Citations

Abstract Introduction Persistent dyspnea increases the risk of disability and impairs quality of life in older patients with bronchiectasis. The impact of dyspnea and fatigue on patients with bronchiectasis in long term follow-up has not been adequately established. We sought to determine if fatigue and higher-grade dyspnea are associated with worse clinical outcomes in 5-years of longitudinal follow-up. Methods We analyzed data collected from a prospective cohort of adult patients with bronchiectasis enrolled in the US Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research Registry. Patients with a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score collected at baseline and during 3-5 years of follow-up were included and stratified as mMRC<2 versus mMRC ≥2. Kruskal-Wallis, independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to test the differences in medians and means for continuous variables and associations between categorical variables, respectively, between the baseline mMRC groups and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) components at follow-up. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between dyspnea and clinical outcomes (exacerbations and hospitalizations) at follow-up. Results 1185 adult patients with bronchiectasis met the inclusion criteria. The median age (interquartile range) was 76 (68 to 83) years. At baseline, patients with mMRC ≥2 had a higher proportion of co-existing diagnoses such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), otitis/rhinosinusitis, rheumatologic disease, and pneumonia compared to patients with mMRC <2 (all p<0.05, data not shown). Furthermore, patients with mMRC > 2 compared to patients with mMRC <2 had higher prevalence of fatigue, acute exacerbations and pulmonary related hospitalizations, and lower mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at follow-up (all p< 0.05) (Table 1). Interestingly, body mass index was slightly higher among those with baseline mMRC ≥2 compared to mMRC <2 (p=0.02). Among those with mMRC ≥2 at both baseline and follow-up (n=67, 42%), the odds of having ≥1 exacerbation was 2.4 times higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-4.1) and 2.8 times higher for ≥1 hospitalization (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.45-5.2) during follow-up after adjusting for fatigue. Conclusion Elevated dyspnea was associated with a greater proportion of patients with bronchiectasis exhibiting acute exacerbations and pulmonary related hospitalizations and lower lung function during follow-up. Research is still needed to understand the causes (drivers) of dyspnea to implement better treatment strategies and reduce adverse outcomes in bronchiectasis patients.

Abstract Introduction: Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) is an obstructive pulmonary disease associated with structural lung disease, altered mucociliary clearance, hyper mucus secretion, recurrent infection, and airway inflammation that results in significant morbidity and mortality. Aspergillus sp (Asp) is a common fungi isolated in respiratory specimens of those with lung disease and is associated with both infectious and allergic pulmonary diseases such as Asthma and Cystic Fibrosis. Despite individuals with NCFB having similar phenotypes as these conditions, the impact of Asp on this population is poorly understood. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective analysis from the US Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry (BRR). NCFB patients without a history of lung transplant who had at least one respiratory Asp culture were included. We compared patients with no history of Asp grown from respiratory culture to those with at least one positive respiratory culture for Asp during the available period. Patient demographics, bacterial culture history, lung function, comorbidities, modified Bronchiectasis Severity Index (mBSI), and sputum parameters were analyzed descriptively. Comparisons between groups were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, independent sample t-tests, and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables as appropriate. Results: 3985 people with NCFB met inclusion criteria. 3359 (84.3%) individuals were Asp culture negative compared to 626 (15.7%) individuals with Asp. There were notable differences in race, showing higher proportions of non-Hispanic white (90.4 vs 82.2%) in this population. While the frequency of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia were similar, there were more individuals with Asthma (31.3 vs 24.7%, p<0.001) and Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) (6.4 vs 2.4%, p<0.001) in the Asp positive group (Figure 1A). The Asp positive group had higher blood eosinophils (150.0 vs 124.0 cells/uL, p=0.026, Figure 1B), had nominally lower lung function (73.5 vs 75.3% ppFEV1, p=0.089), and were more likely to have at least one or more positive bacterial cultures (62.9 vs 51.9%, p<0.001, Figure 1C). There was no significant difference in sex, age, exacerbations, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or NTM positive cultures, sputum volume, or mBSI. Conclusion: Individuals with NCFB and history of one or more positive Asp cultures were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, have a diagnosis of Asthma and/or ABPA, higher blood eosinophils, and more positive airway bacterial cultures. Further work is needed to better understand how Asp contributes to bronchiectasis progression. More expansive analysis and multivariant modeling is underway to better understand the impact of Asp in people with NCFB.

