Abstract Objective Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may develop in patients following successful surgery for endogenous hypercortisolism. Effective strategies to minimize GWS and improve quality of life (QoL) are currently lacking. We aimed to determine the impact of hydrocortisone vs prednisone therapy on GWS and QoL during the first 12 weeks postsurgery. Methods Single-center prospective cohort study (2019-2024) of adults with endogenous hypercortisolism who developed postoperative adrenal insufficiency and treated with either prednisone or hydrocortisone. Quality of life was assessed with Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Cushing QoL questionnaires at baseline and at 12 weeks postsurgery. GWS was assessed using weekly AddiQoL questionnaires for the first 12 weeks postsurgery. Results Of 165 patients, 101 (61%) were treated with hydrocortisone and 64 (39%) with prednisone. At baseline, no group differences were found in the hypercortisolism subtype, comorbidities, or QoL assessments. At follow-up, no group differences in final total daily hydrocortisone equivalent dose were seen. When adjusting for the baseline QoL assessment, patients treated with prednisone demonstrated a higher degree of improvement in their QoL, particularly in the SF-36 mental component score (estimate 0.33, 95% CI, 0.04-0.63), SF-36 role-emotional limitation (estimate 0.52, 95% CI, 0.2-0.84), and SF-36 body pain (estimate 0.31, 95% CI, 0.07-0.56) subcomponents. In the multivariable analysis of age, sex, body mass index, glucocorticoid type, baseline clinical severity score, and baseline QoL assessment, prednisone therapy was an independent predictor of better SF-36 mental component at 12 weeks postsurgery. Conclusions Prednisone therapy was associated with better mental health QoL than hydrocortisone at 12 weeks postsurgery in patients with hypercortisolism.
Convergent Genetic Adaptation in Human Tumors Developed Under Systemic Hypoxia and in Populations Living at High Altitudes
Abstract This study explores parallels between systemic hypoxia adaptation in high-altitude populations and tumorigenesis. We identified EPAS1, a gene critical for hypoxia adaptation in populations such as Tibetans and Sherpas, as playing a similar adaptive role in tumors arising under hypoxic conditions. Tumors from patients with chronic hypoxia displayed impaired DNA repair and frequent emergence of EPAS1 variants, with frequencies reaching up to 90%, echoing the positive selection seen in high-altitude dwellers. Mechanistically, EPAS1 gain-of-function mutations promote COX4I2 expression, reducing cellular oxygen consumption and supporting tumor proliferation in hypoxia. Analysis of clinical data from patients with hypoxia revealed tissue-specific and time-sensitive tumorigenic effects, particularly impacting oxygen-sensitive cells in the postnatal period. Our findings suggest that EPAS1-driven adaptation mechanisms in high-altitude populations provide a model for understanding tumor evolution under hypoxic stress, highlighting how genetic adaptations to diverse stressors in natural populations may yield insights into tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Significance: This study reveals a broad convergence in genetic adaptation to hypoxia between natural populations and tumors, suggesting that insights from natural populations could enhance our understanding of cancer biology and identify novel therapeutic targets. See related commentary by Lee, p. 875
Angiographic Risk Factors for Mislateralization with Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling in Cushing’s Disease
Abstract Disclosure: R. Sandooja: None. J. Saini: None. R. Gregg garcia: None. C. Zhang: None. S. Achenbach: None. E. Atkinson: None. J. Van Gompel: None. W.F. Young: None. I. Bancos: None. Hydrocortisone vs Prednisone During Recovery Following Surgical Cure for Endogenous Hypercortisolism: A Longitudinal Observational Study Introduction: Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) is a constellation of symptoms that occurs after successful surgery for endogenous hypercortisolism. The objective of this study is to compare hydrocortisone versus prednisone on GWS symptoms. Methods: Study design: Single-center prospective longitudinal cohort study, 2019-2023. Participants: Adults with Cushing syndrome (CS) and mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) with post-operative adrenal insufficiency treated with either hydrocortisone or prednisone for glucocorticoid replacement. Measurements: Clinical and biochemical severity scores for hypercortisolism were calculated. