Citations

PURPOSE: This article summarizes the third step of a research program to identify variables that supplement the predictive power of the the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) for survival. The objective was to produce a simple, practical, stratification factor for phase III oncology clinical trials involving patients with advanced malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 729 patients with metastatic colorectal or lung cancers. Patients provided a Karnofsky index and appetite rating while physicians provided a survival estimate and the ECOG-PS. Scores for each item were categorized as having a positive, neutral, or negative indication for survival. A patient was classified as having a relatively good prognosis if three or more of the four items showed a positive indication, a bad prognosis if three or more items were negative, and an uncertain prognosis otherwise (Good/Bad/Uncertain [GBU] index). RESULTS: The GBU index improved on the prognostic power of a Cox model quartile index and PS alone and increased the accuracy of survival classification estimates by 5% to 10% more than ECOG-PS alone. For patients with PS of 0 or 1, significant survival patterns exist between GBU groups (P= .002 and .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GBU index may be recommended as a supplementary stratification factor for certain future phase III trials in metastatic lung or colorectal cancer where patient heterogeneity is a particular concern. The GBU represents a relatively modest increase to the cost and patient burden of a clinical trial given the additional control that is achieved over the potentially confounding concomitant to the treatment variable.

PURPOSE: Substantial and successful effort has been focused on decreasing the risk of local failure after rectal cancer surgery through the use of adjuvant therapies. Our study examined data from studies conducted by United States cooperative groups to investigate the impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical and pathologic reports from 673 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer enrolled onto three adjuvant clinical trials were reviewed for tumor and surgical variables. Additional information on individual institutions and operating surgeon was collected. Variables were tested for association with 5-year local recurrence and survival after adjustment for adjuvant treatments and other important prognostic factors. RESULTS: Five-year local recurrence and survival rates were 16% and 59%, respectively. Surgeons treating more than 10 study cases had lower local recurrence rates than those treating ≤ 10 (11% v 17%, P = .02). Free radial margins also correlated with local recurrence (P = .01). Type of surgery, distal margins, and tumor radial spread were not significant. Tumor adherence to adjacent structures predicted local recurrence (35% v 14%, P < .001) and survival (30% v 63%, P < .001), regardless of en bloc resection. Although T and N classification predicted survival (P < .001), only N classification correlated with local recurrence. The number and percentage of positive nodes correlated with survival, but only the percentage independently predicted local recurrence. Several pathologic and surgical variables were reported suboptimally. CONCLUSION: Moderate variability in outcomes among surgeons was detected in this high-risk population. Efforts to improve surgical results will require changes in reporting practices to allow for more accurate assessment of the quality of surgery.

PURPOSE: We postulated that the pathologic evaluation of the lymph nodes of surgical specimens from patients with rectal cancer can have a substantial impact on time to relapse and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,664 patients with T3, T4, or node-positive rectal cancer treated in a national intergroup trial of adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Associations between the number of lymph nodes found by the pathologist in the surgical specimen and the time to relapse and survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups by nodal status and the corresponding quartiles of numbers of nodes examined. The number of nodes examined was significantly associated with time to relapse and survival among patients who were node-negative. For the first through fourth quartiles, the 5-year relapse rates were 0.37, 0.34, 0.26, and 0.19 (P = .003), and the 5-year survival rates were 0.68, 0.73, 0.72, and 0.82 (P = .02). No significant differences were found by quartiles among patients determined to be node-positive. We propose that observed differences are primarily related to the incorrect determination of nodal status in node-negative patients. Approximately 14 nodes need to be studied to define nodal status accurately. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the pathologic assessment of lymph nodes in surgical specimens is often inaccurate and that examining greater number of nodes increases the likelihood of proper staging. Some patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy are misclassified as node-negative due to incomplete sampling of lymph nodes.

