Citations

Objective:There is a common misconception that improvement in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) after treatment with steroid therapy effectively excludes the diagnosis of a vestibular schwannoma (VS) and such cases do not warrant an MRI. Paralleling this, steroids are commonly withheld for SSNHL in patients with an existing diagnosis of VS, believing that this condition is not steroid-responsive. This study seeks to underscore that improvement or recovery of SSNHL with steroid therapy does not exclude the diagnosis of VS and does not preclude the need for magnetic resonance imaging.Methods:A retrospective chart review was performed (2002–2017) of patients with previously untreated sporadic VS who developed SSNHL that improved after steroid treatment. A clinically significant audiometric improvement was defined as an increase of more than or equal to 15% in word recognition score (WRS) and/or decrease of more than or equal to 15 dB in 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). To supplement these data, a separate population of patients with incomplete or missing audiometric data, who reported unequivocal subjective improvement in hearing after steroid treatment, were also described to reinforce the study objective. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, steroid regimen, and data regarding treatment response were recorded.Results:A total of 29 patients (55% women; median age of 47 yr) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen (48%) cases had objective audiometric documentation of SSNHL, while 15 (52%) had either subjective report only or incomplete audiometric data available. Eighteen (62%) had a single event, while 11 (38%) had more than one episode of SSNHL that was treated with steroids. For all patients, the median time between SSNHL and diagnosis of VS was 1.3 months (range, 0.13–148.4 mo). At the time of diagnosis, 15 tumors were purely intracanalicular, while 15 tumors had cerebellopontine angle extension. Of the latter, the median cisternal tumor size was 15.9 mm (range, 5.3–33). Twenty-six (90%) cases received oral steroid therapy alone, two (9%) had intratympanic steroid therapy alone, and one (3%) required combination therapy. The median PTA improvement with steroid therapy was 21 dB HL (range, –10–101.2) and the median WRS improvement was 40% (range, 4–100%).Conclusion:A therapeutic response to steroid therapy for SSNHL does not exclude the diagnosis of VS. All patients with SSNHL should undergo appropriate diagnostic imaging to prevent delays in diagnosis and potential treatment.

BackgroundOlfactory nerve fibers are at risk of injury during transnasal endoscopic skull‐base approaches. Olfactory outcomes for various techniques have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to report long‐term olfactory outcomes when a cold knife upper septal limb incision technique is used compared to monopolar cautery.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral center. Adult patients undergoing endoscopic approaches with septal incisions were randomized to cold knife or monopolar cautery groups. Patient demographics, clinical history, surgical data, and outcomes were collected. Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative scores on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT) and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) were measured. Fisher's exact tests were performed for categorical variables and t tests were performed for continuous variables.ResultsTwenty‐two (22) patients (10 cold knife, 12 cautery) were enrolled between March 2016 and August 2017. The average age ± standard deviation was 50.2 ± 14.0 years (p = 0.59), 54% (p = 0.69) were female, and the primary pathology was pituitary adenoma (73%, p = 1.00). Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative UPSIT scores were similar between the cold knife and cautery groups (32.8 vs 32.4, p = 0.80; 33.1 vs 33.0, p = 0.96; 33.6 vs 33.3, p = 0.84). On the “sense of smell/taste” question of the SNOT‐22, there was also no difference at all time points (p > 0.22).ConclusionThere was no significant change in patient UPSIT scores 1 year after transnasal skull‐base approaches, and no short‐term or long‐term differences between cold knife and cautery upper septal limb incision techniques. Our study supports an individualized approach based on surgeon preference.

AbstractImplementing tighter intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) tolerances initially resulted in high numbers of marginal or failing QA results and motivated a number of improvements to our calculational processes. This work details those improvements and their effect on results. One hundred eighty IMRT plans analyzed previously were collected and new gamma criteria were applied and compared to the original results. The results were used to obtain an estimate for the number of plans that would require additional dose volume histogram (DVH)‐based analysis and therefore predicted workload increase. For 2 months and 133 plans, the established criteria were continued while the new criteria were applied and tracked in parallel. Because the number of marginal or failing plans far exceeded the predicted levels, a number of calculational elements were investigated: IMRT modeling parameters, calculation grid size, and couch top modeling. After improvements to these elements, the new criteria were clinically implemented and the frequency of passing, questionable, and failing plans measured for the subsequent 15 months and 674 plans. The retrospective analysis of selected IMRT QA results demonstrated that 75% of plans should pass, while 19% of IMRT QA plans would need DVH‐based analysis and an additional 6% would fail. However, after applying the tighter criteria for 2 months, the distribution of plans was significantly different from prediction with questionable or failing plans reaching 47%. After investigating and improving several elements of the IMRT calculation processes, the frequency of questionable plans was reduced to 11% and that of failing plans to less than 1%. Tighter IMRT QA tolerances revealed the need to improve several elements of our plan calculations. As a consequence, the accuracy of our plans have improved, and the frequency of finding marginal or failing IMRT QA results, remains within our practical ability to respond.