Citations

Objectives: Hip arthroscopy is becoming more advanced and commonly performed. However, significant controversy exists regarding whether high grade acetabular cartilage lesions should be treated with debridement or microfracture. In addition, patients treated with microfracture are subject to extended partial weight-bearing rehabilitation in order to mitigate risk of subchondral plate fracture and protect fibrocartilage tissue formation. The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term patient-reported outcomes and failure rate and patient-reported outcomes of Grade 3 and 4 acetabulum labrum articular disruption (ALAD) lesions managed with microfracture or debridement. Methods: Primary arthroscopic labral repair cases at two centers from November 2008 to April 2016 were reviewed in patients aged < 55 years with unipolar ALAD Grade 3 and 4 pathology. Patients undergoing microfracture and debridement were compared using visual analog pain scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Score - Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) to determine predictors of outcomes and failure. Results: 127 hips in 123 patients (47 M, 76 F, mean age 34.7 ± 11.1) undergoing debridement (n = 95) or microfracture (n = 32) were followed for a mean of 4.9 years (range 2.0 - 8.5). Patients undergoing debridement achieved 3.5 point mean improvements in VAS (p < 0.01), 20.9 point improvements in mHHS (p < 0.01), and 25.5 point improvements in HOS-SSS (p < 0.01), which was statistically similar to that observed in microfracture patients (p ≥ 0.19). Five-year survival free of revision surgery was 83.0% in the debridement group and 85.6% in the microfracture group (p = 0.85). Cartilage treatment technique was found not to be predictive of revision risk during both univariate (p = 0.84) and multivariate (p = 0.84) analysis. Conclusion: Patients undergoing debridement of high grade unipolar acetabular cartilage lesions demonstrate similar patient reported outcome scores and revision rates compared to patients undergoing microfracture. These outcomes support debridement of acetabular lesions in order to optimize recovery while maintaining established positive outcomes following hip arthroscopy. [Table: see text]

Objectives: Participation in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is at an all-time high. This population experiences a substantial injury burden with many of these injuries affecting the upper extremities. The NCAA has adopted a data-driven decision-making process when providing recommendations for protecting player safety. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of hand and wrist injury in NCAA football in an effort to provide meaningful data for tailoring effective injury prevention strategies. Methods: An epidemiologic study utilizing the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program (NCAA-ISP) database was performed to investigate rates and patterns of hand and wrist injury in NCAA varsity football teams participating in the NCAA-ISP from 2009 to 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographic data. Injury rates were calculated per 1000 athlete-exposures (AEs) using statistical cross-referencing between injury-level and event-level data. Injury mechanism and severity, as measured by time-loss from play, were determined and compared between exposure factors such as player position, player seniority, and practice versus game setting. Results: 725 hand and wrist injuries were captured in 899,225 AEs. The observed practice hand and wrist injury rate was 0.51 injuries per thousand AEs, which was significantly lower than the game injury rate of 3.60 (p < 0.01). Comparing player demographics for injuries sustained during practice as opposed to game time revealed significant differences based on player year, player position, activity performed at the time of injury, and mechanism of injury (p < 0.01, Figure 1). Player-on-player contact was the most common injury mechanism reported with blocking being the most common activity at injury. Of all sustained injuries, 71.4% resulted in no time loss from competition whereas 9.8% of injuries resulted in greater than 7 days of time loss. On average, fracture resulted in the greatest time loss from competition (8.3 ± 24.0 days for injuries sustained in practice setting, 7.7 ±15.8 days for injuries sustained in game setting). When comparing injury by location, hand injury resulted in greater time loss (3.7 ± 15.1, 4.4 ± 13.8) than to nail/subungual (0±0, 0±0), finger (1.6 ± 6.7, 1.1 ± 4.2), and wrist injury (1.2 ± 3.8, 1.8 ± 4.9). Conclusion: This study characterizes the incidence of NCAA football hand and wrist injuries in both practice and game settings and demonstrates the relatively low rate of injuries leading to loss of playing time. Hand and wrist injury was found to be significantly more common in games when compared to practice. Offensive linemen were the most commonly affected players in the cohort, with most injuries occurring during game time compared to practice. This study provides valuable prognostic data regarding expected time loss from play on a per injury pattern basis. Further investigation on specific injury subtypes and expected time loss as a result of these injures would provide trainers, players, and coaches with useful information on an expected post-injury recovery and rehabilitation timeline. [Figure: see text]

