Citations

In the evaluation of embolic strokes of undetermined source, great emphasis is often placed on cardiovascular disease, namely on atrial fibrillation. Other pathophysiologic mechanisms, however, may also be involved. Carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH)—the presence of blood components within an atheromatous plaque—has become increasingly recognized as a possible etiologic mechanism in some cryptogenic strokes. IPH is a marker of plaque instability and is associated with ipsilateral neurologic ischemic events, even in nonstenotic carotid plaques. As recognition of carotid IPH as an etiology of embolic strokes has grown, so too has the complexity with which such patients are evaluated and treated, particularly because overlaps exist in the risk factors for atrial fibrillation and IPH. In this article, we review what is currently known about carotid IPH and how this clinical entity should be approached in the context of the evaluation of embolic strokes of undetermined source.

Introduction Management of intracranial artery dissection (IAD) remains elusive in medical practice. Intracranially, vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is more commonly encountered than internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD). Deconstructive (EVT-d) and reconstructive (EVT-r) endovascular techniques have been utilized to treat VAD and ICAD. This meta-analysis investigates the safety and efficacy of EVT-r and EVT-d in the management of VAD and ICAD. Methods The literature was searched for all studies with consecutive patient series evaluating EVT-d or EVT-r for VAD or ICAD management. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between EVT-r and EVT-d groups using the random-effect model and meta-regression approaches. Results Overall, 1095 cases pooled from 56 studies were included. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between VAD and ICAD. EVT-r was applied in 647 cases (59.1%) and EVT-d in the rest There was no statistical difference in the rate of procedural complications between EVT-r and EVT-d. Although EVT-d was significantly associated with higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion (86.4%), lower rates of good clinical outcomes (72.1%) and higher mortality (15.1%) were achieved compared to EVT-r (70.2%, 83.3%, and 9.5%; respectively). The mortality rate was higher, and good clinical outcomes were less common in ruptured aneurysms. Ischemic presentation was statistically associated with poor outcomes (mRS 3-5) but low mortality. ICAD often tended to grow following treatment and resulted in poor neurological outcomes. Conclusions IAD has favorable outcomes when treated appropriately. Novel reconstructive endovascular techniques are promising and should be integrated well in endovascular practice. Further studies are warranted.

Background: Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage are rare lesions that can present with hemorrhage. A high rate of rebleeding in the early period following hemorrhage has been reported, but published long-term rates are much lower. No study has examined how risk of rebleeding changes over time. Our objective was to quantify the relative incidence of rebleeding in the early and later periods following hemorrhage. Methods: Patients with dural arteriovenous fistula and cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage were identified from the multinational CONDOR (Consortium for Dural Fistula Outcomes Research) database. Natural history follow-up was defined as time from hemorrhage to first treatment, rebleed, or last follow-up. Rebleeding in the first 2 weeks and first year were compared using incidence rate ratio and difference. Results: Of 1077 patients, 250 met the inclusion criteria and had 95 cumulative person-years natural history follow-up. The overall annualized rebleed rate was 7.3% (95% CI, 3.2–14.5). The incidence rate of rebleeding in the first 2 weeks was 0.0011 per person-day; an early rebleed risk of 1.6% in the first 14 days (95% CI, 0.3–5.1). For the remainder of the first year, the incidence rate was 0.00015 per person-day; a rebleed rate of 5.3% (CI, 1.7–12.4) over 1 year. The incidence rate ratio was 7.3 (95% CI, 1.4–37.7; P , 0.026). Conclusions: The risk of rebleeding of a dural arteriovenous fistula with cortical venous drainage presenting with hemorrhage is increased in the first 2 weeks justifying early treatment. However, the magnitude of this increase may be considerably lower than previously thought. Treatment within 5 days was associated with a low rate of rebleeding and appears an appropriate timeframe.

Objective: Controversy exists as to whether platelet inhibition testing is necessary prior to aneurysm treatment in patients premedicated with antiplatelet agents. Using the IntrePED ( Int ernational Re trospective Study of P ipeline E mbolization D evice) registry, we studied complication rates in platelet-testing and non-platelet testing groups to determine if platelet testing is associated with improved outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms from the INTREPED registry were divided into those who received platelet testing (testing group) and those who did not (nontesting group). Morbidity, mortality and thrombotic and hemorrhagic complication rates were studied. Comparisons between groups for continuous variables were evaluated using t -tests and Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-square for binary categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if platelet function testing was independently associated with poor outcomes adjusting for age, number of devices, aneurysm location, size, and use of multiple exchange wires. Results: When compared to the non-testing group, the platelet testing group suffered higher rates of ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage (12/511, 2.3% versus 0/187, 0.0%, P=0.04), neurological morbidity (42/511, 8.2% versus 4/187, 2.1%, P=0.01), and combined neurological morbidity and mortality (45/511, 8.8% versus 6/187, 3.2%, P=0.01). More patients in the testing group were treated with multiple PEDs (228 patients, 38.1% versus 57 patients, 28.4%, P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, the platelet testing group had a higher odds of total major morbidity (OR=3.80, 95%CI=1.30=11.08, P=0.01) and total major morbidity and neurological mortality (OR=2.74, 95%CI=1.11-6.79). Conclusion: Our findings caution against blind acceptance of platelet testing in Pipeline patients. Further prospective studies are needed to determine if and when platelet testing in Pipeline patients is appropriate.

