Citations

Abstract Objective Myositis is a heterogeneous family of inflammatory myopathies. We sought to define the differential expression of cytokines, cytokine receptors and immune checkpoint genes in muscle biopsies from patients with different forms of myositis in order to characterize patterns of inflammation in each. Methods Bulk RNA-sequencing was performed on muscle biopsy samples from 669 patients, including 105 with DM, 80 with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), 65 with anti-synthetase syndrome, 53 with IBM, 19 with anti-PM/Scl myositis, 310 with other inflammatory or genetic myopathies and 37 controls with normal tissue (NT). Myositis clinical groups and autoantibody subgroups were analysed separately. Expression data were analysed for 338 genes encoding cytokines, cytokine receptors and immune checkpoints. Myositis group-specific genes were identified from this list by finding genes that were specifically differentially expressed in one group compared with all samples and compared with NT (α < 0.001). Results IBM patients had the most differentially overexpressed genes (71) among all clinical groups, including 37 that were IBM-specific. Among the top genes were several involved in type 1 inflammation, including CCL5, CXCR3, CCR5, CXCL9 and IFNG. Anti-Jo1 and anti-PM/Scl patients exhibited differential overexpression of a similar set of genes, while DM patients exhibited differential overexpression of a different set of genes involved in type 1 inflammation. IMNM patients had the least number of differentially overexpressed genes with no predominant inflammatory pattern. Conclusion Each myositis clinical group and autoantibody subgroup had differentially overexpressed inflammatory mediators, including a strong type 1 inflammatory gene signature in IBM.

Objectives To investigate demographic, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) among patients with portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH). Design Retrospective analysis of a real-world cross-sectional survey, the pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) Disease Specific Programme. Setting Secondary care settings in the USA. Participants Pulmonologists (n=22), cardiologists (n=17) and internists (n=7) who saw ≥2 patients with PAH/month provided data on 90 PoPH patients. Mean age of patients was 56.8 years, 51.1% were male, 76.7% were white/Caucasian. Primary and secondary outcome measures Demographic characteristics, initial presentation/diagnosis, disease trajectory, symptoms, comorbidities, treatment patterns and HCRU. Results The most common diagnostic tests were echocardiogram (62.2%), right heart catheterisation (56.7%) and electrocardiogram (48.9%). Dyspnea on exertion (64.4%), dyspnea following exertion (51.1%) and fatigue (48.9%) were the most common symptoms prior to PAH diagnosis as well as the most bothersome. Overall, 13.3% patients had mild disease before treatment vs 42.2% at time of survey. Most (60.0%) had stable disease (21.1% were improving and 18.8% were deteriorating at the time of the survey). Most common recent symptoms were dyspnea on exertion (51.1%), fatigue (37.8%) and dyspnea following exertion (32.2%). Patients had a mean of 1.8 comorbidities. In total, 80.0% of PoPH patients were receiving PAH-specific treatment; 41.7%, 22.2% and 12.5% received monotherapy, dual therapy and triple therapy, respectively. Patients had seen their physician 4.1 times in the past 12 months (3.5 visits specifically for PAH), while 31.1% had been hospitalised for PAH. Most (70.0%) patients were managed in a multidisciplinary team, and 8.9% of patients relied on a caregiver. Conclusions This study highlights the high symptomatic burden coupled with mostly moderate-to-severe disease status and a high hospitalisation rate despite the majority of PoPH patients being on therapy. Therefore, new treatment options in PoPH are in great need.

Cancer therapy-induced hypertension (HTN) is an increasingly recognized complication associated with a wide range of anticancer agents, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and alkylating agents. The pathogenesis of HTN in this setting is multifactorial, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide (NO) suppression, sympathetic nervous system activation, and vascular remodeling. Additional factors, including paraneoplastic syndromes, poorly controlled pain, mood disturbances, and overlapping cardiovascular risk factors like obesity and diabetes, further contribute to the complexity of diagnosis and management. Despite its prevalence and clinical implications, cancer therapy-induced HTN is often addressed using general population guidelines, with limited oncology-specific protocols available. Accurate blood pressure measurement and individualized treatment plans are critical to optimize outcomes and avoid interruptions to cancer therapy. Antihypertensive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and calcium channel blockers have shown efficacy in both blood pressure control and, in some cases, oncologic outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists, cardiologists, and primary care providers is essential to navigate the interplay between cancer treatment and cardiovascular health. Ongoing research is needed to develop targeted guidelines and improve the long-term care of cancer patients affected by treatment-induced HTN.

