Citations

Introduction: Despite ongoing diversity initiatives, Otolaryngology – Head and Neck surgery continues to face a widening representation gap as the Latinx population in the United States grows. To address this disparity, novel strategies for recruiting Latinx medical students into the specialty must be explored. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was distributed to Latinx medical students in the United States via social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and Latino Medical Student Association (LMSA) chapters. Results: Most respondents were unfamiliar with Otolaryngology-specific health disparities affecting Latinx communities and indicated an interest in learning more about these disparities. Most respondents indicated that early exposure to Otolaryngology disparities affecting Latinx communities could increase interest in exploring the specialty. Additionally, most participants deemed a department's commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion and opportunities to serve Latinx patients to be necessary residency program attributes when deciding between programs (69.2% and 66.7%, respectively). Conclusion: Integrating community outreach and education on Otolaryngology-related health disparities into undergraduate medical education may serve as a promising strategy to enhance Latinx recruitment and representation in the specialty.

Importance Neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2–related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are common in hospitalized patients younger than 18 years and may increase risk of new neurocognitive or functional morbidity. Objective To assess the association of severe neurological manifestations during a SARS-CoV-2–related hospital admission with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities at discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study from 46 centers in 10 countries included patients younger than 18 years who were hospitalized for acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C between January 2, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Exposure Severe neurological manifestations, which included acute encephalopathy, seizures or status epilepticus, meningitis or encephalitis, sympathetic storming or dysautonomia, cardiac arrest, coma, delirium, and stroke. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was new neurocognitive (based on the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale) and/or functional (based on the Functional Status Scale) morbidity at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of severe neurological manifestations with new morbidity in each SARS-CoV-2–related condition. Results Overall, 3568 patients younger than 18 years (median age, 8 years [IQR, 1-14 years]; 54.3% male) were included in this study. Most (2980 [83.5%]) had acute SARS-CoV-2; the remainder (588 [16.5%]) had MIS-C. Among the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, 536 (18.0%) had a severe neurological manifestation during hospitalization, as did 146 patients with MIS-C (24.8%). Among survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (27.7% [n = 142] vs 14.6% [n = 356]; P < .001). For survivors with MIS-C, 28.0% (n = 39) with severe neurological manifestations had new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with 15.5% (n = 68) of those without severe neurological manifestations ( P = .002). When adjusting for risk factors in those with severe neurological manifestations, both patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.27-2.70]; P = .001) and those with MIS-C (odds ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.22-3.89]; P = .009) had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study suggest that children and adolescents with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C and severe neurological manifestations may be at high risk for long-term impairment and may benefit from screening and early intervention to assist recovery.

e23252 Background: The UPMC-Kline Health Center (KHC) in Harrisburg, PA, shows a lower cervical cancer screening rate compared to the general population in the USA (57.08% vs 78%, respectively, based on the Medical Group Fiscal Year 2023 Internal Quality Measures). To understand this gap, we distributed a comprehensive questionnaire to patients, aiming to pinpoint factors contributing to the lower screening rate and plan targeted interventions for improvement. Methods: We randomly distributed questionnaires to female patients aged 21 to 61 during appointment check-in at the KHC, considering our linguistically diverse patient population with surveys available in Spanish, English, and Nepali. Given the diverse linguistic landscape of our patient population, we prepared questionnaires in Spanish, English, and Nepali. The survey aims to identify and address specific clinic-related problems, with a follow-up assessment after a few months to gauge improvements following interventions targeting the underlying causes of screening gaps. Results: Over a three-month span, 65 questionnaires were completed. Among the participants, 38% (25 patients - 7 white/Caucasian, 11 black/African American, 1 Asian, 7 others; 12 Hispanic, 13 non-Hispanic) revealed that they had not undergone screening within the past three years. The analysis of this subgroup unveiled significant issues: 84% (21/25) did not receive paperwork to schedule the test, 88% (22/25) were not contacted to schedule the test, 76% (19/25) did not receive reminder notifications before appointments, and 72%(18/25) expressed concerns about the lack of insurance coverage for costs. Furthermore, 76% (19/25) indicated the requirement to pay a co-pay, and an equal percentage reported difficulties in obtaining the screening test. Additionally, 72%(18/25) mentioned that their healthcare providers did not discuss the screening's importance, while 76%(19/25) noted their providers did not explain the purpose of the test. Conclusions: These findings underscore critical gaps in communication, accessibility, and cost-related barriers to cervical cancer screening at KHC. This ongoing quality improvement project, scheduled for data recollection in a few months, encompasses proposed interventions such as automated reminders, technology integration for communication, and distributing flyers in clinic and waiting areas to foster open communication and address inadequate discussions about the importance of screening. The aim is to improve patient awareness, engagement, and ultimately prevent delayed cancer diagnoses. KHC is committed to enhancing the cervical cancer screening rate to minimize the likelihood of delayed cancer diagnoses.

