Citations

Abstract Background: As the development and use of oral anticancer agents increases, it is critical to understand patient adherence to both standard and investigational agents. The open label, phase 3 multicenter PALLAS trial investigates whether adding 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone in patients (pts) with HR- positive, HR2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer. Pts were randomly assigned to either Palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, in a 28-day cycle) plus ongoing provider/patient-choice adjuvant ET (P+ET) versus ET alone. We examined patient-reported adherence to ET +/- P during the first two years of study treatment. Methods: Adherence outcomes were measured in English-speaking pts in the U.S., UK, Ireland and Australia, Spanish-speaking pts in Spain and Mexico, and German-speaking pts in Germany and Austria. Adherence measures included drug diaries completed at each cycle, pill counts (for P only) collected at each study visit, and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 item and the McHorney Adherence Estimator questionnaires completed at cycles 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 (22 months). Mean adherence for each cycle was defined as the average proportion of prescribed pills taken (via drug diary) across all patients who initiated that cycle. Persistence was defined as the duration of drug initiation to treatment cessation (via drug diary). Generalized estimating equations were used to model the “most adherent” pts on the Morisky (score = 5 vs score <5) and “low risk” for adherence problems on the McHorney (score=0 vs score >0) to compare the average difference between arms over time for ET, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables. Results: 81% (N=4688) of PALLAS pts were included in this analysis. Median persistence to ET was 23.6 months in P + ET (n=2169), 23.7 months in ET alone (2136) and 20.4 months for P (n=2194). The number of pts who initiated each cycle for ET declined over time and was similar between arms; the decline was more marked for P (Table 1). Mean adherence range as measured by drug diary was 98.2-99.3% for ET in P+ET and 98.0 - 99.4% in ET alone; and for P, ranged from 93.4 - 98.8%. The adherence and persistence results were nearly identical whether measured by drug diary or pill count for P. The observed percent “most adherent” for P measured by the Morisky scale ranged from 71.9% - 79.6% and the percent “low risk” for adherence problems measured by the McHorney scale, 64.0% - 73.4%. The percent of pts “most adherent” and “low risk” for adherence problems to ET was higher, on average over time, in the P+ET group compared to ET alone (75% vs 68%, p<0.01; 75% vs 72%, p=.05, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported mean adherence for both P + ET and ET alone was strikingly high for pts who remained on therapy; persistence was also high with ET during the 2-year treatment period. Current analyses suggest that nonadherence to either P or ET was likely not a major contributor to the iDFS results seen in the overall PALLAS trial. These results illustrate the importance of measuring and monitoring patient adherence to oral study agents. Support: AFT, Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02513394) and EudraCT (2014-005181-30). https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Adherence and persistence in PALLAS over the 24 month treatment periodPalbocicilb + ETETPalbociclibETETTreatment cycleMean Adherence (SD)N*Mean Adherence (SD)NMean Adherence (SD)N193.4 (13.8)229098.7 (6.1)230999.0 (5.2)2343294.7 (13.3)218198.8 (6.4)220398.4 (7.1)2206397.4 (10.1)211298.7 (7.3)214298.8 (6.3)2168497.6 (10.2)203598.6 (7.8)211099.0 (5.7)2154597.6 (11.1)197598.3 (7.9)209398.1 (8.3)2148698.1 (8.7)189998.7 (6.6)203798.5 (8.2)2116798.1 (9.3)185599.0 (6.3)201298.6 (7.3)2102898.0 (9.1)181098.2 (8.2)199798.1 (8.2)2092998.4 (7.4)173399.0 (6.4)196298.8 (6.8)20511098.3 (8.6)171499.2 (4.9)194699.0 (5.5)20381198.3 (8.0)169198.5 (7.3)193798.2 (8.2)20311298.7 (6.2)161299.1 (5.3)191098.7 (7.5)19861398.5 (7.7)159698.9 (6.4)189398.8 (7.1)19691497.9 (9.3)157698.4 (7.3)188298.0 (9.1)19611598.5 (6.9)151499.2 (4.6)185499.0 (6.0)19281698.2 (8.7)148699.1 (4.6)183599.1 (5.7)19131798.1 (9.8)147998.3 (7.8)182698.5 (6.4)19031898.7 (6.8)141699.3 (4.1)176899.2 (5.3)18601998.7 (7.3)140899.3 (3.8)175699.4 (3.1)18482098.4 (8.9)139798.9 (5.3)174298.7 (5.8)18382198.5 (7.5)130199.0 (6.1)167698.8 (7.1)17842297.8 (9.7)124698.8 (6.2)164799.2 (5.7)17692398.1 (8.8)118098.2 (8.5)161998.4 (8.0)17552498.8 (7.2)108699.0 (6.3)146898.9 (7.1)16192598.8 (6.7)99699.2 (5.2)143298.8 (7.1)15892697.9 (11.2)84599.1 (5.7)140998.6 (8.8)1578ET=Endocrine therapy * Number of pts who initiated the treatment cycle. Citation Format: Eileen Shinn, David Zahrieh, Angela DeMichele, Nick Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Michelle Naughton, Georg Pfeiler, Karen Gelmon, Ingrid Mayer, Daniel Egle, Gabriele Zoppoli, Tiffany Traina, Miguel Martin Jiménez, Silvia Antolin Novoa, Tufia Haddad, Arlene Chan, Alistair Edward Ring, Antonio Wolff, Jose JuanPonce Lorenzo, Dhanusha Sabanathan, Hal Burstein, Zbigniew Ireneusz Nowecki, Gunda Pristauz-Telsnigg, Adam Brufsky, Meritxell Bellet-Ezquerra, Theodoros Foukakis, Yelena Novik, Gabor Rubovszky, Karoline Muehlbacher, Otto Metzger, Theodora Goulioti, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Dominik Hlauschek, Christian Fesl, Erica Mayer, Michael Gnant. Adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without Palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-01.

