Citations

Abstract Purpose Iliopsoas tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been described to result from acetabular component overhang as well as prominent femoral collars. Yet, a portion of patients experience iliopsoas tendinitis in the setting of well-positioned components. The purpose of this study was to assess anatomic factors predisposing to iliopsoas tendinitis after THA. Methods Patients with THAs performed at three academic institutions who subsequently underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas release were retrospectively reviewed from 2015 to 2025 and propensity matched in a 1:3 fashion to a control group of THAs without subsequent iliopsoas release. Controls were matched by age, surgery date, laterality, sex, surgical approach, and implanted femoral component. Patients with iliopsoas tendinitis and subsequent release (THA-IP) were evaluated for anterior acetabular component overhang and femoral collar overhang, when a collar was present. We also evaluated the absolute and relative profile of the lesser trochanter on anteroposterior radiographs, understanding that when less of the lesser trochanter is visualized, the trochanter is anatomically displaced posterolaterally, resulting in a more arduous route from the inner pelvic origin of the iliopsoas to its insertion on the femur. Results Forty-five patients (mean age: 57±11; 71% female; 19 direct anterior, 10 anterolateral, 16 posterior approach) undergoing THA-IP were analyzed and matched to 135 controls. Both groups demonstrated a median cup size of 54 mm and head size of 36 mm. Average time to iliopsoas release after THA was 4 years. Anterior cup overhang of >2 mm was present in 49% of THA-IP patients, with 18% having collared femoral components, and 9% demonstrating collar overhang of >2 mm. Overall, 19 THA-IP patients had <2 mm of cup and collar overhang and 26 patients had >2 mm of overhang. THA-IP patients with <2 mm of cup and collar overhang had significantly greater relative posterolateralization of the lesser trochanter compared to those with overhang of >2 mm (p=0.010) and to controls (p=0.037). Conclusion Visualizing “Less of the Lesser” on anteroposterior hip radiographs and associated posterolateralization of the lesser trochanter may be an anatomic risk factor for iliopsoas tendinitis following THA, even in the presence of satisfactorily positioned components.

Abstract Introduction Understanding factors that impact outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) can aid clinical decision-making and patient counselling. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates among patients undergoing primary THA after hip arthroscopy (HA-THA) compared to a matched cohort of primary THA patients without prior arthroscopy (THA-only). Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent primary THA after prior hip arthroscopy from 2009-2022 at a single institution. Patients with a history of revision arthroscopy were excluded. Cases were propensity-matched with primary THA controls in a 1:4 ratio by age at time of THA, sex, body mass index, surgical approach, and year of surgery. At minimum 2-year follow-up, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (HOOS pain), and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) were analyzed. Results Sixty-three hips in 60 patients (age: 47.3±9.4 years, BMI: 29.8±6.2 kg/m2) were matched to 252 THA-only hips, with patients converting to THA at a mean 3.1 years (range 0.3-10.3) following hip arthroscopy. While both HA-THA and THA patients demonstrated significant (p<0.001) postoperative improvements in PROs, HA-THA patients reported significantly lower postoperative FJS, mHHS, HOOS pain, and VAS pain scores (p<0.001) as compared to THA-only controls. At mean 6.6±3.2 years follow-up, HA-THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 2-3 reported significantly increased FJS, mHHS, and HOOS pain compared to those with preoperative Tönnis grades of 0-1 (p≤0.03). Additionally, HA-THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 0-1 exhibited worse PROs (p<0.001) as compared to THA-only controls. While there were no differences in complication rates between HA-THA patients and THA-only controls (8% vs. 5%, p=0.49), all-cause reoperation was greater amongst HA-THA patients compared to THA-only (10% vs. 2%, p=0.01). Conclusion While improved compared to preoperatively, patients undergoing THA after prior hip arthroscopy demonstrated inferior outcomes at mid-term follow up as compared to a demographically age-matched cohort without prior arthroscopy. When considering conversion to THA following arthroscopy, clinicians should consider counseling patients regarding improved outcomes in the setting of advanced radiographic osteoarthritis, and potentially increased all-cause reoperation.