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Cushing QOL surveys. GWS was assessed using weekly AddiQoL surveys for the first 12 weeks after surgery. Results: Of 131 patients, 91 (69%) patients were treated with hydrocortisone and 40 (31%) with prednisone. No differences in age (median age 51 vs 53 years, P=0.62), sex (84 vs 85% women, P=0.83), etiology of hypercortisolism (ACTH-dependent: 44% vs 48%, P=0.26), clinical severity of hypercortisolism (median score 13 vs 12, P=0.97), or biochemical severity of hypercortisolism (median score of 6 in both, P=0.31) were noted between groups. When assessed at 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-surgery, the prevalence and trajectory of symptoms (fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, sleep, headaches, nausea, weakness) were similar in patients treated with hydrocortisone and prednisone (P>0.05 for all). However, patients treated with prednisone were less likely to report mood changes (8.5% vs 20.9%, P= 0.004) compared to those treated with hydrocortisone. When compared to the presurgical baseline, the overall Cushing QOL score 12 weeks post-surgery improved in both groups (mean delta 8.9 vs 13.0, P=0.21). No differences in the hydrocortisone vs prednisone treatment were found in the SF-36 physical component score (mean delta of -1.7 vs 0.3, P=0.23) and SF-36 mental component score (mean delta 2.3 vs 5.0, P=0.22). Using multivariable analysis, age (estimate 0.22, P= 0.005), clinical severity score (estimate -0.73, P<0.001), female sex (estimate -5.45, P= 0.046) but not glucocorticoid type (estimate -0.06, P=0.98) were associated with the overall GWS symptom burden at 12 weeks. Conclusion: Use of prednisone after curative surgery for hypercortisolism was associated with lower mood symptoms, but did not impact the overall severity or trajectory of other symptoms associated with GWS. Baseline clinical severity of hypercortisolism, age, and female sex were associated with GWS burden. Presentation: 6/1/2024
7787 Primary Aldosteronism Medical Treatment Outcomes (PAMO): An International Consensus on Outcome Assessment Criteria and Multicentre Study
Abstract Disclosure: J. Yang: None. J. Burrello: None. J. Goi: None. T.A. Williams: None. W.F. Young: Consulting Fee; Self; Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Other; Self; Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. P.J. Fuller: None. P. Investigators: None. Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, at adequate doses, lower blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in patients with PA. However, there is a lack of a standardized approach to medical therapy and subsequent outcomes assessment. We aimed to: 1) establish criteria for assessing outcomes of targeted medical treatment of PA, and 2) evaluate outcomes using these criteria across an international cohort. A panel of 31 PA experts from 31 centres across four continents used the Delphi method, including three rounds of online questionnaires, to reach consensus. Clinical data were then collected from consecutive patients with PA who started targeted medical treatment between 2016 and 2021 at the participating centres. Consensus was reached for six outcomes, including complete, partial, or absent biochemical response, and complete, partial, or absent clinical response. “Complete biochemical response” was defined as “correction of hypokalemia without potassium supplementation, and normalization of plasma renin activity or concentration”; while “absent biochemical response” was defined as “persistent hypokalemia and/or persistently suppressed or low plasma renin activity or concentration without change from baseline”. “Complete clinical response” was defined as “normal blood pressure without additional antihypertensive medications”; while “absent clinical response” was defined as “the same or increased blood pressure compared to before targeted treatment with same or more antihypertensive medications, not counting targeted therapy”. Of 1483 patients (mean age 52y, 48% female) from 28 centers, 232 (16%) had a complete clinical response, and 719 (49%) had a complete biochemical response at the most recent follow-up (median 29 months after treatment initiation). Compared to those with partial or absent clinical response, patients with complete clinical response had a significantly higher proportion of women and lower proportion with diabetes, stroke or left ventricular hypertrophy. They also had a significantly shorter duration of hypertension, lower BMI, higher eGFR and lower defined daily dose of antihypertensives at baseline. In contrast, these differences were not observed in those with a complete, partial or absent biochemical response. The defined daily dose of targeted therapy did not differ across the various response categories. In conclusion, we have established an international expert consensus for standardized criteria to evaluate the response to targeted medical treatment of PA, facilitate comparisons of outcome data and guide clinicians who manage PA. In a retrospective international cohort, less than half of medically-treated patients reached the established biochemical treatment targets. Further work is needed to increase the rate of complete response. Presentation: 6/3/2024
