Citations

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual . The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information ( Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 , online only).

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer address all aspects of management for breast cancer. The treatment landscape of metastatic breast cancer is evolving constantly. The therapeutic strategy takes into consideration tumor biology, biomarkers, and other clinical factors. Due to the growing number of treatment options, if one option fails, there is usually another line of therapy available, providing meaningful improvements in survival. This NCCN Guidelines Insights report focuses on recent updates specific to systemic therapy recommendations for patients with stage IV (M1) disease.

TPS4204 Background: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer has yet to be defined. Recent phase II trial results demonstrate a median overall survival time (mOS) of only 22.4 months after treatment with perioperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with 36% not reaching surgery due to disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy. While potential benefits and shortcomings of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been well documented, to date, no phase III trial has directly compared a perioperative versus an adjuvant chemotherapy strategy in resectable pancreatic cancer. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A021806 is an actively accruing randomized controlled phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: To qualify for enrollment, patients must have biopsy-proven localized resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Patients must have good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1) and be candidates to receive mFOLFIRINOX treatment. All patients enrolled undergo central radiologic eligibility review for quality control and are then randomized to either Arm 1 which consists of 8 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX or Arm 2 which includes upfront surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. The primary endpoint of the trial is overall survival with secondary endpoints evaluating disease-free survival, margin-negative resection rate, surgical complications, and chemotherapeutic adverse events. Additional correlative endpoints include quality of life and radiomic imaging assessments. A total enrollment of 352 patients is planned from the US and Canada; current enrollment for this trial is at 145 patients. An OS interim analysis will be performed when 50% of the events (124) are observed combining the two arms. If the trial continues after interim analysis, the final OS analysis will be performed with a total of 248 events (combined arms). If the Cox model (stratified by tumor location and ECOG PS) comparing OS between arms produces a one-sided p-value < 0.05, then we will conclude that the OS of the perioperative therapy arm is superior to adjuvant therapy. The Alliance A021806 phase III trial aims to define a new standard of care for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04340141 .

8013 Background: Ide-cel is an FDA-approved treatment for RRMM patients (pts). However, there is limited data on how BT for disease control during its manufacturing process affects clinical outcomes. Methods: Eleven US academic centers contributed data to this analysis without involvement from the manufacturer. By 5/1/2022, 235 pts had undergone leukapheresis, with 214 infused with a median follow up of 9 months (mos). BT was given between leukapheresis and CAR-T infusion. Results: In this analysis, 79% of pts (n = 170) received BT, which included alkylator-based in 35.5%, steroid and/or IMiD/Ab combos (IMiD combos) in 14%, PI combinations (PI combos) in 12%, and selinexor in 10%. BT recipients had higher ECOG PS 2-4, R-ISS 2-3, ferritin, and CRP before lymphodepleting (LD) chemo, however, no difference among BT subgroups. No difference in prior lines of therapy or penta-refractory between BT and No BT (NBT) groups or BT subgroups. Median cycle of the BT was 1 (1-7), with overall response rate (ORR) of 12%, with no difference among BT subgroups. Incidence and severity of CRS and ICANs were comparable in BT and NBT. However, pts who received BT had a longer median hospital stay compared to NBT, particularly in the alkylator/selinexor subgroups. There were no significant difference in cytopenias at day 90 post CAR-T between the BT and NBT or BT subgroups. For the 73% (n = 157) evaluable for day 90 response, there was no difference in the complete or ORR between the BT and NBT groups (41% vs. 52%; p = .2 and 84% vs. 87.5%, p = .8, respectively). Median PFS was worse at 8.1 mos in BT vs 11.5 mos in NBT (p = .03). Among BT subgroups, PFS was the longest with IMiD combos with median PFS not reached (NR), comparable to NBT, and was significantly longer than all other BT subgroups (p = 0.01). The median OS was 13.8 mos with BT and NR in NBT (p = .002). In BT subgroup analysis, alkylators had a shorter OS, although, this was not significant (p = .06). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS in relationship to response to BT (p = .6 and p = .9, respectively). Conclusions: Pts without BT had longer PFS and OS post ide-cel, likely reflective of less aggressive disease. Those who received BT with steroid/IMiD and Ab combos had similar PFS as NBT. However, BT choice is complicated by disease severity and should be evaluated per patient circumstances. [Table: see text]

