Citations

249 Background: Evaluating tumor specific pathologic and genetic profiles in mCRPC stage is difficult due to the limited availability of mCRPC tissue. We describe findings from a prospective cohort study performed to obtain concomitant histopathology and genetic information in mCRPC. Methods: Patients with mCRPC initiating abiraterone acetate therapy underwent 2 serial (3 months apart) metastatic (met) site needle core biopsies (NCB1/2). Bone lesions were biopsied using 11-13G core needles and 18G core biopsy devices were used for non-osseous masses. Up to 4 cores were obtained at each biopsy with the 1st core (S1) sent for DNA sequencing, the 2nd (S2) for RNA sequencing, and the 3rd/4th (X3, X4) submitted for xenograft implantation. From each, 1-2 mm segments were separated and formalin-fixed for histopathologic examination (HPE). Results: A total of 54 patients, enrolled between June 2013 and July 2014, underwent 94 NCB (54 NCB1, 40 NCB2), rendering a total of 259 samples (94 S1; 75 S2; 59 X3 and 31 X4) of which 85 (32%) were positive (pos) for tumor by HPE. Positivity for tumor in S1, S2, X3, and X4 cores was 42%, 33%, 22%, and 19%, respectively. At least one core pos for met tumor was observed in 62% NCB1 and 52% NCB2 (overall 52/94; 56%). Met sites biopsied include bone (71), lymph nodes (18), liver (3), penile (1) and pelvic (1) soft tissues. HPE revealed met adenocarcinoma in 44/52, and poorly differentiated carcinoma in 8/52. Gleason grade applied to the met ranged from 3+4 to 5+5. 45/85 pos samples (53%) had > 50% tumor cellularity. Pos NCB in bone lesions was observed in 23/71 (32%), compared to 17/23 (73%) of non-bone sites (p=.0004). 85 S1 samples yielded DNA material, of which 66 (77%) had ≥10% tumoral DNA. 24 cases with negative HPE had ≥10% tumoral DNA; 7 cases with pos HPE had <10 tumoral DNA. In all, 76/94 (81%) NCB yielded tumor material either by HPE or DNA analysis. Conclusions: NCB of mCRPC is feasible and provides adequate tissue for pursuing HPE and sequencing studies. HPE of extracted material correlates with DNA sequencing data and provides complementary information on tumor features. Bone lesions yield significantly less tumoral material than non-osseous sites.

190 Background: It is not known if biopsy of CRPC stage metastases alters CTC results. We evaluated pre & post biopsy CTC counts in a prospective cohort undergoing pre-chemotherapy abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P). Methods: CTC enumeration was performed on 7.5mL blood using the FDA cleared immunomagnetic/immunofluorescence assay (CellSearch). Time of blood draw for CTC counts pre/post biopsy was recorded for each biopsy. Biopsies were performed using 11/13 gauge core biopsy device for bone lesions and 18 gauge core needle biopsy device for soft tissue/nodal metastases. All patients (pts) underwent two serial biopsies 3 months apart. Change in CTC counts pre/post biopsy for visits 1 and 2 were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank test (significance at p<0.05). Differences in CTC count change (visit1) pre/post biopsy based on metastatic site (skeletal vs. non-skeletal) was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Median age of the cohort was 74 years (IQR: 68-78); median PSA at V1 was 16.4 ng/ml (IQR: 6.4-87.6); at V2 was 11.5 ng/ml (IQR: 1.8-23.7). Of 59 pts undergoing biopsies 42 were in bone and 17 in nodal/soft tissue masses. At V1, pre/post biopsy CTC counts were measured on 50 and 49 pts, respectively; at V2, pre/post CTC counts were measured on 43 and 36 pts. High volume metastatic disease at V1 was observed in 67.8 % of all pts. Table lists CTC counts and time of collection pre/post biopsy for both visits. Mean change in pre/post biopsy CTC counts for skeletal sites was 0.7 (range: -12 to 64) compared to 12.1 (range: -21 to 13) for non-skeletal sites (p=0.23). Conclusions: An increase in mean CTC counts after biopsy of CRPC metastases was observed. No significant differences in change of CTC counts based on site biopsied (skeletal versus non-skeletal) was noted. Correlation with clinical outcomes is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT# 01953640. [Table: see text]

