Citations

e24143 Background: Accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial to guiding drug eligibility, dose-adjusting systemic therapy, and minimizing the risks of both undertreatment and toxicity in patients with cancer. To date, there has been a lack of guidance to standardize approaches to GFR estimation in the cancer population based on the available evidence. We aim to present data on the first systematic review (SR) of GFR estimating equations in patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a SR on behalf of the American Society of Onco-Nephrology (ASON) on the accuracy of equations to estimate GFR in adult patients with cancer, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We required that studies use a reference methodology as comparator involving measured GFR via urinary or plasma clearance of an exogenous filtration marker or carboplatin. Two search strategies focusing on studies using serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (Cys) were developed. Risk of bias and quality assessment was performed for all studies. Results: A total of 39 studies (21,949 patients in total, 19,025 with solid cancers) were included. Studies assessing populations in Europe were most frequent (50%), followed by Asia (27%) and the remaining from Australia/New Zealand and North and South America. Risk of bias and quality assessment allocated 15 studies (38%) as low or very low quality, and 24 (62%) as low-moderate or moderate quality. The most commonly assessed GFR estimating equations included Cockroft-Gault (32 studies), Modification of Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) (24 studies), Chronic Kidney Disese Epidemiology Collaboration Study (CKD-EPI)Cr (22 studies), Wright (13 studies), CKD-EPICys (8 studies), CKD-EPICr-Cys (8 studies), and Jeliffe (8 studies). Given the importance of accurate and timely eGFR assessment and the evidence supporting the performance (i.e., accuracy) of the CKD-EPI incorporating both Cr and Cys, we suggest the use of this equation in patients with cancer (grade 2C). Where Cys is unavailable, CKD-EPICr is the next preferred equation given the supporting data for its performance and widespread availability. Since included studies were moderate quality or lower, the ASON rated the certainty of evidence as low. Also, additional data on clinical outcomes related to the selection of eGFR equations is needed. We suggest measurement of GFR via an exogenous filtration marker in patients with cancer for whom eGFR results in borderline eligibility for therapies or clinical trials (ungraded). Conclusions: Based on the results of this SR, we suggest use of contemporary methods for estimation of GFR (CKD-EPICr-Cys and CKD-EPICr-Cr) and avoidance of older and less accurate formulae such as Cockcroft-Gault.

Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is characterized by clonal cell deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin causing renal manifestations without overt malignancy. MIDD is a subtype of MGRS characterized by deposition of monoclonal light (LCDD), heavy chains (HCDD), or both (LHCDD) along the renal glomerular and tubular basement membranes. Virtually all organs can be involved, and if left untreated, MIDD can progress to MM and end stage renal disease. Although these patients classically did not receive treatment, current MIDD management is primarily focused on controlling the underlying clonal plasma cell disorder. Case description: We present a 56-year-old male with atypical MIDD treated successfully with plasma cell directed therapy consisting of daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DARA-CYBOR-D). Despite a primary diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease, renal biopsy suggested myeloma-related MIDD based on linear immunofluorescent staining for IgG and kappa light chains along the tubular and glomerular basement membranes. Notably there were no electron dense deposits in the mesangium or tubular basement membranes typical to MIDD electron microscopy. Despite the presentation of MIDD on IF only, DARA-CYBOR-D treatment led to hematologic and renal improvement and remission from MIDD, with a GFR increase from 22 to 59 mL/min/BSA and a drop in urine protein from up to 9 to 0.6 g/dL. Conclusions: In conclusion, our case illustrates the efficacy of the DARA-CYBOR-D regimen in a patient with IF-only MIDD. We highlight the importance of obtaining a kidney biopsy when there are other potential causes for real decline and enhance our understanding of pathological and clinical spectrum of MIDD.