6998 Giant Pheochromocytoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
Abstract Disclosure: B. Bahrani Fard: None. N. Nikravangolsefid: None. J. Maroun: None. A. Cross: None. T. Foster: None. T. McKenzie: None. W. Young Jr: None. B.M. Dy: None. M. Lyden: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Giant pheochromocytomas (PHEO), defined based on size > 10 cm, are rare. Data on clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of giant PHEOs are scarce. Objectives: to determine prevalence of giant PHEO and compare presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with giant vs non-giant PHEOs. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with giant PHEO and randomly chosen patients with non-giant PHEO (referents) at 6:1 ratio, evaluated between 2000-2023. All variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Of 828 patients with PHEO evaluated between 2000 and 2023, 31 (3.7%) had giant PHEO (median size 12 cm, IQR 10.0-13.5). In comparison to referents (n=186, median size 4 cm, IQR, 2.9-5.0), patients with giant PHEO were similar in age (median age 53 vs 55 years, P=.55), more frequently discovered based on symptoms (52% vs 32%, P=.04), and less likely to be bilateral (3% vs 12%, P=.31). Genetic testing was performed in 103 (48%) of patients, without group differences, however, patients with giant PHEO were less likely to have an associated germline mutation detected (7% vs 47%, P=.004). Patients with giant PHEO had more symptoms of catecholamine excess (median of 2 vs 1, P=.04) and presented with a higher prevalence of severe metanephrine excess >10 times above upper normal range (76% vs 30%, P<.0001). Adrenalectomy was performed in 94% of patients with giant PHEOs and in 100% referents, with higher rates of open adrenalectomy in giant PHEO (86% vs 14%, P<.0001). In addition to preoperative alpha-adrenergic blockade (89%), metyrosine was used in 14 (7%) patients, mostly in patients with giant PHEO (26% vs 3%, P<.0001). Patients with giant PHEO had a longer hospital length of stay (laparoscopic: median 5 vs 2 days, P<.0001; open: median 6 vs 5 days, P=.24), and a higher complication rate (31% vs 10%, P=.006).Median follow up was 3 years (IQR 1-8) years, similar in patients and referents. Metastases developed at a much higher rate in patients with giant PHEOs (45% vs 4% in referents, P<.0001). Disease specific mortality was 7% in patients with giant PHEOs and 0% in referents. Conclusion: Patients with giant PHEO were more symptomatic, had a higher degree of catecholamine excess, and a higher rate of perioperative complications. Almost half of patients with giant PHEO developed metastases, warranting a close follow-up. Presentation: 6/2/2024
6808 Effect of Corticosteroid Premedication on Adrenal Vein Sampling in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism and Iodine Contrast Allergy
Abstract Disclosure: S. Mohan: None. O.A. Shariq: None. J.C. Andrews: None. W.F. Young: None. Background: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is performed in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) to subtype surgically curable unilateral disease. During AVS, iodinated contrast is used to confirm catheterization of adrenal veins for accurate sampling. However, in patients with severe contrast allergy, the optimal method of safely and effectively confirming localization is debatable. Premedication with oral corticosteroids has raised concern for suppression of cortisol and confounding of AVS results. We therefore investigated our experience of AVS after corticosteroid premedication in patients with PA and iodine contrast allergy. Methods: Patients with PA who underwent AVS at our center under continuous cosyntropin infusion (50 mcg/hr started 30 minutes before sampling) between September 1990 - October 2023 were identified. Individuals with documented allergy to iodinated contrast who received corticosteroid premedication were matched 1:1 for age and sex with control patients without contrast allergy or premedication. Baseline demographics, biochemical variables, AVS results, and follow-up data were compared between groups. Results: 1273 AVS studies were performed in 1255 patients with PA and 35 (2.8%) patients received corticosteroid premedication for contrast allergy. Methylprednisolone was used in 32 (91.4%) patients while dexamethasone was used in the rest. No patients experienced a severe breakthrough allergic reaction. Mean age was similar in cases vs. controls (53.9 vs. 54.1 years, P=0.92) with 16 females (45.7%) per group. There were no significant differences in baseline aldosterone-to-renin ratios (57.7 vs. 49.3, P=0.57) or daily defined doses of antihypertensives (5.5 vs. 4.4, P=0.21) between the two groups. Absolute cortisol levels (mcg/dL) from both adrenal veins (AV) and the inferior vena cava (IVC) were similar between cases and controls (right AV: 752.5 vs. 813.7, P=0.48; left AV: 527.2 vs. 462.7, P=0.33; IVC: 