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) accounts for ~60-70% of all BC cases. CDK4/6i combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for first- and second-line therapy of patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on substantial improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to ET alone. Unfortunately, most patients (pts) develop resistance to CDK4/6i. The mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i resistance have not been fully elucidated. Robust in vivo CDK4/6i resistant animal models from pts with de novo and acquired CDK 4/6i resistance are lacking. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are important preclinical tools in oncology to advance our understanding of cancer biology and to evaluate drug response phenotypes. Unfortunately, the establishment of sustainable PDXs from pts with HR+ BC is much more difficult than from HR-negative BC. In order to obtain clinically relevant models that can be utilized to better understand mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ET and CDK4/6i, we report the development of PDXs from a prospective study in which percutaneous biopsies were obtained from women receiving palbociclib for the treatment of HR+ advanced or MBC (PROMISE; NCT03281902). Methods: PROMISE (Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Tumor Sequencing in Women Receiving Palbociclib for Advanced Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive Breast Cancer) is a prospective trial which enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC who planned to start treatment with palbociclib and letrozole (1st line [FL]) or palbociclib and fulvestrant (2nd line [SL]). For pts enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), serial tumor biopsies were obtained prior to the start of treatment and at disease progression to establish PDXs. Because baseline take rate was low, we amended the protocol to attempt PDX generation after the 2nd cycle (C2) of therapy. Tissues were received within an hour of excision and were orthotopically implanted in the mammary fat pad of 6~8-week-old nonobese diabetic (NOD)/SCID/IL-2g-receptor null (NSG) mice. Tumor growth was defined as tumor volume ≥ 50 mm3. Tumor take rate was defined as percent of patients with development of at least one stably transplantable (passed at least for two generations) xenograft that was pathologically confirmed as BC. Results: Of the 50 pts enrolled at MCR, 37 were FL pts (2 ineligible) and 13 were SL pts (1 ineligible). Fresh tumor samples obtained pre-treatment from 43 eligible pts (32 FL), after C2 from 17 eligible pts (13 FL), and at disease progression from 10 eligible pts (5 FL) were implanted. Tumor growth was seen in at least one mouse from a pre-treatment specimen in 1 (3.1%) FL pt (confirmed BC) and 4 (36.4%) SL pts (2 confirmed BC); from end of C2 specimens in 2 (15.4%) FL pts and 2 (50%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC); and at progression in 1 (20%) FL pt and 2 (40%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC). The take rate from pre-treatment samples among FL pts was 1/32 (3.1%; 95% CI: 0.08-16.2%). Take rates in other groups are pending histological review. Discussion: In pts receiving palbociclib for HR+ MBC, the take rate using a pre-treatment percutaneous biopsy was low (3.1%) in the FL setting. However, higher growth rates were seen in the SL setting. The observation of higher growth rates at the end of C2 and at progression may relate to the activation of G1/S that occurs with withdrawal of palbociclib, and should be further studied. PDX remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of tumor biology and the development of new therapeutics, especially for those models established from pts with palbociclib and ET resistance. Proteogenomic and sequencing studies are ongoing to fully characterize these PDXs. Citation Format: Jia Yu, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Jason P. Sinnwell, Ann M. Moyer, Bo Qin, Yayun Gu, Huan Zhang, Jodi M. Carter, Krishna R. Kalari, Brendan P. McMenomy, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Fergus J. Couch, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard Weinshilboum, Ciara O'Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) before and after cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) treatment: Initial findings from the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-07.