e23244 Background: The UPMC-Kline Health Center (KHC) located in Harrisburg, PA, has a lower colon cancer screening rate compared to the general patient population in the USA (26.03% vs 78%, respectively, according to the Medical Group Fiscal Year 2023 Internal Quality Measures). To understand the reasons behind this disparity, a comprehensive questionnaire was conducted aiming to identify factors contributing to the lower colonoscopy screening rate and to implement targeted interventions to improve the situation. Methods: Surveys were distributed to eligible patients aged 45 to 75 at the clinic, considering linguistic diversity by preparing questionnaires in Spanish, English, and Nepali. Distribution, randomized and conducted by medical assistants, aims to identify and address specific clinic-related issues. Subsequent assessment, after a few months, will determine improvements resulting from interventions targeting the underlying causes of screening gaps. Results: Over a three-month period, a total of 77 questionnaires were completed and collected. We analyzed responses from 33 patients (42%, 14 females, and 19 males; 16 white/Caucasian, 14 black/African American, 2 Asian, 1 other; 8 Hispanic/Latino, 25 non-Hispanic/Latino) who had not undergone a colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Findings revealed that 72% (24/33) of patients reported not receiving paperwork for scheduling, while 72% (24/33) were not contacted to schedule the test. Additionally, 78% (26/33) of patients did not receive a reminder call or message before their scheduled appointments. 51% (17/33) of patients highlighted a lack of insurance coverage for costs, with 63% (21/33) indicating the need for a co-pay. 57% (19/33) of patients reported difficulties in obtaining the screening test. 51% (17/33) of patients mentioned that their healthcare provider discussed the importance of the screening test, and 54% (18/33) of patients noted that their providers explained the purpose of the test. Conclusions: The survey identifies scheduling, communication, and cost-related barriers to colon cancer screening at KHC. Proposed interventions, including the implementation of automated reminders, integrating technology to facilitate communication, and incorporating flyers within the clinic and patient waiting areas. This quality improvement project is ongoing, with data scheduled for recollection in a few months. These measures are anticipated to foster improvements, aiding more patients in preventing delayed cancer diagnoses. KHC aims to create a patient-friendly environment by addressing scheduling inefficiencies, improving communication, and tackling financial concerns for timely and accessible colon cancer screenings.

Introduction Empowering people living with multimorbidity (multiple chronic conditions) to gain greater confidence in managing their health can enhance their quality of life. Education focused on self-management is a key tool for fostering patient empowerment and is mostly provided on an individual basis. Virtual communities of practice (VCoP) present a unique opportunity for online education in chronic condition self-management within a social context. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of individualised, online self-management education compared with VCoP among middle-aged individuals living with multiple chronic conditions. Methods and analysis People aged 30–60, living with ≥2 chronic conditions and receiving care in primary care (PC) centres and outpatient hospital-based clinics in Madrid and Canary Islands will enrol in an 18-month parallel-design, blinded (intervention assessment and data analysts), pragmatic (adhering to the intention-to-treat principle), individually randomised trial. The trial will compare two 12-month web-based educational offers of identical content; one delivered individually (control) and the other with online social interaction (VCoP, intervention). Using repeated measures mixed linear models, with the patient as random effect and allocation groups and time per group as fixed effects, we will estimate between-arm differences in the change in Patient Activation Measure from baseline to 12 months (primary endpoint), including measurements at 6-month and 18-month follow-up. Other outcomes will include measures of depression and anxiety, treatment burden, quality of life. In addition to a process evaluation of the VCoP, we will conduct an economic evaluation estimating the relative cost-effectiveness of the VCoP from the perspectives of both the National Health System and the Community. Ethics and dissemination The trial was approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committees of Gregorio Marañón University Hospital in Madrid/Nuestra Señora Candelaria University Hospital in Santa Cruz de Tenerife. The results will be disseminated through workshops, policy briefs, peer-reviewed publications and local/international conferences. Trial registration number NCT06046326 .

