Puccinelli, Cassandra L.

ObjectivesThe spine is the most common site of bone metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The role of surgery in the management of cervical spine (C‐spine) metastases (CSpM) has not been adequately explored.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center from 2002 to 2018. Inclusion criteria were pathologic diagnosis of DTC and imaging/pathologic diagnosis of CSpM. Statistical analysis utilized t tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves with univariate and multivariate Cox regressions.ResultsFifty patients with DTC and CSpM were identified. Of those, 16 underwent surgical resection of the C‐spine, whereas 34 did not. The most common presenting symptom was neck pain (N = 37, 74%). Patients in the surgery group were more likely to report a subjective improvement of symptoms (P < .01) and to have local (P < .01) and systemic (P = .04) disease control. Five‐year overall survival was 44.7% for the surgery group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.1–69.3) and 11.1% (95% CI: 2.1–28.8) for the nonsurgery group (P = .01). The strongest risk factor for improved overall survival after C‐spine metastasis was local disease control at the C‐spine (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12–0.85, P = .02). Surgical intervention was significantly associated with improved survival on both univariate (HR = 0. 35, 95% CI: 0.15–0.82, P = .02) and multivariate (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14–0.98, P = .04) analysis.ConclusionSurgical management of CSpM in differentiated thyroid cancers is associated with significantly improved local disease control and overall survival. Referral to spine surgeons should be considered after diagnosis.Level of EvidenceIV. Laryngoscope, 131:E1741–E1747, 2021

ObjectivesClinical variables affecting anesthetic recovery following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to resect oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have not been described. We aimed to explore risk factors associated with prolonged postanesthesia recovery following TORS.Study DesignRetrospective case‐control study.SettingTertiary referral center, January 2010 to November 2016.Subjects and MethodsPatients included adults undergoing primary TORS ± neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients were categorized by phase I recovery time into the “goal” recovery group (75th percentile [lower 3 quartiles], n = 272) and the “prolonged” recovery group (n = 91). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between clinical characteristics and prolonged phase I recovery.ResultsA total of 363 patients were included. Median (interquartile range) duration of postanesthesia recovery was 1.5 hours (1.0‐2.0). Prolonged recovery was associated with isoflurane (odds ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.56‐5.14], P <. 001), midazolam (2.77 [1.50‐5.12], P =. 001), and larger opioid doses (1.26 [1.01‐1.58] per 10‐mg intravenous morphine equivalents, P =. 040) and inversely associated with multimodal antiemetic therapy (0.34 [0.15‐0.78], P =. 011). Prolonged cases had higher rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (n = 43 [47.2%] vs 86 [31.6%], P =. 008), respiratory depression (28 [30.8%] vs 12 [4.4%], P <. 001), sedation (Richmond Agitation‐Sedation Scale < –2; 26 [28.6%] vs 35 [12.9%], P =. 001), severe pain (numeric rating score ≥7; 31 [34.4%] vs 45 [17.2%], P =. 001), and longer hospital stays (4 vs 3 days, P <. 001).ConclusionsSeveral anesthetic factors are associated with anesthesia recovery duration, which may be shortened by efforts to reduce postoperative sedation, severe pain, and nausea/vomiting. Shortened anesthesia recovery time may reduce hospital stay.

Objectives Determine the effect of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) on long‐term olfactory outcomes after surgery. Methods An English‐language search was conducted using the Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2000 to October 2017 for adult patients undergoing ESBS with subjective and objective olfaction outcomes. Two authors independently examined articles to identify those meeting inclusion criteria. Studies examining objective olfactory outcomes after ESBS were included in the meta‐analysis. A random‐effects meta‐analysis of patients undergoing sellar and parasellar ESBS was conducted to compare preoperative and postoperative olfactory outcomes using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT). Results Among 339 eligible articles, 29 articles met inclusion criteria. Twenty‐five of these focused on sellar and parasellar tumors. Individual articles not meeting criteria for meta‐analysis were qualitatively reported. Meta‐analysis showed there was no difference in preoperative and postoperative olfactory function after sellar and parasellar ESBS based on the UPSIT (five studies, mean difference [MD] = −1.03; 95% CI: −3.98, 1.93; P = .50) and the CCIST (three studies, MD = −0.77; 95% CI: −3.03, 1.49; P = .50). A pooled overall meta‐analysis revealed similar results (eight studies, effect size = −0.30; 95% CI: −0.79, 0.18; P = .22). However, heterogeneity for all meta‐analyses was high ( I 2 > 95%, P < .01), suggesting significant variation in the included studies. Conclusions Based on published objective olfaction outcomes after sellar and parasellar ESBS, there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative olfaction. Further prospective studies using validated objective measures of olfaction are required to improve our understanding on this subject. Level of Evidence 2a Laryngoscope , 129:1998–2007, 2019