Abstract Background: Cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but endocrine resistance is a major challenge. PROMISE [NCT0281902; n=63] is a multicenter study that enrolled women with HR+ HER2- MBC commencing palbociclib (Pb) with letrozole (1st line [1L]) or fulvestrant (2nd line [2L]), and was designed to perform a comprehensive “omic” assessment of prospectively collected biospecimens (pre-treatment (M1), at 2 months (M2), and at disease progression). The goal is to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with resistance to CDK4/6i and ET and PFS outcomes. Here we report the association between the proteomic, metabolomics, and lipidomics data generated from pre-Pb and 2-month serum samples and PFS. Methods: Untargeted mass spectrometry data was generated from Metabolon, assaying 1308 metabolites and 831 lipids. Additionally, 1436 proteins were assayed on the Olink platform. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the univariate hazard ratio (HR) for all features with respect to PFS. The analyses were performed on samples from 45 patients (N=33 1Lwith 9 progression events and 12 2L with 8 progression events), obtained from M1 and M2 timepoints on Pb + ET. Enrichment analysis p-values are calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Proteomics: In the M1 timepoint, 93 and 43 proteins were associated with PFS in the 1L and 2L settings, respectively; inflammation genes were enriched among the 1L setting (p= 0.034); 33 proteins presented HRs ranging between 0.026 and 0.56. The FABP9 protein (HR of 1.98, 95% CI 1.02-3.83) was associated with worse PFS. Conversely, inflammation genes were not observed to be enriched in 2L. In the M2 timepoint, we observed 60 and 21 proteins significantly associated with PFS, but no biological function was enriched in 1L and 2L. Metabolites: In the M1 timepoint, metabolism of the sulfur-containing amino acids (methionine, cysteine, SAM and taurine) were enriched in the 1L setting (p= 0.035, HR range 0.15-0.33); and the branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine) were significantly associated with PFS in the 2L setting (p= 0.028, HR range 0.013-0.33). At the M2 timepoint, the amino acids were no longer enriched, but fatty acid metabolism was significantly enriched for both 1L and 2L (p= 0.048 and 0.067, respectively). Pathways involving lipids, amino acids, and xenobiotics were enriched in metabolites related to PFS (p <0.05) for both treatment lines at M1 and M2. Lipidomics: In the M1 timepoint, 10 and 19 lipids were associated with PFS for 1L and 2L, respectively. The most notable lipid associated with worse PFS in the 1L was an 18 carbon phosphatidylinositol, PI(18:1/18:2), (HR 7.34 (CI 1.27-42.50); 8 triglycerides were associated with improved PFS (HR range 0.39 and 0.55). In 2L, the 19 lipids associated with PFS included 12 phosphatidylcholines (enrichment p = 5.6X10-8). In the M2 timepoint, 15 and 8 lipids were significantly associated with PFS for 1L and 2L. An enrichment of phosphatidylinositols was observed in 1L (p= 1.2X10-5); none were observed in the 2L.Future Directions: Networks are being constructed using the proximity scores of the proteins, lipids, and metabolites associated with PFS in M1 and M2 for 1L and 2L. Network similarities and analyses will be conducted.Conclusion: Distinct multi-omic changes identified in serum samples obtained from PROMISE participants M1 and M2 on Pb correlate with disease progression in both 1L and 2L settings. Additionally, validation studies will determine the significance of these findings. Citation Format: Krishna R. Kalari, Kevin J. Thompson, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Seul Kee Byeon, Akhilesh Pandey, Abe Eyman Casey, Peter T. Vedell, Ann M. Moyer, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Saranya Chumsri, Prema Peethambaram, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Ciara C. O’ Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz. Multiomics data reveal novel biomarkers for CDK4/6 resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-03.

