Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1581 citation(s) found for "Au, Kelly".

Effectiveness of a Decision Aid in Potentially Vulnerable Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial
Schaffer, Jason T. , Kline, Jeffrey A. , Diercks, Deborah B. , Jones, Russell, Demers, Michel, Shah, Nilay D. , Inselman, Jonathan , Torres, Carlos A, Rising, Kristin L. , Hollander, Judd E. , Torres, Carlos A., Owen, Kelly P. , Meisel, Zachary F. , LeBlanc, Annie , Herrin, Jeph , Montori, Víctor M. , Hess, Erik P.

Medical Decision Making | May 19, 2017 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 69-78

10.1177/0272989x17706363 | PMID 28525723 Get It

Background. We test the hypotheses that use of the Chest Pain Choice (CPC) decision aid (DA) would be similarly effective in potentially vulnerable subgroups but increase knowledge more in patients with higher education and trust in physicians more in patients from racial minority groups. Methods. This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial in adults with chest pain potentially due to acute coronary syndrome. The trial compared an intervention group engaged in shared decision making (SDM) using CPC to a control group receiving usual care (UC). We assessed for subgroup effects based on age, sex, race, income, insurance, education, literacy, and numeracy. We dichotomized each characteristic and tested for interactions using regression models with indicators for arm assignment and study site. Results. Of 898 patients (451 DA, 447 UC), over 50% were female, over one-third were black, nearly one-third had a high school education or less, and over 60% had “low” health literacy. The DA did not increase knowledge more in patients with higher education ( P for interaction = 0.06) but did increase knowledge more in the “typical” than in the “low” numeracy subgroup (10.6% v. 4.7%, absolute difference [AD] = 5.9%, P for interaction = 0.025). The DA did not significantly increase patient trust in physicians in racial minorities ( P for interaction = 0.06) but did increase trust more in patients with “low” literacy compared with those with “typical” literacy (3.7% v. –1.4%, AD = 5.1, P for interaction = 0.011). Conclusions. CPC benefited all sociodemographic groups to a similar extent, with greater knowledge transfer in patients with higher numeracy and greater physician trust in patients with “low” health literacy. Tailoring SDM interventions to patient characteristics may be necessary for optimal effectiveness.
Development of a Unifying Target and Consensus Indicators for Global Surgical Systems Strengthening: Proposed by the Global Alliance for Surgery, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care (The G4 Alliance)
Haider, Adil H. , Scott, John W. , Gause, Colin D., Meheš, Mira, Hsiung, Grace, Prelvukaj, Albulena, Yanocha, Dana, Baumann, Lauren M., Ahmed, Faheem , Ahmed, Naeem , Anderson, Sara, Angaté, Hervé, Arfaa, Lisa, Asbun, Horacio J. , Ashengo, Tigistu Adamu , Asuman, Kisembo, Ayala, Ruben , Bickler, Stephen W. , Billingsley, Saul, Bird, Peter, Botman, Matthijs , Butler, Marilyn, Buyske, Jo, Capozzi, Angelo, Casey, Kathleen , Clayton, Charles, Cobey, James C., Cotton, Michael , Deckelbaum, Dan, Derbew, Miliard , deVries, Catherine R. , Dillner, Jeanne, Downham, Max, Draisin, Natalie, Echinard, David, Elneil, Sohier , ElSayed, Ahmed , Estelle, Abigail, Finley, G. Allen , Frenkel, Erica, Frykman, Philip K., Gheorghe, Florin, Gore‐Booth, Julian, Henker, Richard , Henry, Jaymie , Henry, Orion, Hoemeke, Laura , Ibanga, Iko, Jackson, Eric V., Jani, Pankaj , Johnson, Walter D. , Jones, Andrew , Kassem, Zeina, Kocan, Abbey, Krishnaswami, Sanjay , Lane, Robert H. , Latif, Asad , Levy, Barbara , Linos, Dimitrios , Linz, Peter E., Listwa, Louis A., Magee, Declan, Makasa, Emmanuel , Marin, Michael L. , Martin, Claude , McQueen, Kelly, Morgan, Jamie , Moser, Richard , Neighbor, Robert, Novick, William M. , Ogendo, Stephen, Omigbodun, Akinyinka , Onajin‐Obembe, Bisola , Parsan, Neil, Philip, Beverly K., Price, Raymond R. , Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Ratel, M, Reynolds, Cheri, Roser, Steven M. , Rowles, Jackie , Samad, Lubna , Sampson, John , Sanghvi, Harshadkumar, Sellers, Marchelle L., Sigalet, David L. , Steffes, Bruce C., Stieber, Erin, Swaroop, Mamta , Tarpley, John L. , Varghese, Asha , Varughese, Julie, Wagner, Richard, Warf, Benjamin C. , Wetzig, Neil , Williamson, Susan , Wood, Joshua, Zeidan, Anne, Zirkle, Lewis G. , Allen, Brendan, Abdullah, Fizan , Asbun, Horacio, Butler, Marilyn, Gheorghe, Florin, Hoffman, David C. , Lane, Robert, Varughese, Julie

