Citations

Abstract SGI-110 is a novel second generation HMA, formulated as a low volume SQ injection. It is designed as a dinucleotide incorporating decitabine and guanosine, to prolong in vivo exposure and potentially improve efficacy of its active component, decitabine by protecting decitabine from rapid deamination by cytidine deaminase. Preclinically, SGI-110 demonstrated potent activity in-vivo using different routes of administration. A randomized Phase 1-2 FIH PK/PD-guided, dose-escalation study is being conducted in subjects with relapsed/refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS or AML. The objective of the first stage of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of SGI-110 and to establish the MTD and the biologically effective dose (BED). Subjects are randomized to one of two SQ regimens (daily x5 or once weekly x3, both given in 28-day courses). PD is evaluated by LINE-1 global DNA hypomethylation. The second stage of the study will be a randomized Phase 2 dose expansion, once the BED and MTD have been determined. Currently, 5 dose-cohorts have been fully enrolled, (n= 55) at doses ranging from 3mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2 daily x5, and 6mg/m2 to 90 mg/m2 weekly x3 but are not yet fully evaluable. PK guidance has allowed rapid dose escalation, and PD assessment of global hypomethylation has been correlated with increased dose and exposure levels. Apart from manageable local injection site pain, SGI-110 has been well tolerated. Other AE's were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia. There have been 3 remissions in relapsed AML subjects: 1 CR with weekly (60mg/m2) and 1 PR and 1 CR with daily (36 and 60 mg/m2 respectively). The PK profile showed efficient conversion of SGI-110 to decitabine achieving exposures in the therapeutic range as predicted from the SGI-110 rational design, characterized by decitabine AUC in therapeutic range (cohorts 4-5), lower Cmax, and longer effective half life, as compared to historical data based on molar equivalent doses of IV decitabine. Dose-dependent hypomethylation induction in the first 5 cohorts was observed. The subject who achieved a CR had the highest degree of hypomethylation induction of all subjects tested to date, and also the highest decitabine AUC in the cohort. Updated efficacy, safety, PK, and PD data of both regimens will be presented. SGI-110 is safe and well tolerated to date; biologically effective and therapeutic dose levels have been achieved with little toxicity so far with both regimens. Preliminary efficacy (PR+CR) has been observed in relapsed AML subjects. The PK profile showed efficient conversion of SGI-110 to decitabine with achievable therapeutic exposures, longer apparent half life, and lower Cmax than predicted equivalent decitabine doses given IV. Global Hypomethylating effects were observed at all dose levels, evaluated to date with both regimens. The results justify the progress of the study to the second dose-expansion Phase 2 stage after establishing the BED and MTD. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-214. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-214

Context: The delivery of end-of-life care (EOLC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) varies widely among medical care providers. The differing opinions of nurses and physicians regarding EOLC may help identify areas of improvement. Objective: To explore the differences of physicians and nurses on EOLC in the ICU and how these differences vary according to self-reported proficiency level and primary work unit. Design: Cross-sectional survey of 69 ICU physicians and 629 ICU nurses. Setting: Single tertiary care academic medical institution. Results: A total of 50 physicians (72%) and 331 nurses (53%) participated in the survey. Significant differences between physicians and nurses were noted in the following areas: ability to safely raise concerns, do not resuscitate (DNR) decision making, discussion of health care directives, timely hospice referral, spiritual assessment documentation, utilization of social services, and the availability of EOLC education. In every domain of EOLC, physicians reported a more positive perception than nurses. Additional differences were noted among physicians based on experience, as well as among nurses based on their primary work unit and self-reported proficiency level. Conclusions: Even with an increased focus on improving EOLC, significant differences continue to exist between the perspectives of nurses and physicians, as well as physicians among themselves and nurses among themselves. These differences may represent significant barriers toward providing comprehensive, consistent, and coordinated EOLC in the ICU.

Background The authors explored the relationship between nitrous oxide use and neurologic and neuropsychological outcome in a population of patients likely to experience intraoperative cerebral ischemia: those who had temporary cerebral arterial occlusion during aneurysm clipping surgery. Methods A post hoc analysis of a subset of the data from the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial was conducted. Only subjects who had temporary arterial occlusion during surgery were included in the analysis. Metrics of short-term and long-term (i.e., 3 months after surgery) outcome were evaluated via both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 denotes a worse outcome in patients receiving nitrous oxide. Results The authors evaluated 441 patients, of which 199 received nitrous oxide. Patients receiving nitrous oxide had a greater risk of delayed ischemic neurologic deficits (i.e., the clinical manifestation of vasospasm) (OR, 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.95; P = 0.025). However, at 3 months after surgery, there was no difference in any metric of gross neurologic outcome: Glasgow Outcome Score (OR, 0.67; CI, 0.44-1.03; P = 0.065), Rankin Score (OR, 0.74; CI, 0.47-1.16; P = 0.192), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR, 1.02; CI, 0.66-1.56; P = 0.937), or Barthel Index (OR, 0.69; CI, 0.38-1.25; P = 0.22). The risk of impairment on at least one test of neuropsychological function was reduced in those who received nitrous oxide (OR, 0.56; CI, 0.36-0.89; P = 0.013). Conclusion In this patient population, use of nitrous oxide was associated with an increased risk for the development of delayed ischemic neurologic deficits; however, there was no evidence of detriment to long-term gross neurologic or neuropsychological outcome.