Objective: Diabetes is a defining disease of the 21st century because of its rising prevalence, association with obesity, and enormous health impact. Abundant evidence shows that lifestyle interventions can delay or prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults, offer relief, and sometimes achieve complete remission. Despite this empowering message, there are no clinical practice guidelines that focus primarily on lifestyle interventions as first-line management of prediabetes and T2D. Our objective, therefore, is to offer pragmatic, trustworthy, and evidence-based guidance for clinicians in using the 6 pillars of lifestyle medicine—nutrition, physical activity, stress management, sleep, social connectedness, avoidance of risky substances—for managing adults with T2D and in preventing T2D in adults with prediabetes or a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods: We used well-established, peer-reviewed guideline methodology to develop evidence-based key action statements (recommendations) that facilitate quality improvement in clinical practice. The guideline development group included 20 members representing consumers, advanced practice nursing, cardiology, clinical pharmacology, behavioral medicine, endocrinology, family medicine, lifestyle medicine, nutrition and dietetics, health education, health and wellness coaching, sleep medicine, sports medicine, and obesity medicine. Recommendation strength was based on the aggregate evidence supporting a key action statement plus a comparison of associated benefits vs harms/costs. Multiple literature searches, conducted by an information specialist, identified 8 relevant guidelines, 118 relevant systematic reviews, and 112 randomized clinical trials. The guideline underwent extensive internal, external, and public review and comment prior to publication. Results: We developed 14 key action statements and associated evidence profiles, each with a distinct quality improvement goal in the context of lifestyle interventions for T2D. Strong recommendations were made regarding advocacy for lifestyle interventions; assessing baseline lifestyle habits; establishing priorities for lifestyle change; prescribing aerobic and muscle strength physical activity; reducing sedentary time; identifying sleep disorders; prescribing nutrition plans for prevention and treatment; promoting peer/familial support and social connections; counseling regarding tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs, and establishing a plan for continuity of care. Recommendations were made regarding identifying the need for psychological interventions and for adjusting (deprescribing) pharmacologic therapy. We include numerous tables and figures to facilitate implementation, a plain-language summary for consumers, and an executive summary for clinicians as separate publications. Conclusions: There is robust research evidence supporting the efficacy of lifestyle interventions in preventing, treating, and achieving remission of T2D in adults. Our multidisciplinary guideline development group successfully synthesized this evidence into 14 key action statements that can be used by clinicians and other healthcare professionals to improve quality of care for adults with, or at-risk for, T2D. Despite the research gaps and implementation challenges we highlight in the guideline we believe strongly that our recommendations have immediate relevance and can help raise awareness and shift the paradigm of T2D management towards optimal use of lifestyle interventions.

This executive summary highlights evidence-based recommendations for using lifestyle interventions in the treatment and remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and prediabetes in adults. The summary and guideline are intended for any clinician or healthcare professional in a community or non-inpatient healthcare setting involved in managing non-pregnant adults with T2D, prediabetes or a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The purpose of this executive summary is to provide a succinct overview of the key action statements (recommendations) from Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. This is the first diabetes guideline to emphasize lifestyle interventions as the foundation of management and is also the first to focus on all six pillars of lifestyle medicine (plant-predomination nutrition, regular physical activity, restorative sleep, stress reduction, social connectedness, and avoiding risky substances), including behavior change strategies. This summary is not intended to substitute for the full guideline, which should be read before taking the recommended actions. The guideline on which this summary is based was developed with a priori methodology that has been previously published, refined, and used in over 20 multidisciplinary, trustworthy, and evidence-based national guidelines. The guideline development group included 20 members representing consumers, advanced practice nursing, cardiology, clinical pharmacology, behavioral medicine, endocrinology, family medicine, lifestyle medicine, nutrition and dietetics, health education, health and wellness coaching, sleep medicine, sports medicine, and obesity medicine. We developed 14 key action statements and associated evidence profiles, each with a distinct quality improvement goal in the context of lifestyle interventions for T2D. Strong recommendations were made regarding advocacy for lifestyle interventions; assessing baseline lifestyle habits; establishing priorities for lifestyle change; prescribing aerobic and muscle strength physical activity; reducing sedentary time; identifying sleep disorders; prescribing nutrition plans for prevention and treatment; promoting peer/familial support and social connections; counseling regarding tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs, and establishing a plan for continuity of care. Recommendations were made regarding identifying the need for psychological interventions and for adjusting (deprescribing) pharmacologic therapy. We include numerous tables and figures to facilitate implementation, a plain-language summary for consumers, and an executive summary for clinicians as separate publications. Although not a substitute for the full clinical practice guideline, this executive summary can provide insight into the key guideline recommendations, to whom they apply, and to how they might alter care. These recommendations offer detailed, explicit, and evidence-based strategies for successful lifestyle behavior change, making them relevant not only to our guideline but to other guidelines and standards that advocate for lifestyle change in managing adults with T2D.

Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) progress differently among individuals with autosomal dominant familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) caused by genetic mutations in granulin ( GRN +) or chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 ( C9orf72 +). Objective To determine whether these differences begin prior to the onset of dementia, we compared the longitudinal rates of change of NPS among C9orf72 +, GRN +, and noncarrier controls in the predementia phase. Additionally, we assessed whether the NPS changes were correlated with gray matter (GM) volume loss or white matter signal abnormalities (WMSAs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Eighty-two participants (N = 10 GRN +, N = 23 C9orf72 +, N = 49 noncarriers) were followed using various NPS rating scales for an average of 7.8 years. Group differences were compared using generalized linear mixed-effects models. GM volume and WMSA volumes were measured on 42 participants (N = 8 GRN +, N = 11 C9orf72 +, N = 23 noncarriers) who had two MRI visits. These measures were correlated with the rates of NPS score changes. Results C9orf72 + showed higher rates of increase in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total and the Iowa Scales of Personality Change (ISPC) dysexecutive disturbance scores versus noncarriers. GRN + showed higher rates of increase in the BDI total, the ISPC total, and the emotional/social disturbance scores versus noncarriers; and higher rates of increase in the ISPC emotional/social personality and distressed disturbance scores versus C9orf72 +. Across all groups, faster WMSA accumulation correlated with higher rates of increase in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire total score. Conclusions Changes in NPS differ among C9orf72 +, GRN +, and noncarrier controls prior to the onset of overt FTD.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) are essential for managing life-threatening arrhythmias but can impact patients’ quality of life (QoL), mood, and sexual health. Although QoL may improve shortly after implantation, factors such as age, psychological state, and ICD shocks can influence long-term outcomes. Anxiety, depression, and fears around physical and sexual activity are common among ICD patients, yet the depth of these effects remains underexplored. This cross-sectional, correlational study examined associations between QoL, mood, and sexual health in 30 adult ICD patients (ages 27–83) within 3 years postimplantation, recruited from a Southeastern U.S. academic medical center. Participants completed the SF-36, Profile of Mood States, and Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire. Spearman’s correlations indicated that lower QoL was significantly associated with higher mood disturbance (rho = −0.645, p < .001) and lower sexual health (rho = 0.535, p = .005), though no significant link was found between mood disturbance and sexual health (rho = −0.279, p = .168). Multiple linear regression confirmed that QoL was influenced by both mood and sexual health. Post-hoc power analysis using EpiData verified that the sample size ( n = 30) provided 90% power with a 5% error rate. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional and sexual well-being in ICD patient care. Targeted interventions could improve outcomes, but further research with larger samples is needed to deepen understanding of these relationships.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated benefits in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but their impact following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is less well understood. Using the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX) multi-center registry (2014–2022), we identified patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)—defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50% and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV—not previously treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) who experienced an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients who initiated SGLT2i within 1-year post-AMI were compared with those who did not. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohorts ( n = 20,423 each; mean age 68.3 ± 11.0 years; 54.5% female) for demographics, comorbidities, and treatment variables. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause mortality, recurrent AMI, acute heart failure, and stroke. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest and major bleeding. SGLT2i use was associated with lower rates of MACE (3.7% vs 6.1%; P = .0005), all-cause mortality (0.9% vs 5.6%; P < .0001), and other adverse events at both 30 days and 1 year. In this large, propensity-matched cohort, SGLT2i use post-AMI in HFpEF patients was associated with favorable cardiovascular outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these associations.

Abstract Background The increasing prevalence of dementia poses significant challenges for emergency department (ED) care, as persons living with dementia (PLWD) more frequently experience adverse outcomes such as delirium, prolonged stays, and higher mortality rates. Despite advancements in care strategies, a critical gap remains in understanding how ED interventions impact outcomes in this vulnerable population. This systematic review aims to identify evidence‐based ED care interventions tailored to PLWD to improve outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier), and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global through September 2024. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024586555). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and quality improvement initiatives focused on ED interventions for PLWD. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, ED revisits, functional decline, and mortality. Results From 3305 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included nonpharmacologic therapies (e.g., music and light therapy), specialized geriatric ED units, and assessment tools, such as for pain. Tailored interventions including geriatric emergency units and community paramedic care transitions were effective in reducing 30‐day ED revisits and hospitalizations. However, heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes precluded meta‐analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion This review underscores the urgent need for standardized and evidence‐based interventions in ED settings for PLWD. Approaches including multidisciplinary care models and nonpharmacologic therapies demonstrated potential for improving outcomes. Future research should prioritize consistent outcome measures, interdisciplinary collaboration, and person‐centered care strategies to enhance the quality and equity of ED services for PLWD.