Abstract Targeted BRAF inhibition in melanoma yields frequent and dramatic responses, which are unfortunately followed by almost universal development of therapeutic resistance. In contrast to MAP kinase pathway activation, (e.g., differential BRAF splicing, MEK1 mutations), direct gatekeeper mutations, seen with other targeted therapies, have not yet been reported in association with resistance to targeted BRAF inhibition. Through a combination of genomic profiling of clonal diversity and molecular modeling, we documented a new molecular mechanism of vemurafenib resistance in a melanoma patient, occurring by selection of a pre-existing clonal subpopulation harboring a novel mutation in the vemurafenib-binding site of BRAF. We assessed melanoma clonal diversity using a novel approach for studying tumor heterogeneity in solid tumors, based on separating cellular subpopulations by nuclear flow sorting coupled to next generation sequencing. This approach identified distinct, coexisting melanoma subpopulations prior to initiation of vemurafenib. While vemurafenib treatment suppressed multiple clonal populations, a distinct population was noted at the time of relapse, harboring both the common activating V600E and a novel L567V mutation in the vemurafenib-binding site. Molecular modeling predicted that L567V would interfere with drug binding leading to decreased therapeutic response. Using a lentiviral expression system we assessed the functional effects of the L567V mutation both alone, and in combination with V600E. Assessment of the kinase activity in an in vitro kinase assay using MEK as a substrate indicates that the L567V mutant retains kinase activity. However, expression in a panel of melanoma cell lines demonstrates that while both the V600E single mutant and the L567V single mutant respond to BRAF inhibition by decreasing the levels of phospho-Erk, the double mutant actually responds to treatment by increasing phospho-Erk levels. This is also reflected in the increased viability of cells expressing double mutant in presence of increasing drug levels (PLX4720), compared to either of the single mutants. Taken together, the data suggest that the BRAF L567V/V600E double mutant confers insensitivity to vemurafenib, and that patients harboring both mutations may demonstrate clinically significant resistance to vemurafenib. Further, this data illustrates the role of clonal heterogeneity in mediating key clinical events including response to therapy and development of resistance, a major challenge of targeted BRAF therapies. Citation Format: Aleksandar Sekulic, Ashani T. Weeraratna, Jefferey L. MacKeigan, Amanpreet Kaur, Michael O'Connell, Megan L. Goodall, Michael Barrett, Elizabeth Lenkiewitz, Tara Holley, Victoria Zismann, Michael Gordon, Gideon Bollag, Chao Zhang, Jeffrey M. Trent. Discovery and molecular modeling of a novel mutation in the vemurafenib binding site of BRAF associated with therapeutic resistance in a patient with metastatic melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-213. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-213

Purpose With improved patient care, better diagnosis, and more treatment options after tumor recurrence, outcomes after fluorouracil (FU) -based treatment are expected to have improved over time in early-stage colon cancer. Data from 18,449 patients enrolled onto 21 phase III trials conducted from 1978 to 2002 were evaluated for potential differences in time to recurrence (TTR), time from recurrence to death (TRD), and overall survival (OS) with regard to FU-based adjuvant regimens. Methods Trials were predefined as old versus newer era using initial accrual before or after 1995. Outcomes were compared between patients enrolled onto old- or newer-era trials, stratified by stage. Results Within the first 3 years, recurrence rates were lower in newer- versus old-era trials for patients with stage II disease, with no differences among those with stage III disease. Both TRD and OS were significantly longer in newer-era trials overall and within each stage. The lymph node (LN) ratio (ie, number of positive nodes divided by total nodes harvested) in those with stage III disease declined over time. TTR improved slightly, with larger number of LNs examined in both stages. Conclusion Improved TRD in newer trials supports the premise that more aggressive intervention (oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or surgery for recurrent disease) improves OS for patients previously treated in the adjuvant setting. Lower recurrence rates with identical treatments in those with stage II disease enrolled onto newer-era trials reflect stage migration over time, calling into question historical data related to the benefit of FU-based adjuvant therapy in such patients.

Purpose Prior studies have suggested that patients with stage II/III colon cancer receive similar benefit from intravenous (IV) fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy regardless of age. Combination regimens and oral fluorouracil (FU) therapy are now standard. We examined the impact of age on colon cancer recurrence and mortality after adjuvant therapy with these newer options. Patients and Methods We analyzed 11,953 patients age < 70 and 2,575 age ≥ 70 years from seven adjuvant therapy trials comparing IV FU with oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine, uracil, or tegafur) or combinations of fluoropyrimidines with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in stage II/III colon cancer. End points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR). Results In three studies comparing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with IV FU, statistically significant interactions were not observed between treatment arm and age (P interaction = .09 for DFS, .05 for OS, and .36 for TTR), although the stratified point estimates suggested limited benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin in elderly patients (DFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.13; OS HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.27). No significant interactions by age were detected with oral fluoropyrimidine therapy compared with IV FU; noninferiority was supported in both age populations. Conclusion Patients age ≥ 70 years seemed to experience reduced benefit from adding oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines in the adjuvant setting, although statistically, there was not a significant effect modification by age, whereas oral fluoropyrimidines retained their efficacy.