11535 Background: Twenty-five percent of patients with Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) have metastatic disease at diagnosis, most commonly in the lungs. Our objectives were to compare overall (OS) and pulmonary disease-free survival (PDFS) between patients with metastatic EWS at diagnosis who achieve rapid complete response (RCR), defined as radiographic resolution of all pulmonary nodules at the end of induction chemotherapy, and those with residual pulmonary nodules after induction chemotherapy (non-RCR). Methods: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included children under 20 years of age with metastatic EWS treated from 2007-2020 at 19 institutions participating in the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Chi-square tests were conducted for differences among groups, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for OS and PDFS. Cox regression was performed for OS, controlling for whole lung irradiation (WLI), extrapulmonary metastases, and age. Results: Among 153 patients with metastatic EWS at diagnosis, 61 (40%) achieved RCR, and 87 (57%) did not (5 unknown). The median number of pulmonary nodules was 3.5 in the RCR vs 5 in the non-RCR groups (p = 0.02), while bilateral disease was present in 44 (72%) RCR vs 75 (86%) non-RCR patients (p = 0.03). Pulmonary relapse occurred in 58 (38%) patients, including 18 (29%) in the RCR and 36 (41%) in the non-RCR groups (p = 0.14). Factors associated with pulmonary relapse in the univariate analysis include median age [15 years (IQR: 12-17) with pulmonary relapse vs 12 years (IQR: 9-16) without (p = 0.03)] and extrapulmonary metastases at diagnosis [24 (41%) patients with pulmonary relapse vs 26 (27%) patients without pulmonary relapse (p = 0.05)]. WLI was performed in 100 patients and was not associated with a reduction in pulmonary relapse (p = 0.93). Complete surgical clearance of pulmonary disease was attempted in 29 (19%) patients, including 17 of the patients who met the criteria for RCR. On Kaplan-Meier analyses, 5-year PDFS did not significantly differ based on RCR (67%) vs. non-RCR (53%, p = 0.13), or WLI (61%) vs. no WLI (54%, p = 0.32). However, 5-year OS did vary significantly between patients with RCR and WLI (85%), RCR without WLI (55%), non-RCR with WLI (60%), and non-RCR without WLI (25%; p < 0.01). In Cox regression analysis, RCR was associated with improved OS after controlling for WLI, extrapulmonary metastases, and patient age (HR 0.51, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with EWS who had pulmonary metastases at diagnosis had improved OS if they achieved RCR and received WLI, despite having no significant differences in rates of pulmonary relapse. Further research is needed to determine whether clearance of pulmonary disease achieved through surgical metastasectomy provides a comparable survival benefit and if any subsets of patients have a reduced risk of pulmonary relapse after resection.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe management and outcomes from a contemporary cohort of children with Wilms tumor complicated by inferior vena caval thrombus. Background: The largest series of these patients was published almost 2 decades ago. Since then, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been commonly used to manage these patients, and outcomes have not been reported. Methods: Retrospective review of 19 North American centers between 2009 and 2019. Patient and disease characteristics, management, and outcomes were investigated and analyzed. Results: Of 124 patients, 81% had favorable histology (FH), and 52% were stage IV. IVC thrombus level was infrahepatic in 53 (43%), intrahepatic in 32 (26%), suprahepatic in 14 (11%), and cardiac in 24 (19%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a 3-drug regimen was administered in 82% and postresection radiation in 90%. Thrombus level regression was 45% overall, with suprahepatic level showing the best response (62%). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was potentially avoided in 67%. The perioperative complication rate was significantly lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [(25%) vs upfront surgery (55%); P=0.005]. CPB was not associated with higher complications [CPB (50%) vs no CPB (27%); P=0.08]. Two-year event-free survival was 93% and overall survival was 96%, higher in FH cases (FH 98% vs unfavorable histology/anaplastic 82%; P=0.73). Neither incomplete resection nor viable thrombus cells affected event-free survival or overall survival. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy resulted in excellent outcomes, even with advanced-stage disease and cardiac extension. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased the need for CPB to facilitate resection. Complete thrombectomy may not always be necessary.

