Citations

Abstract Background: Newer generation ultrathin strut stents are associated with less incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the short term. However, its long-term effect on different cardiovascular outcomes remains unknown. Objectives: We aim to identify the effects of newer-generation ultrathin-strut stents vs. standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents (DES) on long term outcomes of revascularization in coronary artery disease. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and registries that compare newer-generation ultrathin-strut (<70 mm) with thicker-strut (>70 mm) DES to evaluate cardioprotective effects over a period of up to 5 years. Primary outcome was TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcomes included the components of TLF, stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause death were pooled as the standardized mean difference between the two groups from baseline to endpoint. Results: We included 19 RCTs and two prospective registries (96756 patients) in this analysis. The overall effect on the primary outcome was in favor of second-generation ultrathin struts stents in terms of TLF at ≥ one year, ≥ two years, and ≥ three years (P value= 0.01, 95% CI [0.75, 0.96]), P value=0.003, 95% CI [0.77, 0.95]), P value= 0.007, 95% CI [0.76, 0.96]), respectively. However, there was no reported benefit in terms of TLF when we compared the two groups at ≥ five years (P value= 0.21), 95% CI [0.85, 1.04]). Some of the reported components of the primary and secondary outcomes, such as TLR, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and TVMI, showed the same pattern as the TLF outcome. Conclusion: Ultrathin-strut DES showed a beneficial effect over thicker strut stents for up to three years. However, at the 5-year follow-up, the ultrathin strut did not differ in terms of TLF, TLR, TVR, and TVMI compared with standard-thickness DES, with similar risks of patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), MI, ST, cardiac death, and all-cause mortality.

Abstract Background The role of serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has evolved during the pandemic as seroprevalence in global populations has increased. The Infectious Diseases Society of America convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) serology literature and construct updated best practice guidance related to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing. This guideline is an update to the fourth in a series of rapid, frequently updated COVID-19 guidelines developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Objective To develop evidence-based recommendations and identify unmet research needs pertaining to the use of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for diagnosis, decisions related to vaccination and administration of monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma in immunocompromised patients, and identification of a serologic correlate of immunity. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature reviewed, identified, and prioritized clinical questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. Results The panel recommends against serologic testing to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 2 weeks after symptom onset (strong recommendations, low certainty of evidence). Serologic testing should not be used to provide evidence of COVID-19 in symptomatic patients with a high clinical suspicion and repeatedly negative nucleic acid amplification test results (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). Serologic testing may assist with the diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (strong recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). To seek evidence for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the panel suggests testing for immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG/IgM, or total antibodies to nucleocapsid protein 3 to 5 weeks after symptom onset (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). In individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, the panel suggests against routine serologic testing given no demonstrated benefit to improving patient outcomes (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence). The panel acknowledges further that a negative spike antibody test may be a useful metric to identify immunocompromised patients who are candidates for immune therapy. Conclusions The high seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 worldwide limits the utility of detecting anti-SARS CoV-2 antibody. The certainty of available evidence supporting the use of serology for diagnosis was graded as very low to low. Future studies should use serologic assays calibrated to a common reference standard.

Abstract Aims Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cardiac amyloidosis has poor outcomes, and its assessment in all TAVR patients is costly and challenging. Electrocardiogram (ECG) artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that screen for CA may be useful to identify at-risk patients. Methods and results In this retrospective analysis of our institutional National Cardiovascular Disease Registry (NCDR)-TAVR database, patients undergoing TAVR between January 2012 and December 2018 were included. Pre-TAVR CA probability was analysed by an ECG AI predictive model, with &gt;50% risk defined as high probability for CA. Univariable and propensity score covariate adjustment analyses using Cox regression were performed to compare clinical outcomes between patients with high CA probability vs. those with low probability at 1-year follow-up after TAVR. Of 1426 patients who underwent TAVR (mean age 81.0 ± 8.5 years, 57.6% male), 349 (24.4%) had high CA probability on pre-procedure ECG. Only 17 (1.2%) had a clinical diagnosis of CA. After multivariable adjustment, high probability of CA by ECG AI algorithm was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.96, P = 0.046] and higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalizations] (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01–1.82, P = 0.041), driven primarily by heart failure hospitalizations (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.13–2.20, P = 0.008) at 1-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in TIA/stroke or myocardial infarction. Conclusion Artificial intelligence applied to pre-TAVR ECGs identifies a subgroup at higher risk of clinical events. These targeted patients may benefit from further diagnostic evaluation for CA.