Abstract Purpose To investigate clinical outcomes, including patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), subjective anterior groin pain and hip flexion strength, and reoperation rates following arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Patients who were indicated for arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after ipsilateral THA were prospectively identified between 2023-2025 at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative PROMs, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Tegner activity scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and subjective anterior groin pain and hip flexion strength were analyzed. Reoperations at final follow-up were also evaluated. Results A total of 44 hips in 41 patients (23 females and 18 males) were included (mean age: 64.7 ± 10.2, mean BMI: 29.9 ± 5.9 kg/m2). Fifty-five percent of patients underwent surgery on their right hip. The mean postoperative follow-up timeframe was 10.0 ± 7.1 months. There was a significant improvement in postoperative PROMs compared to pre-operative levels for VAS at rest (1.3 ± 1.9 vs. 2.9 ± 2.2), VAS with use (3.1 ± 3.8 vs. 8.0 ± 1.6), Tegner activity scale (2.9 ± 1.3 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1), and SANE (74.0 ± 20.3 vs. 47.9 ± 23.4) (p<0.001 for all). Over 90% of patients reported feeling much better or slightly better regarding their anterior groin pain at 2-weeks post-operatively (93%), 6 weeks post-operatively (90%), 3 months post-operatively (93%), and at final follow-up (91%). Regarding hip flexion strength, 73% reported feeling much better or slightly better at 2-weeks post-operatively, 95% at 6-weeks post-operatively, 85% at 3 months post-operatively, and 61% at final follow-up. Only 2 patients (5%) reported feeling much weaker at final follow-up. Two of 44 hips (5%) underwent reoperation at final follow-up. One patient underwent a 2-stage revision THA at 5 months postoperatively due to infection, while 1 patient underwent an open iliopsoas release with acetabular screw removal and liner exchange. Overall, the mean surgery satisfaction was 8.1 ± 2.6 on a scale of 1-10. Conclusion Patients who underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening following THA demonstrated satisfactory postoperative outcomes, with over 90% reporting durably improved anterior groin pain and nearly two-thirds reporting increased hip flexor strength throughout follow-up.

Objectives: Historically, horizontal cleavage meniscus tears have been debrided with single leaflet preservation, but more recently this has been challenged by repair of these tear types. While circumferential meniscus repair with all-inside and inside-out instrumentation has been described, there remains a paucity of literature regarding the clinical outcomes of this technique. Our purpose was to assess clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of circumferential meniscus repair for horizontal cleavage tears at minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: Patients with isolated horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus (Fig. 1a) undergoing primary circumferential meniscus repair (Fig. 1b), including both inside-out and all-inside suturing techniques, at a single institution between 2015 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion and analyzed retrospectively. Arthroscopic images and operative notes were examined to confirm circumferential meniscal repair. Patient demographics, surgery details, and clinical findings were extracted from the institutional electronic medical records. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients not consenting for research, less than 2-years of clinical follow-up, and concurrent ipsilateral repair of a non-horizontal cleavage tear. Patients were not excluded if they had a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Thirty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Knees were analyzed for laterality, number of sutures, suturing technique, concurrent injuries, concurrent procedures, and surgical history. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were collected at minimum 2-year follow-up and analyzed. Return to sport (RTS) and revision surgery were analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven patients (25 male, 12 female; mean age, 29.4 ± 12.4 years) who underwent circumferential meniscal repair of a horizontal cleavage tear were included in the study and followed for a mean of 6.2 years (range, 2.2-9.3 years, Table 1). There was a total of 38 knees (23 right, 15 left). One patient (3%) had bilateral circumferential meniscal repair surgeries done at separate times. Three (16%) patients failed primary repair and had secondary partial meniscectomy. Similar numbers of circumferential meniscal repairs were performed on lateral and medial menisci, 21 (55%) and 17 (45%), respectively. An average number of 3 ± 2 sutures were used at the time or repair with one of 38 menisci (3%) having a hybrid combination of both all-inside and inside-out suture technique, 24 menisci (63%) had all-inside technique, and 13 menisci (34%) had inside-out technique. Concurrent procedures included 4 ACL reconstructions (3 autograft, 1 allograft), and 8 chondroplasties (4 patella, 2 trochlea, 1 medial femoral condyle, and 1 unspecified, Table 2). At the time of final follow-up, patients reported mean Tegner activity scores of 6.2 ± 2.3, VAS pain with rest of 1.0 ± 2.0, VAS pain with use of 2.5 ± 2.7, and IKDC of 81.6 ± 18.6. When asked, using a VAS Five Point scale, how their knee is currently compared to before their surgery, 14 (74%) feel much better than before surgery, 2 (11%) feel slightly better than before surgery, 1 (5%) feels no change when compared to before their surgery, 2 (11%) feel slightly worse than before surgery, and no one felt much worse than before surgery. Sixteen patients were involved in sports before their surgery. Of those that played sports before their surgery, 14 (88%) returned to sport (Table 3). The most common sports played were hockey (19%), volleyball (19%), tennis (13%), and football (13%). Levels of sport played before surgery included 7 (44%) recreational, 6 (38%) high school, 2 (13%) college, and 1 (6%) club. Levels of sport played after surgery for those who returned to sport included 6 (43%) recreational, 2 (14%) high school, 5 (36%) college, and 1 (7%) club with a significant increase in levels of sport played after surgery ( p ≤ 0.006) compared to before surgery. Conclusions: At an average of 6-years of follow up, there was an 84% success rate of circumferential meniscal repair for horizontal cleavage tears. Most patients who play sports, return to sport and do so at the same or higher level and report successful PROMs. Circumferential meniscal repairs should be considered for patients with horizontal cleavage tears.