Abstract Background: Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) can improve outcomes in ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. The choice of CDK 4/6i selection and dose depends on clinical context and/or potential side effect of profile of each unique CDK 4/6i. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in patients initiated on CDK 4/6i and assess adherence to recommended laboratory monitoring in breast cancer patients in both an institutional and national dataset. Methods: The institutional cohort (IC) involved a retrospective chart review of patients newly initiated on palbociclib between May 8, 2018 - June 4, 2019 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The national cohort (NC) reviewed medical and pharmacy claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) and included patients who were initiated on palbociclib (P), ribociclib (R) or abemaciclib (A) between February 6, 2015 - September 30, 2019. NC patients were required to have a minimum of 6 months baseline coverage, 6 months coverage after first prescription and Day 1 labs drawn. For both cohorts, patients were ≥18 years old with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Data was collected for up to 6 cycles of treatment and included cycle start dates, doses, dates of lab draws and dose changes. Laboratory adherence was defined as a complete blood count being drawn +/- 3 days of the defined timepoint for the IC and +/- 5 days for the NC with a l4-day window for Cycle 1, Day 1 labs. Results: The IC included 81 patients and the NC 2600. In the NC, the most prescribed CDK 4/6i was P (90%), followed by A (6%) and R (4%). Prescription breakdown by geographic region was Midwest (26%), Northeast (14%), South (47%), West (13%). Ethnic breakdown of the group was White (68%), Black (15%), Hispanic (8%), Asian (3%) and unknown (6%). P practice pattern data were available for both the IC and NC, but R and A data in the NC only. In the IC, the initial P dose was 125 mg (95%), 100 mg (1%) and 75 mg (4%). In the NC, P (n=2329) dose was 125 mg (81%), 100 mg (15%) and 75 mg (4%). Dose reductions were common with 25% and 28% of patients requiring one dose reduction and 16% and 9% of patients requiring two dose reductions in the IC and NC, respectively. In NC patients initially treated with P, 5% were subsequently treated with A and 2% with R. In the NC, A (n=163) was initiated at 200 mg (7%), 150 mg (79%), 100 mg (10%) and 50 mg (4%). One dose reduction was required in 25% of patients and 6% required two dose reductions. Of those initially treated with A, 16% were subsequently treated with P and 1% with R. In the NC, R (n=108) was initiated at 600 mg (81%), 400 mg (8%) and 200 mg (11%). One dose reduction was required in 17% of patients and 2% required two dose reductions. Of those initially treated with R, 7% each were subsequently treated with P and 10% with A. Laboratory adherence was assessed for P only. For the IC, a total of 81 patients were included (mean age 61±13 years, 98% female and 95% White). The NC included 2329 patients (mean age 66±12 years, 99% female and 69% White). Laboratory adherence is listed in the table below: Conclusions: P was the most commonly prescribed CDK 4/6i. Dose reductions were less common with R. Adherence to laboratory monitoring was higher in our institutional cohort than in a national administrative claims database. Initiatives to ensure that labs are drawn at recommended timepoints during P therapy will be important for safety. ICNCC1D193%100%C1D1589%61%C2D191%71%C2D1558%55%C3D199%62%C4D190%55%C5D184%53%C6D178%50%C = cycle, D = day. Citation Format: Jodi Taraba, Kavya Swarna, Allison Golbach, Lindsey Sangaralingham, Kathryn Ruddy, Kristin Mara, Matthew Smith, Tufia Haddad, Karthik Giridhar. Evaluation of CDK 4/6 inhibitor practice patterns and institutional versus national adherence to palbociclib laboratory monitoring in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-23-05.