174 Background: AA/P is an FDA approved treatment for mCRPC. Since markers of early resistance to AA/P are unknown, we report initial findings of androgen receptor (AR) based associations with short term (12 week) progression on AA/P. Methods: mCRPC stage patients (pts) initiating pre-chemotherapy AA/P underwent metastatic site biopsies at baseline (pre AA/P) and after 12 weeks. Baseline somatic whole exome DNA, tumor gene expression for AR full length (ARFL), AR splice variant 7 (ARV7) and ARV7/ARFL ratios were compared in progessors versus non-progressors. Progression at or within 12 weeks of AA/P therapy was defined as death or disease progression by PCWG2 “composite progression (CP)” and/or “radiographic progression” endpoints. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test for differences in the two groups for comparing ARFL, ARV7 expressions and ARV7/ARFL ratios and chi square tests were used for differences in copy number variation. Results: Between 1/2013 and 6/2014, 59 pts were enrolled of which 44 have disease assessment data at the12-week time point. CP was observed in 17/44 patients. DNA seq and clinical data was available for 42/44 pts. Using radiographic progression at 12 weeks, AR Amplification/Gain was observed in 20/26 non-progressors (13 with Amplification) and in 9/16 progressors (P-value = 0.19; OR 2.5). ARFL and ARV7 gene expressions in both groups is provided in table. Conclusions: A trend towards higher ARV7/ARFL gene expression ratio in metastases was observed with early progression on AA/P. AR gain/amplification is observed less often in pts with early progression. Validation of these findings is on-going in this prospective trial. Clinical trial information: NCT# 01953640. [Table: see text]

497 Background: As activating RAS mutations have been shown to predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR therapies in advanced CRC, NCCN guidelines recommend testing for KRAS exon 2 and non-exon 2 mutations; however, these alterations are thought to explain only a subset of de novo resistance to targeted therapy. In a large set of CRC assayed with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care, we assessed the frequency of less common KRAS short insertions that may predict failure of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: 4,422 CRC cases were assayed with CGP performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of > 650X for at least 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. All classes of genomic alterations (GA) were identified, including base pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Pertinent available prior molecular testing results and clinical history was reviewed for selected cases. Results: Out of 4,422 CRC cases analyzed, KRAS short variants were identified in 50.9% of cases. A majority of cases contained a KRAS alteration at either codon G12 (35.5%) or G13 (9.1%), while alterations at codons Q61 or A146 were identified in 2.2% and 3.1% of cases, respectively. KRAS insertions were identified in 8 ( < 0.5%) cases. All KRAS insertions identified fell within codons 9-13, and 6/8 cases harbored V9_G10 insertions. Out of 6 patients with prior KRAS testing results available, 5 (83%) were negative by previous testing. Conclusions: CGP identifies KRAS insertions within or adjacent to hotspot regions in CRC cases which have previously tested negative for KRAS mutations. Given the importance of KRAS alterations in predicting lack of response to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC, accurate detection of these alterations in the course of clinical care is essential for effective treatment. CGP offers the possibility of identifying KRAS insertions that may impact efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapy and should be considered when previous focused testing for KRAS mutations is negative.

237 Background: AA/P is an approved treatment for mCRPC but there are no known predictive markers of response or resistance. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate if Androgen Receptor (AR) & AR-variant (ARV) expression in tissue metastases can predict resistance to AA/P. Methods: mCRPC stage patients (pts) initiating pre-chemo AA/P underwent metastatic site biopsies prior to (pre-AA/P) and after 12 weeks of treatment. Composite progression at 12 weeks, (primary endpoint) was evaluated with PSA, RECIST, bone scan and symptoms (per PCWG2). mRNA expressions of pre-AA/P ARFL, ARV3, ARV7, ARV9, ARV23, ARV45, four cell cycle division genes, Chromogranin-A (CHGA) together with PSA/testosterone levels, Gleason Score (GS) at initial diagnosis; high versus low volume disease; time from starting hormone therapy to mCRPC stage and serum CHGA levels were evaluated using a logistic regression model for predicting resistance at 12 weeks of therapy. A final multivariate model fitted only those factors thought to be clinically relevant or with an entry threshold of p ≤ 0.3 in univariate analysis. Results: Between 6/2013 & 3/2015, 82 pts were enrolled of which 52 had complete mRNA expression & disease assessment data at the12-week time point for analysis. Median age of the cohort was 72.5 yrs (IQR: 68.5-78); median pre-AA/P PSA was 18 ng/ml (IQR: 8.1- 46.6); GS distribution at initial diagnosis for GS 2-6; 7; 8-10 was 11; 14; 27 respectively. Progression was observed in 21/52 pts after 12 weeks. At the univariate level elevated pre-AA/P expression of ARV3 (p = 0.08), ARV7 (p = 0.26), ARV9 (p = 0.04), and cell division cycle gene CDC45 (p = 0.19) along with GS at diagnosis (p = 0.29) met the threshold for inclusion into multivariate analysis. Elevated expression of pre-therapy ARV9 in metastases alone was associated with progression at 12 weeks (OR: 3.9; CI 1.07 – 14.16; C-Index: 0.63). The 12-week biopsy of pts with progression had increased ARV9 mRNA expression compared to pts responding at 12 weeks (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Increased ARV9 mRNA expression in metastases is associated with early resistance to AA/P. This observation will need further validation in comparable datasets. Clinical trial information: NCT #0195364.