Purpose To compare clinical and functional outcomes (including range of motion, clinical laxity, reoperation/revision rates, and patient‐reported outcome measures) of combined anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR/PCLR) with and without suture tape (ST) augmentation via a propensity‐matched cohort analysis. Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent simultaneous primary ACLR/PCLR between 2001 and 2022. A 1:1 propensity match was performed using patient sex, Schenck classification grade, age ±8 years, and body mass index ±10 to produce 2 cohorts: ACLR/PCLR with and without (control) ST augmentation. Clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], range of motion, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score) were analyzed. Results The propensity match produced a final cohort of 50 ACLR/PCLR patients: 25 with ST augmentation and 25 nonaugmented controls. Most patients had a KD3M injury (12 in each cohort), and no significant differences were noted in concomitant neurovascular, meniscal, or chondral injuries between the groups. Forty patients (80%) completed follow‐up at a mean of 4.7 years for the ST cohort and 8.5 years for the control cohort ( P > .05). Postoperative ST versus control values for outcome measures including VAS at rest (0.9 vs 1.5; P = .71), VAS with use (3.0 vs 2.2; P = .24), International Knee Documentation Committee (75.7 vs 76.3; P = .37), Lysholm (81.8 vs 77.6; P = .91), and Tegner activity (4.8 vs 5.4; P = .37) scores showed no differences ( P > .05 for all). There were no differences in excessive postoperative clinical laxity between ST and control cohorts (ST n = 1 vs control n = 2, Lachman 2+, P = .140; ST n = 3 vs control n = 1, posterior drawer 2+, P = .122). The total number of patients who underwent reoperation was 7 of 25 (28%) for the ST cohort and 8 of 25 (32%) for the control cohort ( P = .76). Conclusions Concomitant ACLR/PCLR utilizing ST augmentation showed similarly satisfactory postoperative clinical outcomes at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up compared to a matched cohort without ST. The use of an independent ST did not limit motion or increase the incidence of complications or revision surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Abstract As the prevalence of hip arthroscopy increases, management of capsular defects as well as capsulotomy closure has increasingly been recognized for their impact on recurrent symptoms in the young athletic hip. Several recent studies have shown that capsular closure at the time of primary hip arthroscopy improves both short‐ and long‐term patient‐reported outcomes, revision rates, and conversion to arthroplasty. Specifically, capsular insufficiency is a source of recurrent pain and microinstability. In this context, far medial labral tears pose a challenge for suture fixation, given the historic need of extending the interportal capsulotomy to obtain adequate trajectory for suture anchors and subsequent passage. Given the suboptimal stability consequences of extending the capsulotomy medially, here we present a novel approach for suture fixation of the medial labrum. This technique provides an effective method for suture fixation of the medial labrum, without necessitating extension of the interportal capsulotomy. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Context: There is need for an up-to-date comprehensive review of baseball interval throwing programs in the literature. Objective: To (1) understand the origin and basis of interval throwing programs; (2) evaluate the content of programs in the peer-reviewed literature including target audience, initiation criteria, throwing specifics, arm care, and performance evaluation metrics; (3) classify these variables as well defined, ambiguous, or missing; and (4) analyze variability in key aspects including starting criteria, length, progression, and completion criteria. Data Sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Web of Science, and Scopus Study Selection: The full text of studies, in English, had to be available. Included studies had to contain a complete interval throwing program designed for baseball players. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Initial screening was conducted based on article title and abstract. Full text of the remaining articles was evaluated for fulfillment of inclusion criteria. Results: Nine studies initially met inclusion criteria. The programs’ comprehensiveness was poor, with a mean Interval Throwing Program Checklist score of 20 (range 14-23) on a scale of 0 to 30. There were a variety of components, including progressive long toss, weighted ball, and throwing mechanics exercises. The programs identified had significant heterogeneity in duration, intensity, progression, and focus. Overall, there was a significant lack of attempts at validation or formal study of efficacy for published throwing programs. Conclusion: Current published interval throwing programs are mostly variations of an original program published many years ago and were based on principles of progressive loading with pain as sign of injury that should be monitored carefully. However, these programs have minimal clinical validation and objective measures to quantify their effectiveness. This work identifies several limitations in the current literature and can serve as a foundation for future development of evidence-based interval throwing programs.