Abstract Background: FGFR dysregulation is observed in multiple cancers and targeting FGFR is an emerging therapeutic strategy with FDA approved treatments in bladder and cholangiocarcinoma. Here we examined the prevalence of FGFR mutations, fusions, and high-level amplifications in breast cancer, stratified by receptor subtype and local/metastatic status, in both Foundation Medicine (FM) and institutional Mayo Clinic (MC) cohorts. Methods: For the FM cohort, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) examining at least 324 genes for all classes of alterations, including FGFR1-4 was carried out for 32,048 breast cancers during the course of routine clinical care in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified lab (Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on up to 1.1 Mb, microsatellite instability high (MSI-High) was determined on up to 114 loci and predicted ancestry from >10,000 SNPs. Estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status were available for a subset of FM samples. Additionally, 131 patients with metastatic breast cancer from a subset of patients at three Mayo Clinic sites (MC cohort) with clinical characteristics and cancer-panel DNA sequencing data from a CLIA-certified lab (Tempus, Chicago, IL) were included. Results: In the FM cohort, the prevalence of FGFR1-4 high-level amplification (CN≥10) was 10.1%, while mutations (1.5%) and fusions (0.72%) were rare. Most amplifications occurred in FGFR1 (9.2%); most fusions and mutations occurred in FGFR2 (0.46%, 0.77%). FGFR alteration prevalence was highest in ER+/HER2- subtype (14.4%) and lowest in HER2+ disease (7.7%). FGFR alterations were more common in IDC (11.7%) than ILC (7.7%), p<3E-08. FGFR alterations were more prevalent in the metastatic setting relative to breast-biopsied disease (13.6% v 10.1%; OR = 1.4; p=2E-17), especially in the HER2+ (OR =1.9, p=0.004) and ER-/HER2- (OR = 1.9, p = 0.05) disease; no enrichment was seen in the ER+/HER2- metastases (OR =1.0, p = 1). FGFR amplifications were observed at a higher prevalence in patients with predicted East Asian ancestry, relative to patients with European ancestry (12.1% v 10.0%; p = 0.03). Overall, the most common activating mutations in FGFR were FGFR2 N549K (n=85), FGFR1 N546K (n=78), FGFR4 V510M (n=28), FGFR2 K659E (n=28), FGFR4 V510L (n=20), and FGFR2 Y375C (n=15). The most common recurrent fusions were FGFR3:TACC3 (n=36), FGFR2:TACC2 (n=17), FGFR1:TACC1 (n=9), FGFR1:BAG4 (n=6), and FGFR2:ATE1 (n=5). In patients with FGFR amplifications, the most frequently co-occurring alterations were ZNF703 (78.4%), TP53 (51.5%), CCND1 (36.1%), FGF3/4/19 (32.9 - 34.4%), PIK3CA (30.7%), MYC (29.6%), ESR1 (17.2%), EMSY (16.3%), and PTEN (10.6%). Significant co-occurrence was observed for a number of genes including FGF3/4/19, CDK4, and CDK8 (all OR>2, p<1E-07); mutual exclusivity was observed with PIK3R1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 (all OR <0.5, p<4E-13), among other genes. In the 131 metastatic tumors from MC, the prevalence of FGFR1-4 high-level amplifications was 19.8% [FGFR1 (12.4%), FGFR2 (7.4%), and FGFR3 (0.8%)]. The prevalence of high-level FGFR amplifications did not differ by clinical subtypes: HR-/HER2- (7/31), HR+/HER2- (15/79), and HER2+ (2/11), p=0.68. Conclusions: High-level FGFR amplifications are observed in >11% of breast cancers, especially the ER+/HER2- subtype, while mutations/fusions are rare. These data support the ongoing studies evaluating targeted therapies for FGFR amplified ER + breast cancer. Correlations with clinical information (MC cohort) and associations with actionable alterations are ongoing and may inform potential combination strategies. Citation Format: Karthik V Giridhar, Ethan S Sokol, Peter T Vedell, Jason P Sinnwell, Aakash Desai, Tufia C Haddad, Ciara C O’Sullivan, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Siddhartha Yadav, Kostandinos Sideras, Brenda Ernst, Minetta C Liu, Abe Eyman Casey, Xiaojia Tang, Zoe Fleischmann, Karthikeyan Murugesan, Krishna R Kalari, Matthew P Goetz. The frequency and somatic mutation landscape of Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-02.