23.1 vs. 24.5, P=0.18). The ratio of cortisol in the corresponding AV to the IVC (selectivity index) was >5 in all patients, confirming appropriate cannulation, with similar mean selectivity indices between groups (right AV: 33.0 vs. 33.7, P=0.86; left AV: 22.8 vs. 19.0 P=0.17). Unilateral disease (indicated by a lateralization index >4) was present in 20 (57.1%) patients who received premedication compared with 16 (45.7%) controls (P=0.34). Surgery for unilateral disease was performed in 16 cases and 12 controls, with similar post-op day 1 aldosterone levels in both groups (3.8 vs. 3.3, P=0.36), consistent with surgical cure. Conclusion: In patients with PA and iodine contrast allergy, premedication with corticosteroids prior to cosyntropin-stimulated AVS does not significantly suppress cortisol levels or affect interpretation of AVS results, with comparable rates of disease subtyping and surgical outcomes when compared to a control group. Presentation: 6/3/2024
5109 Evaluation of an educational intervention to primary care providers to increase screening for primary aldosteronism
Abstract Disclosure: M.D. Figueiredo: None. J. Wagoner: None. W.F. Young: None. L.M. Fishbein: None. M.T. McDermott: None. Introduction: Primary aldosteronism (PA) accounts for at least 5% of hypertension cases and up to 20% of resistant hypertension. Underdiagnosis leads to delayed treatment and increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to assess the impact of an educational series for primary care providers (PCPs) on increasing screening rates for PA. Methods: Educational intervention consisted of a 5-day, 2-minute email series for 111 PCPs on PA screening, confirmation, and treatment (trained group). Following the training, EMR data were extracted for patients with PAC (plasma aldosterone concentration) or PRA (plasma renin activity), new hypertension diagnosis code, or a new MRA prescription within 1 year pre- or post-intervention and data pre- and post- intervention were compared. A proper screen included sending both PAC and PRA simultaneously. IRB approval was obtained. Results: In the pre-intervention year, 57 patients were properly screened for PA by the 111 PCPs. Post-intervention, 151 patients were screened for PA showing a 2.65-fold increase in screening with the educational intervention. Using a paired T-test across quartiles pre- and post-intervention, this increase was statistically significant (P=0.0148). We further demonstrated a sustained effect throughout the 12 months post-intervention per quartile (Q+1 n=29, Q+2 n=45, Q+3 n=33, Q+4 n=42). Of the total cohort screened (both pre- and post-intervention), 28% had a positive screen for PA (defined liberally as PAC >5 ng/dL with PRA <1 ng/mL/h). Discussion: The educational intervention drove an increase in PCP screening for PA in the year post-intervention and this increase was sustained across all quartiles of the year. Of the screened cohort (pre- and post-intervention), 28% screened positive for PA, and those patients were more frequently referred to specialists post-intervention. Our study has some limitations, including the relatively small sample size of PCPs educated and patients screened, and the 2020 start to the COVID-19 pandemic impact during the post-intervention period. Conclusion: Our findings advocate for continued education to reinforce PA screening criteria using an easy, not time consuming and effective educational tool. Continuous education is crucial to reinforce next steps in confirmation and treatment. Presentation: 6/3/2024
9274 Combined Ovarian and Adrenal Vein Sampling in Women Presenting with Severe Hyperandrogenism
Abstract Disclosure: A.Y. Chang: None. D.Z. Erickson: None. W.F. Young: None. K. Grennan: None. J.C. Andrews: None. E. Kapoor: None. Background: While mild androgen excess is frequently encountered in endocrine practices, severe symptoms, rapid onset or markedly abnormal biochemical testing lead to further evaluation for rare ovarian androgen-producing tumors, ovarian hyperthecosis or androgen-secreting adrenal tumors. Combined ovarian and adrenal vein sampling (COAVS) might be necessary to identify the source of androgen hypersecretion and guide treatment. The utility of COAVS has been studied in limited case series, combining case reports and different centers. There is no consensus regarding the testosterone gradient that localizes the androgen source or the added value of COAVS when a pathologic source of androgen excess is suspected. The additional clinical benefit of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) when combined with ovarian vein sampling (OVS) has also not been examined. Objectives: We sought to determine: a) the optimal total testosterone (TT) gradient for identifying unilateral vs bilateral source of hyperandrogenism and b) the utility of AVS in addition to OVS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult women who had