Objective:There is a common misconception that improvement in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) after treatment with steroid therapy effectively excludes the diagnosis of a vestibular schwannoma (VS) and such cases do not warrant an MRI. Paralleling this, steroids are commonly withheld for SSNHL in patients with an existing diagnosis of VS, believing that this condition is not steroid-responsive. This study seeks to underscore that improvement or recovery of SSNHL with steroid therapy does not exclude the diagnosis of VS and does not preclude the need for magnetic resonance imaging.Methods:A retrospective chart review was performed (2002–2017) of patients with previously untreated sporadic VS who developed SSNHL that improved after steroid treatment. A clinically significant audiometric improvement was defined as an increase of more than or equal to 15% in word recognition score (WRS) and/or decrease of more than or equal to 15 dB in 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA). To supplement these data, a separate population of patients with incomplete or missing audiometric data, who reported unequivocal subjective improvement in hearing after steroid treatment, were also described to reinforce the study objective. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, steroid regimen, and data regarding treatment response were recorded.Results:A total of 29 patients (55% women; median age of 47 yr) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen (48%) cases had objective audiometric documentation of SSNHL, while 15 (52%) had either subjective report only or incomplete audiometric data available. Eighteen (62%) had a single event, while 11 (38%) had more than one episode of SSNHL that was treated with steroids. For all patients, the median time between SSNHL and diagnosis of VS was 1.3 months (range, 0.13–148.4 mo). At the time of diagnosis, 15 tumors were purely intracanalicular, while 15 tumors had cerebellopontine angle extension. Of the latter, the median cisternal tumor size was 15.9 mm (range, 5.3–33). Twenty-six (90%) cases received oral steroid therapy alone, two (9%) had intratympanic steroid therapy alone, and one (3%) required combination therapy. The median PTA improvement with steroid therapy was 21 dB HL (range, –10–101.2) and the median WRS improvement was 40% (range, 4–100%).Conclusion:A therapeutic response to steroid therapy for SSNHL does not exclude the diagnosis of VS. All patients with SSNHL should undergo appropriate diagnostic imaging to prevent delays in diagnosis and potential treatment.

BackgroundOlfactory nerve fibers are at risk of injury during transnasal endoscopic skull‐base approaches. Olfactory outcomes for various techniques have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to report long‐term olfactory outcomes when a cold knife upper septal limb incision technique is used compared to monopolar cautery.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral center. Adult patients undergoing endoscopic approaches with septal incisions were randomized to cold knife or monopolar cautery groups. Patient demographics, clinical history, surgical data, and outcomes were collected. Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative scores on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT) and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) were measured. Fisher's exact tests were performed for categorical variables and t tests were performed for continuous variables.ResultsTwenty‐two (22) patients (10 cold knife, 12 cautery) were enrolled between March 2016 and August 2017. The average age ± standard deviation was 50.2 ± 14.0 years (p = 0.59), 54% (p = 0.69) were female, and the primary pathology was pituitary adenoma (73%, p = 1.00). Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative UPSIT scores were similar between the cold knife and cautery groups (32.8 vs 32.4, p = 0.80; 33.1 vs 33.0, p = 0.96; 33.6 vs 33.3, p = 0.84). On the “sense of smell/taste” question of the SNOT‐22, there was also no difference at all time points (p > 0.22).ConclusionThere was no significant change in patient UPSIT scores 1 year after transnasal skull‐base approaches, and no short‐term or long‐term differences between cold knife and cautery upper septal limb incision techniques. Our study supports an individualized approach based on surgeon preference.