Citations

Background and Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), closely associated with obesity, contributes to increased morbidity and mortality due to complications such as cardiometabolic disease. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) in achieving diabetes remission and to examine key predictors influencing remission outcomes. Materials and Methods: This review synthesizes data from studies on MBS and EBT outcomes, focusing on predictors for diabetes remission such as preoperative insulin use, diabetes duration, HbA1c, and C-peptide levels. Additionally, predictive scoring systems, including the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS), DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, ABCD, and Robert et al. scores, were analyzed for their utility in forecasting remission likelihood. Results: Key predictors of T2D remission include shorter diabetes duration, lower HbA1c, and higher C-peptide levels, while prolonged insulin use, and higher insulin doses are associated with lower remission rates. Scoring models like IMS and DiaRem demonstrate that lower scores correlate with a higher likelihood of remission, especially for procedures such as Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). RYGB generally shows higher remission rates compared to sleeve gastrectomy (SG), particularly among patients with mild disease severity, while EBTs like ESG and IGBs contribute 5–20% total weight loss (TWL) and moderate glycemic control improvements. Conclusions: Both MBS and EBTs are effective for T2D management, with predictive scoring models aiding in individualized patient selection to optimize remission outcomes. Further research to validate these predictive tools across diverse populations could enhance treatment planning for both surgical and endoscopic interventions.

Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is the most dreaded complication after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to estimate and compare risks of sICH after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) depending on the location of the large vessel occlusion, concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis, timing of treatment, and core size. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were included following a comprehensive search strategy on different databases from inception to March 1, 2024. Random-effect models in a meta-analysis were employed to get the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for sICH with MT, compared to other reperfusion treatment regimens, including best medical treatment and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Results: MT in the anterior circulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH as compared with no-MT (RR: 1.46; 95%CI: 1.03-2.07; P = 0.037). Risk of sICH was comparable between the MT and MT+IVT groups (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.57-1.03; P = 0.079). There was no difference in sICH risk with MT as compared with no-MT within 6 hours of last known well (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.78-1.66; P = 0.485) and beyond that time (RR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.80-2.08; P = 0.252); the risk of sICH was also comparable between MT conducted within 6 hours of last known well and MT conducted beyond that time (P = 0.512). The sICH risk for MT in the posterior circulation (RR: 7.48; 95%CI: 2.27-24.61) was significantly higher than for MT in the anterior circulation (RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.90-1.56) (P = 0.003). MT was also associated with a significantly higher sICH risk than no-MT among patients with large-core strokes (RR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.09-2.66, P = 0.018). Conclusion: When evaluating cumulative evidence from randomized controlled trials, the risk of sICH is increased after MT compared with patients not treated with MT. Yet, the difference is largely driven by the greater risk of sICH in patients treated with MT for posterior circulation occlusions and, to a lesser degree, large core strokes. Concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis and the use of MT in the extended therapeutic window do not raise the risk of sICH.

Background: Angiographic shape of occlusion, like the clot meniscus sign and the claw-sign, have been reported to potentially impact recanalization rate and clinical outcome in patient undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic strokes. Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Patients were grouped into clot meniscus/claw sign positive and negative groups based on the definitions obtained from each study. Primary outcomes included technical success, with a meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model to calculate proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Results: We included seven studies recruiting 1572 patients. The results indicated that the positive and negative groups had comparable first-pass effect (OR: 1.95; 95%CI: 0.76 – 5.01; P = 0.167) and final recanalization (OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 0.81 – 2.27; P = 0.248) rates. However, the rate of having a favorable functional outcome was significantly higher in the positive than negative sign groups (OR: 1.91; 95%CI: 1.25 – 2.92; P < 0.003). Within the sign-positive population, the use of contact aspiration was associated with a significantly higher rate of recanalization compared to using a stent retriever (OR: 0.18; 95%CI: 0.07 – 0.49; P < 0.001). This result did not translate into a clinical impact, as both stent retriever and contact aspiration showed comparable rates of functional independence at three months (OR: 0.22; 95%CI: 0.02 – 2.33; P = 0.210). Conclusion: The presence of the clot meniscus/claw sign is not associated with recanalization outcomes after thrombectomy. However, it might be a good sign to predict which thrombectomy technique might be associated with better recanalization, although current evidence might need further confirmation.

Introduction: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for enhancing stroke diagnosis, aiding treatment decision making, and improving overall patient care. Leading AI-driven platforms such as RapidAI, Brainomix®, and Viz.ai have been developed to assist healthcare professionals in the swift and accurate assessment of stroke patients. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Characteristic descriptive measures were gathered as appropriate from all included studies, including the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and comparison of the available tools. Results: A total of 31 studies were included, of which 29 studies focused on detecting acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or large vessel occlusions (LVOs), and 2 studies focused on hemorrhagic strokes. The four main tools used were Viz.ai, RapidAI, Brainomix®, and deep learning modules. Conclusions: AI tools in the treatment of stroke have demonstrated usefulness for diagnosing different stroke types, providing high levels of accuracy and helping to make quicker and more precise clinical judgments.