OBJECTIVE Recent studies have suggested that biologically effective dose (BED) is an important correlate of pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The goal of this study was to determine if BED is superior to prescription dose in predicting outcomes in TN patients undergoing GKRS as a first procedure. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 871 patients with type 1 TN from 13 GKRS centers. Patient demographics, pain characteristics, treatment parameters, and outcomes were reviewed. BED was compared with prescription dose and other dosimetric factors for their predictive value. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 60% were female. Nearly 70% of patients experienced pain in the V2 and/or V3 dermatomes, predominantly on the right side (60%). Most patients had modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grade IV or V pain (89.2%) and were taking 1 or 2 pain medications (74.1%). The median prescription dose was 80 Gy (range 62.5–95 Gy). The proximal trigeminal nerve was targeted in 77.9% of cases, and the median follow-up was 21 months (range 6–156 months). Initial pain relief (modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grades I–IIIa) was noted in 81.8% of evaluable patients at a median of 30 days. Of 709 patients who achieved initial pain relief, 42.3% experienced at least one pain recurrence after GKRS at a median of 44 months, with 49.0% of these patients undergoing a second procedure. New-onset facial numbness occurred in 25.3% of patients after a median of 8 months. Age ≥ 63 years was associated with a higher probability of both initial pain relief and maintaining pain relief. A distal target location was associated with a higher probability of initial and long-term pain relief, but also a higher incidence of sensory dysfunction. BED ≥ 2100 Gy2.47 was predictive of pain relief at 30 days and 1 year for the distal target, whereas physical dose ≥ 85 Gy was significant for the proximal target, but the restricted range of BED values in this subgroup could be a confounding factor. A maximum brainstem point dose ≥ 29.5 Gy was associated with a higher probability of bothersome facial numbness. CONCLUSIONS BED and physical dose were both predictive of pain relief and could be used as treatment planning goals for distal and proximal targets, respectively, while considering maximum brainstem point dose < 29.5 Gy as a potential constraint for bothersome numbness.

Abstract Introduction Microdenervation of the spermatic cord (MSCD) is an effective treatment modality for men with intractable scrotal content pain. For patients not interested in preserving fertility, some centers advocate ligation of the vas during denervation while others perfer stripping of the Vas deferens to preserve the vasal artery, hence preserving vasculature to testis and possibly decreasing post operative congestion pain. Objective This multicenter study analyzes outcomes of patients that underwent MSCD by either stripping or ligating the vas deferens Methods A retrospective chart review of 85 patients who underwent MSCD from 2020-2023 was performed. Patients’ demographics including history of prior surgical procedures was recorded. Response to surgery was evaluated as either complete resolution of pain, partial resolution of pain or no improvement in pain. Results 85 patients underwent MSCD with a median (IQR) age of 36 (25.5-46.5) years and median duration of pain of 16 months. 37 patients underwent stripping of vas while 48 underwent ligation of vas during MSCD. Median follow up was 12 months. 21(43.5%) patients had prior inguinal scrotal surgery in ligation group compared to 5 (13.5%) in the stripping group p=0.003. The etiology of pain was similar between the groups. The response to MSCD between the 2 groups was similar (p=0.968), with similar post op complications (Table 1). Conclusions In men with intractable chronic scrotal content with no interest in preserving fertility, ligation or stripping of the vas deferens yields similar outcomes with regards to pain resolution. Both techniques are safe with no reports of any testicular atrophy. Disclosure No.

AbstractNew‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in COVID‐19 raises significant clinical and public health issues. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to compile and analyze the current literature on NOAF in COVID‐19 and give a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and outcomes of NOAF in COVID‐19. A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. The random effect model using inverse variance method and DerSimonian and Laird estimator of Tua2 was used to calculate the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). Results for outcome analysis were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI and pooled using the Mantel‐Haenszel random‐effects model. The pooled prevalence of NOAF in COVID‐19 was 7.8% (95% CI: 6.54%–9.32%),a pooled estimate from 30 articles (81 929 COVID‐19 patients). Furthermore, our analysis reported that COVID‐19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of developing severe disease compared with COVID‐19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.78, 95% CI: 3.75–6.09) and COVID‐19 patients with a history of pre‐existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.10–3.59). Similarly, our analysis also indicated that COVID‐19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of all‐cause mortality compared with, COVID‐19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.83, 95% CI: 2.99–4.92) and COVID‐19 patients with a history of pre‐existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.35–3.96). The meta‐analysis did not reveal any significant publication bias. The results indicate a strong correlation between NOAF and a higher risk of severe illness and mortality. These results emphasize the importance of careful surveillance, early detection, and customized NOAF management strategies to improve clinical outcomes for COVID‐19 patients.