Abstract Background: More than two thirds of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) have estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors. In most countries, current standard-of-care first-line treatments include an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant, a selective ER degrader, combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Concurrent use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists is recommended for men and premenopausal women with ABC. Nevertheless, almost all ABCs eventually become resistant to endocrine therapy and the disease is incurable in these cases. New therapies are needed to combat endocrine therapy resistance, maintain patient health-related quality-of-life, and delay the need for chemotherapy. AZD9833 (camizestrant) is a highly potent, next-generation selective ER degrader and pure ER antagonist that has demonstrated anticancer properties across a range of preclinical models, including those with ER-activating mutations (Scott et al, AACR 2020). A Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study (SERENA-1) has demonstrated that AZD9833 is well tolerated and has a promising antitumor activity when administered alone or in combination with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (Baird et al, SABCS 2020). SERENA-4 (NCT04711252) is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib for patients with ER+/HER2− ABC who have not received systemic treatment in the advanced disease setting. Methods: SERENA-4 will enroll 1342 patients with de novo or recurrent ER+/HER2− ABC who have not previously received systemic treatment for their locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients with recurrent disease must have received adjuvant aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen therapy for at least 24 months without relapse. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive oral treatment with either (a) AZD9833 75 mg once daily, palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment and a placebo for anastrozole 1 mg once daily or (b) anastrozole 1 mg once daily, palbociclib (same as active arm) and a placebo for AZD9833 75 mg once daily. Men and premenopausal women will also receive a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS; up to 5 years). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (up to 8 years), second PFS, time to chemotherapy, objective response rate, and changes in health-related quality-of-life measures. Enrollment began in January 2021. As of 02 July 2021, the number of open sites is 57 across 15 countries. Acknowledgments: We thank Julia Mawer, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK, for providing medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca Funding: The SERENA-4 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca. © 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Citation Format: Fabrice André, Seock-Ah Im, Patrick Neven, Richard D Baird, Johannes Ettl, Matthew P Goetz, Erika Hamilton, Hiroji Iwata, Zefei Jiang, Anil Abraham Joy, Vincent Haddad, Andrew Walding, Manuel Selvi Miralles, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Antonio Llombart-Cussac. SERENA-4: A Phase III comparison of AZD9833 (camizestrant) plus palbociclib, versus anastrozole plus palbociclib, for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-06.

Abstract Concomitant treatment with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella may improve outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock compared with VA-ECMO alone. Here, we explain a new method to introduce Impella and ECMO through the same arterial access site and jugular venous cannulation to accomplish a mobile patient concept.

PURPOSE The PALLAS study investigated whether the addition of palbociclib, an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in early hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) breast cancer. In this analysis, we evaluated palbociclib exposure and discontinuation in PALLAS. METHODS Patients with stage II-III HR+, HER2– disease were randomly assigned to 2 years of palbociclib with adjuvant ET versus ET alone. The primary objective was to compare iDFS between arms. Continuous monitoring of toxicity, dose modifications, and early discontinuation was performed. Association of baseline covariates with time to palbociclib reduction and discontinuation was analyzed with multivariable competing risk models. Landmark and inverse probability weighted per-protocol analyses were performed to assess the impact of drug persistence and exposure on iDFS. RESULTS Of the 5,743 patient analysis population (2,840 initiating palbociclib), 1,199 (42.2%) stopped palbociclib before 2 years, the majority (772, 27.2%) for adverse effects, most commonly neutropenia and fatigue. Discontinuation of ET did not differ between arms. Discontinuations for non–protocol-defined reasons were greater in the first 3 months of palbociclib, and in the first calendar year of accrual, and declined over time. No significant relationship was seen between longer palbociclib duration or ≥ 70% exposure intensity and improved iDFS. In the weighted per-protocol analysis, no improvement in iDFS was observed in patients receiving palbociclib versus not (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11). CONCLUSION Despite observed rates of discontinuation in PALLAS, analyses suggest that the lack of significant iDFS difference between arms was not directly related to inadequate palbociclib exposure. However, the discontinuation rate illustrates the challenge of introducing novel adjuvant treatments, and the need for interventions to improve persistence with oral cancer therapies.