Citations

Introduction: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has emerged as a minimally invasive option for high-risk surgical candidates with severe and symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR), but post-procedure residual mitral valve (MV) dysfunction remains a significant concern. This study evaluates the clinical utility of combining artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) for diastolic dysfunction (DD) grading and the echocardiography-derived velocity time integral of the MV and left ventricular outflow tract ratio (VTIMV/LVOT) in predicting prognosis in patients post-M-TEER. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent M-TEER between 2014 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on VTIMV/LVOT and ECG-AI scores into three groups: both normal parameters, either abnormal parameter, or both abnormal parameters to compare outcomes (mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], and the need for subsequent MV reintervention) using Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression models, and net reclassification improvement. Results: Overall, 250 patients were included; the median age was 79.5 (IQR: 73.1, 84.6) and 66.4% were male. The combined abnormal VTIMV/LVOT (≥2.5) and ECG-AI score for DD (>1) was associated with higher risk of one-year mortality (adjusted HR: 4.56 [1.04–19.89], p = 0.044) and MACE (adjusted HR: 3.72 [1.09–12.72], p = 0.037) compared to patients with both normal parameters. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential additive value of integrating VTIMV/LVOT and ECG-AI scores as a prognostic tool for a personalized approach to the post-operative evaluation and risk stratification in M-TEER patients.

Aortic stenosis (AS), the most common valvular heart disease, is traditionally graded based on several echocardiographic quantitative parameters, such as aortic valve area (AVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and peak jet velocity (Vmax). This systematic review evaluates the clinical significance and prognostic implications of discordant high-gradient AS (DHG-AS), a distinct hemodynamic phenotype characterized by elevated MPG despite a preserved AVA (>1.0 cm2). Although often overlooked, DHG-AS presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, as high gradients remain a strong predictor of adverse outcomes despite moderately reduced AVA. Sixty-three studies were included following rigorous selection and quality assessment of the key studies. Prognostic outcomes across five key studies were discrepant: some showed better survival in DHG-AS compared to concordant high-gradient AS (CHG-AS), while others reported similar or worse outcomes. For instance, a retrospective observational study including 3209 patients with AS found higher mortality in CHG-AS (unadjusted HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.7), whereas another retrospective multicenter study including 2724 patients with AS observed worse outcomes in DHG-AS (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.56). These discrepancies may stem from delays in intervention or heterogeneity in study populations. Despite the diagnostic ambiguity, the presence of high gradients warrants careful evaluation, aggressive risk stratification, and timely management. Current guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) calcium scoring, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) planimetry, and, when needed, catheterization. Anatomic AVA assessment by TEE, CT, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can improve diagnostic accuracy by directly visualizing valve morphology and planimetry-based AVA, helping to clarify the true severity in discordant cases. However, these modalities are limited by factors such as image quality (especially with TEE), radiation exposure and contrast use (in CT), and availability or contraindications (in CMR). Management remains largely based on CHG-AS protocols, with intervention primarily guided by transvalvular gradient and symptom burden. The variability among the different guidelines in defining severity and therapeutic thresholds highlights the need for tailored approaches in DHG-AS. DHG-AS is clinically relevant and associated with substantial prognostic uncertainty. Timely recognition and individualized treatment could improve outcomes in this complex subgroup.

Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is known to be a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, its role in the development of AF, independent of this association, remains unclear. Methods and results Adult patients from the three Mayo Clinic sites with a baseline Lp(a) and without AF history were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their Lp(a) levels: high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) and low Lp(a) (<50 mg/dL). Survival probabilities free from incident AF were compared between Lp(a) groups, during a follow-up period up to 15 years, using the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was also conducted. A total of 75 376 patients were included (median age: 55 years, 59% males), with a median follow-up duration of 8.8 (inter-quartile range: 3.4, 14.8) years. Incident AF was detected in 5738 (7.6%) patients. Survival probability free from incident AF was significantly lower in patients with elevated Lp(a) (86%) compared with those with low Lp(a) (88%, log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusted for potential risk factors of AF showed a statistically significant association of elevated Lp(a) with an 11% increase in AF risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.18). Conclusion Our study suggests that elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) is an independent risk factor for incident AF. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate our results and to test if reducing Lp(a) could mitigate the burden of AF.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established causal risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), as reported by multiple Mendelian randomization studies and large epidemiological studies. When elevated Lp(a) is combined with other risk factors, most notably elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a synergistic atherogenic effect has been reported. However, the current literature is conflicting regarding how Lp(a) interacts in the context of controlled LDL-C levels (e.g., <70 mg/dL) and whether reducing LDL-C can modify the atherogenic effect of Lp(a). In some studies, elevated Lp(a) was still significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, despite controlled levels of LDL-C. In contrast, multiple studies have reported attenuation of the cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a) with lower LDL-C levels. Moreover, the relationship between Lp(a) and triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and very low-density lipoprotein remains unclear. In this literature review, we summarize and discuss the current evidence regarding the interactions between Lp(a) and other lipid molecules, how they contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD, and future perspectives, particularly in the current era where promising targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are under development.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic and management approaches for PH often face limitations, leading to delays in diagnosis and potentially suboptimal treatment outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) offers a transformative approach to PH care. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for original studies on AI applications in PH, using predefined keywords. Out of more than 500 initial articles, 45 relevant studies were selected. Risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool). Results: This review examines the potential applications of AI in PH, focusing on its role in enhancing diagnosis, disease classification, and prognostication. We discuss how AI-powered analysis of medical data can improve the accuracy and efficiency of detecting PH. Furthermore, we explore the potential of AI in risk stratification, leading to treatment optimization for PH. Conclusions: While acknowledging the existing challenges and limitations and the need for continued exploration and refinement of AI-driven tools, this review highlights the significant promise of AI in revolutionizing PH management to improve patient outcomes.