AbstractBackgroundBrain glucose hypometabolism is among the earliest pathogenic changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This metabolic dysfunction points to the personal bioenergetic capacity, defined as the ability to maintain energy homeostasis under all circumstances including deregulated glucose uptake, as a potential source of resilience to the disease. Fasting blood acylcarnitine profiles are a central readout for this capacity in the absence of dietary glucose and capture the activity and efficiency of glucose‐independent routes of mitochondrial energy metabolism.MethodWe used fasting serum acylcarnitine profiles of 1,531 participants (465 with normal cognition, 762 with mild cognitive impairment, and 304 with clinical AD) from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative to perform unsupervised subgroup identification using hierarchical clustering. Identified subgroups were investigated for differences in A/T/N biomarker profiles and cognitive status. The contributions of genetic and potentially modifiable factors defining the subgroups were quantified using analysis of explained variance. The influence of the strongest determining factors on longitudinal cognitive trajectories was estimated using linear mixed‐effects models and gene‐by‐environment interaction analysis.ResultWe found several bioenergetically distinct subgroups with significant differences in AD biomarker profiles and cognitive function. The strongest genetic contribution to this bioenergetic endophenotype seems to be specifically linked to succinylcarnitine metabolism and significantly modulates the rate of future cognitive decline. In contrast, potentially modifiable sustainment of beta‐oxidation efficiency seems to decelerate bioenergetic aging, thus creating a bioenergetic reserve that delays progression of cognitive decline. Using gene‐by‐environment interaction analysis, we demonstrate that this molecular framework identifies a subgroup of individuals that is likely to benefit significantly from personalized therapeutic, dietary or lifestyle interventions tailored to increase resilience against bioenergetic disturbances in AD.ConclusionOur study reports on a set of genetic and metabolic markers that define bioenergetically distinct subgroups with significant differences on the AD biomarker and cognitive level. Longitudinal data suggest that targeting the modifiable fraction of this endophenotype might be a promising strategy to slow down disease progression in individuals with specific allelic configurations.

Abstract Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and for identifying asymptomatic carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests continues to increase as does the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss nuances of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlight important unmet research needs related to COVID-19 diagnostic testing. IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. The panel agreed on 12 diagnostic recommendations. Access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public health response to COVID-19 infection. Information on the clinical performance of available tests continues to grow, but the quality of evidence of the current literature to support this updated molecular diagnostic guideline remains moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is suggested for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions. Evidence in support of rapid testing and testing of upper respiratory specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs, which offer logistical advantages, is sufficient to warrant conditional recommendations in favor of these approaches.

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain unknown in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 . We aim to evaluate the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in patients with a BMI ≥ 40 when started on DOACs versus VKAs. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines to identify studies using the terms: “venous thromboembolism”, “Vitamin K antagonists” and “direct oral anticoagulants”. After the screening, We extracted the data till May 2023 in a data extraction sheet. Our inclusion criteria were: adult patients, morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ), who were on DOACs or VKAs for VTE or atrial fibrillation. We used a variance-weighted random-effects model to analyze data on DOACs vs. VKAs, estimating event rates and odds ratios while assessing heterogeneity. Data were analyzed using the ‘meta’ package in R. Results: Our analysis included a total of 16 studies (n= 62704 patients). Obese patients on DOACs had a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent VTEs compared to VKAs OR 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59 - 0.88, I2 :19%). Also, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKAs in morbidly obese patients (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58 - 0.74, I2 :0%). For non-major bleeding, although the statistical significance was not reached, a consistent trend favoring DOACs was observed (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.47-1.21). (Figure1) Conclusions: Among morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40), DOACs are associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTEs, and major bleeding compared to VKA. For non-major bleeding, there was a trend favoring DOACs over VKA. Increased recruitment of obese patients in clinical trials is needed to provide us with robust data for informed clinical decision-making.