Citations

Endothelial cell-based angiogenesis requires activation of survival signals that generate resistance to external apoptotic stimuli, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), during pathobiologic settings. Mechanisms by which this is achieved are not fully defined. Here, we use a model in which the multifunctional cytokine nitric oxide counterbalances TNF-α-induced apoptosis, to define a role for membrane trafficking in the process of endothelial cell survival signaling. By perturbing dynamin GTPase function, we identify a key role of dynamin for ensuing downstream endothelial cell survival signals and vascular tube formation. Furthermore, nitric oxide is directly demonstrated to promote dynamin function through specific cysteine residue nitrosylation, which promotes endocytosis and endothelial cell survival signaling. Thus, these studies identify a novel role for dynamin as a survival factor in endothelial cells, through a mechanism by which dynamin S-nitrosylation regulates the counterbalances of TNF-α-induced apoptosis and nitric oxide-dependent survival signals, with implications highly relevant to angiogenesis.

Abstract Regulator of G-protein signaling–GAIP-interacting protein COOH terminus (GIPC) is involved in protein trafficking, endocytosis, and receptor clustering and is associated with insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR), a receptor important for proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. Here, we described GIPC expression in different human pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) cell lines and we examined the role of GIPC in the regulation of IGF-IR protein levels in PCA. Interestingly, inhibition of GIPC expression by RNA interference led to reduced IGF-IR protein levels and a subsequent decrease in proliferation of PCA cells. We also determined that the PDZ domain of GIPC is essential for the post-translational regulation and the binding of IGF-IR. The importance of GIPC in pancreatic cancer development and progression is supported by tissue microarray data of 300 pancreatic cancer specimens where GIPC is highly expressed in PCA. Taken together, our data suggest that GIPC is a central molecule for the stability of IGF-IR and could be a target for future therapy. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(21): 10264-8)

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF) is critical for angiogenesis but fails to induce neovascularization in ischemic tissue lesions in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) is critical for angiogenesis, although little is known about the precise role of endothelial VEGFR-1 and its downstream effectors in this process. Here we have used a chimeric receptor approach in which the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor was substituted for that of VEGFR-1 (EGLT) or VEGFR-2 (EGDR) and transduced into primary cultures of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using a retroviral system. Activation of HUVECs expressing EGLT or EGDR induced rapid phosphorylation of eNOS at Ser1177, release of NO, and formation of capillary networks, similar to VEGF. Activation of eNOS by VEGFR-1 was dependent on Tyr794 and was mediated via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, whereas VEGFR-2 Tyr951 was involved in eNOS activation via phospholipase Cγ1. Consistent with these findings, the VEGFR-1–specific ligand placenta growth factor-1 activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and VEGF-E, which is selective for VEGFR-2–activated phospholipase Cγ1. Both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 signal pathways converged on Akt, as dominant-negative Akt inhibited the NO release and in vitro tube formation induced following activation of EGLT and EGDR. The identification Tyr794 of VEGFR-1 as a key residue in this process provides direct evidence of endothelial VEGFR-1 in NO-driven in vitro angiogenesis. These studies provide new sites of modulation in VEGF-mediated vascular morphogenesis and highlight new therapeutic targets for management of vascular diseases.

Atherogenesis is the pathobiological process, which underlies atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and evolves in the 3 stages of initiation, progression, and complication to clinical significance. Of note, this process is associated with neovascularization, and it was not until recently that the implications of angiogenesis in atherogenesis were delineated. This article gives an updated overview on this topic and briefly reflects on the similarities with neovessel formation in carcinogenesis.

ABSTRACT Initially, it was thought that there was no intracellular signaling mediated by NRP‐1 alone in response to its ligands. However, the emerging data from our group as well as others suggest that the signaling through NRP‐1 actually promotes angiogenesis and is mediated through its C‐terminal domain and downstream molecules such as phosphoinositide 3‐kinase. Hence, understanding the signal transduction pathways mediated by NRP‐1 and identification of its downstream molecules are of importance. By using both in vivo zebrafish model and in vitro tissue culture system, we have shown that the C‐terminal three amino acids of NRP‐1 (SEA‐COOH) are required for NRP‐1‐mediated angiogenesis. Furthermore, knocking down of RGS‐GAIP‐interacting protein C terminus (GIPC) in zebrafish, which is associated with C‐terminal domain of NRP‐1, exhibits similar vasculature phenotypes to those from NRP‐1 null. Specific and effective silencing of GIPC in vascular endothelium results in inhibition of NRP‐1‐mediated migration. In both cases as described, PDZ domain of GIPC is responsible for its function. Taken together, our data suggest a novel role of GIPC in angiogenesis and vessel formation and also support our hypothesis that NRP‐1 can facilitate downstream signaling to promote angiogenesis through GIPC.—Wang, L., Mukhopadhyay, D., Xu, X. C terminus of RGS‐GAIP‐interacting protein conveys neuropilin‐1‐mediated signaling during angiogenesis. FASEB J. 20, E732–E741 (2006)