Objectives: Little is known about the natural history and long-term outcome of a surgically treated symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. The goals of this study were to describe the rate and factors associated with recurrent lateral meniscus tears and progression to symptomatic lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in patients surgically treated for a symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. Patients with surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus have a high incidence of meniscus re-tear and progression to lateral compartment OA. Methods: A large, geographic database was reviewed to identify and confirm patients presenting with symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus between 1998 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to document treatment and outcomes at a minimum clinical follow-up of two years. Results: 70 discoid meniscus patients (30 F, 40 M) with a mean age of 27 years (Range: 2.0-66.0) were followed for an average of 5.8 years (Range 2.0-23.7). Sixty patients underwent surgical management: 49 (82%) patients underwent partial lateral meniscectomy and 11 (18%) underwent meniscus repair (including saucerization). Tear-free survival following surgery was 93% at 2 years, 69% at 5 years, and 40% at 8 years. Overall progression to symptomatic lateral compartment OA in the surgical group was 10% at 2 years, 23% at 5 years, and 48% at 8 years. Of those patients who developed lateral compartment OA, 55% (11/20) had a Kellgren-Lawrence score 2 or greater at last radiographic follow-up. Young age and open growth plates were associated with increased incidence of postoperative re-tear (HR: 0.96, CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.01). Increased age at diagnosis and BMI ≥ 30 were associated with increased risk of progression to lateral compartment OA on final radiographs. Conclusion: Patients with a surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus tear had a high rate of recurrent meniscus tear at long-term follow-up (60% at 8 years) that was associated with young age. Approximately 48% of surgically treated patients developed symptomatic lateral compartment OA at eight years from initial presentation. The risk of progression to OA increased with older age at diagnosis and BMI ≥ 30.

Background: Little is known about the natural history of a surgically treated symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. The goals of this study were to describe the rate and factors associated with recurrent lateral meniscal tears and progression to symptomatic lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in patients surgically treated for a symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. Hypothesis: Patients with surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus have a high incidence of meniscal retear and progression to lateral compartment OA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A large geographic database was reviewed to identify and confirm patients presenting with symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus between 1998 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to document treatment and outcomes at a minimum clinical follow-up of 2 years. Results: A total of 59 patients (27 females, 32 males) with a mean age of 25.7 years (range, 4.0-66.0 years) underwent surgical management of a discoid lateral meniscus and were evaluated for a mean of 5.6 years (range, 2.0-23.7 years). Of these, 48 (82%) patients underwent partial lateral meniscectomy, with 24 patients undergoing concurrent saucerization. Eleven (18%) underwent meniscal repair. Tear-free survival following surgery was 41% at 8 years. Progression to symptomatic lateral compartment OA was 50% at 8 years. Young age (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = .01) and open growth plates (hazard ratio, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.15-8.88; P = .03) were associated with increased incidence of postoperative retear. Older age at diagnosis and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 were associated with increased risk of progression to lateral compartment OA on final radiographs. Conclusion: Patients with a surgically treated lateral discoid meniscal tear had a high rate of recurrent meniscal tear (59% at 8 years). Approximately 50% of surgically treated patients developed symptomatic lateral compartment OA at 8 years from diagnosis.

