Citations

Key Points Under current treatment approaches, patients with LA GVHD have poor overall and failure-free survival. Levels of AREG are elevated in LA GVHD, and the AREG/EGF ratio is predictive of overall survival and nonrelapse mortality in LA GVHD.

The strong male predominance in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains inadequately explained, but sex hormones might be involved. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the androgen pathway influence risk of developing BE and EAC. This genetic‐epidemiological analysis included 14 studies from Australia, Europe and North America. Polymorphisms in 16 genes coding for the androgen pathway were analyzed using a gene‐based approach: versatile gene‐based test association study. This method evaluates associations between a trait and all SNPs within a specific gene rather than each SNP marker individually as in a conventional GWAS. The data were stratified for sex, body‐mass index, waist‐to‐hip ratio, tobacco smoking and gastroesophageal reflux status. Included were data from 1,508 EAC patients, 2,383 BE patients and 2,170 control participants. SNPs within the gene CYP17A1 were associated with risk of BE in the sexes combined (p = 0.002) and in males (p = 0.003), but not in females separately (p = 0.3). This association was found in tobacco smokers (p = 0.003) and in BE patients without reflux (p = 0.004), but not in nonsmokers (p = 0.2) or those with reflux (p = 0.036). SNPs within JMJD1C were associated with risk of EAC in females (p = 0.001). However, none of these associations replicated in a subsequent sample. Fourteen other genes studied did not reach statistically significant levels of association with BE, EAC or the combination of BE and EAC, after correcting for the number of genes included in the analysis. In conclusion, genetic variants in the androgen‐related genes CYP17A1 and JMJD1C might be associated with risk of BE and EAC, respectively, but replication data with larger sample sizes are needed.

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐resolution manometry using the Chicago classification, which utilizes parameters including integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal contractile integral (DCI), and contractile front velocity (CFV), shows better diagnostic ability than previous conventional criteria. However, the current normal cut‐off values for the Chicago classification are based on individuals aged 19–48 years and do not include older people. Here, we aimed to assess the normal values for the Chicago classification in individuals aged 20–67 years and compare the parameters across age groups.MethodsFifty‐four asymptomatic healthy individuals (27 male and 27 female; age range. 20–67 years) were prospectively enrolled. To evaluate the effect of age and sex on manometric profiles, we attempted to enroll equal numbers of male and female subjects for each decade. Manometry was performed in both the supine and sitting positions.Key ResultsThe distal latency (DL) was significantly shorter with increasing age in both measurement positions. Furthermore, IRP was significantly higher with increasing age in both positions. Spearman's ranked correlation coefficient analysis indicated that DCI and IRP in both positions were positively correlated with age.Conclusions & InferencesAge affects the key parameters currently used in the Chicago classification, including IRP, DCI, and DL. Larger prospective studies with older subjects are needed to determine the age‐related normal values for the Chicago classification system.

Abstract Background Long‐lasting food impactions requiring endoscopic bolus removal occur frequently in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis ( E o E ) and harbor a risk for severe esophageal injuries. We evaluated whether treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids is able to reduce the risk of occurrence of this complication. Methods We analyzed data from the S wiss E o E C ohort Study. Patients with yearly clinic visits, during which standardized assessment of symptoms, endoscopic, histologic, and laboratory findings was carried out, were included. Results A total of 206 patients (157 males) were analyzed. The median follow‐up time was 5 years with a total of 703 visits (mean 3.41 visits/patient). During the follow‐up period, 33 patients (16 % of the cohort) experienced 42 impactions requiring endoscopic bolus removal. We evaluated the following factors regarding the outcome ‘bolus impaction’ by univariate logistic regression modeling: swallowed topical corticosteroid therapy ( OR 0.503, 95%‐ CI 0.255–0.993, P = 0.048), presence of EoE symptoms ( OR 1.150, 95%‐ CI 0.4668–2.835, P = 0.761), esophageal stricture ( OR 2.832, 95%‐ CI 1.508–5.321, P = 0.001), peak eosinophil count >10 eosinophils/ HPF ( OR 0.724, 95%‐ CI 0.324–1.621, P = 0.433), blood eosinophilia ( OR 1.532, 95%‐ CI 0.569–4.118, P = 0.398), and esophageal dilation ( OR 1.852, 95%‐ CI 1.034–3.755, P = 0.017). In the multivariate model, the following factors were significantly associated with bolus impaction: swallowed topical corticosteroid therapy ( OR 0.411, 95%‐ CI 0.203–0.835, P = 0.014) and esophageal stricture ( OR 2.666, 95%‐ CI 1.259–5.645, P = 0.01). Increasing frequency of use of swallowed topical steroids was associated with a lower risk for bolus impactions. Conclusions Treatment of E o E with swallowed topical corticosteroids significantly reduces the risk for long‐lasting bolus impactions.