Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

13 citation(s) found for "Eisen, Andrea".

Assessing burnout among oncologists in Ontario, Canada.
Singh, Simron , Farrelly, Ashley , Chan, Catherine, Nazeri-Rad, Narges, Nicholls, Brett, Bellicoso, Daniela , Eisen, Andrea , Fox, Colleen , Holloway, Claire , Rothenberger, David A. , Eisen, Andrea , Bauman, Glenn , Falkson, Conrad B , Kennedy, Erin , McLeod, Robin S. , Trudeau, Maureen , Shanafelt, Tait D.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 8, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 29_suppl | Pages: 41-41

10.1200/jco.2020.38.29_suppl.41 Get It

41 Background: Provider experience and physician burnout has been recognized as a critical issue in medicine. Ontario, Canada has a single payer cancer system run by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) with a mandate covering system level planning and delivery of cancer services, funding, and quality improvement. As part of a larger provincial initiative to address clinician burnout, we examined the prevalence and drivers of burnout in practicing physician oncologists in Ontario. Methods: In November-December 2019, surgical, medical, hematological, and radiation oncologists in Ontario were invited to complete an anonymous online survey to assess burnout and its drivers. Burnout prevalence was assessed through the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS MP). Data on demographic, workplace, engagement, and practice profiles were collected. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to assess key variables associated with “high” burnout using a common definition of high scores on the MBI subscales of emotional exhaustion (EE) (> 27) and/or depersonalization (DP) (>10). Results: Response rate to the survey was 44% (n=418) with 72% reporting high levels of burnout. Mean scores for EE (30.7, SD 12.1) and DP (9.9, SD 6.7) were consistent with high burnout. Participants endorsed known drivers of burnout including: 1) a poor culture of wellness at work (e.g., not comfortable talking to leadership (72%), 2) inefficiencies of practice (e.g. feeling insufficient documentation time (67%)) and 3) personal resilience (e.g. not feeling they are contributing professionally in ways they value (21%)). Age (<45yrs) (OR: 2.15), poor/marginal control over workload (OR: 4.42), feeling used/unappreciated (OR: 2.63), working atmosphere that feels hectic/chaotic (OR: 2.68), and insufficient time for documentation requirements (OR: 2.52) significantly impacted the odds of high burnout in the regression model (p<0.05). Conclusions: The high rate of burnout among oncology physicians in a single payer public cancer system in Ontario is concerning for the wellbeing of providers, patients and system sustainability. Drivers important for maintaining a culture of wellness and efficiency of practice will require local, regional and provincial health policy to improve. Next steps will include raising awareness with provincial initiatives/policy to address key burnout drivers, and examining the impact of working under pandemic conditions (Covid-19) on oncologist burnout.
New Developments and Challenges in Rare Genitourinary Tumors: Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancers and Squamous Cell Cancers of the Penis
Pagliaro, Lance C. , Aragon-Ching, Jeanny B, Aragon‐Ching, Jeanny B.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book | October 29, 2018 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 37 | Pages: 330-336

10.1200/edbk_175558 | PMID 28561704 Get It

The diagnosis and treatment of rare genitourinary tumors is inherently challenging. The Rare Diseases Act of 2002 initially defined a rare disorder as one that affects fewer than 200,000 Americans. The lack of widely available clinical guidelines, limited research funding, and inaccessible clinical trials often lead to difficulty with treatment decisions to guide practitioners in rendering effective care for patients with rare genitourinary cancers. This article will discuss basic tenets of diagnosis and treatment as well as recent developments and clinical trials in rare non-urothelial bladder cancers and penile squamous cell cancers.
Docetaxel As Monotherapy or Combined With Ramucirumab or Icrucumab in Second-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Three-Arm, Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial
Petrylak, Daniel P. , Tagawa, Scott T. , Eisen, Andrea , Canil, Christina , Burke, John M. , Shaffer, David R. , Pan, Chong‐Xian, Aragon‐Ching, Jeanny B. , Tang, Shande, Zhang, Hui , Cavanaugh, Christopher , Gao, Ling , Walgren, Richard A., Kohli, Manish , Spira, Alexander, Yu, Evan Y., Shaffer, David, Kim, Jenny J, Aragon-Ching, Jeanny B, Quinn, David I, Vogelzang, Nicholas J. , Cavanaugh, Christopher T, Kauh, John S, Chi, Kim N, Sridhar, Srikala S , Spira, Alexander I. , Yu, Evan Y , Kim, Jaeyeon , Quinn, David I , Kauh, John Sae Wook , N., Kim , Tagawa, Scott T , Eisen, Andrea

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 1, 2016 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1500-1509

10.1200/jco.2015.65.0218 | PMID 26926681 Get It

Purpose This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel monotherapy or docetaxel in combination with ramucirumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody) or icrucumab (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 antibody) after progression during or within 12 months of platinum-based regimens for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm A), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV plus ramucirumab 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 of a 3-week cycle (arm B), or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 plus icrucumab 12 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle (arm C). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned and treated in arms A (n = 45), B (n = 46), or C (n = 49). PFS was significantly longer in arm B compared with arm A (median, 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.1 to 6.9 months v 2.8 months; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.6 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.389; 95% CI, 0.235 to 0.643; P = .0002). Arm C did not experience improved PFS compared with arm A (1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; stratified hazard ratio, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.550 to 1.357; P = .5053). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (arms A, B, and C) were neutropenia (36%, 33%, and 39%), fatigue (13%, 30%, and 20%), febrile neutropenia (13%, 17%, and 6.1%), and anemia (6.7%, 13%, and 14%, respectively). Conclusion The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel met the prespecified efficacy end point for prolonging PFS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving second-line treatment and warrants further investigation in the phase III setting.