187 Background: Patient-reported evaluations of interpersonal quality of care are essential elements of quality of cancer care assessment. At times, patients may be unable to report themselves on their care experience and systems may rely on proxy reports. The validity of this approach is dependent on the degree to which family caregiver assessments are concordant with patient assessments. Methods: A VA cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their caregivers both completed a self-administered questionnaire on the quality of VA cancer care in 3 specific domains: surgery, chemotherapy overall and chemotherapy nursing care, all measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Because the kappa statistic penalizes skewed distributions which are commonly seen in patient satisfaction reports, agreement between patients and caregivers on perceptions of quality care were measured using Gwet’s AC2 statistic. Stratified analyses on caregiver burden, race, education, and age as well as patient’s stage of disease were used to assess variation in agreement. Results: 417 caregiver-patient dyads completed the survey (70% response rate), of whom 362 (86.8%) had surgery and 195 (46.8%) had chemotherapy. Overall agreement was high for the 3 quality of care domains: AC2 (95% CI): 0.870 (0.838, 0.903) for surgery, 0.835 (0.786, 0.884) for chemotherapy overall and 0.906 (0.868, 0.944) for chemotherapy nurses. Stratified analyses of agreement showed particular populations of higher or lower agreement; however the findings were inconsistent across the three domains and most were not statistically significant. Patients with lower stage (I-II) had higher agreement than higher stages (III-IV) (AC2: 0.967 and 0.879 respectively, P = 0.006) but only in the chemotherapy nurses domain. For the surgery domain, age was the only significant difference in agreement (0.816, 0.912, and 0.838 for < 50, 51-65, and > 65 respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Family caregiver reports on the quality of CRC care were highly concordant with patient reports. Therefore, family caregivers may be able to provide reasonable proxy report on measures of quality of cancer care when patient reports are unavailable.

226 Background: Patients undergoing cancer treatment often need support from an informal caregiver to help manage symptoms. Self-efficacy (SE) in caregiving refers to confidence in being able to care for the patient’s needs. Low SE has been associated with increased caregiver burden and mental health symptoms, which in turn, can affect the quality of informal care provided. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between caregiver training received from cancer care providers and SE in caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Caregivers of CRC patients diagnosed in 2009 were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Caregivers were asked about specific patient problems (pain, bowel, fatigue, medications, and other). Caregiver perceptions of training adequacy and SE were assessed on a problem specific basis. The patient’s stage of disease was obtained from cancer registry data. Associations between training and SE were examined for each problem using multivariate logistic regression and adjusted for age, relationship to patient, race, care burden, level of education, stage of disease, perception of patient’s health, and general confidence as a caregiver. Results: 417 caregivers completed the survey (70% response rate), of whom 374 (90%) were female and 284 (68%) were the patient’s spouse/partner. The number of caregivers reporting inadequate training for CRC-related problems were pain 77 (38%), bowel 80 (38%), fatigue 121 (48%), medication 65 (26%), and other 101 (40%). The odds of having low SE were significantly higher among those with perceptions of inadequate training across the following CRC-related problems: pain, 10.10 (3.36, 30.39); bowel, 5.04 (1.98, 12.82); fatigue, 8.45 (3.22, 22.15); managing medications, 9.00 (3.30, 24.51); and other, 3.87 (1.68, 8.93). Conclusions: This study showed a significant association between caregiver training and SE in a cross-sectional study. Given that the perception of inadequate training among caregivers was common, further exploration of the longitudinal impact of training on caregiver SE should be done to identify interventions to help improve the experience of cancer caregivers.