Aims The aims of this study were to characterize antibiotic choices for perioperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) prophylaxis, assess antibiotic allergy testing efficacy, and determine rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on perioperative antibiotic regimen. Patients and Methods We evaluated all patients undergoing primary TKA or THA at a single academic institution between January 2004 and May 2017, yielding 29 695 arthroplasties (22 705 patients), with 3411 arthroplasties in 2576 patients (11.5%) having undergone preoperative allergy testing. A series of institutional databases were combined to identify allergy consultation outcomes, perioperative antibiotic regimen, and infection-free survivorship until final follow-up. Results Among 2576 allergy-tested patients, 2493 patients (97%) were cleared to use cephalosporins. For the entire cohort, 28 174 arthroplasties (94.9%) received cefazolin and 1521 (5.1%) received non-cefazolin antibiotics. Infection-free survivorship was significantly higher among arthroplasties receiving cefazolin compared with non-cefazolin antibiotics, with 0.06% higher survival free of infection at one month, 0.56% at two months, 0.61% at one year, and 1.19% at ten years (p < 0.001). Overall, the risk of PJI was 32% lower in patients treated with cefazolin after adjusting for the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, joint arthroplasty (TKA or THA), and body mass index (BMI; p < 0.001). The number needed to treat with cefazolin to prevent one PJI was 164 patients at one year and 84 patients at ten years. Therefore, potentially 6098 PJIs could be prevented by one year and 11 905 by ten years in a cohort of 1 000 000 primary TKA and THA patients. Conclusion PJI rates are significantly higher when non-cefazolin antibiotics are used for perioperative TKA and THA prophylaxis, highlighting the positive impact of preoperative antibiotic allergy testing to increase cefazolin usage. Given the low rate of true penicillin allergy positivity, and the readily modifiable risk factor that antibiotic choice provides, we recommend perioperative testing and clearance for all patients presenting with penicillin and cephalosporin allergies. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):9–15.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries and reasons for time loss in sports and carries significant implications, including posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA). Instability associated with ACL injury has been linked to the development of secondary meniscal tears (defined as tears that develop after the initial ACL injury). To date, no study has examined secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury and their effect on OA and arthroplasty risk. Purpose: To describe the rates and natural history of secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury and to determine the effect of meniscal tear treatment on the development of OA and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database of >500,000 patients was reviewed to identify patients with primary ACL injuries between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2005. Information was collected with regard to ACL injury treatment, rates/characteristics of the secondary meniscal tears, and outcomes, including development of OA and conversion to TKA. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted multivariate survival analyses were performed to test for the effect of meniscal treatment on survivorship free of OA and TKA. Results: Of 1398 primary ACL injuries, the overall rate of secondary meniscal tears was 16%. Significantly lower rates of secondary meniscal tears were noted among patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction within 6 months (7%) as compared with patients with delayed ACL reconstruction (33%, P < .01) and nonoperative ACL management (19%, P < .01). Of the 235 secondary meniscal tears identified (196 patients), 11.5% underwent repair, 73% partial meniscectomy, and 16% were treated nonoperatively. Tears were most often medial in location (77%) and complex in morphology (56% of medial tears, 54% of lateral tears). At the time of final follow-up, no patient undergoing repair of a secondary meniscal tear (0%) underwent TKA, as opposed to 10.9% undergoing meniscectomy and 6.1% receiving nonoperative treatment ( P = .28). Conclusion: Secondary meniscal tears after ACL injury are most common among patients undergoing delayed surgical or nonoperative treatment of their primary ACL injuries. Secondary tears often present as complex tears of the medial meniscus and result in high rates of partial meniscectomy.

