strategy using an adapted version of the Unified Theory of Behavior Change to organize and understand parent accounts. Results: Five groups were conducted with 27 parents (mean child age=9.35 years; standard deviation [SD]=2.00), mean time since diagnosis=3.33 years (SD=2.47). Most parents (81.5%) had pursued stimulant treatment. Inductive analysis revealed 17 attitudes facilitating adherence and 25 barriers. Facilitators included parent beliefs that medication treatment resulted in multiple functional gains and that treatment was imperative for their children's safety. Barriers included fears of personality changes and medication side effects. Complex patterns of parent adherence to medication regimens were also identified, as well as preferences for psychiatrists who were diagnostically expert, gave psychoeducation using multiple modalities, and used a chronic illness metaphor to explain ADHD. Theory-based analyses revealed conflicting expectancies about treatment risks and benefits, significant family pressures to avoid medication, guilt and concern that their children required medication, and distorted ideas about treatment risks. Parents, however, took pride in successfully pursuing efforts to manage their child behaviorally and to avoid medication when possible. Conclusions: Focus group data identified social, cognitive, and affective influences on treatment decision making. Results support prior research comparing family/social functioning, physician characteristics, and adherence. Findings suggest that parent attitudes to psychiatric care need to be assessed comprehensively at initial evaluation to aid the development of psychoeducational messages, and a more careful consideration about how parents interpret and respond to adherence-related questioning.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is one of several novel methods that provide real-time, high-resolution imaging at a micron scale via endoscopes. CLE has the potential to be a disruptive technology in that it can change the current algorithms that depend on biopsy to perform surveillance of high-risk conditions. Furthermore, it allows on-table decision making that has the potential to guide therapy in real time and reduce the need for repeated procedures. CLE and related technologies are often termed “virtual biopsy” as they simulate the images seen in traditional histology. However, the imaging of living tissue allows more than just pragmatic convenience; it also allows imaging of living tissue such as active capillary circulation, cellular death, and vascular and endothelial translocation, thus extending beyond what is capable in traditional biopsy. Immediate potential applications of CLE are to guide biopsy sampling in Barrett's esophagus and inflammatory bowel disease surveillance, evaluation of colorectal polyps, and intraductal imaging of the pancreas and bile duct. Data on these applications is rapidly emerging, and more is needed to clearly demonstrate the optimal applications of CLE. In this paper, we will focus on the role of CLE as applied to colorectal polyps detected during colonoscopy.

Abstract Background: A major issue surrounding the use of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of breast cancer is the eventual development of resistance. Endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, is being developed as a novel endocrine therapy for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. While numerous studies have investigated the process of tamoxifen resistance, no such data exist regarding the mechanism by which cells develop resistance to endoxifen. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line and the identification of a specific treatment to effectively target these resistant cells. Methods: MCF7 cells were chronically exposed to concentrations of endoxifen previously demonstrated to be associated with the greatest reductions in estrogen stimulated proliferation and transcription (1000 nM). Changes in the physiological and molecular properties of these cells were monitored during the course of resistance using a wide range of techniques. Results: Following 15 months of endoxifen exposure, an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in MCF7 cells, characterized by loss of E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of fibronectin and vimentin expression and increased responsiveness to TGFβ. Resistant cells exhibit a 7-fold increase in their proliferation rates relative to parental cells and display basal like properties (triple negative) due to silencing of ERα , progesterone receptor and CD24 expression. Resistant cells were confirmed to be estrogen insensitive through the use of cell proliferation and gene expression studies. Wound healing and cell migration assays revealed that resistant cells are highly aggressive with a significant level of metastatic potential. Microarray analysis revealed over 7500 genes to be differentially expressed in the resistant cell line relative to parental cells using a 2-fold cutoff, of which only 52 genes (0.7%) were determined to be up-regulated. Interestingly, a number of the most highly altered genes have previously been implicated in the development of EMT and/or resistance including Twist2, IGF binding protein 5, GATA and β-tubulin. Based on the identification of P-tubulin as the most up-regulated gene in resistant cells, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) was recognized as a candidate drug to specifically target this resistant cell line due to it known roles in blocking tubulin polymerization. Indeed, 2ME2 exposure resulted in the induction of apoptosis and significant cell death in vitro. Conclusions: Chronic exposure of MCF7 cells to high concentrations of endoxifen led to induction of EMT with cells that are basal like, estrogen and SERM insensitive, highly TGFP responsive with significantly increased proliferation rates and metastatic potential relative to parental cells. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of resistance to endoxifen may differ from those observed with long term exposure to tamoxifen and have identified 2ME2 as a potentially successful alternative therapy for endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-11.