Purpose Despite increasing awareness of accrual challenges, it is unknown if accrual of older patients to breast cancer treatment trials is improving. Methods We examined accrual of older patients to Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology systemic therapy breast cancer trials during 1985-2012 and compared disease characteristics and reasons for therapy cessation for older (age ≥ 65 years and ≥ 70 years) versus younger (age < 65 years and < 70 years) participants. To examine accrual trends, we modeled age as a function of time, using logistic regression. Results Overall, 17% of study participants were ≥ 65 years of age. Approximately 15%, 24%, and 24% of participants in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic trials were age ≥ 65 years, and 7%, 15%, and 13% were age ≥ 70 years, respectively. The odds of a patient age ≥ 65 years enrolling significantly increased over time for adjuvant trials (odds ratio [OR] per year, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.05) but decreased significantly for neoadjuvant and metastatic trials (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.67 and OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00). Similar trends were seen for those age ≥ 70 years but these were statistically significant for adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials only (OR, 1.05, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.07; and OR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.62). In general, those age ≥ 65 years ( v those < 65 years) in adjuvant studies had a higher mean number of lymph nodes involved and more hormone receptor-negative tumors, although tumor sizes were similar. Early protocol treatment cessation was also more frequent in those age ≥ 65 years (50%) versus < 65 years (35.9%) across trials. Conclusion Older patients with breast cancer remain largely underrepresented in cooperative group therapeutic trials. We observed some improvement in accrual to adjuvant trials but worsening of accrual for neoadjuvant/metastatic trials. Novel strategies to increase accrual of older patients are critical to meaningfully change the evidence base for this growing patient population.

106 Background: Some patients with lymph node metastases experience prolonged survival following radical prostatectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative imaging who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy. Methods: Patients with lymph node metastases diagnosed during radical prostatectomy from 1988-2003 were reviewed. Patients with preoperative CT or MRI images were included in the study. Radiology reports were reviewed to determine if patients had clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy (cN+). For all analyses, patients with cN+ were compared to those with clinically negative nodes (cN−). Results: Preoperative imaging was available in 202 men with lymph node metastasis at the time of prostatectomy. Of these 17% (34/202) were cN+. None had pre-operative lymph node biopsy and none had abandoned prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 11.1 years, PSA recurrence occurred in 50% (17/34) and 49% (82/186), local recurrence in 18% (6/34) and 13% (22/186) and systemic progression in 32% (11/34) and 24% (40/186) of patients with cN+ and cN-, respectively. On multivariate analysis, cN+ was not associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.66, p=0.1). Conclusions: cN+ patients undergoing surgical therapy for prostate cancer may experience similar outcomes to cN− patients. The presence of clinically suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative imaging should not be an absolute contraindication for surgical therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

175 Background: The efficient delivery of adjuvant and salvage therapy after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer is hampered by a lack of biomarkers to assess the risk of clinically significant recurrence and progression. Methods: Mayo Clinic Radical Prostatectomy Registry (RP) patient specimens were selected from a case-control cohort with 14 years median follow-up for training and initial validation of an expression biomarker genomic classifier (GC). An independent, blinded case-cohort study of high-risk RP subjects was used to validate GC, comparing the performance of GC to a multivariate logistic regression clinical model (CM) and GC combined with clinical variables (genomic-clinical classifier, GCC) for predicting clinical recurrence (defined as positive bone or CT scan within 5 years after biochemical recurrence). The concordance index (c-index) and Cox model were used to evaluate discrimination and estimate the risk of clinical recurrence. Results: In the training subset (n=359), both GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.90 whereas CM had a c-index of 0.76. In the internal validation set (n=186), GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.76 and 0.75, while CM had a c-index of 0.69. In an independent high-risk study (n=219), GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.77 and 0.76, while CM had a c-index of 0.68. In subset analysis of Gleason score 7 patients within the high-risk group, GC and GCC showed improved discrimination with c-index of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively compared to 0.70 for CM. In the high-risk group, the risk of recurrence by GC model score quartiles at 5 years after RP was estimated at 1%, 5%, 5% and 18%. Conclusions: The GC model shows improved performance over CM in the prediction of clinical recurrence in a high-risk cohort and in subset analysis of Gleason score 7 patients. The addition of clinical variables to the GC model did not significantly contribute to classifier performance in patients with high-risk features. We are further testing the performance of the GC and GCC models and their usefulness in guiding decision-making (e.g., for the adjuvant therapy setting) in additional studies of prostate cancer clinical risk groups.