Abstract Focal cartilage defects lead to significant pain and disability, prompting the development of various options for biologic restoration of the articular surface. Although each technique and biologic implant provides various advantages and associated limitations, matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) has gained popularity given promising long‐term results. We present a technique for the facile implantation of MACI membranes using cookie cutter instrumentation to aid in defect debridement and graft preparation. The technique described allows for efficient operative workflow while ensuring the creation of vertical, stable defect edges and a form‐fitting MACI membrane in a readily implemented fashion. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty (revision THA) occurs for a wide variety of indications and in the United States it is coded under Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) 466, 467, and 468, which do not account for revision etiology, a potentially substantial driver of cost. This study investigates revision THA costs and 30-day complications by indication, both locally and nationally. Methods: Hospitalization costs and complication rates for 1,422 aseptic revision THAs performed at a high-volume center between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, charges for 28,133 revision THAs in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were converted to costs using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project cost-to-charge ratios, and 30-day complication rates for 3,224 revision THAs were obtained with use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Costs and complications were compared between revision THAs performed for fracture, wear/loosening, and dislocation/instability with use of simultaneous and pairwise comparisons and a multivariable model accounting for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, age, and sex. Results: Local hospitalization costs for fracture (median, $25,672) were significantly higher than those for wear/loosening ($20,228; p < 0.001) or dislocation/instability ($17,911; p < 0.001), with differences remaining significant even after adjusting for patient comorbidities (p < 0.001). NIS costs for fracture (median, $27,596) were higher than those for other aseptic indications (wear/loosening: $21,176, p < 0.001; dislocation/instability: $16,891, p< 0.001). Local 30-day orthopaedic complication rates for fracture (20.7%) were higher those than for dislocation/instability (9.0%; p = 0.007) and similar to those for wear/loosening (17.6%; p = 0.434). Nationally, combined medical and surgical complication rates for fracture (71.3% of patients with ≥1 complication) were significantly higher than those for wear/loosening (35.2%; p < 0.001) or dislocation/instability (35.1%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hospitalization costs for revision THA for fracture were 33% to 48% higher than for all other aseptic revision THAs, both locally and nationally. This increased cost persisted even after multivariable comorbidity adjustment, the current DRG basis for stratifying revision THA reimbursement. Additionally, 30-day complication rates suggest that increased resource utilization for fracture patients continues even after discharge. Indication-specific coding and reimbursement systems are necessary to maintain sustainable access to revision THA for all patients. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Hip arthroscopy is becoming more advanced and commonly performed. However, significant controversy exists regarding whether high-grade acetabular cartilage lesions should be treated with debridement/abrasion or microfracture. In addition, patients treated with microfracture are subject to extended protected weightbearing rehabilitation to mitigate risk of subchondral plate fracture and to protect fibrocartilage tissue formation. Purpose: To determine the midterm patient-reported outcomes and failure rate of patients with grade 3 and 4 acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) lesions managed with debridement/abrasion or microfracture. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Primary arthroscopic labral repair cases at 2 centers from November 2008 to April 2016 were reviewed for patients aged <55 years with unipolar ALAD grade 3 and 4 chondrolabral acetabular delamination. Patients undergoing microfracture and debridement/abrasion were compared using the visual analog pain scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) to determine predictors of outcomes and failure. Results: A total of 113 hips in 110 patients (66 males, 44 females; mean age, 34.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing debridement/abrasion (n = 82) or microfracture (n = 31) were followed for a mean of 4.9 years (range, 2.0-8.5 years). Lesion size was not statistically different between the debridement/abrasion (1.3 ± 1.0 cm 2 ) and microfracture cohorts (1.4 ± 1.0 cm 2 ) ( P = .47). Patients undergoing debridement/abrasion achieved 3.6-point mean improvements in VAS ( P < .01), 21.2-point improvements in mHHS ( P < .01), and 25.4-point improvements in HOS-SSS ( P < .01), which were not significantly different from those observed in microfracture patients ( P≥ .20). The 5-year rate of survival free of revision surgery was 84.0% in the debridement/abrasion group and 85.6% in the microfracture group ( P = .78). The cartilage treatment technique was found not to be predictive of revision risk during both univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; P = .98) and multivariate (HR, 0.93; P = .90) analysis accounting for patient age, lesion grade, and acetabular coverage. Conclusion: Patients undergoing debridement/abrasion of high-grade unipolar acetabular cartilage lesions demonstrate similar outcome scores and revision rates compared with those of patients undergoing microfracture. These outcomes support the consideration of preferential debridement/abrasion at the discretion of the treating surgeon to optimize recovery while maintaining established positive outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

Background: Participation in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is at an all-time high. This population of athletes experiences a substantial injury burden, with many injuries affecting the upper extremities. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of hand and wrist injuries in college football players from the academic years 2009–2010 to 2013–2014. We hypothesized that variables such as event type (practice vs game), mechanism of injury, and player position would have an effect on the injury incidence. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: An epidemiological study utilizing the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program was performed to investigate rates and patterns of hand and wrist injuries in participating varsity football teams from 2009–2010 to 2013–2014. Results: A total of 725 hand and wrist injuries were captured in 899,225 athlete-exposures. The observed practice injury rate was 0.51 injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures, compared with a game injury rate of 3.60 ( P < .01). Player-on-player contact was the most common injury mechanism reported, with blocking being the most common activity at the time of injury. Offensive linemen were most likely to experience an injury. Of all injuries sustained, 71.4% resulted in no time loss from competition, whereas 9.8% of injuries resulted in longer than 7 days of time loss. A fracture resulted in the greatest time loss from competition (mean ± SD, 8.3 ± 24.0 days; median, 0 days [range, 0-148 days] for injuries sustained in a practice setting) (mean ± SD, 7.7 ± 15.8 days; median, 0 days [range, 0-87 days] for injuries sustained in a game setting). Conclusion: Hand and wrist injuries were found to be significantly more common in games when compared with practices. This study provides valuable prognostic data regarding expected time loss on a per-injury pattern basis. Further investigation on specific injury subtypes and expected time loss as a result of these injures would provide trainers, players, and coaches with useful information on an expected postinjury recovery and rehabilitation timeline.