Abstract Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers. Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.

Abstract Background: We have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most potent tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-estrogenic effects of this drug in breast cancer cells expressing ERα (Wu, Hawse et al. Cancer Res 2009;69:1722). These studies support the clinical findings which demonstrate that women with genetically impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have significantly reduced endoxifen levels and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. More recently, data has emerged from several laboratories suggesting that expression of ERβ in breast tumors leads to increased benefits from tamoxifen therapy. However, the role of ERβ in mediating endoxifen action has yet to be explored.Methods: Using U2OS osteosarcoma cells, as well as Hs578T and MCF7 breast cancer cells, stably expressing ERβ, we examined the effects of endoxifen on ERβ protein levels by western blotting, ERβ transcriptional activity by real-time RT-PCR, and on ERβ inhibition of breast cancer cell growth through the use of proliferation assays.Results: We have discovered that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, unlike its targeted degradation of ERα, and induces ERα/ERβ heterodimerization in a concentration dependent manner. We have also found that endoxifen is a more potent inhibitor of estrogen induced gene expression in MCF7 cells stably expressing ERβ. Concentrations of endoxifen that mimic patients with impaired CYP2D6 activity (20-40 nM) do not significantly alter E2-induced cell proliferation in MCF7 cells expressing only ERα. However, these concentrations of endoxifen significantly reduce the estrogen induced proliferation rate of MCF7 cells expressing ERβ.Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, induces ER heterodimerization and more potently inhibits the actions of estrogen in breast cancer cells expressing ERβ. The presence of ERβ sensitizes cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen and growth inhibition occurs at substantially lower endoxifen concentrations (20-40 nM) than in cells that express only ERα (100 nm). Our data suggest that tamoxifen therapy may be beneficial even in patients with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism when ERβ is expressed. These studies also suggest that the increased effectiveness of tamoxifen therapy in patients whose tumors express ERβ may be due to the effects of endoxifen. Finally, these findings underscore the need to further elucidate the role of ERβ in the biology and treatment of breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 405.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine factors that are associated with aggression that is responsive versus refractory to individualized optimization of stimulant monotherapy among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Children who were aged 6 to 13 years and had ADHD, either oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder, significant aggressive behavior, and a history of insufficient response to stimulants completed an open stimulant monotherapy optimization protocol. Stimulant titration with weekly assessments of behavior and tolerability identified an optimal regimen for each child. Families also received behavioral therapy. Parents completed the Retrospective-Modified Overt Aggression Scale (R-MOAS) at each visit. Children were classified as having stimulant-refractory aggression on the basis of R-MOAS ratings and clinician judgment. Differences that pertained to treatment, demographic, and psychopathology between groups with stimulant monotherapy–responsive and –refractory aggression were evaluated. RESULTS: Aggression among 32 (49.3%) of 65 children was reduced sufficiently after stimulant dosage adjustment and behavioral therapy to preclude adjunctive medication. Those who responded to stimulant monotherapy were more likely to benefit from the protocol's methylphenidate preparation (once-daily, triphasic release), showed a trend for lower average dosages, and received fewer behavioral therapy sessions than did children with stimulant-refractory aggression. Boys, especially those with higher ratings of baseline aggression and of depressive and manic symptoms, more often exhibited stimulant-refractory aggression. CONCLUSIONS: Among children whose aggressive behavior develops in the context of ADHD and of oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder, and who had insufficient response to previous stimulant treatment in routine clinical care, systematic, well-monitored titration of stimulant monotherapy often culminates in reduced aggression that averts the need for additional agents.