Bevacizumab (BCZ), commercially known as Avastin, is a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Initially recognized as a breakthrough in oncology, it has since gained FDA approval for various ocular conditions and more recently, for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Bevacizumab's ability to inhibit excessive neovascularization suggests it may have a potential role in treating chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). Recent studies have shown that the pathophysiology of cSDH is more complex than previously understood, with VEGF concentrations in subdural fluid significantly exceeding those in serum, contributing to the high recurrence rates. Intra-arterial administration of bevacizumab has shown promising results in recent case series against chronic subdural hematoma, and may be a viable alternative to middle meningeal artery embolization. If successful, this treatment could significantly decrease the rate of recurrence and result in lower rates of severe neurological complications such as visual loss. This literature review explores the connection between bevacizumab and cSDH, focusing on the pharmacological, safety, and delivery aspects of this approach while summarizing the current evidence supporting its use.

Background There has been growing data about the association between D-dimer levels and thrombectomy outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) with no cumulative evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to discuss and analyze the findings of the current studies to provide more robust evidence in this regard. Methods A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus to retrieve all relevant investigations. A meta-analysis was conducted, and the results were presented in odds ratio (ORs) for binary variables and ratio of means (ROM) for continuous variables, each accompanied by its respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After searching and screening, 14 studies were included. The analysis showed that the low D-dimer group had significantly higher rates of favorable functional outcome (OR: 4.40; 95%CI: 2.65–7.30; p < 0.001, n = 3) and recanalization (OR: 4.13; 95%CI: 1.57–10.84; p = 0.004, n = 3) than the high one. The association between D-dimer levels and first-pass effect and re-occlusion risk was also demonstrated. Eventually, two studies also demonstrated a significant association between high D-dimer levels and deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage as post-thrombectomy complications. Conclusion Current evidence indicates a significant association between D-dimer levels and post-thrombectomy outcomes in AIS patients. However, current data are remarkably heterogeneous, and additional comparative investigations are needed.

Background The angiographic shape of an occlusion, like the clot meniscus sign and the claw sign, has been reported to potentially impact the recanalization rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic strokes. Method Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases. Patients were grouped into clot meniscus/claw sign positive and negative groups based on the definitions obtained from each study. Primary outcomes included technical success, with a meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model to calculate proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Results We included seven studies recruiting 1572 patients. The results indicated that the positive and negative groups had comparable first-pass effect (OR 1.95; 95% CI 0.76 to 5.01; P=0.167) and final recanalization (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.81 to 2.27; P=0.248) rates. However, the rate of having a favorable functional outcome was significantly higher in the positive group than in the negative sign group (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.92; P<0.003). Within the sign-positive population, the use of contact aspiration was associated with a significantly higher rate of recanalization compared with using a stent retriever (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; P<0.001). This result did not translate into a clinical impact, as both stent retriever and contact aspiration showed comparable rates of functional independence at 3 months (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.02 to 2.33; P=0.210). Conclusion The presence of the clot meniscus/claw sign is not associated with recanalization outcomes after thrombectomy. However, it might be a good sign to predict which thrombectomy technique might be associated with better recanalization, although current evidence may need further confirmation.

Background and purpose Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after their initial therapy has been a significant challenge in the field of neurointervention. Recently flow diverters stents are widely used for treating intracranial aneurysms. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the safety and efficacy of flow diverter in treating recurrent or recanalized intracranial aneurysms. Methods This meta-analysis is reported following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We conducted a systematic review of literature in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Pooled prevalence and the corresponding 95% are calculated from extracted data using a random-effect model. Results The systematic literature search included 21 studies involving 411 patients, with 135 (32.8%) being male and 276 (67.2%) being females with a total number of 447 aneurysms. The overall rate of adequate occlusion was 90.67% (95% CI: 84.23%–94.65%), and the rates were comparable between the surgery (93.48%), coiling (91.78%), and stenting (85.77%) groups. The overall pooled rate of complete occlusion was 81.80 (95% CI: 71.14%–89.13%). On doing a subgroup analysis, the complete occlusion rates were 89.68%, 84.39%, and 73.47% for the surgery, coiling, and stenting groups, respectively. The overall mortality rate and achieving modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 was 1.28% (95% CI: 0.45%–3.64%) and (95% CI: 89.92%–97.84%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity is noted in the included studies. Conclusion Flow diverter stents are an effective and safe method for retreating recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms with a high rate of complete and adequate occlusion. The rate of mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and overall and procedural complications following using flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms is low.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Background: The field of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is currently an expanding surgical field with constant refinements in techniques, outcomes, indications, and objectives. MBS has been effectively applied across diverse patient demographics, including varying ages, genders, body mass indexes, and comorbidity statuses. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review of published retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and literature reviews from inception to 2024, reporting outcomes of MBS using databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springer Link. Results: MBS is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for patients with obesity and associated medical conditions (mortality rate 0.03–0.2%; complication rates 0.4–1%). The favorable safety profile of MBS in the short-, mid-, and long-term offers the potential to treat patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, chronic anticoagulation, neoplastic disease, and end-organ failure without increased morbidity and mortality. Conclusions: In conclusion, the future of MBS lies in the ongoing innovation and adapted therapeutic strategies along with the integration of a variety of other techniques for managing obesity. Careful preoperative assessments, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach, remain essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after MBS.