Abstract Clozapine is primarily metabolized via cytochrome P450(CYP)1A2 and to a lesser extent CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. Metabolic inhibitors of clozapine, such as fluvoxamine and ciprofloxacin, are important to recognize to avoid adverse drug events. Estrogen-containing oral contraceptives (eOCPs) are weaker CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 inhibitors but are associated with a 2-fold increase of clozapine concentrations. The potential for phenoconversion due to a CYP genetic polymorphism can add additional complexities when considering drug interactions. A case report is presented of a suspected interaction between newly initiated clozapine and a prescribed eOCP for which the patient’s pharmacogenomic status was known. A 17-year-old, nonsmoking, White female with a history of schizophrenia was initiated on clozapine 12.5 mg at bedtime with a plan to increase by 25 mg every 4 days in the outpatient setting. The patient was a known rapid CYP1A2 metabolizer without identified sources of CYP1A2 induction and a CYP2C19 rapid metabolizer. Based on pharmacogenomic testing, there was no suspicion for significant gene-drug interactions. Yet, as the patient was prescribed an eOCP, a clozapine concentration was obtained after reaching 150 mg at bedtime. This steady-state clozapine concentration was found to be 560 ng/mL, correlating with worsening sedation and constipation. Given ongoing side effects, clozapine was lowered to 100 mg at bedtime; however, ongoing intolerance ultimately led to clozapine discontinuation. This case highlights the potential interaction between clozapine and eOCP in a CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 rapid metabolizer, leading to clozapine intolerance and discontinuation. The concomitant use of clozapine and eOCPs should be undertaken judiciously.

Introduction Clozapine is the only antipsychotic approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but without appropriate monitoring, it can be associated with potentially fatal outcomes. An International Adult Clozapine Titration Guideline categorizes patients into normal or slow metabolizers. Categorization provides clozapine titration schedules and recommends regular c-reactive protein (CRP) and clozapine concentration monitoring to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The impact of the guideline on clozapine ADRs has not been evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review assessed clozapine titrations, laboratory monitoring, ADRs, and discontinuations for clozapine-naive adult inpatients at a single center from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2022. Each patient’s cumulative weekly clozapine dosage was compared with their guideline recommended dosage to create a percent accordance. Linear logistic regression evaluated the relationship between titration speed and the presence of an ADR, while descriptive statistics analyzed laboratory monitoring. Results Forty-three patients were included, with the majority being White males with schizophrenia. An inverse relationship existed between the last inpatient week clozapine dose percent accordance and the probability of an ADR. Nonobese patients were less likely than obese patients to experience an ADR (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.99). CRP and clozapine concentration monitoring was suboptimal. Discussion Based on our small retrospective review of primarily White males, more aggressive clozapine titrations did not increase ADRs. Future studies with more diverse samples are needed and should focus on specific ADRs, which may have increased occurrence with rapid titrations. Obese patients were at higher risk of ADRs, correlating with the guideline-recommended slower titrations for these patients.

Abstract Background and Aims Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) has a poor renal prognosis and a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation, up to 90%, typically within the first-year post-transplant. Nearly 50% of patients lose their renal allograft within 3 years of recurrence. It has been suggested that pretreatment therapy (with B cell depleting or plasma-cell directed therapy) can help prevent recurrence or modulate the course of disease post-transplant. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of pretreatment therapy given within 6 months prior to kidney transplant on outcomes including PGNMID recurrence and all cause graft loss. Method Between 1996 and 2022, a total of 28 patients with biopsy-proven PGNMID as the cause of end stage kidney disease received a total of 31 kidney transplants. All patients had at least one year of follow-up data, for all but one patient this included surveillance kidney transplant biopsies completed at our center. Recurrence was defined histologically by immunofluorescence finding of monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, independent of other histological or clinical parameters. The incidence of recurrence and all cause graft loss were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots. Results Median age of patients at transplant was 57 years, 87% were white, 65% were male, 74% received living donor transplant, 59% received thymoglobulin induction, 81% received maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Median follow up time was 80 months. A total of 9 patients received pretreatment within 6 months of transplant, 8 received Rituximab and one received Daratumumab. The pretreatment group was generally younger at transplant (53 years vs 57 years) and had a shorter median follow up time (65 months vs 96.5 months), but neither were statistically significant. Overall recurrence rate was 78% for pretreatment and 91% for control, though difference in time to recurrence was not statistically significant (Fig. 1). The difference in all cause graft loss between groups was not statistically significant, however, none in the pretreatment group had graft loss by 60 months (Fig. 2). One patient who received daratumumab had no recurrence by 1 year post-transplant. Conclusion In kidney transplant recipients with PGNMID, pretreatment (primarily with rituximab) may be modulating the post-transplant course of disease. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this effect and if plasma-cell directed vs B-cell directed therapy may be superior.