World Journal of Surgery | May 15, 2017 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2426-2434

10.1007/s00268-017-4028-1 | PMID 28508237 Get It

AbstractAfter decades on the margins of primary health care, surgical and anaesthesia care is gaining increasing priority within the global development arena. The 2015 publications of the Disease Control Priorities third edition on Essential Surgery and the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery created a compelling evidenced‐based argument for the fundamental role of surgery and anaesthesia within cost‐effective health systems strengthening global strategy. The launch of the Global Alliance for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care in 2015 has further coordinated efforts to build priority for surgical care and anaesthesia. These combined efforts culminated in the approval of a World Health Assembly resolution recognizing the role of surgical care and anaesthesia as part of universal health coverage. Momentum gained from these milestones highlights the need to identify consensus goals, targets and indicators to guide policy implementation and track progress at the national level. Through an open consultative process that incorporated input from stakeholders from around the globe, a global target calling for safe surgical and anaesthesia care for 80% of the world by 2030 was proposed. In order to achieve this target, we also propose 15 consensus indicators that build on existing surgical systems metrics and expand the ability to prioritize surgical systems strengthening around the world.
Airway epithelial anion secretion and barrier function following exposure to fungal aeroallergens: role of oxidative stress
Zaidman, Nathan A. , O’Grady, Kelly E., Patil, Nandadevi, Milavetz, Francesca, Maniak, Peter J., Kita, Hirohito , O’Grady, Scott M. , Kita, H

American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology | April 27, 2017 | Volume: 313 | Issue: 1 | Pages: C68-C79

10.1152/ajpcell.00043.2017 | PMID 28446427 Get It

Aeroallergens produced by Alternaria alternata can elicit life-threatening exacerbations of asthma in patients sensitized to this fungus. In this study, the effect of Alternaria on ion transport mechanisms underlying mucociliary clearance and airway epithelial barrier function was investigated in human airway epithelial cells. Apical exposure to Alternaria induced an increase in anion secretion that was inhibited by blockers of CFTR and Ca2+-activated Cl− channels. Stimulation of anion secretion was dependent on Ca2+ uptake from the apical solution. Alternaria exposure also produced an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) that was blocked by pretreatment with the oxidant scavenger glutathione (GSH). GSH and the NADPH oxidase inhibitor/complex 1 electron transport inhibitor diphenylene iodonium chloride (DPI) blocked ATP release and the increase in intracellular [Ca2+] evoked by Alternaria. Alternaria also decreased transepithelial resistance, and a portion of this effect was dependent on the increase in ROS. However, the Alternaria-induced increase in unidirectional dextran (molecular mass = 4,000 Da) flux across the epithelium could not be accounted for by increased oxidative stress. These results support the conclusion that oxidative stress induced by Alternaria was responsible for regulating Ca2+-dependent anion secretion and tight junction electrical resistance that would be expected to affect mucociliary clearance.
Esophageal Perforation Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Hershman, Stuart H. , Kunkle, William Aaron , Kelly, Michael P. , Ray, Wilson Z. , Bumpass, David B. , Peters, Colleen , Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Currier, Bradford L. , Rahman, RaʼKerry K., Isaacs, Robert E., Smith, Justin S. , Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Thompson, Sara E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Lord, Elizabeth L. , Buser, Zorica , Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E., Buchowski, Jacob M. , Gum, Jeffrey L. , Singhatanadgige, Weerasak , Kim, Jin Young , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Kelly, Michael P