OBJECTIVE—Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor agonist and glipizide, an insulin secretagogue, are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes. Our study was designed to examine the effects of pioglitazone versus glipizide on body water, body composition, and hemodynamic parameters in the presence of comparable glycemic control between groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We studied 19 diabetic subjects randomly assigned to either 45 mg pioglitazone (n = 8) or 10 mg (median dose) glipizide (n = 11) for 12 weeks. Body water content was measured with deuterated water, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography, and cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance by acetylene rebreathing technique both before and after therapy. RESULTS—Pioglitazone increased (P < 0.001 from baseline) total body water (+2.4 ± 0.5 l) accounting for 75% of the total weight gain (+3.1 ± 2.0 kg) but did not alter vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations. Total abdominal (−32.2 ± 19 cm2) and visceral fat area (−16.1 ± 8 cm2) tended to decrease with pioglitazone but increased (P < 0.02 for differences between groups) with glipizide (+38.4 ± 17 cm2 abdominal; +19.1 ± 9 cm2 visceral). Pioglitazone tended to reduce (P = 0.05) diastolic (−8.4 ± 4 mmHg) and mean (−9.5 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.08) blood pressure and reduced (P < 0.001) systemic vascular resistance (2,785 ± 336 vs. 2,227 ± 136 dynes/s per m2), while there were no differences in these parameters with glipizide. Neither therapy altered circulating catecholamine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS—When pioglitazone and glipizide are given in doses sufficient to achieve equivalent glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone increases total body water, thereby accounting for the majority of weight gain, tended to decrease visceral and abdominal fat content and blood pressure, and reduces systemic vascular resistance.

Abstract Purpose: The overall 5-year survival of patients with pancreatic cancer remains <5%. Novel therapeutic strategies are needed. We examined the effect of rapamycin, alone and in combination with antiangiogenesis therapy, on pancreatic cancer in vivo. Experimental Design: Human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells were orthotopically injected into severe combined immunodeficient/beige mice to evaluate primary tumor growth and liver metastasis after treatment with rapamycin alone or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody 2C3. Tumor cell proliferation was determined by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. To detect tumor cell apoptosis, the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay was used. Tumor angiogenesis was investigated by using a monoclonal anti-CD31 antibody. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Rapamycin, alone and in combination with 2C3, strongly inhibited primary and metastatic tumor growth in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer animal model. Furthermore, the combination therapy significantly improved the effect on liver metastasis compared with single treatment with either rapamycin (P = 0.0128) or 2C3 (P = 0.0099). Rapamycin alone inhibited pancreatic tumor cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and decreased tumor angiogenesis. Nevertheless, the combination therapy showed a significant, stronger inhibition of tumor cell proliferation (P = 0.0002 versus rapamycin alone and P < 0.0001 versus 2C3 alone). The induction of apoptosis was significantly higher than in the rapamycin-treated group (P = 0.0039). Additionally, the combination therapy further improved suppression of tumor cell angiogenesis compared with rapamycin treatment (P = 0.029) Conclusions: Our studies propose new therapeutic strategies to inhibit both primary and metastatic tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. Considering the fact that liver metastasis is a crucial problem in advanced stages of pancreatic cancer, the combination therapy of rapamycin plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody 2C3 is a significant advantage compared with single treatment with rapamycin.

Abstract Here, we report an intrinsic property of gold nanoparticles (nanogold): they can interact selectively with heparin-binding glycoproteins and inhibit their activity. Gold nanoparticles specifically bound vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF)-165 and basic fibroblast growth factor, two endothelial cell mitogens and mediators of angiogenesis resulting in inhibition of endothelial/fibroblast cell proliferation in vitro and VEGF-induced permeability as well as angiogenesis in vivo. In contrast, nanogold did not inhibit VEGF-121 or epidermal growth factor, two non–heparin-binding growth factors, mediated cell proliferation. Gold nanoparticles significantly inhibited VEGF receptor-2 phosphorylation, intracellular calcium release, and migration and RhoA activation in vitro. These results report for the first time a novel property of gold nanoparticles to bind heparin-binding proteins and thereby inhibit their subsequent signaling events.

Abstract Many important physiological and pathological processes are modulated by angiogenesis. It has been shown that initiation of this angiogenic process is an essential early step in the progression of malignant tumors. We report here that ablation of peripheral dopaminergic nerves markedly increased angiogenesis, microvessel density, microvascular permeability, and growth of malignant tumors in mice. Endogenous peripheral dopamine acted through D2 receptors as significantly more angiogenesis and tumor growth was observed in D2 dopamine receptor knockout mice in comparison with controls. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 phosphorylation, which is critical for promoting angiogenesis, was also significantly more in tumor endothelial cells collected from the dopamine-depleted and D2 dopamine receptor knockout animals. These results reveal that peripheral endogenous neurotransmitter dopamine might be an important physiological regulator of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated tumor angiogenesis and growth and suggest a novel link between endogenous dopamine, angiogenesis, and tumor growth.