Objective: We previously derived the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS), designed using a multidisciplinary consensus approach among neurovascular specialists from diverse geographic and practice backgrounds. Here, we report on the development and validation of the final version of UIATS. Method: An international, multidisciplinary (neurosurgery, neuroradiology, neurology, clinical epidemiology) group of 69 (39 panel members and 30 blinded external reviewers) specialists in the research and treatment of UIAs was convened. A web survey-based Delphi consensus process consisting of 7 rounds was utilized to rate numerous features of potential relevance in the assessment and treatment of UIAs and to develop the UIATS. Mean ratings were repeatedly used to determine statistical weight for each factor and then transformed into corresponding scores for every item to create the UIATS. For internal and blinded external validation, 30 representative cases of patients with UIAs were used to test the level of agreement (5 point Likert Scale) with treatment recommendations based on the UIATS. Results: The final UIATS system was designed in three domains (patient-, aneurysm - and treatment-related), comprising 13 different categories and 29 different features (Figure 1). Mean agreement based on Likert scores (5 indicating strong agreement and 1 indicating strong disagreement) was 4·2 for both reviewer cohorts, whereas mean agreement per case was 4·2 (panel members) and 4·5 (external reviewers) (p=0·017, Mann-Whitney-U Test). Conclusion: The final version of UIATS system was internally and externally validated by a large multidisciplinary group of neurovascular specialists, which suggests that the UIATS reflects contemporary decision-making regarding management of a patient with an UIA. The UIATS may aid clinicians in deciding on the appropriate management for an UIA.

Introduction: Timing of clinical grading has not been fully studied in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our primary objective was to identify at which time point the clinical assessment using the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale (WFNS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is most predictive of poor functional outcome. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on the association of clinical grading determined at presentation, nadir and post-resuscitation, and poor outcome. Poor functional outcome was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1-3 at 6 months. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Results: We identified 186 consecutive patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2002 and June 2008. Patients’ mean age was 56.9±13.7 years and 63% of the patients were women. Twenty-four percent had poor functional outcome (mortality was 17%). On univariable logistic regression analyses, GCS determined at presentation (OR=0.80; p<0.0001), nadir (OR=0.73; p<0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=0.53; p<0.0001), modified Fisher Scale (OR=2.21;p=0.0013), WFNS assessed at presentation (OR=1.92;p<0.0001), nadir (OR=3.51; <0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=3.91; <0.0001), intracerebral hematoma on initial CT (OR=4.55;p<0.0002), acute hydrocephalus (OR=2.29;p=0.0375), and cerebral infarction (OR=4.84; <0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only cerebral infarction (OR=5.80; 0.0013) and WFNS grade post-resuscitation (OR=3.43;<0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. Receiving operating characteristics/area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated that WFNS determined post-resuscitation had a stronger association with poor outcome (AUC=0.90) than WFNS assessed upon admission or at nadir. Conclusions: Timing of WFNS assessment affects its prognostic value. Outcome after aSAH is best predicted by rating WFNS after neurological resuscitation.

Object We sought to determine the safety and efficacy in secondary stroke prevention of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease (SyNC). Methods This was a single-centre retrospective case series. All patients who underwent CEA for unilateral anterior circulation cerebrovascular events with ipsilateral <50% carotid stenosis from 2002 to 2020 were included. Imaging hallmarks including the degree of luminal stenosis and the presence of various vulnerable plaque characteristics (eg, intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) on MR angiography, ulceration or low-density plaque on CT angiography) were assessed. The presence of vulnerable plaque characteristics was compared between arteries ipsilateral to the ischaemic event and contralateral arteries. The prevalence of perioperative/intraoperative complications, as well as recurrent ischaemic events at follow-up was determined. Results Thirty-two patients were included in the analysis, of which 25.0% were female. Carotid arteries ipsilateral to an ischaemic event had a significantly higher prevalence of IPH when compared with contralateral arteries (80.0% vs 0.0%; p<0.001). There were no intraoperative complications. One patient (3.1%) developed symptoms of transient ipsilateral ischaemia 1 day following CEA which resolved without treatment. In a median follow-up of 18.0 months (IQR 5.0–36.0), only one patient (3.1%) experienced a transient neurologic deficit with complete resolution (annualised rate of recurrent stroke after CEA of 1.5% for a total follow-up of 788 patient-months following CEA). All other patients (31/32, 96.9%) were free of recurrent ischaemic events. Conclusion CEA appears to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with SyNC. Additional studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up intervals are needed in order to determine the role of CEA in this patient population.