COAVS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 1996 to 2023. Pathologic sources of androgen excess were defined as ovarian hyperthecosis (OH) as well as ovarian and adrenal tumors. We calculated the ratio of dominant OV or AV divided by the nondominant OV or AV. Results: 22 COAVS procedures from 7 premenopausal and 15 postmenopausal women were included in the study: 12 (55%) women had adrenal abnormalities seen on computed cross sectional imaging and 5 (23%) had unilateral ovarian imaging abnormalities. Of the 22 participants in the case series, successful 4-vessel catheterization was completed in 20 (1 right ovarian vein could not be cannulated, and 1 had bilateral oophorectomy). Nine (41%) women had unilateral and 10 (45%) bilateral ovarian androgen hypersecretion. Eleven (50%) women had pathologic causes for elevated TT (5 ovarian tumors, 6 cases of OH), 5 lacked follow-up pathology and 5 had benign pathology. AVS did not diagnose an adrenal source of androgen hypersecretion. TT concentrations were significantly greater in patients with unilateral compared to those with bilateral ovarian androgen hypersecretion (median 262.5 ng/dL [245- 401.5 IQR] vs 104 ng/dL [82-190], P = 0.01). In addition, TT concentrations were higher in those women with a pathologic source of TT hypersecretion compared to those with benign ovaries (349 ng/dL [251-538] vs 115 ng/dL [93-195], P = 0.03). All cases of unilateral ovarian disease had a dominant OV gradient of TT ≥ 2.1 compared to the nondominant OV. Conclusion: In a series of successful COAVS in women with androgen hypersecretion, an ovarian side-to-side gradient of ≥ 2.1 diagnosed all sources of unilateral ovarian pathology. AVS did not diagnose any pathologic source of adrenal androgen excess in this patient cohort. Presentation: 6/3/2024
7417 Combined Ovarian and Adrenal Vein Sampling in Women Presenting with Severe Hyperandrogenism
Abstract Disclosure: A.Y. Chang: None. D.Z. Erickson: None. W.F. Young: None. J.C. Andrews: None. E. Kapoor: None. Background: While mild androgen excess is frequently encountered in endocrine practices, severe symptoms, rapid onset or markedly abnormal biochemical testing lead to further evaluation for rare ovarian androgen-producing tumors, ovarian hyperthecosis or androgen-secreting adrenal tumors. Combined ovarian and adrenal vein sampling (COAVS) might be necessary to identify the source of androgen hypersecretion and guide treatment. The utility of COAVS has been studied in limited case series, combining case reports and different centers. There is no consensus regarding the testosterone gradient that localizes the androgen source or the added value of COAVS when a pathologic source of androgen excess is suspected. The additional clinical benefit of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) when combined with ovarian vein sampling (OVS) has also not been examined. Objectives: We sought to determine: a) the optimal total testosterone (TT) gradient for identifying unilateral vs bilateral source of hyperandrogenism and b) the utility of AVS in addition to OVS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult women who had COAVS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 1996 to 2023. Pathologic sources of androgen excess were defined as ovarian hyperthecosis (OH) as well as ovarian and adrenal tumors. We calculated the ratio of dominant OV or AV divided by the nondominant OV or AV. Results: 22 COAVS procedures from 7 premenopausal and 15 postmenopausal women were included in the study: 12 (55%) women had adrenal abnormalities seen on computed cross sectional imaging and 5 (23%) had unilateral ovarian imaging abnormalities. Of the 22 participants in the case series, successful 4-vessel catheterization was completed in 20 (1 right ovarian vein could not be cannulated, and 1 had bilateral oophorectomy). Nine (41%) women had unilateral and 10 (45%) bilateral ovarian androgen hypersecretion. Eleven (50%) women had pathologic causes for elevated TT (5 ovarian tumors, 6 cases of OH), 5 lacked follow-up pathology and 5 had benign pathology. AVS did not diagnose an adrenal source of androgen hypersecretion. TT concentrations were significantly greater in patients with unilateral compared to those with bilateral ovarian androgen hypersecretion (median 262.5 ng/dL [245- 401.5 IQR] vs 104 ng/dL [82-190], P = 0.01). In addition, TT concentrations were higher in those women with a pathologic source of TT hypersecretion compared to those with benign ovaries (349 ng/dL [251-538] vs 115 ng/dL [93-195], P = 0.03). All cases of unilateral ovarian disease had a dominant OV gradient of TT ≥ 2.1 compared to the nondominant OV. Conclusion: In a series of successful COAVS in women with androgen hypersecretion, an ovarian side-to-side gradient of ≥ 2.1 diagnosed all sources of unilateral ovarian pathology. AVS did not diagnose any pathologic source of adrenal androgen excess in this patient cohort. Presentation: 6/3/2024