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 28S-36S

10.1177/2192568216687535 | PMID 28451488 Get It

Study Design: Multicenter retrospective case series and review of the literature. Objective: To determine the rate of esophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery. Methods: As part of an AOSpine series on rare complications, a retrospective cohort study was conducted among 21 high-volume surgical centers to identify esophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery. Staff at each center abstracted data from patients’ charts and created case report forms for each event identified. Case report forms were then sent to the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network Methodological Core for data processing and analysis. Results: The records of 9591 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery were reviewed. Two (0.02%) were found to have esophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery. Both cases were detected and treated in the acute postoperative period. One patient was successfully treated with primary repair and debridement. One patient underwent multiple debridement attempts and expired. Conclusions: Esophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery is a relatively rare occurrence. Prompt recognition and treatment of these injuries is critical to minimizing morbidity and mortality.
2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Minimal, Moderate, and Major Clinical Response in Adult Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheum
Rider, Lisa G. , Ruperto, Nicolino , Bayat, Nastaran, Amato, Anthony A. , Dastmalchi, Maryam, Katz, James D. , Mammen, Andrew L. , Visser, Marianne de, Ytterberg, Steven R. , Lundberg, Ingrid E. , Chung, Lorinda, Dankó, Katalin , Torre, Ignacio García‐De La , Villa, Luca, Rinaldi, Mariangela, Rockette, Howard E., Lachenbruch, Peter A., Miller, Frederick W. , Vencovský, Jiří , Rouster‐Stevens, Kelly , Huber, Adam M. , Selva-O’Callaghan, Albert , Rutkove, Seward B. , Dimachkie, Mazen M. , Olesińska, Marzena , Chung, Leland W.K. , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Ramchandren, Sindhu , Saketkoo, Lesley Ann , Mann, H. , Aggarwal, Rohit , Erman, Brian , Feldman, Brian Michael , Oddis, Chester V. , Chinoy, Hector , Cooper, Robert G. , Fiorentino, David Franklin , Isenberg, David , Visser, Marianne de, Chung, Lorinda, Song, Yeong Wook , Mann, Heřman , Vencovsky, Jiri , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Selva O'Callaghan, Albert , Chung, Lorinda , García-De La Torre, Ignacio , Dimachkie, Mazen M , Lundberg, Ingrid E , Pistorio, Angela

Arthritis & Rheumatology | April 6, 2017 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 898-910

10.1002/art.40064 | PMID 28382787 Get It

ObjectiveTo develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM).MethodsExpert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287 definitions using core set measures. Myositis experts rated greater improvement among multiple pairwise scenarios in conjoint analysis surveys, where different levels of improvement in 2 core set measures were presented. The PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise Rankings of All Possible Alternatives) method determined the relative weights of core set measures and conjoint analysis definitions. The performance characteristics of the definitions were evaluated on patient profiles using expert consensus (gold standard) and were validated using data from a clinical trial. The nominal group technique was used to reach consensus.ResultsConsensus was reached for a conjoint analysis–based continuous model using absolute percent change in core set measures (physician, patient, and extramuscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0–100), determined by summing scores for each core set measure, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each core set measure. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were ≥20, ≥40, and ≥60 points in the total improvement score. The same criteria were chosen for juvenile DM, with different improvement thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity in DM/PM patient cohorts were 85% and 92%, 90% and 96%, and 92% and 98% for minimal, moderate, and major improvement, respectively. Definitions were validated in the clinical trial analysis for differentiating the physician rating of improvement (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe response criteria for adult DM/PM consisted of the conjoint analysis model based on absolute percent change in 6 core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
Proteomic analysis of patients with mantle cell lymphoma identifies Hsp90, and other proteins as potential target(s) for drug therapy
McCormick, D. J., Ansell, Stephen M. , Novak, Anne J. , Stenson, Mary, Krajnik, Kelly L., Ghobrial, Irene M. , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Witzig, Thomas E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 5, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 14_suppl | Pages: 6530-6530