Ebola virus (EBOV) causes severe disease outbreaks in humans with high case fatality rates. EBOV requires adaptation to cause lethal disease in mice by acquiring single mutations in both the nucleoprotein (NP) and VP24 genes. As an attempt to model mouse-adapted EBOV (MA-EBOV), we engineered novel pentacistronic minigenomes (5xMG) containing a reporter gene, VP40, and glycoprotein genes as well as the NP and VP24 genes from either EBOV or MA-EBOV. The 5xMGs were constructed and optimized, and the produced transcription- and replication-competent virus-like particles (trVLPs) were demonstrated to infect several cell lines. Introduction of the mouse-adaptation mutations did not significantly impact the replication and transcription of the 5xMG or the relative infectivity of the trVLPs in vitro. This work demonstrates the development of the 5xMG system as a new versatile tool to study EBOV biology.

ImportanceMyeloperoxidase is one of the most abundant peroxidase enzymes in activated myeloid cells. Myeloperoxidase inhibitors may have a clinical benefit in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by slowing neurodegeneration via reduced neuroinflammation and oxidative stress.ObjectiveTo determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of verdiperstat, a selective myeloperoxidase inhibitor, in ALS.Design, Settings, and ParticipantsVerdiperstat was tested as a regimen of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial, a multicenter, double-blind, perpetual platform design, randomized clinical trial, with sharing of trial infrastructure and placebo data across multiple regimens. The study was conducted at 54 ALS referral centers across the US from July 2020 to April 2022. Adult participants with a diagnosis of clinically possible, probable, laboratory-supported probable, or definite ALS defined by the revised El Escorial criteria were randomized to verdiperstat or regimen-specific placebo. An additional group of participants concurrently randomized to placebo from other regimens was included in the analyses.InterventionsEligible participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive oral verdiperstat, 600 mg, twice daily or matching placebo for a planned placebo-controlled duration of 24 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline through week 24 in disease severity, as measured by a joint model of ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised and survival, with the treatment effect quantified by the disease rate ratio (DRR), with DRR less than 1 indicating a slowing in disease progression of verdiperstat relative to placebo.ResultsA total of 167 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.4] years; 59 [35.3%] female; 108 [64.6%] male) were randomized to either verdiperstat (126 [75.4%]) or to placebo (41 [25.6%]). Among the participants randomized to the verdiperstat regimen, 130 (78%) completed the trial. The estimated DRR was 0.98 (95% credible interval, 0.77-1.24; posterior probability = 0.57 for slowing of disease progression [DRR <1]). Verdiperstat was estimated to slow progression by 2% vs placebo (95% credible interval, −23% to 24%; posterior probability 0.57). Verdiperstat was overall safe and well tolerated. Common adverse events in the verdiperstat group were nausea, insomnia, and elevated thyrotropin levels.Conclusions and RelevanceResults demonstrate that treatment with verdiperstat was unlikely to alter disease progression in ALS.Trial RegistrationClinical Trial Identifiers: NCT04297683 and NCT04436510

ImportanceAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal disease. The sigma-1 (σ1) receptor emerged as a target for intervention.ObjectiveTo determine the effects of pridopidine, a σ1-receptor agonist, in ALS.Design, Settings, and ParticipantsPridopidine was tested as a regimen of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial, a phase 2/3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, platform trial. The study was conducted at 54 sites in the US from January 2021 to July 2022 (final follow-up, July 14, 2022). A total of 163 participants with ALS were randomized to receive pridopidine or placebo. An additional 122 concurrently randomized participants were assigned to receive placebo in other regimens and included in the analyses.InterventionsEligible participants were randomized 3:1 to receive oral pridopidine 45 mg twice daily (n = 121) or matching oral placebo (n = 42) for a planned duration of 24 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline through week 24 in ALS disease severity, analyzed using a bayesian shared parameter model, which has components for function (Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R]) and survival that were linked through an integrated estimate of treatment-dependent disease slowing across these 2 components. This was denoted as the disease rate ratio (DRR), with DRR less than 1 indicating a slowing in disease progression on pridopidine relative to placebo. There were 5 key secondary end points: time to 2-point or greater reduction in ALSFRS-R total score among participants with bulbar dysfunction at baseline, rate of decline in slow vital capacity among participants with bulbar dysfunction at baseline, percentage of participants with no worsening in the ALSFRS-R bulbar domain score, time to 1-point or greater change in the ALSFRS-R bulbar domain score, and time to death or permanent assisted ventilation.ResultsAmong 162 patients (mean age, 57.5 years; 35% female) who were randomized to receive the pridopidine regimen and included in the primary efficacy analysis, 136 (84%) completed the trial. In the primary analysis comparing pridopidine vs the combined placebo groups, there was no significant difference between pridopidine and placebo in the primary end point (DRR, 0.99 [95% credible interval, 0.80-1.21]; probability of DRR <1, 0.55) and no differences were seen in the components of ALSFRS-R or survival. There was no benefit of pridopidine on the secondary end points. In the safety dataset (pridopidine, n = 121; placebo, n = 163), the most common adverse events were falls (28.1% vs 29.3%, respectively) and muscular weakness (24.0% vs 31.7%, respectively).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this 24-week study, pridopidine did not impact the progression of ALS.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04297683, NCT04615923

Importance The etiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a fatal neurodegenerative disease, is unknown. However, neuroinflammation and complement activation may play a role in disease progression. Objective To determine the effects of zilucoplan, an inhibitor of complement C5, in individuals with ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants Zilucoplan was tested as regimen A of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial, a phase 2 to 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled perpetual platform clinical trial with sharing of trial infrastructure and placebo data across multiple regimens. Regimen A was conducted from August 17, 2020, to May 4, 2022. A total of 162 participants were randomized to receive zilucoplan (122 [75.3%]) or regimen-specific placebo (40 [24.7%]). An additional 124 concurrently randomized participants were randomized to receive placebo in other regimens. Interventions Eligible participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive zilucoplan or matching placebo within strata of edaravone and/or riluzole use for a planned duration of 24 weeks. Active drug (zilucoplan, 0.3 mg/kg) and placebo were provided for daily subcutaneous dosing. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was change in disease severity from baseline through 24 weeks as measured by the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score and survival, analyzed using a bayesian shared-parameter model and reported as disease rate ratio (DRR; <1 indicating treatment benefit). The study included prespecified rules for early stopping for futility. Outcome analyses were performed in the full analysis set comparing the zilucoplan group with the total shared placebo group (n = 164). Results Among the 162 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [11.3]; 99 [61.1%] male), 115 (71.0%) completed the trial. The estimated DRR common to ALSFRS-R and survival was 1.08 (95% credible interval, 0.87-1.31; posterior probability of superiority, 0.24). The trial was stopped early for futility. No unexpected treatment-related risks were identified. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of zilucoplan in ALS, treatment did not alter disease progression. The adaptive platform design of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial made it possible to test a new investigational product with efficient use of time and resources. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04297683