Abstract Background: MM remains incurable and new tx options are needed, especially in heavily pre-treated R/R pts. REGN5459, a BCMAxCD3 bispecific Ab, binds to BCMA on MM cells and with low affinity to CD3 on T cells, triggering T-cell activation and plasma cell depletion with low cytokine release preclinically. This first-in-human study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of REGN5459 monotherapy in pts with R/R MM. Methods: Eligible pts had received ≥3 prior lines of tx including an anti-CD38 Ab, proteasome inhibitor, and immunomodulatory drug, and had exhausted all available tx options. Pts could receive REGN5459 until progression/intolerable toxicity. Primary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the recommended Ph 2 dose (RP2D) of REGN5459 (Ph 1) and assess efficacy of REGN5459 (Ph 2) per ORR. Results: As of June 9, 2022, 43 pts were enrolled (Ph 1, 33; Ph 2, 10): median age 67 yrs (range, 26-85), 51% female, 16% high cytogenetic risk, 14% extramedullary plasmacytoma, 37% R-ISS Stage III disease, 61% triple-class refractory, and median of 5 (range, 2-9) prior lines of tx. In Ph 1, one DLT was reported in a pt receiving the highest dose (900 mg; Gr 3 hypoxia, pt later found to have primary lung cancer). RP2D was identified as 480 mg. All pts enrolled had ≥1 TEAE, 74% had Gr ≥3 TEAEs. TEAEs all-Gr in ≥30% of pts were CRS (54%), fatigue (44%), neutropenia (37%), anemia (35%), cough (30%), and diarrhea (30%). Gr ≥3 TEAEs in ≥15% of pts were neutropenia (37%), anemia (26%), lymphopenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and hypertension (16%). CRS Gr 1, 2, and 3 were reported in 47%, 2%, and 5%, respectively; there was no Gr 4 or 5 CRS. No Gr 3 CRS with RP2D. Tocilizumab was used in 19% and steroids in 9% of pts. One pt developed ICANS (2%, Gr 2). Incidence of serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to tx discontinuation was 63% and 16%. Infections occurred in 61% (37% Gr ≥3). After data-cutoff, two deaths due to COVID pneumonia and COVID infection have been reported. ORR was 67% (58% ≥VGPR) for the entire cohort and 100% (85% ≥VGPR; 15% sCR; 39% CR) among pts receiving the RP2D (n=13). Median follow-up was 7 mos (range, 1-26) with longest response ongoing for 22+ mos. Median time to response was 0.8 mos. Median DOR was NR (95% CI, 12-NE); 12-mo DOR for RP2D was 66.7% (95% CI, 5.4-94.5). Of pts in ≥CR with available MRD results (n=8), 50% were MRD negative at the 10−5 threshold. Conclusion: These initial data show that REGN5459 has acceptable safety/tolerability in R/R MM with most CRS of low grade and low incidence of ICANS. Modulation of CD3 affinity on bispecific Abs to maximize tumor killing, and mitigate CRS and T-cell exhaustion, warrants further research. Efficacy in this heavily pre-treated cohort was encouraging, with 100% ORR with the RP2D. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Attaya Suvannasankha, Prashant Kapoor, Matthew J. Pianko, Joshua Richter, Anita D'Souza, Larry D. Anderson, Andrew Magyar, Oluwaseun Aina, Anita Boyapati, Damien Cronier, Nikhil Singh, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Glenn S. Kroog, Hans C. Lee. Safety and efficacy from the phase 1/2 first-in-human study of REGN5459, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody with low CD3 affinity, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT013.