Background Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, it is still unclear whether controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to optimal levels can attenuate cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a), especially in the setting of secondary prevention. Methods Adult patients with a baseline Lp(a) measurement who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and reached their LDL-C target levels (<70 mg/dl) at Mayo Clinic sites between 2006 and 2017 were included. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves were created to compare the survival probabilities among patients with Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl compared with Lp(a) < 50 mg/dl. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to quantify the association of elevated Lp(a) with our relevant outcomes and to control for possible confounders. Results In total, 878 patients (median age: 68 years, and 74% males) who underwent PCI were included for analysis. Of them, 29.7% had elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl. Kaplan–Meier curves did not reveal any significant difference in survival probabilities for elevated Lp(a) for any outcome including MACE (P = 0.91), all-cause mortality (P = 0.26), or the separate MACE components. Similarly, the multivariable analysis showed no significant association for MACE (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–1.37) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.74–1.30). Conclusion In patients who underwent PCI and have their LDL-C controlled below 70 mg/dl, no significant association was found between elevated Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl and risk for MACE or all-cause mortality.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), however categorization as precapillary or postcapillary is challenging due to the need for invasive right heart catheterization (RHC). Studies have validated transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to characterize PHTN and ECG-artificial intelligence (AI) to predict diastolic dysfunction risk. The utility of these noninvasive tools in patients with CKD is unknown. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with end stage CKD who underwent RHC between 2011 and 2021. Patients with PHTN (pulmonary artery pressure >20mmHg on RHC) were categorized as having precapillary (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PCWP, ≤15mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance, PVR, >2WU) or postcapillary PHTN (PCWP >15mmHg and PVR ≤2WU for isolated postcapillary or PVR >2WU for combined). TTE and ECG within 3 months of RHC were obtained. TTE measurements were used to calculate ePLAR (echocardiographic pulmonary to left atrial ratio); tricuspid regurgitant peak velocity (TRV max ) divided by mitral E/e’. ECGs were analyzed with an AI risk tool for diastolic dysfunction (score 0-3, increasing with increasing risk). Receiver operating curves (ROC) evaluated the performance of these tests. Results: 60 patients were included; 16 (27%) with precapillary and 44 (73%) with postcapillary PHTN. ROC analysis found good accuracy for both ECG-AI diastolic dysfunction risk score to predict precapillary PHTN with AUC 0.724 (sensitivity=60% and specificity=88% for an ECG score value ≤1) and ePLAR with AUC 0.715 (sensitivity=75% and specificity=70% for ePLAR >0.17m/sec). Highest accuracy for detection of precapillary PHTN was reached by combination of ePLAR and ECG-AI tool, with AUC 0.756 (sensitivity=73%, accuracy of 86% for a value ≤1.17). Conclusions: ECG-AI generated diastolic risk score of 0-1 (low risk) and high ePLAR showed good accuracy in characterizing precapillary PHTN in patients with end stage CKD. The combination of these noninvasive tools further increased the diagnostic accuracy, reflecting its potential utility in classification of patients with CKD and PHTN, a crucial determinant of the ideal therapeutic plan in kidney transplant candidates.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common clinically managed cardiac arrhythmia, is known to increase the risk of heart failure, stroke, and mortality. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), also plays a role in cardiovascular health. However, the influence of Lp(a) on the development of AF, independent of its association with ASCVD, remains unclear. Hypothesis: Elevated Lp(a) may be associated with increased risk of new-onset AF. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients from the three Mayo Clinic sites who had their Lp(a) levels measured and had no prior history of AF. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their serum Lp(a) concentrations: high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) and low Lp(a) (<50 mg/dL). New AF diagnoses were identified during the follow-up period. Survival probabilities between the two Lp(a) groups were compared using the Kaplan–Meier curve and the Log-Rank test. Cox regression analyses, both univariable and multivariable, were performed to evaluate established risk factors and compare the risk of new-onset AF between the high and low Lp(a) groups. Results: A total of 108,930 patients were included (median age: 55 years, 58% males), with a follow-up duration for up to 10 years. Incident AF was detected in 8432 (7.7%) patients. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients with AF versus non-AF patients: 15 (IQR 43) vs. 12 (IQR 34) mg/dL, p<0.001. The percentage of patients having elevated Lp(a) was significantly higher in the AF group versus non-AF group: 2119 (25%) vs 21151 (21%), p<0.001. Survival probability for new-onset AF was significantly lower in patients with elevated Lp(a) compared with those with low Lp(a) (log rank p<0.001, Figure 1). In the univariate analysis, high Lp(a) levels were associated with a 17% increase in the risk of AF (HR = 1.17, 95% CIs: 1.12 to 1.23). The multivariate analysis adjusted for well-established risk factors for AF showed a less strong but still significant association, with a 10% increase in AF risk (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.15). Conclusion: Our study suggests that elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) seems to be an independent risk factor for new-onset AF. Future prospective studies are still warranted to validate our results.