Abstract Rationale Hospital readmission within 30 days poses challenges for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients because of its impact on care quality, costs, and outcomes. Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are particularly affected by readmission, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life. Because small sample sizes have hindered previous studies, this study seeks to address this gap in knowledge by examining a large-scale dataset. Objective To determine the rate and probability of 30-day all-cause readmission and secondary outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) or ILD admitted to the hospital. Methods This study is a nested cohort study that used the PearlDiver patient records database. Adult patients (age ⩾18 yr) who were admitted to hospitals in 28 states in the United States with COVID-19 or ILD diagnoses were included. We defined and analyzed two separate cohorts in this study. The first cohort consisted of patients with COVID-19 and was later divided into two groups with or without a history of ILD. The second cohort consisted of patients with ILD and was later divided into groups with COVID-19 or with a non–COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis at admission. We also studied two other subcohorts of patients with and without idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis within the second cohort. Propensity score matching was employed to match confounders between groups. The Kaplan-Meier log rank test was applied to compare the probabilities of outcomes. Results We assessed the data of 2,286,775 patients with COVID-19 and 118,892 patients with ILD. We found that patients with COVID-19 with preexisting ILD had an odds ratio of 1.6 for 30-day all-cause readmission. Similarly, an odds ratio of 2.42 in readmission rates was observed among hospitalized individuals with ILD who contracted COVID-19 compared with those who were hospitalized for non–COVID-19 pneumonia. Our study also found a significantly higher probability of intensive care admission among patients in both cohorts. Conclusions Patients with ILD face heightened rates of hospital readmissions, particularly when ILD is combined with COVID-19, resulting in adverse outcomes such as decreased quality of life and increased healthcare expenses. It is imperative to prioritize preventive measures against COVID-19 and establish effective postdischarge care strategies for patients with ILD.

Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The mainstay of frontline therapy remains R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or R-CHOP-like immunochemotherapy. Patients' responses to R-CHOP therapy vary depending on the stage and/or molecular subtypes of DLBCL. Approximately 40% of advanced-stage DLBCL patients suffer from a refractory or relapsed disease[1]. The outcome for patients with early relapses after rituximab-containing first-line therapy remains poor[2]. DLBCL poses a marked degree of genetic heterogeneity. Here, we compare the expression of genes related to epigenetics and chromatin modifications in DLBCL patients resistant and non-resistant to R-CHOP therapy. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the differences in the expression of genes related to epigenetics and chromatin modification in DLBCL patients that could lead to chemoresistance and failure of R-CHOP treatment. Method The gene expression profile (GEP) was obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Accession number: GSE173263) submitted by Dlouhy et al[3]. The GEP was analyzed in DLBCL cases, including 10 early failure cases (defined as refractory to induction treatment or early relapsing (<12 months from diagnosis)) and 29 responding patients, to identify features associated to primary chemoresistance. The comparison was done using the list of genes proposed by Bakhshi, T. et. al[4] , where he selected the genes that were identified to potentially cause epigenetic and chromatin modifications in DLCBL. All the comparisons were done using a T-test. Results There were significant differences in the gene expression related to epigenetics and chromatin modifications between DLBCL patients in the early failure arm versus the remission arm. Patients who had early failure to R-CHOP tended to have higher expression of these genes: SMARCA4 (p=0.010), SETD1B (p=0.018), SETD2 (p=0.024), EP300 (p=0.012), MLL3 (p=0.049), INO80 (p=0.001), CHD8 (p=0.007), NCOR1 (p=0.020), ARID1B (p=0.034), and SETD5 (p=0.007). Compared to the patients who were in remission after R-CHOP therapy, these patients had significantly higher expression of HIST1H1E (p=0.007). Conclusion Gene expression related to epigenetics and chromatin modifications significantly impacts the prognosis of DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. Differences in gene expression may lead to chemoresistance, and higher expression levels are associated with a worse prognosis. This study sheds light on the importance of chromatin and epigenetic modifications in DLBCL progression, guiding the development of future therapies.