10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.6530 Get It

Comparative effectiveness of tumor response assessment methods: Standard-of-care versus computer-assisted response evaluation.
Florez, Edward , Sirous, Reza , Lirette, Seth T. , Griswold, Michael , Wang, Zhen J. , Bieszczad, Jacob, Cox, Kelly , Goenka, Ajit H. , Howard-Claudio, Candace M, Sanyal, Rupan , Henagen, J. Clark, Storrs, Judd , Allen, Brian C. , Remer, Erick M. , Howard, Candace M. , Kang, HyunSeon Christine , Nandwana, Sadhna B. , Shinagare, Atul Bhanudas , Davenport, Matthew S. , Rini, Brian I. , Smith, Andrew D. , Storrs, Judd M , Lirette, Seth

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 29, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 432-432

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.432 Get It

432 Background: In clinical trials and clinical practice, tumor response assessment with computed tomography (CT) defines critical end points in patients with metastatic disease treated with systemic agents. Methods to reduce errors and improve efficiency in tumor response assessment could improve patient care. Methods: Eleven readers from 10 different institutions independently categorized tumor response according to three different therapeutic response criteria using paired baseline and initial post-therapy CT studies from 20 randomly selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib as part of a completed phase III multi-institutional study. Images were evaluated with a manual tumor response evaluation method (standard-of-care) and with computer-assisted response evaluation (CARE) that included stepwise guidance, interactive error-identification and correction methods, automated tumor metric extraction, calculations, response categorization, and data/image archival. A cross-over design, patient randomization, and two-week washout period were used to reduce recall bias. Comparative effectiveness metrics included error rate and mean patient evaluation time. Results: The standard-of-care method was on average associated with one or more errors in 30.5% (6.1/20) of patients while CARE had a 0.0% (0.0/20) error rate (p<0.001). The most common errors were related to data transfer and arithmetic calculation. In patients with errors, the median number of error types was 1 (range 1-3). Mean patient evaluation time with CARE was twice as fast as the standard-of-care method (6.4 vs. 13.1 minutes, p<0.001). Conclusions: Computer-assisted tumor response evaluation reduced errors and time of evaluation, indicating better overall effectiveness than manual tumor response evaluation methods that are the current standard-of-care.
Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in heart and heart‐lung transplant recipients
Bruminhent, Jackrapong , Petterson, Tanya M. , Kremers, Walter K. , Cawcutt, Kelly A., Cawcutt, Kelly , Thongprayoon, Charat , Razonable, Raymund R. , Bruminhent, Jackrapong , Kremers, Walter K

Clinical Transplantation | March 17, 2017 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ctr.12968 | PMID 28314071 Get It

Abstract Background Clostridium difficile is a major cause of diarrhea in thoracic organ transplant recipients. We investigated the epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection ( CDI ) in heart and heart‐lung transplant ( HT ) recipients. Methods This is a retrospective study from 2004 to 2013. CDI was defined by diarrhea and a positive toxigenic C. difficile in stool measured by toxin enzyme immunoassay (2004‐2006) or polymerase chain reaction (2007‐2013). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the association of risk factors with time to CDI and survival with CDI following transplantation. Results There were 254 HT recipients, with a median age of 53 years ( IQR , 45‐60); 34% were female. During the median follow‐up of 3.1 years ( IQR , 1.3‐6.1), 22 (8.7%) patients developed CDI . In multivariable analysis, risk factors for CDI were combined heart‐lung transplant ( HR 4.70; 95% CI , 1.30‐17.01 [ P =.02]) and retransplantation ( HR 7.19; 95% CI , 1.61‐32.12 [ P =.01]). Acute cellular rejection was associated with a lower risk of CDI ( HR 0.34; 95% CI , 0.11‐0.94 [ P =.04]). CDI was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality ( HR 7.66; 95% CI , 3.41‐17.21 [ P <.0001]). Conclusions Clostridium difficile infection after HT is more common among patients with combined heart‐lung and those undergoing retransplantation. CDI was associated with a higher risk of mortality in HT recipients.