Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

231 citation(s) found for "Fa, Farraye".

S964 Culprit or Bystander? Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Secukinumab Use in Patients With Inflammatory Arthropathy
Singh, Lovekirat, Khan, Mohammad Hassaan, Dulai, Parambir S. , Kochhar, Gursimran , Desai, Aakash , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S461-S461

10.14309/01.ajg.0000777388.25390.d3 Get It

S894 Burden of Herpes Zoster Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Large Administrative Claims Database
Thompson‐Leduc, Philippe , Poston, Sara , Gupta, Deepshekhar , Ma, Siyu , Pawlowski, John E. , Duh, Mei Sheng , Banatwala, Azeem , Bernstein, Emma , Singer, David , Cheng, Wendy Y. , Devine, Francesca , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S420-S420

10.14309/01.ajg.0000777108.73669.4f Get It

S892 Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are at Increased Risk for Complications From Herpes Zoster
Singh, Siddharth , Inselman, Jonathan , Swarna, Kavya, Keavney, Andrew, Caldera, Freddy , Hayney, Mary S. , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S420-S420

10.14309/01.ajg.0000777100.68018.56 Get It

S819 Incidence, Outcomes, and Impact of COVID-19 on Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Propensity Matched Analysis of a Large Research Network
Hadi, Yousaf , Dulai, Parambir S. , Mohy‐ud‐din, Nabeeha , Kochhar, Gursimran , Kupec, Justin Thomas , Jairath, Vipul , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S379-S379

10.14309/01.ajg.0000776808.31254.af Get It

S763 A Cohort Study of the Age of Menopause in Female Patients With and Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Moktan, Varun , Daoud, Nader , Tremaine, William J., Kane, Sunanda V. , Hochwald, Alexander , Hodge, David O. , Loftus, Edward V. , Faubion, Stephanie S. , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S352-S353

10.14309/01.ajg.0000776584.48281.9f Get It

S2472 Nintedanib-Associated Colitis
Senada, Peter A., Geiger, Xochiquetzal J., Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S1044-S1044

10.14309/01.ajg.0000783420.76597.45 Get It

Faecal Calprotectin from Ileostomy Output Is Sensitive and Specific for the Prediction of Small Bowel Inflammation in Patients with Crohn’s Disease
Daoud, Nader , Picco, Michael F., Daoud, Nader D, Hashash, Jana G. , Farraye, Francis A.

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis | October 9, 2021 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 601-605

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab182 | PMID 34633435 Get It

Abstract Background Severe Crohn’s disease [CD] can result in extensive bowel resections and need for creation of an ileostomy. Faecal calprotectin [FC] is well studied in CD management, though its role in patients who have an ileostomy is unclear. Our aim is to understand if FC is a useful adjunct to radiographic or endoscopic studies in identifying recurrent CD after surgery in patients with an ileostomy. Methods Between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2020, we searched the Mayo Clinic electronic medical record retrospectively for adult patients with ICD-10 code for CD, and a surgical history of an ileostomy. Patients were included in the analysis if they had at least one FC measured and a concomitant radiographic imaging and/or endoscopic procedure. An abnormal FC was defined as greater than 60 µg/g. Results Of 51 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 17 had an FC level >60 µg/g. Of these 17 patients, 14 had imaging and/or an ileoscopy confirming the presence of small bowel inflammation, with a sensitivity of 87.5%. Of the remaining 34 patients with an FC level ≤60 µg/g, 32 patients had imaging and/or ileoscopy demonstrating no small bowel inflammation, with a specificity of 91.4%. FC from an ileostomy effluent had a positive predictive value of 82.3%, a negative predictive value of 94.1% and test diagnostic accuracy of 90.1%. Conclusion FC from an ileostomy effluent is a highly sensitive and specific test for the assessment and monitoring of small bowel inflammation and disease recurrence in patients with CD.
On-site Availability Improves Vaccination Rates in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Farraye, Francis A. , Farraye, Francis A , Hashash, Jana G.

Crohn's & Colitis 360 | September 16, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/crocol/otab068 | PMID 36777281 Get It

Vulvar Crohn's Disease: Clinical Features and Outcomes
Cho, Janice , Loftus, Edward V. , Bruining, David H. , Chedid, Victor , Faubion, William A. , Johnson, Amanda M. , Kane, Sunanda V. , Papadakis, Konstantinos A. , Pardi, Darrell S. , Picco, Michael F., Raffals, Laura E. , Schroeder, Kenneth W., Tremaine, William J., Cho, Janice M, Chedid, Victor G , Loftus, Edward V , Farraye, Francis A. , Kisiel, John B. , Malik, Talha A. , Coelho–Prabhu, Nayantara

American Journal of Gastroenterology | September 9, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2296-2299

10.14309/ajg.0000000000001502 | PMID 34732676 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Vulvar involvement is a rare complication of Crohn's disease (CD). The optimal treatment of vulvar CD is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a 25-year retrospective cohort study of vulvar CD from 3 referral centers. Clinical features and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified. The most common vulvar symptoms were pain (74%), edema (60%), ulcerations (46%), nodules (36%), and abscess (34%). Medical management leading to symptomatic improvement varied, and 5 patients ultimately required surgery. DISCUSSION: Vulvar CD manifests with a broad spectrum of symptoms. Aggressive medical management was frequently effective, although surgery was required in 10% of cases.
COVID-19 vaccine use in immunocompromised patients: A commentary on evidence and recommendations
Duly, Kristine, Bhat, Shubha , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy | August 29, 2021 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 63-71

10.1093/ajhp/zxab344 | PMID 34455440 Get It

Abstract Purpose While COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization (EUA) deemed the vaccines to be effective and safe for public use, the phase 3 trials leading to EUA predominantly excluded patients with immunocompromising conditions. Immunocompromised patients make up a significant proportion of the population, and in light of recent mass vaccination efforts, we aim to review current evidence and recommendations of COVID-19 vaccines in 4 patient populations with immunocompromising disorders or conditions: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, solid organ transplantation, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Summary Given the evolving data on the safety and efficacy of the approved COVID-19 vaccines in the immunocompromised population, it is vital that pharmacists and other immunizing providers understand the current data and recommendations and provide the public with accurate information. To date, the only immunocompromised subgroup included in phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials have been those with HIV infection. However, recent retrospective trials have provided reassuring data on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in immunocompromised patients, and the interim analysis of the Moderna phase 3 trial produced promising data on efficacy in HIV-infected patients. Presently, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, British Society for Immunology, and various other governmental and professional societies and organizations endorse COVID-19 vaccination in the immunocompromised population. Conclusion While additional data is needed to determine the effects of immunocompromising medical conditions and immunosuppressing medications on the efficacy of the vaccine, the benefits of vaccination is anticipated to outweigh theoretical risks. Thus, COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for immunocompromised patients at this time, and providers should make efforts to decrease vaccine hesitancy in this population through education and reassurance.