Abstract Introduction: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex procedure historically requiring inpatient stay. There is increased emphasis for these to be performed on an outpatient basis by insurance companies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the proportion of various surgical listing classifications (outpatient, outpatient-overnight, inpatient), the incidence of subsequent denial/request for additional documentation for approval of inpatient stay, and to characterize the average length of stay (LOS) following PAO. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all PAOs, performed by four participating surgeons, at a single academic institution over a two-year period. The initial listing status as an outpatient-overnight or inpatient procedure was identified. Whether a preoperative peer review was required for approval of inpatient listings as well as if additional documentation was necessary to convert outpatient-overnight listings to inpatient stays were also recorded. Results: A total of 140 PAOs amongst 117 patients were performed with 25 (17.9%) initially listed as an inpatient stay and 115 (82.1%) listed as outpatient-overnight. Of the 25 PAOs listed as inpatient, 2 (8.0%) required a preoperative peer review process to justify or clarify listing status. The average LOS was 1.9 ± 1.4 days with 55.7% (78/140) of PAOs staying two or more nights in the hospital. Only 6 PAOs (4.3%) went home the same day as surgery. Of the 115 PAOs listed as an outpatient-overnight, 53 (46.1%) converted to an inpatient stay. Conclusion: Over half of PAOs performed required inpatient stay beyond outpatient-overnight status. Preoperative peer-to-peer review for inpatient stay approval was modestly frequent (8% of inpatient listings), and all conversions to inpatient required additional service documentation to support status conversion. Understanding trends in postoperative hospitalizations and LOS might allow for better informed partnerships between surgeons and insurance companies creating more efficient pre-authorizations, billing practices, and expected patterns of patient care and discharge.

Abstract Background: Osteochondral allograft and autograft transplantation for femoral head defects have emerged as promising treatments for concomitant cartilage and subchondral bone injuries in young patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent osteochondral allograft or autograft transplantation for femoral head defects and access any risk factors that may lead to conversion to THA. Methods: All patients who underwent osteochondral allograft or autograft transplantation for femoral head defects were analyzed. All patients had symptomatic femoral head osteochondral defects identifiable on advanced imaging such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed at final follow-up with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score – Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score – Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Additionally, patients were assessed radiographically preoperatively and at a final postoperative visit using anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs for osteoarthritis using Tönnis grading. Results: A total of 27 patients were included in this study (19 osteochondral allograft transplantation, 8 osteochondral autograft transplantation). The overall mean follow-up was 4.7 years. The average mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 for the allograft cohort were 86.7, 92.8, 81.4, and 79.0, respectively, while for the autograft cohort it was 87.6, 92.7, 83.1, and 82.0, respectively. For the allograft cohort, there were a total of 5 reoperations (26.3%) consisting of 4 THA at a mean of 1.9 years and 1 trochanteric osteotomy nonunion at 0.7 year. For the remaining allograft patients who did not undergo treatment failure, only one (6.7%) had radiographic osteoarthritis progression. None of the patients in the autograft cohort underwent THA. Overall, conversion to THA was 14.8%. Conclusion: Osteochondral allograft and autograft transplantation for femoral head defects demonstrated overall favorable clinical outcomes and conversion to THA at mean 5-year follow-up and should be considered for patients with focal femoral head defects.