Purpose Limited data exist regarding the outcomes of adjuvant therapy in younger patients with stage II and III colon cancer. We examined disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), and grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) in younger patients in the 33,574 patient Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints Group data set. Patients and Methods Individual patient data from 24 randomized phase III clinical trials were obtained for survival outcomes, which included 10 clinical trials for AE outcomes. Two age-based cutoff points were used to define younger patients: age younger than 40 years and younger than 50 years. Adjuvant therapy benefit analyses were limited to the nine clinical trials in which the investigational chemotherapeutic arm demonstrated benefit. Results One thousand seven hundred fifty-eight patients (5.2%) were younger than 40 years, 5,817 patients (17.3%) were younger than 50 years, and only 299 patients (0.9%) were younger than 30 years. No meaningful differences in sex or stage were noted in younger versus older patients. Younger and older patients did not differ in RFI (age, < 40 years: hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; P = .62 and age < 50 years: HR, 1.02; P = .35). Younger patients (both cutoff points), had longer OS and DFS than older patients. In trials demonstrating adjuvant therapy benefit, similar DFS benefit was observed by age. Younger patients experienced less leukopenia and stomatitis, but more frequent nausea/vomiting. Conclusion Among patients on clinical trials, younger and older patients with stage II and III colon cancer had similar RFI and adjuvant therapy benefit. Younger patients have longer OS and DFS, which is likely primarily because of fewer competing causes of death. Adjuvant therapy is beneficial for colon cancer in patients younger than 50 years who meet typical clinical trial eligibility criteria.

Abstract Purpose: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. However, the influence of body mass index (BMI) upon the outcome of colon cancer survivors and its relationship to gender remains unknown. Experimental Design: BMI (kg/m2) was calculated and categorized in patients with TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n= 4,381) enrolled in 7 randomized trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine the association of BMI with disease-free and overall survival. Results: Among colon cancer patients, 868 (20%) were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) of which 606 were class 1 (BMI 30–34 kg/m2) and 262 were class 2,3 (BMI ≥35 kg/m2). Obese versus normal-weight patients were more likely to be younger, have distal tumors, show intact DNA mismatch repair (MMR), and have increased lymph node metastases (p &lt;0.017). The association of BMI and MMR status was dependent upon patient age (p= 0.031). In a multivariate analysis, BMI was significantly associated with both disease-free (p=0.030) and overall survival (p=0.0017). Men with class 2,3 obesity showed reduced overall survival compared to normal weight men [HR 1.35 (1.02, 1.79); p=0.039]. Women with class I obesity had reduced overall survival [HR 1.24 (1.01, 1.53), p=0.045] compared to normal weight women. BMI was not predictive of therapeutic benefit. Conclusions: Obesity is associated with intact DNA mismatch repair status and was an adverse, independent prognostic variable in colon cancer survivors. Interventions to reduce obesity have the potential to improve patient outcomes in colon cancer survivors. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(1 Suppl):B111.

Abstract Purpose: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. However, the influence of body mass index (BMI) upon the prognosis of colon cancer survivors and its relationship to gender remains unknown. Experimental Design: BMI (kg/m2) was categorized in patients with TNM stage II and III colon carcinomas (n= 4,381) enrolled in 7 randomized trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association of BMI with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among colon cancer patients, 868 (20%) were obese (BMI &gt;30 kg/m2) of which 606 were class 1 (BMI 30-34 kg/m2) and 262 were class 2,3 (BMI &gt;35 kg/m2). Obese versus normal-weight patients were more likely to be younger (p=0.038), have distal tumors (0.058), show intact DNA mismatch repair (MMR) (p=0.035), and have more lymph node metastases (p=0.017). In a multivariate analysis, BMI was significantly associated with both DFS (p=0.030) and OS (p=0.0017). Men with class 2,3 obesity showed reduced OS compared to normal weight men [HR 1.35 (1.02, 1.79); p=0.039]. Women with class I obesity had reduced OS [HR 1.24 (1.01, 1.53), p=0.045] compared to normal weight women. Overweight status was associated with improved OS in men (p= 0.006) and underweight women had significantly worse OS (p= 0.019). BMI was not predictive of therapeutic benefit. Conclusions: Obesity is an independent prognostic variable in colon cancer survivors and shows gender-related differences. These data suggest that obesity-related biological factors can influence clinical outcome. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 904.