Importance Bioenergetic failure has been proposed as a driver of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). CNM-Au8 is a suspension of gold nanocrystals that catalyzes the conversion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride into NAD + , resulting in an increase of cellular adenosine triphosphate production. Objective To determine the effects of CNM-Au8 on ALS disease progression. Design, Setting, and Participants CNM-Au8 was tested as a regimen of the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial, a phase 2/3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind platform trial. The study was conducted at 54 sites in the US from July 2020 to March 2022 (final follow-up, March 17, 2022). A total of 161 participants with ALS were randomized to receive CNM-Au8 (n = 120) or regimen-specific placebo (n = 41). Data from 123 concurrently randomized placebo participants in other regimens were combined for analyses. Interventions Eligible participants were randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio to receive CNM-Au8 60 mg daily (n = 61), CNM-Au8 30 mg daily (n = 59), or matching placebo (n = 41) for 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline through week 24 in ALS disease severity measured by a bayesian shared parameter model of function (based on the Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale) and survival, which provided an estimate of the rate of disease progression measured by the disease rate ratio (DRR), with a DRR of less than 1 indicating treatment benefit. Secondary end points included a Combined Assessment of Function and Survival using a joint-rank test, rate of decline in slow vital capacity (percent predicted), and survival free of permanent assisted ventilation. Results Among 161 participants who were randomized within the CNM-Au8 regimen (mean age, 58.4 years; 61 [37.9%] female), 145 (90%) completed the trial. In the primary analysis comparing the combined CNM-Au8 dosage groups vs the combined placebo groups, the primary end point (DRR, 0.97 [95% credible interval, 0.783-1.175]; posterior probability of DRR <1, 0.65) and the 3 secondary end points suggested no benefit or harm of CNM-Au8. In the active (n = 120) vs placebo (n = 163) groups, the most common adverse events were diarrhea (23 [19%] vs 12 [7%]), nausea (17 [14.2%] vs 14 [8.6%]), fatigue (12 [10.8%] vs 30 [18.4%]), and muscular weakness (24 [20%] vs 45 [27.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance No benefit of CNM-Au8 on ALS disease progression was observed at 24 weeks. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04297683 , NCT04414345

AbstractNerve plexuses are complex networks of interwoven nerves in the peripheral nervous system. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the anatomy and function of the major nerve plexuses in the human body. The main spinal nerve plexuses—cervical, brachial, abdominal, lumbar, and sacral—are examined in detail, including their spinal origins, anatomical locations, and the areas they innervate. Understanding the intricate anatomy of nerve plexuses is essential for interventionalists, as it aids in the diagnosis and treatment of various neurological disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system.

Abstract Apilimod dimesylate is a first-in-class phosphoinositide kinase, FYVE-type zinc finger-containing (PIKfyve) inhibitor with a favourable clinical safety profile and has demonstrated activity in preclinical C9orf72 and TDP-43 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) models. In this ALS clinical trial, the safety, tolerability, CNS penetrance and modulation of pharmacodynamic target engagement biomarkers were evaluated. This phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, biomarker-end-point clinical trial was conducted in four US centres (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05163886). Participants with C9orf72 repeat expansions were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive twice-daily oral treatment with 125 mg apilimod dimesylate capsules or matching placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week open-label extension. Safety was measured as the occurrence of treatment-emergent or serious adverse events attributable to the study drug and tolerability at trial completion or treatment over 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in plasma and CSF and concentrations of apilimod dimesylate and its active metabolites and of pharmacodynamic biomarkers of PIKfyve inhibition [soluble glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (sGPNMB) upregulation] and disease-specific CNS target engagement [poly(GP)] were measured. Between 16 December 2021 and 7 July 2022, 15 eligible participants were enrolled. There were no drug-related serious adverse events reported in the trial. Fourteen (93%) participants completed the double-blind period with 99% dose compliance [n = 9 (90%) apilimod dimesylate; n = 5 (100%) placebo]. At Week 12, apilimod dimesylate was measurable in CSF at 1.63 ng/ml [standard deviation (SD): 0.937]. At Week 12, apilimod dimesylate increased plasma sGPNMB by >2.5-fold (P < 0.001), indicating PIKfyve inhibition, and lowered CSF poly(GP) protein levels by 73% (P < 0.001), indicating CNS tissue-level proof of mechanism. Apilimod dimesylate met prespecified key safety and biomarker end-points in this phase 2a trial and demonstrated CNS penetrance and pharmacodynamic target engagement. Apilimod dimesylate was observed to result in the greatest reduction in CSF poly(GP) levels observed to date in C9orf72 clinical trials.